Tag: Banking

Swiss National Bank Cuts their Benchmark Interest Rate

On Thursday, 20th March 2025, officials of the SNB (Swiss National Bank) cut their benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 0.25%, the lowest rate since September 2022. In the current cycle of quantitative easing, this is the fifth time the SNB has cut rates and President Martin Schlegel signalled that officials do not expect any more easing for the time being. The President went on to say that “This rate has an expansionary impact; in that sense the probability of additional policy easing is naturally lower”. Experts advise that pricing in the swaps market indicates no more rate cuts by the SNB in 2025.

The move to cut rates on Thursday follows a reduction in rates by 50 basis points in December 2024, a move that caught financial markets by surprise. Analysts suggest that this move completes their foreign-exchange policy which i.) is in anticipation of future market volatility and ii.) to deter inflows into the Swiss Franc. As a result of global trade tensions due to President Trump’s tariffs and other geopolitical and economic policies, the Swiss Franc is regarded as a safe haven for investors guarding against global instability.

Data released during the week prior to Thursday’s rate cut shows that in the last quarter of 2024, the SNB basically removed themselves from the foreign exchange markets, confirming one whole year without any considerable interventions. Indeed, once Trump won the presidential election on 5th November 2024, the Swiss Franc gained against the Euro, but those gains have since been erased with the Franc weakening against the Euro. The President of SNB said on Thursday, “Switzerland is not a currency manipulator; past interventions were necessary to maintain price stability”. This statement analysts suggest is to remind Trump that during his first term, Switzerland was branded a currency manipulator.

Experts in this arena suggest that the decision to cut interest rates is to contain market pressure, and to stop the Swiss Franc from strengthening thus lowering import costs which would impact negatively on inflation. SNB President Schlegel said, “the outlook for inflation is currently very uncertain, with risks predominantly on the downside” SNB officials have lifted their inflation forecast from 0.30% to 0.40% for 2025 and 0.80% in 2026 and 2027. SNB also confirmed that during the last quarter, Switzerland’s economy enjoyed its strongest expansion and, as a result, still expects the economy to grow between 1.005 to 1.50 % in 2025. Once again Donald Trump’s tariffs and other policies both domestic and international seem to heavily weigh on policymakers’ decisions at central banks.

Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Steady

On Wednesday, 19th March 2025, the Federal Reserve announced they were holding their benchmark interest rates steady at 4.25% – 4.50%. The FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) voted 8 – 1 in favour of keeping interest rates steady, with the dissenting voice belonging to Christopher J. Waller, who has been a member of the Board of Governors since December 18, 2020. It appears that members are concerned that inflation could remain stubbornly high whilst at the same time the economy could be slowing.

The Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, confirmed that the significant policy changes attributed to President Trump were the main reason for the Fed’s high degree of uncertainty in regard to the U.S. economy. However, he went on to say that Federal Reserve officials will certainly wait for greater clarity on the impact of President Trump’s policies, before making any definite changes to borrowing costs.

Policymakers still suggest that further interest rate cuts will be necessary, with financial markets pricing in two further cuts, totalling 50 basis points in 2025 and a number of traders suggesting that there is a 62.1% of a further interest rate cut in June this year. Officials further marked down their outlook for inflation and growth and see the economy accelerating by just 1.7% this year, down from 2.1% as advised by their last projection in December 2024.

On the inflation front, Fed policymakers advise that inflation has remained elevated since Donald Trump was elevated to the Presidency and have raised their average estimate for core inflation (does not include food and energy prices) for 2.5% to 2.8% for year end 2025.

They also increased their estimate for the end of 2025 from 4.3% to 4.4%, whilst confirming that consumer confidence had gone south, resulting in softening spending figures.

It is expected that the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision will incur the wrath of President Trump, who has repeatedly suggested that he should have a role in interest rate decisions. Indeed, he announced to the world in January 2025, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, “With oil prices going down, I’ll demand interest rates drop immediately, and likewise they should be dropping all over the world”.

Experts suggest that in the coming months, President Trump will certainly try and get a firm grip on the Federal Reserve as he will wish to exert his influence on interest rate decisions. Indeed since the inauguration of President Trump on January 20th 2025, the Federal Reserve has held two meetings where the decision was to hold interest rates steady, with the first meeting in January bringing an end to a run of three consecutive interest rate cuts.

In the run up to the presidential election on November 5th 2024, Trump announced he would not fire Jerome Powell, but with two interest rate holds two months into the Presidency we will have to wait and see. However, a President only has the power to appoint a Fed chairman, he cannot fire the chairman unless he has “cause” as per the Federal Reserve Act. In other words, President Trump cannot fire Chairman Powell over policy disagreements, but Trump being Trump he may find a way to get what he wants.

Investors Pile Into Ultra-Short Term Bonds ETFs

Currently, President Trump’s economic policies are fanning the flames of concerns regarding a recession and a sell-off in the stock markets, and investors are pumping money into Ultra-Short Term Bonds ETFs*. Led by products such as the iShares 0 – 3 Month Treasury ETF, this sector has received in excess of USD 16 Billion since January 1st 2025 with iShares 0-3 Month Treasury accounting for circa USD 7 Billion. Last week March 3rd – March 8th 2025, data reveals that the iShares ETF received USD 1.4 Billion recording the largest inflow of funds to date.

*Ultra-Short Term Bonds – These are bond funds that invest only in fixed income instruments with very short-term maturities. Such instruments will have maturities of less than one year and are usually defined as government or corporate bonds, CDs (Certificates of Deposits), commercial paper, and money market funds.

*Ultra-Short Term Bonds ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) – These funds are designed for investors who are focused on reserving assets but would also like to earn income. Utilising short-term investment grade corporate, bonds, government bonds and money market instruments, these ETFs aim to best returns on cash and your typical money market funds without incurring substantially more risk.

Data provided by experts show that lay-offs in the US federal workforce, softening economic data and President Trump’s on-again, off-again tariff war on the allies and top trading partners of the United States has fuelled a sell-off in the stock market. Indeed, since election day of November 5th 2024, President Trump and the rest of the financial markets has seen all the gains since that day on the S&P 500 Index completely wiped out. Furthermore, economic models provided by a number of investment banks and other such luminaries, suggest that the risk of a recession in the US economy is on the up.

During times of volatility and turbulence in stock markets those ETFs with short-dated maturities tend to receive an accelerated amount of incoming funds. Data received shows that from 2013 during downturn months in the S&P 500, flows into the above-mentioned funds were circa USD 2.7 Billion, and during the up-turn months funds received were circa USD 440 Million.

Elsewhere in the week through March 5th 2025, Global Money Market Funds witnessed a huge inflow of funds, and data provided by LSEG Lipper* showed the amount received as USD 61.32 Billion, with a net inflow of USD 39.55 Billion the week before. Many commentators and experts attribute this inflow to President Trump escalating his trade war by imposing steeper tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada.

*LSEG Lipper – provides global independent fund performance data, in a precise granular fund classification system, and includes mutual funds, CEFS (Closed-End Funds), ETFs, hedge funds, domestic retirement funds, pension funds, and insurance products.

Experts have suggested that President Trump has put the strength of the economy on the backburner while he pursues his political goals and agendas. This could turn out to be a massive mistake as more and more analysts, experts, and economists, suggest that his somewhat outdated “America First” platform is knocking confidence and weighing on confidence. Indeed, an increasing number of economists had revised downwards their growth predictions with warnings that Trumpenomics and his trade wars are proving more damaging to the US economy than first anticipated.

Furthermore, the R word is beginning to be used more and more with many feeling that a recession could soon be appearing on the horizon. Furthermore, when asked that very question on Sunday 9th March 2025, President Trump declined to rule out the possibility that the US Economy could indeed fall into recession.

The European Central Bank Cuts Interest Rates March 2025

On Thursday 6th March 2025 and for the sixth time since June 2024, the ECB (European Central Bank) cut interest rates by a ¼ of 1% (25 basis points) to 2.5%. The ECB’s Governing Council released a statement saying, “The disinflation process is well on track, inflation has continued to develop broadly as staff expected, and the latest projections closely align with the previous inflation outlook”. The vote by the governing council was unopposed except for Austria’s Robert Holzmann who abstained. The ECB now sees inflation averaging 2.3% in 2025, 1.9% in 2026, and 2.0% in 2027. 

Experts suggest that the ECB’s thoughts on interest rates is not as clear cut as it was a few weeks ago as there is increased geopolitical uncertainty plus a large fiscal stimulus looming large on the horizon. As President Trump withdraws backing for Ukraine, the President of the European Union, Ursula von der Leyen, suggested that the funds needed to rearm Europe could easily reach as much as Euros 800 Billion. Experts suggest that such an outlay could well have implications for economic expansion, and inflation. 

The President of the ECB noted that the risk to economic expansion was still leaning towards the downside. However, the President pointed out that increased defence spending should give the economy a lift after President Trump turned against Europe and Ukraine leaving the Europeans to drive forward their own defence and that of the Ukraine. The President also went on to say that the ECB would be even more data-dependent and said that they would pause quantitative easing should the data/numbers suggested that was needed in order to hit their inflation target of 2%. 

At their next policy meeting in April, it would appear that bank officials are heading for a showdown over interest rate cuts and are preparing for some difficult negotiations. Interestingly, the doves on the governing council appear to see little reason to pause, whilst the hawks feel they should hold interest rates to study the implications of increased European defence spending and the on-going up-coming geopolitical risks. 

Experts suggest the financial markets are also undecided with traders and investors feeling that the upcoming defence outlays will fan inflation and push economic expansion. One financial expert said that in the Euro bloc there is an expectation of higher growth rates and a slowdown in the disinflationary process. This will reduce the scope for further interest rate cuts at the next meeting of the ECB in April and the rhetoric of President Lagarde shows she is sitting on the fence as to whether or not there will in fact be an interest rate cut. There is also the spectre of tariffs from President Trump which undoubtedly clouds the thinking of officials.

Reserve Bank of India cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Five Years

On Friday 7th February 2025, the Central Bank of India, the RBI (Reserve Bank of India), for the first time in five years cut its key policy rate by 25 basis points to 6.25%. Officials advised that the decision was unanimous and that the interest rate cut was in response to a downturn in the highest populated country in the world, and to shore up economic growth. The bank further advised that it was going to be proactive with liquidity measures given the banking system has had negative liquidity for the last two months. 

Experts on the Indian economy suggested that the effect of the interest rate cut will be felt mainly by new loans and on those floating rate loans that are linked to external benchmarks such as SMEs (small and medium enterprises) and in the housing sector. Elsewhere, analysts predict the interest rate cut will have a negative effect on NIMS (net interest margins being the difference between interest paid and interest earned), in the NBFI* (Nonbank Financial Institution) arena. It is suggested that NIMS will come under pressure in areas where there is direct competition with banks such as the commercial loans or near-prime urban housing/ affordable housing sectors. 

*NBFI – A nonbank financial institution does not have a full banking licence and cannot  accept deposits from the public. A NBFI is not regulated by the government and are therefore not subject to the same laws and regulations as banks. 

The rate cut comes on the heels of an injection into the domestic banking system by the RBI of USD18 Billion in an effort to ease a cash shortage in the economy and the February 1st, 2025, Union Budget where struggling middle classes received a tax cut of USD12 Billion. The governor of the RBI Sanjay Malhotra was quoted as saying “ the bank was keeping its policy stance neutral” with markets interpreting this statement as opening more pace for economic growth thereby signalling further rate cuts of 50 basis points to a full 1% in 2025.

Some economists predict that in Q4 2025 inflation will remain steady at 4.4%  rising to 4.6% in Q1 2026, however it is estimated that from Q2 onwards inflationary pressures are expected to ease. This is the first rate cut by the RBI since the Covid-19 Pandemic crisis which is indicating a more dovish stance by the bank. This is possibly the main reason why Governor Malhotra was elected in December 2024 ousting his more hawkish predecessor Governor Shaktikanta Das, depriving him of a third term. Experts suggest that this was perhaps an intervention by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had decided the cost of borrowing had remained too high over a substantial period.

Sadly for the RBI, their current and future policies (like a number of countries around the world) may be somewhat stymied by the tariff policies of the US President Donald Trump. The Indian Rupee is trading close to record lows, there are record outflows by foreign investors, plus and further geopolitical and economic headwinds could see further complications for the Central Bank and government economic policy.

Those Arguing for Protection for UBS get the Thumbs Down from the Swiss Regulator

Following the collapse of Credit Suisse AG, Switzerland is currently undergoing a regulatory overhaul, and senior management of UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland AG) plus their lobbyists have been arguing that the bank should be given special treatment allowing the bank to increase its competitiveness on the global financial stage. Executives and lobbyists have been arguing against the likelihood of the Swiss Government raising the capital requirements for UBS, suggesting that this will hurt what they refer to as a “National Champion”.

FINMA (Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority), the financial watchdog and  regulatory authority of Switzerland has basically given the thumbs down to any special treatment regarding the bank’s competitiveness against rivals in the global financial markets. The CEO of FINMA Stefan Walter was insistent when he said that in order to ensure the Swiss finance sector stays competitive, the best way is to strengthen reputation and stability via the medium of good oversight. He was quoted as saying “A direct mandate to competitiveness opens the door to conflicts of interest, political intervention or excessive lobbying by the supervised parties”. He went on to say, “the regulator should instead focus on the protection of creditors and the functioning of financial markets”.

It is the government’s plan that has brought the lobbyists and executives of UBS out in force which is to increase the capital requirements for UBS (currently Switzerland’s only global player) which may well result in calls for more capital in the region of USD 25 Billion. The CEO of UBS Sergio Ermotti has branded such a plan as “an extreme overreaction” that would effectively increase the costs of banking services and would subsequently damage competitiveness.

However, in May 2024 Stefan Walter said that UBS should provide a 100% backing for its foreign units which then and now aligned with the government’s plan to increase the capital requirements for UBS, a statement reiterated just recently. The reason for this statement is that in March 2023, when Credit Suisse AG failed, the problem was that the parent bank had such a low capital backing for foreign units they were less able to absorb losses. Today, pushing back against FINMA’s recommendations are Swiss business and banking lobbies who also have said that FINMA did not use its powers when Credit Suisse was in crisis.

As far as FINMA is concerned, CEO Walter said that FINMA currently lacks the powers that are currently available to other regulators saying that the Swiss supervisor can only curb or decline bankers’ bonuses if they have first received stabilising funds from the government. He went on to say that FINMA needs the ability to work independently and just as importantly without the pressure that currently comes from the political arena or from the institutions it supervises. FINMA has made its point, but now it is up to the Swiss parliament and the government which will decide the final outcome.

Will the Bank of England Reduce, Hold or Even Increase Interest Rates in December?

The next meeting of the Bank of England’s MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) is on December 19th, 2024, where it will be decided what the policy will be on interest rates. However, data released from the ONS (Office for National Statistics) shows inflation rose more than forecast in October (well above the Bank of England’s benchmark target of 2%) and has been interpreted by the financial markets as a reduction in the prospects for another interest rate cut before the end of 2024. 

The ONS went on to say that in September consumer-price inflation rose from 1.7% to 2.3% due to an increase in energy bills and was above the Bank of England’s forecast of 2.2%. Furthermore, service inflation, which is always monitored closely by the MPC as a sign of domestic pressure, remained elevated at 5% up from 4.9% in September, but in line with forecasts from the Bank of England.

This is the first sign of a predicted increase in inflation for the coming year, and will no doubt be a precursor to a more cautious approach to interest rates by the Bank of England. Markets suggest that the MPC, in light of inflationary pressures both at home and abroad, may well hold interest rates and the predicted three cuts for next year have now according to experts been priced in at two cuts.

The pick-up in headline inflation between two months marks the biggest increase since October 2022 and the Bank of England has advised they expect inflation to hit the 3% mark by Q3 2025. The Bank went on to explain that this forecast is made up of last year’s fall in energy prices having now dropped out of annual calculations and the expansionary budget laid down by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Inflation in October increased due to the UK’s households energy cap rising by 10% as opposed to a drop this time last year.

The Bank of England has previously advised that there will be a cautionary approach to cutting interest rates, and this is now backed up by the latest UK budget which should boost growth and inflation, plus there is now uncertainty surrounding the global economy with the threat of a Trump administration setting off a trade war. 

The ONS has also advised that service inflation remained sticky and kept high by high prices in hotels and restaurants, plus a 6.3% increase in airlines fares on a month-on-month basis, the highest jump for any October since 2001, when records were first kept. Some analysts are even suggesting that if President elect Trump comes good on his tariff promises, combined with an inflationary UK budget, the Bank of England may even be compelled to raise interest rates.

President Elect Trump and his potential effect on Geopolitics

On Tuesday 5th November 2024 America had a presidential election, and by Wednesday 6th the world knew for certain that the Republican Nominee ex-President Trump was now President elect Donald Trump. Beating Kamala Harris by 312 electoral votes to 226 electoral votes, President elect Donald Trump also won the popular votes by over 3.5 million votes. In Congress, the Republican party controls the Upper House (the Senate) and is the leading party for control of the lower house (the House of Representatives). If indeed the Republican party ends up controlling both the lower and upper houses, this will make it easier for President elect Trump to successfully pursue his policy agenda.

Geopolitics

With President elect Donald Trump due to take the office of President of the United States of America on Monday January 20th, 2025, political experts have been suggesting which world leaders will be the winners and losers when it comes to dealing with the new president. Below are a number of leaders whom the experts feel will either benefit or lose out under a Trump presidency,

Winners

  1. Vladimir Putin – The President of Russia has already exchanged a number of calls from President elect Trump, where apparently the President elect urged him not to escalate the war. He further added he was interested in future discussions to discuss a resolution to the war. Political experts suggest that despite any rhetoric to the contrary both Presidents remain close, and that President Putin will benefit from a Trump presidency.
  1. Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS) – The Crown Prince is the de facto leader of Saudi Arabia and experts suggest he will use a Trump presidency to obtain a security pact with the United States. Under his last presidency Trump opened diplomatic ties with a number of Arab states and Israel, and he is expected to expand that to Saudi Arabia. Political experts suggest that MBS is close to Trump, (apparently MBS called Trump in the early hours of Wednesday 6th November to express his joy at The Donald returning to power) and he and Saudi Arabia will benefit from a Trump presidency.
  1. Benjamin Netanyahu – The Prime Minister of Israel and President elect Trump have long been allies and Netanyahu will welcome the return of Donald Trump as he has a somewhat fractious and tense relationship with the current incumbent of the White House, President Joe Biden. Indeed, Prime Minister Netanyahu has already spoken with President elect Trump three times since the election and announced that both he and Donald Trump see eye to eye on Iran.
  1. Giorgia Meloni – Experts advise that the Prime Minister of Italy has an affinity with Elon Musk which, it is believed, will give her good opportunities to interact with Donald Trump. She is essentially a right wing politician, and with President elect Trump’s negative views on NATO she could well become a conduit between the EU and the White House.
  1. Kim Jong Un – During his last presidency Donald Trump managed to have a relatively warm relationship with the North Korean Dictator, through various exchanges of written correspondence and two summit meetings. The return of Trump should be welcomed by Kim especially as he has rebuffed approaches from the United States during the Biden presidency. He has allied himself closer to President Putin and experts suggest that Putin’s relationship with Trump may well foster a renewed relationship with the United States. In his first presidency, as a show of goodwill, Trump reduced military exercises with South Korea and Kim will be hoping for much of the same again.
  1. Narendra Modi – Political experts advise that the Prime Minister of India and Donald Trump have a close personal relationship and in public are seen to praise each other and confirm that they are friends. However, the Biden Presidency has expressed disappointment and frustration with the Indian government for their close ties with Russia who supply them with military equipment and cheap oil. President elect Trump has promised a deal to end the Russia/Ukraine war which may well give Modi space to continue dealing with Russia.
  1. Javier Milei- The Argentinian President met Trump back in February for the first time and wasted no time in telling him what a great president he had been when he first took office. Furthermore, President Milei has also wasted no time getting to know Elon Musk who has told him that he is looking for ways his companies can invest in his country. Argentina is also hoping to secure are replacement for the currently in place USD44 Billion IMF (International Monetary Fund) programme which a Trump presidency might just help to get over the line.
  1. Viktor Orban – The Prime Minister of Hungary is considered by many in the European Union to be the black sheep of the family (for his pro-Russian leanings), but at the same time President Elect Trump has praised Orban for his strong-man style of leadership. Prime Minister Orban has made known his dislike for the European Union and has enhanced that view by making a trip to Georgia’s capital Tbilisi, where despite protests against the recent government election, he congratulated the country on not becoming the next Ukraine.

Losers

  1. Volodymyr Zelenskiy – The President of Ukraine is, so say a number of political experts, worried that under a Trump presidency there could be a cut back in military aid and in the event of peace talks, be forced to give up land to Russia. Furthermore, the relationship between the two presidents has been somewhat combustible ever since their telephone conversation on 25th July 2019 where Trump allegedly leaned on Zelensky to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden in order to damage their reputations. This led to Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial, and with President elect Trump promising a swift end to the war, (which he blames on President Biden, not Russia), the new administration may not prove to be beneficial to Ukraine.
  1. Xi Jinping – The President of China is already under pressure at home due to the state of the economy especially in the commercial and residential property sectors. His government has just rolled out a massive stimulus package to calm investor nerves and to boost growth, and President elect Trump’s threat of a 60% tariff on all Chinese exports to America would decimate trade and remove one of the main planks that support China’s economy. However, a ray of light comes in the form of Elon Musk, who has extensive business interests in China, and Musk is close to the President elect so he might be able to persuade Donald Trump not to be too fierce with China.
  1. Keir Starmer – The British Prime Minister has got off on the wrong foot with President elect Trump. First, his left wing government was accused by the Republican campaign of sending volunteers to help Vice President Kamal Harris in her bid for the White House. The second gaffe comes from Britain’s Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary who called the President elect a “Woman-hating neo-Nazi-sympathising sociopath”. So, a great start to the United Kingdom’s relationship with the soon to be new President of the United States; interfering in a sovereign country’s election process and insulting their new leader. Despite murmurings from the President elect that the United Kingdom might be safe from the increase in tariffs (there will of course have to be concessions by the UK), political experts suggest that Starmer might find it difficult to persuade the soon to be incumbent of the White House that the US/UK relationship is still special. 
  1. Claudia Sheinbaum – The Mexican president is waiting to find out if the President elect will make good on his threats regarding tariffs. If Mexico are hit with new tariffs, it will become a barrier to the goal of increasing exports to the United States through nearshoring*. There are other dark clouds on the horizon as the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, used to be called NAFTA- North American Free Trade Agreement) comes up for review in July 2026. Mexico is currently the largest exporter to the United States: as of July 2023, China’s share of American imports was 14.6% whilst Mexico led the way with 15%. Immigration is also at the top of the President elect’s list, and no doubt pressure will be put on the Mexican government to continue to curtail illegal immigration. President Sheinbaum has already issued a rebuke to the President elect for his negative comments regarding her economy minister Marcelo Ebrard, and many experts agree that under the Trump administration Mexico could be in for a tough time.

*Nearshoring – This where a supply chain or production is shifted from overseas to a neighbouring country or nearby country, usually within the same continent or region. The above scenario where Tesla moved their supply chain to Monterey to supply computers to their Texas factory is a prime example.

  1. Masoud Pezeshkian – The president of Iran and his government do not seem bothered by any potential impact a Trump administration may bring to bear. However, with the President elect coming down firmly in Israel’s favour he may well revert to the “Maximum Pressure” policy towards Tehran as he did when he was last in the White House. Certainly, Donald Trump will look without favour on Iran, but a ray of light could be both the UAE and Saudi Arabia, who have repaired relations with Iran, and last time round were both supporters of the Maximum Pressure Policy. The President elect may wish to impose the strictest of penalties on Iran, but without the support of the UAE and Saudi Arabia, this task may well have become more difficult.
  1. Emmanuel Macron – The President of France has already posted on X “Ready to work together as we did four years ago”. From an economic standpoint France has little to gain, but if trade tensions are reignited then France certainly has a lot to lose. The last time Donald trump was ensconced in the White House, tariffs on make-up, sparkling wine and cheese were just about avoided, but the core of that dispute still remains unresolved. The Trump/Macron relationship in the past has been very hit and miss, but with the President elect’s position on the Russia/Ukraine war at odds with the leader of France, and a possible trade war in the offing, a Trump administration may not be exactly what President Macron is looking for. 
  1. Olaf Scholz – The German Chancellor was finance minister when Angela Merkel ruled the roost in Germany, and it is no secret that Donald Trump loathed him. Chancellor Scholz may well find it difficult to forget about the Trump/Merkel connection, plus the President elect has always been fixated on German cars and their trade surplus, so they may well be in the firing line of the new administration. Scholz and his government openly supported the Kamala Harris bid for the White House and President elect Trump will probably not forget the comments made by the Chancellor and his team. Some political experts are suggesting that a Trump presidency is a nightmare for them. Germany has the largest economy in Europe, and within that economy the automotive sector is the largest, which will be exposed to the President elect’s tariffs. On top of all that, the chancellor has a diametrically opposed view to Trump over support for Ukraine.
  1. Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva – The President of Brazil on the 4th November 2024 (the eve of the US election) stated that he was praying for a Harris victory and named Trump as the instigator of the antidemocratic riots in Washington DC, having lost the election to Joe Biden. Furthermore, the previous President of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, is the main political rival of da Silva and a staunch ally of Donald Trump. Bolsonaro is dubbed the “Trump of the Tropics”, and a Trump presidency is emboldening the far right in Brazil. Experts suggest that under a Trump presidency, Brazil will face new challenges in regard to inflation, trade and environmental issues. Brazil is also an avid member of BRICS* which aspires to a new world order away from America and the US Dollar, and the new President when in office may not look too kindly on this country. 

*BRICS is an acronym for five regional countries and their economies and is made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Their common belief is that by 2050, they will be the world’s dominant supplier of raw materials, manufactured goods, and services. The UAE have since joined along with Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, with Saudi on the cusp of joining along with Thailand and Malaysia. Their aim is to challenge the economic and political monopoly of the West. Interestingly, if Saudi Arabia does indeed accept membership of BRICS, the bloc will represent 42% of the global oil supply. 

  1. Shigeru Ishiba – The Prime Minister of Japan is in the President elect’s sights because of their trade surplus, and the United States’ wish for Japan to pay more for the US military presence which is circa 55,000 personnel. The deal for the US military is up for renewal in 2026, where no doubt the Trump administration will demand an increase in payment. Furthermore, and with Trump’s sights firmly set on China, Japan will be asked again to curtail their exports of chip making equipment to that country. Previous dealings with the President elect were amiable due to the closeness of the late premier Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Sadly Ishiba does not enjoy such closeness, but if Japan plays their cards right they could become an even better friend by becoming a mediator in trade hostilities between the United States and China. 

Final Thoughts

Overall, the election of President Trump may well signal defeat for Ukraine in their on-going war with Russia. The European support for Ukraine was never going to amount to much without the United States being on-board. Donald Trump has proposed a quick exit to this war, which basically means no longer supporting Ukraine, and the will to resist will ebb away as the US withdraws their support. If the Europeans are firmly on Ukraine’s side, they will have to up the ante and increase their support, possibly alienating the Trump administration. 

As for the Middle East, Trump has come down firmly on the side of Israel, so we will wait and see what response comes from the USA if Iran decides to increase their attacks on Israel. The new administration may ignore calls for a ceasefire with Hamas and let the Israeli government decide this issue. How this will play out with Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar again, we will have to wait and see. 

Elsewhere the Trump administration is focused on tariffs, and it seems a trade war is certainly in the offing. China is top of the President Elect’s hit list with a mouth watering 60% tariff on all China’s exports to the USA, with a maximum of 20% for the rest of the world. 

NATO is next on the Trump hit list, as defence spending collectively by EU governments was budgeted at USD 326 Billion for 2024, that is circa one third of what the USA spends. In 2017 the EU committed to increase spending on defence equipment to 35%, today only circa 17% has been achieved. The big question is will Donald Trump pull out of NATO, experts are at loggerheads on this, as some feel he will and the Europeans will have to make NATO Trump proof, or he won’t but will make life very difficult. 

The Bank of England Cuts Interest Rates: November 2024

Amidst the hubbub of Ex-President Donald Trump becoming President Elect Donald Trump, the Bank of England announced on Thursday 7th November that they were cutting interest rates by 25 basis points. This is the second time this year that the MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) has cut interest rates, this time voting by a majority of eight to one. This cut came as data released showed inflation down to 1.7% in September, down from 2.2% in August. However, policymakers were quick to point out that the recent budget presented by Chancellor Reeves, which contained £70 Billion of extra spending (backed by higher taxes), would add 0.5% to headline inflation and 0.75% to GDP (Gross Domestic Product).

The single dissenting voice in the MPC was external economist Catherine Mann who voted for interest rates to be held steady at 5%. This was due to the Bank of England announcing that the increase in the national wage and National Insurance Contributions (NICs) could possibly be responsible for adding inflationary pressure in the form of higher prices and and reduced wages. Policymakers further implied that due to the budget, the cost of borrowing will decrease at a slower rate in 2025.

[A] gradual approach to cutting borrowing costs [is] required

Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England

Some experts have predicted that the slower pace in cutting interest rates will have a negative impact on many households. The Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, in a separate statement cautioned that whilst borrowing cost would still be coming down in the future, the markets should not expect any rapidity in this area. Indeed, with President Elect Trump, who will be firmly ensconced in the White House next January, the Governor went on to say a “gradual approach to cutting borrowing costs was required” as US policies could also encourage inflationary pressure in the world economy.

Analysts now advise that that interest rates will probably not fall below 4% in 2025 .Some experts suggest that borrowers should lock in borrowing costs now with interest rates staying higher for longer, with the added influence of American policy having a negative impact on UK inflation. The Bank of England further announced that they expect inflation to be around 2.5% by close of business December 2024, up from the 1.7% figure in September, adding their oft repeated message that monetary policy would have to stay “restrictive for sufficiently long” to return inflation to 2% on a sustained basis. 

Crypto Market: November 2024 Update

There are many positives in the crypto world at the moment: with Bitcoin recently attaining an all-time high, renewed inflows into Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and with market sentiment betting on an ex-president Donald Trump win, especially as he is a crypto convert. Many experts confirm that recently the market has been dominated by the performance of Bitcoin, however, underneath all the confidence, there is a growing concern that some of the once perceived “hot assets” are struggling.

There appears to be a split in the cryptocurrency performances with Bitcoin and Solana up circa 64% since the start of the year and Elon Musk and Memecoin are up a staggering 80%. However, the so-called altcoins* of Algorand, Polkadot, and Polygon all took a beating. Venture Capital deals have yet to recover from the crash that came after the 2021 bull market, with data showing investment in digital-asset start-ups falling by 20% in the third quarter on a quarter-on-quarter basis. 

*Altcoins – These are alternative cryptocurrency to Bitcoin; they are rapidly multiplying and can be subject to extreme volatility.

Elsewhere, crypto exchange Coinbase Inc announced earnings estimates were missed and their rival crypto exchange Kraken has been rumoured to cut the workforce by 15%. DYdX trading announced recently that they will be making redundant in excess of 33% of their workforce and Consensys, whose main business is providing software for the Ethereum Network, has announced they are trimming their workforce by circa 20%.

Consensys and many other associated crypto companies are attributing their current woes to a certain extent to the SEC (US Securities and Exchange Commission) and their lack of clarity surrounding regulations. Interestingly, if elected, Ex-President Donald Trump has announced he will fire the Chairman of the SEC Gary Gensler. One expert recently announced that due to regulatory uncertainty, many large US operators and centralised exchanges will potentially incur higher costs. 

Furthermore, one expert advised that some of the digital-asset companies, due to their technologies, are struggling to generate revenues, which added to the perceived increase in costs may well be behind the recent announcements of workforce cuts. It has also been noted that many blockchains which were being looked upon as alternatives to Bitcoin have gone into decline, again possible due to crypto start-ups not receiving the required investment funds.


There appears to be a disconnect in demand and supply due to the bifurcation or fragmentation in the crypto arena. However, on the positive side, Bitcoin, the on-going poster boy for cryptocurrencies and the crypto market in general, is going from strength to strength. Furthermore, the introduction of Bitcoin-backed Exchange Traded Funds in January 2024 has paved the way for adoption by wall street and a massive inflow of funds. An example of this is BlackRock Inc’s iShares Bitcoin Trust which, on Wednesday 30th November, saw a record inflow for a single day of USD872 Million. Donald Trump has vowed to turn the United States into the crypto capital of the world, and whilst this is good news for the crypto market, the industry will have to get its underbelly in order.