Tag: World News

The Declining Value of the US Dollar

In the past two months the US Dollar has declined 5% against major currencies (the US Dollar index currently stands at a 13 month low) suggesting that increase in the value of the dollar in the years after the Covid-19 Pandemic has come to end. Analysts suggest that this is not too surprising because the rhetoric coming out of the Federal Reserve has recently softened regarding interest rates. Indeed, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, made it plain at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium (20th  – 22nd August 2024) that inflation was, in fact, receding. Chairman Powell went on to say “Inflation is on what increasingly appears to be a sustainable path to our 2% objective”. 

The big question at the moment is not if, but by how much the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at their next meeting on September 18th, 2024, and will sustained cuts in interest rates erode the dollar haven that the United States has enjoyed for the last three years? Analysts suggest that according to bond market pricing* financial markets can expect a 0.25% reduction in interest rates at the September Federal Reserve meeting. However, there are those in the market who suggest that the Federal Reserve could indeed cut rates by a full half percentage point. 

*Correlation Between Interest Rates and Bond Prices – The relationship between interest rates and bond prices are such that when interest rates fall bond prices rise and when interest rates rise bond prices fall. Thus when existing bonds have a lower interest rate than current interest rates they are less desirable, so as the interest rate on the US Dollar falls, so bonds become more attractive and their price rises. 

What effect will the declining value of the US Dollar have on emerging markets, exporters of commodities, and the rest of the world? As the dollar declines due to interest rate cuts some analysts are questioning whether the status as global reserve currency will be affected. Experts agree that the reserve currency status will not be threatened by a declining US Dollar as the United States is still the safest place to invest with buoyant stock markets and decent yields. However funds that are domiciled in the United States may look outside its borders as investment opportunities open up in other parts of the world. 

Elsewhere, countries whose economies rely on the exports of commodities will usually reap the benefit of a falling US Dollar, as the commodity price correlation usually moves inversely to that of the US Dollar. Emerging markets that have not had the best of times in recent years should broadly benefit, especially those resource-poor markets (Inc India and China) who rely on the importation of commodities denominated in US Dollars. The US Dollar has lost ground against the  G-10 currencies, the largest of which is within the European Union and specifically the Federal Republic of Germany, where a stronger Euro will only increase the pain of weakening capital expenditure and consumer confidence.

The odds are very good for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates at their September meeting. However, Chairman Powell always hedges his bets by reminding the financial community that their decisions are always data driven. He reminded us at Jackson Hole, with the upside of beating inflation against the downside of labour market concerns (which had cooled substantially with unemployment rising to 4.3%), future actions would depend on incoming data and the balance of risks.

The Underlying Problems in the Russian Economy

Despite over 1,000 global multinational corporations leaving the country plus sanctions being imposed, the Russian leadership has been “bigging up” the economy, but do their words really ring true? On closer inspection the apparent economic feel-good factor is down to the Russian government massively overspending, which has hidden restrictive monetary policy from the populous using intense fiscal stimulus. All is not rosy in the economic garden of Russia as experts suggest that the government is engaged in a spending spree that is completely unsustainable.

Analysts have shown that most of Russia’s human, production and financial resources have all been redirected to the defence sector in order to finance the President’s war with the Ukraine. This has left the civilian sector exceptionally short of resources, who have been struggling to meet the increasing demand from the consumer sector. Sadly, the disparity that now reigns within the Russian economy (funding the war at the expense of the rest of the economy) has seen inflation jump with added pressure coming from increasing costs of imports and the depreciation of the rouble. The prioritisation of military spending over everything else is essentially stifling innovation and damping down any long-term growth prospects.

Analysts suggest that Russia is indeed running out of reserves and estimate that the amount of liquid assets available for distribution is just shy of USD100 Billion. This shows that the war is eating heavily into Russian reserves built up from oil revenues in the first decade of the 21st century, despite new levies and increases in taxes across the whole economy. The largest contributor to revenue has, without a doubt, been the oil and gas sector, where experts estimate such contributions amount to circa 33% of total revenues. Regarding tax, a mineral extraction tax has been levied on the giants of the oil and gas industry and their only LNG producer Novatek now faces an increase in its corporate tax rate from 20% to 34%. Furthermore the Russian government will from January 1st, 2025, increase the overall corporate tax rate from 20% to 25%, the war effort now creeping into the bottom lines of all major Russian corporations. 

The tax measures being taken by the Russian government in itself is not totally ruinous, but when combined with the withdrawal of virtually all global multinationals and sanctions it’s clear they are ruining any chances of critical investment vital to the future of the Russian economy. A number of key development projects such as the Arctic LNG-2* have been brought to a halt due to the lack of investment and the withdrawal of key international companies. The war effort is bleeding the private sector dry, especially in the area of wages, where they cannot compete with the defence sector.

*Arctic LNG-2 – Novatek reported that there had been a massive increase in capital expenditure of USD$4 Billion on this project as they had to turn to Chinese replacements of western equipment. Due to the virtual total withdrawal of international companies (Baker Hughes, Linde and Technip along with sanctions), this project has now come to a complete standstill. 

Despite the political rhetoric, China has ceased helping Russia on the financial front with analysts advising that circa 80% of Russian transactions in Yuan are being reversed as fear of secondary sanctions have scared off Chinese financial institutions indicating the reluctance of engaging with Russia. Furthermore, experts report that important direct commodity payments between Russia and China are being frozen. On top of this interest rates are currently 18% and not stopping inflation. Government financial experts had expected with interest rates so high Indian and Chinese investors would flock to the marketplace, but such thinking is flawed as Russian assets are regarded as toxic. Finally, Russia is banned from the international capital markets so has no chance of raising funds from the global debt and equity markets. At this rate the entire financial structure of the Russian economy will become destabilised, and who knows what a bankrupt President Putin would do to alleviate the situation. 

Are Global Markets Facing a New Period of Volatility?

On Monday 5th August 2024 trading rooms in financial centres across the world faced one of the most volatile and chaotic days in recent history. In the United States by the close of business on Monday The MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) All Country World Index (ACWI) was showing 90% of stocks had fallen, in what has been termed as an indiscriminate global sell-off. In Tokyo the Nikkei was down 12%, in Seoul the Kospi was down by 9% and at the opening bell in New York the Nasdaq plunged 6% in seconds. However by the Thursday evening of that week the turmoil in the markets had been forgotten as the S&P and ACWI were both down by only 1%.

But what brought about this huge summer sell-off? Many financial experts suggest that financial markets had convinced themselves that a soft land for the US economy was a given especially after what was perceived as a successful fight against inflation, with interest rates being kept high by the Federal Reserve. However, the moves in the markets were completely off the scale in relation to what actually triggered the sell-off. Analysts suggest the touchpaper was lit when two economic updates were published in the first two days of August 2024, plus a further announcement by the Bank of Japan (BOJ) that they were raising interest rates.

The first set of data was a survey of manufacturing, which was closely followed by official data released regarding the state of the US labour market. When taken together analysts suggested that instead of a soft landing, the US economy was indeed heading for a recession, and that unlike the Bank of England and the European Central Bank (ECB), the Federal Reserve was moving too slowly on interest rate cuts. The data released on new jobs, which was by no means the worst of the year, fell short of expectations of being only 114,000 as opposed to the expected figure of 175,000.

The start of the sell-off began in the Asian markets on Monday 5th August, as a stronger yen and rising interest rates in Japan combined with the bad economic data coming out of the United States. A vast number of market players and investors have been tied up in the “Yen Carry-Trade”*, where advantage has been taken of low interest rates in Japan allowing investors to borrow cheaply in Yen and invest in overseas assets especially in large US tech stocks and Mexican bonds. A number of traders felt the Yen carry trade was the “epicentre” of the markets and the unwinding of these trade caused the shakeout that followed. 

*Yen Carry Trade – For many years cheap money has been in Japan where interest rates have held at near zero. Any investor, bank, hedge fund etc can, for a small fee, borrow Japanese Yen and buy things like US tech stocks, government bonds or the Mexican Peso which have in recent years offered solid returns. The theory to this trade is that as long as the US Dollar remains low against the Yen investors can pay back the Yen and still walk away with a good profit. 

The sell-off also hit the Tokyo Stock Exchange which recorded its sharpest fall in 40 years, whilst the VIX** also known as the “Fear Gauge” hit a high of 65 (only surpassed a few times this century having enjoyed a lifetime average of circa 19.5), implying the markets expect a swing of 4% a day over the next month in the S&P 500. Analysts announced that when trading hit its peak it was very reminiscent of the 2007 – 2009 Global Financial Crisis, but without systemic risk fears. A well-known Japanese equity strategist suggested “The breath and the depth of the sell-off appeared to be driven a lot more by extremely concentrated positioning coming up against very tight risk limits”. 

**The VIX – is a ticker symbol and the in-house or popular name for the Chicago Board Options Exchange’s (CBOE) Volatility Index. This is a popular measure of the stock market’s expectation of volatility based on S&P 500 index options.

In the last four years Yen carry trades have been very popular as Japan has been essentially offering free money keeping interest rates at almost zero to encourage economic growth whilst the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe were raising interest rates to fight inflation. For many, borrowing at next to nothing in Japan and investing in a US Treasury Bond paying 5% or Mexican Bonds paying 10% seemed like a no brainer. However, once the market fundamentals of this carry trade started moving towards negative territory the global unwinding of these trades was an inevitability.

The market makers were always in evidence throughout the sell-off, suggesting that the structure of the markets were still in place. However, experts said that the biggest moves on the VIX were driven by a tsunami of investors all moving in the same direction. As one senior executive put it “there was no yin and yang of different views”, it was just one way traffic. However, the rebound on the following Thursday just highlighted the lack of fundamental clarity where, as one expert put it “The market is so fascinated by what is the latest data point that the ties between day-to-day stock price moves and fundamentals are more disconnected than ever before”. 

There have, however, been undercurrents in the background indicating a shift in current trends, and with unnerving global politics from the United States to the Middle East plus continued rumblings from China over Taiwan, volatility in the markets is ever present. Add to this US growth trending downwards and market/investor concern over stretched valuations in the US tech market, taken together with other factors including the fourth consecutive move south in the S&P and the VIX trending higher, a negative move in the markets could have been anticipated. So, whilst the fundamentals were in place to be interpreted by market experts, it was the data points and the unwinding of the Yen carry trades that kicked off the volatility swings.

Looking back from today (Friday 16th August) it is as if the volatility and single day crash never happened, however a number of experts suggest that markets could remain volatile until the Federal Reserve interest rate decision in September. Many renown commentators have said what happens in the United States does not stay in the United States, especially as the country has been a major driver of global economic growth, so if the United States does go into recession the world as a whole would suffer. Analysts also suggest that there are further Yen carry trades to unwind which will impart volatility into the markets. In the short-term, therefore, it would appear volatility is on the menu especially with an uncertain presidential election in November. Long term volatility is difficult to predict, but the markets will now be aware that when there is consensus thinking e.g. a soft landing for the US economy and all is rosy in the garden, markets can quickly turn on their heads and bite you very badly.

Global Financial Markets Rethink

Expert financial analysts are suggesting that many of the presumptions that have driven the global financial markets in 2024 are quickly being rethought. Speculation that the Federal Reserve may well cut interest rates faster than predicted has given way to doubt over the economy of the United States, prompting investors to redeploy their investments in the currency and bond markets. The shift in sentiment has also been driven by a slew of disappointing results in corporate earnings, together with scepticism from shareholders that the huge investments in AI* (artificial intelligence) by tech companies may not pay off as soon as was originally expected. 

Indeed, analysts advise how investors were caught by surprise when results for Alphabet Inc (google parent) showed how much had been invested in technology, but any returns were not reflected in the revenue figures. Interestingly, while still up 12%, this year the Nasdaq 100 index has fallen circa 9% from its record high on July 10th, wiping out USD23 Trillion from its market value. Many experts have pronounced that the AI frenzy no longer looks as positive as it was before. 

*Artificial Intelligence – The bull market up to June 2024 has boosted the S&P 500 market capitalisation by USD9 Trillion (fuelled by AI stocks) since the Federal Reserve pivoted away from rate hikes in August 2023. Experts advise that performance is extremely concentrated in a few mega-cap names and could make the effect of any major decline in big tech stocks more pronounced.

Another example of the “rethink” is where investors have been borrowing in low yielding yen to invest in higher yields such as the Mexican Peso, the New Zealand Dollar, and the Australian Dollar. However, it appears that these transactions are a thing of the past as the gap between the BOJ’s (Bank of Japan) and its counterparts is set to come closer to each other.  Elsewhere, experts advise that the European and United States Equity markets in 2024 have been driven by the general agreement that inflation was slowly coming under control, however they feel that now the US economy is becoming weaker and weaker, changing the perception towards equities. 

In Sub-Saharan Africa, analysts advise that a somewhat laboured return to the international capital markets has run straight into a stop sign basically due to uncertainty over the November presidential election which has given global investors the jitters. There are 49 governments in the region and only five (Benin, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Kenya, and Senegal) have managed to sell US Dollar bonds in 2024 in a combined amount of USD6.2 Billion which is much lower for the same period in 2022*. In fact those countries within emerging markets will see high yield borrowings classed as higher risk if former President Donald Trump wins the upcoming election, as experts feel he will favour fiscal expansion negating any reduction in the already high global borrowing costs.

*Sub Saharan Africa – The whole region was denied access to overseas capital for two years due to rising global interest rates and the devastation of war. 

As the US election approaches, it will be interesting to see how the different markets react, though currently there seems to be a massive “rethink” to how global markets will be driven. Whoever wins the White House, it appears that investor sentiment at least for the being is moving to safer havens.

The Petrodollar Agreement Between The USA and Saudi Arabia: Fact or Fiction?

In the middle of June 2024 there were a plethora of rumours regarding the collapse of the “Petrodollar Agreement” between Saudi Arabia and the United States. These rumours took off like a rocket and were exacerbated on social media platforms such as X. The purported 50 year old agreement requiring Saudi Arabia to price its crude oil exports in US Dollars had apparently expired on Sunday 16th June 2024. Many commentators on X were horrified and suggested that this would surely undermine the status of the US Dollar as the de facto global world reserve currency, leading to massive financial upheaval. As a result, according to Google Trend data, searches for the term “Petrodollar” spiked to the highest level on record, dating back to 2004.

However, mainstream media did not report this news. Indeed, a number of foreign-policy experts, plus some experts from Wall Street, announced that the agreement in itself did not exist, at least not in the way pronounced on many social media outlets. One well known chief economist advised that this was indeed fake news but did indeed confirm there was a joint agreement between Saudi Arabia and the United States on the 8th of June 1974. 

This agreement is referred to as the United States-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation and had nothing to do with currencies, as the Saudis were already selling their oil in Sterling and continued to do so after signing the agreement. Therefore there was no formal agreement requesting the Saudis to price their oil in USD Dollars only, however, later in 1974 they actually stopped receiving Sterling as payment for oil exports. The 1973 OPEC oil embargo was the reasoning behind the June 1974 agreement and both the United States and Saudi Arabia wished to come to a formal arrangement where each got more out of the other. 

Post the 1973 OPEC oil embargo saw a spike in oil prices which greatly enhanced Saudi Arabia’s surplus of US Dollars. They wished to use to industrialise their economy, whilst the United States were keen for them to recycle these dollars back into the US Economy. This led to a further agreement in late 1974 where the United States promised military aid equipment, and in return the Saudis would invest billions of dollars in US Treasury’s. This agreement was kept under wraps until 2016 when Bloomberg News filed a Freedom of Information Act request to the National Archives. 

However, Saudi Arabia are making noises about receiving payments for oil in other currencies apart from the US Dollar. This is heightening due to their membership of BRICS*, which was due on the 1st of January 2024 but was delayed, however the South African government has since confirmed Saudi Arabia as a full member. Today, Saudi Arabia no longer has US dollar reserves and is borrowing heavily in the sovereign debt market, even selling parts of its national oil company (Saudi Aramco which has in excess of 270 billion barrels in reserve). Furthermore, whilst Saudi Arabia still owns significant reserves, some of which are tied up in US Treasury’s, data reveals that both Japan and China have more assets tied up in US debt. 

*BRICS – Is an intergovernmental agency and is an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, (all joined 2009) followed by South Africa in 2010 as the original participants. Today, membership has grown to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, with Thailand, and Malaysia on the cusp of joining. Russia sees BRICS as continuing its fight against western sanctions and China, through BRICS, is increasing its influence throughout Africa and wants to be the voice of the “Global South”. A number of commentators feel as the years progress BRICS will become an economic and geopolitical powerhouse and will represent a direct threat to the G7 group of nations. Currently this group represents 44% of the world’s crude oil production and the combined economies are worth in excess of USD28.5 Trillion equivalent to 28% of the global economy. 

Indeed analysts suggest that in a sense the “Petrodollar” actually died about 30 years ago. Fifty years ago Saudi Arabia’s current account surplus was in excess of 50% of its GDP (Gross Domestic Product) with the petrodollar reflecting this. The only reason the United States benefited was due to Saudi Arabia recycling US Dollars into the American debt market. However, between 2003 – 2008, the value of these dollars became less and less as Saudi Arabia and other OPEC nations channelled these funds to improve their economy spending on items such as goods and services. In 2024, data released shows that the current account surplus of Saudi Arabia is 0.5%, with analysts suggesting that the country will fall into deficit in 2025 continuing until 2030. 

With speculation abounding that Saudi Arabia is about to move away from receiving US Dollars for oil, experts advise that the administration of Joe Biden is close to signing a security deal with Saudi Arabia. Analysts advise that this deal will also encompass efforts to solve the current Gaza conflict, making progress towards creating a Palestinian state and a civil nuclear agreement between Saudi Arabia and the United States.

Experts in foreign policy suggest that the signing of this agreement is President Joe Biden’s attempt to bring Saudi Arabia closer to the United States and mend some fences between the two countries. Furthermore these experts suggest that this agreement will also encourage Saudi Arabia to pull back from the current Sino-Saudi partnership involving security and increased diplomatic relations, thus putting an end to speculation of Saudi Arabia dumping the dollar in favour of other currencies.

Federal Reserve Holds its Benchmark Interest Rate

On June 12th, 2024, the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) for the seventh straight meeting, once again held its benchmark interest rate steady at 5.25% – 5.5%, which is the highest level it’s been for over twenty years. Whilst Chairman Powell dialled back expectations for rate cuts this year saying the latest forecasts were a new conservative approach, financial markets suggest that there may be two rate cuts this year with the first cut possibly coming in September. However, policymakers have advised that instead of three rate cuts in 2024 as previously advised, they now only expect to make one rate cut in 2024. 

On the same day before the FOMC meeting CPI (consumer price index) figures were published, reflecting better than expected data which is cause for optimism in the future. Chairman Powell was quoted as saying the “numbers are encouraging” and suggested that the latest CPI figures may not have been fully taken into account by the latest quarterly projections. He went on to say that although the committee were briefed on the CPI figures, most individuals do not update projections when data arrives in the middle of policy meetings. His words were jumped on by many leading experts who suggested that the door is still wide open for two rate cuts in 2024. 

Officials of the Federal Reserve raised their outlook for inflation in the longer term to 2.8%, up 0.2% from their March 2024 estimation and still above their target of 2%. However, experts suggest the Federal Reserve is still trying to come to terms as to the appropriate time to cut interest rates, as there is uncertainty regarding tight monetary policy and the impact it is having on the economy. Despite high borrowing costs, consumer spending and job growth have been particularly resilient even though inflation remains above 2%. Chairman Powell has been quick to point out the split within the committee where the “Dot Plot”* showed eight officials expecting 2 rate cuts, seven expecting one rate cut and four expecting zero rate cuts.

*Dot Plot – This is a graphical display consisting of data points on a graph which the Federal Reserve uses to predict interest rates. The graphs display quantitative variables where each dot represents a value.

Experts suggest that chairman Powell is content to leave interest rates unchanged until the economy sends a clear signal such as a jump in the unemployment rate or further declines in the CPI. However, with the Federal Reserve’s eyes on the PCE index (Personal Consumption Index), nothing is really as it seems.

Interest Rates Remain Unchanged in Europe, America, and the United Kingdom

The European Central Bank

On the 7th of March 2024 the European Central Bank (ECB) kept interest rates on hold for the fourth meeting in succession, the deposit rate of 4% remaining unchanged. The consensus coming out of the Governing Council is that keeping borrowing costs unchanged for a sufficiently long period means that their target inflation number of 2% will be more easily accessible. Indeed, the President of the ECB Christine Lagarde advised that inflation is definitely slowing down but remains sceptical of lowering interest rates at this time. 

President Lagarde went on to say that further data in the coming months, especially by June, should give the ECB a clearer picture regarding a drop in interest rates. Like the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve, the ECB is considering when to announce that inflation is beaten and start the process of unwinding their unprecedented monetary tightening policy. However, like their peers the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England and despite Presidents Lagarde’s coyness on a June 2024 interest rate cut, the indications from the ECB are that a June interest rate cut is in the offing, and as a result money markets are indicating three/four interest rate cuts by the end of the 2024.

The Federal Reserve

On the 20th of March 2024 the Federal Reserve’s FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) announced that they are holding the benchmark federal funds rate steady at 5.25% to 5.50% for the fifth consecutive meeting. However, officials signalled that they remain confident that rates will be cut in 2024 for the first time since March 2020 and they also revised downward their December 2023 forecast of four interest rate reductions in 2025 to three interest rate reductions. Whilst the Federal Reserve has seen inflation fall from a high of 9.1% in July 2022, the figure sadly ticked up slightly in February 2024 due to the cost of clothes, car insurance, airline fares, gas, rent and shelters. 

Post-meeting statements/comments were nearly identical to those made at the post meeting interviews in January 2024, being that rate cuts will not be made until the Federal Reserve is more confident that inflation is moving towards the 2% target. Experts have predicted that interest rate will be cut three times this year but there are doubts as recent data shows inflation is slowing and remains at 3.2%, meanwhile financial analysts and traders are betting that the first interest rate cut will be announced this June. Chairman Jerome Powell reiterated his vow to keep interest rate elevated as the fight against inflation continues. 

The Bank of England

The Bank of England’s MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) on the 21st of March 2024, maintained Bank Rate at 5.25% by a majority vote of 8 to 1 as official data released showed that inflation had receded to 3.4%, its lowest level in over two years. However, whilst headline inflation has been receding rapidly, the Bank of England is very aware of prices in the service sector and wages where price growth is still in excess of 6%. The Governor of the Bank of England Andrew Bailey was quoted as saying “Britain’s economy is moving  towards the point where the Bank of England can start cutting interest rates”. Interestingly within the 8 to 1 majority and for the first time since September 2021 none of the MPC members voted for a rate hike, and two hawks (Jonathon Haskel and Catherine Mann) became part of the no-change majority with Swati Dhingra being the one vote for a cut in interest rates. 

When asked the question ‘Were investors correct to price-in two to three rate cuts in 2024?’, Andrew Bailey replied “It is reasonable for markets to take that view”, while stressing that he would not confirm or endorse the size or the timing of the cuts. As a result experts within the financial markets have raised their bets for a first cut in June 2024 as Governor Bailey confirmed that the UK was on the way to winning the battle against inflation. Interestingly, Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt has alluded to an October 2024 general election, so in order to avoid criticisms of bias towards the government and to assert their independence, any interest rate cuts will have to be made sooner rather than later.

Interest Rate Overview: Eurozone, United States, United Kingdom February 2024

As predicted by many commentators, the governing council of the ECB (European Central Bank), the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the United States Federal Reserve and the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England, all kept interest rates on hold. All three central banks cited the continuing fight against inflation as the reason for keeping interest rates on hold, but as many experts are predicting, interest rates will fall in 2024 in all three jurisdictions.

The Eurozone

On Thursday 25th January the Governing Council of the ECB announced for the third time in a row that interest rates were being held at a record high of 4%, reaffirming their fight against inflation. Many traders and analysts in the financial markets are betting on a rate reduction at the next Governing Council meeting on April 11th, 2024. 

However, Governor Christine Lagarde announced it was “premature to discuss rates”, though some unnamed members of the council have added that if upcoming data shows that inflation is beaten, then the April meeting could be dovish for a fall in interest rates at the June meeting. Despite these utterances, many in the financial markets believe the ECB have got it wrong and will be forced to cut interest rates in April.

The United States

On Wednesday January 31st, 2024, the Federal Reserve kept policy rates at a 22 year high of 5.25% – 5.50%, where the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell gave a massive endorsement on the economy’s strengths. He further advised that with the on-going expectation of falling inflation, coupled with economic growth, that rates had now peaked and would fall in the coming months. However, despite this pledge, Chairman Powell went on to say that he did not expect a rate cut at their next policy meeting in March, as they wish to see on-going positive data on the reduction of inflation to their figure of 2%. 

Interestingly, the Federal Reserve is hoping to accomplish beating inflation through tighter credit without putting the economy into recession, which historians suggest they only accomplished once in the last 100 years. But with inflation falling more quickly than expected, (2.6% as at close of business 2023), the Chairman is coming under political pressure to reduce rates in March. 

A massively divided country is going to the polls in November to elect a new president, and Chairman Powel received written requests to reduce interest rates from Senator Elizabeth Warren (Dem, former presidential candidate), and Senate Banking Committee Chair Sherrod Brown (Dem). Some market experts are suggesting that there is a circa 63% chance that the Federal reserve will cut interest rates in March, but with seven weeks of economic data to come the markets will have much to mull over.

United Kingdom

On February 1st, 2024, the Bank of England’s MPC announced that it was holding interest rates steady at 5.25%, admitting that a rate cut had been part of their discussions. In the end there was a split decision in the MPC with six members in favour of holding, two members voting to increase rates and one member voting for a drop in interest rates. Interestingly, this is the first time since the Covid-19 pandemic that a rate-setter has voted for a cut in interest rates, and the first time since the global financial crisis of 2008, that there has been a three-way split in the MPC.

Following the announcement, The governor of the Bank of England Andrew Bailey announced that “the level of bank rate remains appropriate, and we are not yet at a point where we can lower rates”. He also pointed out that there is an upside risk to inflation due to continuing trade disruptions, and ambiguously advised how long policy remains restrictive depends on incoming data. However, experts suggest that the Bank of England is now warming to rate cuts in 2024, with officials believing that consumer price inflation will be at 2% in the second quarter, mainly due to falling energy prices., a year earlier than forecasted last November.

Market analysts mainly agree that whatever the statement that comes out of the above central banks, interest rates are set to fall in 2024. It would appear that the Bank of England is set to lag behind the ECB and the Federal Reserve when it comes to cutting interest rates. However, better than expected January US employment figures may delay a US interest rate cut beyond March, and as to whether or not they all fall at the same time, only time will tell.

China Snowball Derivatives and their Potential Losses

USD13 Billion worth of China Snowball Derivatives are approaching loss levels as the ongoing route of China’s stock market is pressurising these structured products, threatening to raise market volatility. Indeed, over the years snowballs have attracted China’s wealthy and institutional investors, but a rapid decline in the Chinese stock market is now exposing risks to these derivatives hitting loss-triggering levels. But what exactly are “Snowball” derivatives?

A Snowball product is a structured hybrid derivative which pays a bond-like coupon and consists of additional options on basic financial assets, which include underlying assets such as stocks or stock indexes. The word snowball derives from the fact that coupons can be rolled over and coupon pay-outs rely on the underlying asset trading within a certain range. 

Currently, experts are advising that circa USD4.2 Billion (Yuan30 Billion) of snowballs that are tied to the CSI 1000 Index* are approaching levels that trigger losses at maturity, whilst another circa USD8.4 Billion (Yuan 60 Billion) are between 5 and 10% away from their knock-in** thresholds. This week on Wednesday 15th January, the CSI 1000 index closed at its lowest level since April 2022. 

*The CSI 1000 Stock Index – This index is composed of 1,000 small and liquid stocks of all A-shares, excluding the CSI 800 constituents (follows the 800 largest stocks by free-float market cap and represents large and mid-cap A-share stocks). It reflects the stock price performance of a group of small-cap companies in the Chinese A-share market. 

**Knock Ins – There are two types of knock-in options: down-and-in and up-and-in. The former (currently China’s problem) is triggered if the underlying asset price falls below a certain level and the latter is triggered if the underlying asset price rises to a certain level. 

During the Covid-19 Pandemic, snowballs gained in popularity among the wealthy Chinese and asset managers, with brokers typically offering such grand returns or coupon rates of between 12 and 20%. 

Between February and April 2023, many of the outstanding snowball derivatives were issued, and since then the CSI 1000 has fallen by circa 22%, and for those who bought a one year contract with an 80% knock in last February, if there is no rebound in the market, next month they may be holding some serious losses. 

Despite government efforts to kick-start the stock markets by halving stamp duty on stock trades (August 2023), or their own exchanges launching new blue chip benchmarks where sectors such as chip manufacturing or renewables are granted greater weightings, sadly for snowball holders such small measures have failed to work with many investors now looking elsewhere. Unless the government engages in the type of quantitative easing as seen in the past in Europe, the United Kingdom and the United States, there is little else the government can do to stop the pessimism that is sweeping through the stock markets, signalling losses for many snowball holders.

What is the forecast for China in 2024?

China, the world’s second largest economy, kicks off 2024 with a much weaker economy, raising doubts about the underlying foundations on which its decades of amazing growth is built. Once China’s draconian Covid-19 pandemic laws were revoked, their leaders expected it would be business as usual for their economy. However, instead of consumers returning to malls, increases in land auctions and home sales, and factories tooling up for increases in demand, foreign firms have pulled money out, factories are facing waning demand, consumers are saving not spending, two of the largest properties companies along others have defaulted on their loans and local government finances are in a complete mess.

Reforms have always been particularly difficult in China, but the leaders are now presented with some tough choices if things are to improve in 2024. However, it has been an inauspicious start as Hong Kong’s flagship, the Hang Seng Index, started 1.5% down on 2nd January 2024. Mainland China’s CSI 300, which measures the top 300 stocks listed in Shenzhen and Shanghai, also dropped 1.3% and in excess of 43% since its peak in 2021. Both indexes were two of the worst performers in 2023 with a slowdown in production activity, lukewarm consumption, a prolonged property slump and concerns over Beijing’s crackdown on the tech sector.

However it is not all doom and gloom for the Chinese stock markets. Experts say that the trends in the Hang Seng Index are closely related to the number of IPO’s (Initial Public Offerings), and the same experts are predicting that HK$100 Billion (Circa £10 Billion and $7.8 Billion) will be raised in Hong Kong in 2024, just over double of that raised in 2023. A number of analysts have gone on to say that today the risk premium of Chinese stocks has reached a level that, in the past, has led to returns nothing short of spectacular. Indeed, the yield gap between stocks and bonds has now reached circa 5.5% and has rarely been this big, in fact the dividend yield of the stock benchmark has risen above the dividend yield of the long term bond benchmark for the first time since 2005. Adding to this optimism for Chinese stocks in 2024, a well-known emerging markets equity fund in the United States boosted its equity holdings of China and Hong Kong stocks in one of their funds to 33% of its portfolio. This confirmed that, in their view, the relentless selling is just about over and 2024 will be a good year. 

On economic growth, top Chinese officials have pledged to put this at the forefront of their economic plans. However, the hole in this plan is the lack of measures to boost consumer spending, which may end up making it hard to deliver on this statement. The tone for economic development for the following year is usually set at the CEWC (Central Economic Work Conference) which finished on the 9th of December 2023. This closely watched conference announced that policy would focus on “the central task of economic development and the primary task of high quality development”. Analysts have suggested that this conference was more pro-growth than in previous conferences, however they went on to say that potential growth levels of circa 5% would be hard to achieve without stimulus measures directly targeting consumer spending. Indeed, there was a complete silence on increasing household income and consumption support policies, and many analysts agree that weak consumption is a major drag on the economy.

On the deflation front, China has been fighting this for most of 2023 due to weak spending and the property slump, and finally policymakers have indicated that they will address this problem, which up to now, has been studiously ignored. Deflation is not good for the economy as falling prices are a major concern, and companies and consumers may put off investments and purchases anticipating a further fall in prices, which in turn can further slow the economy. Acknowledging this problem a quote from the 2023 CEWC said “Total social financing and money supply should be in line with economic growth and the price target”, which basically refers to the amount of financing needed for the real economy. Analysts noted that this was the first time the Price Target had been alluded to, indicating a more accommodating monetary policy. This suggests there will be interest rate cuts in 2024 acting as a stimulus to the economy. It should be noted that the CPI (Consumer Price Index) fell 0.5% in November 2023, the biggest since the Covid-19 Pandemic, marking an acceleration in the rate of deflation. 

The property market has been a major headache for Chinese policy makers and the economy, with experts advising that property market stabilisation should be very near the top of economic priorities. This is because there are signs that the crisis within the property market is spilling over into the broader economy, including consumer confidence and financial markets. The CEWC confirmed that Chinese policymakers will meet this problem head-on by announcing the importance of resolving risks in “real estate, local government debt, and small and medium sized financial institutions”. They went on to say that the government, with regard to three major areas, will accelerate construction in public infrastructure facilities, affordable housing and urban village redevelopment. The property industry accounts for circa 30% of Chinese Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and the real estate slump has accounted for many of China’s current economic problems. House sales have gone south dramatically with developers’ debt problems spilling over into the shadow banking system*.

*China’s Shadow Banking System – This refers to financing outside of the formal Chinese Banking System and is conservatively estimated by experts to be in the region of USD3 Trillion. Such financing is made by banks through off-balance sheet activities or by non-bank financial institutions such as Chinese Trust firms. These trust companies sell investment products to qualified investors and the funds are used to invest in a wide range of financial assets, plus they are used to lend to property developers and their project companies and to local government financing vehicles who in turn lend to property companies. 

Politically, experts suggest that China’s leaders will look to thaw relations with the United States and Europe, if only for economic purposes. Indeed, President Xi Jinping met with President Joe Biden in San Francisco back in November 2023 and recently met with EU Commission officials in Beijing in an effort to keep the European Union close for trade purposes and to get access to technology. However, any perceived thaw will be down to economic expediency and nothing more. In fact, for the first time President Xi Jinping announced in his New Year speech that the economy is facing troubles in such areas as employment, with many finding it difficult to fund basic needs and enterprises having a tough time. He went on to say that we will consolidate and strengthen the momentum of economic recovery. 

Outside influences may have a direct impact on the Chinese economy in 2024. President Xi’s desire to control or unify Taiwan could put China in direct conflict with the United States. The looming presidential election in Taiwan has three candidates, the Beijing sceptic William Lei (Democratic Progressive Party), the Beijing friendly Hou You-Yi (Kuomintang)  and the third candidate Ko Wen-je who will follow the outgoing president’s approach. Beijing will look at this election as a litmus test for a non-violent unification. The possibility of a second Donald Trump term could end up being a real wild card for China/ United States relations, and could well impact some of China’s geopolitical goals. The preferred candidate for China, according to experts, would be anyone showing weakness towards NATO, Ukraine and Taiwan.

The rhetoric coming out of Beijing is setting the tone for 2024 with their ambition for progress, development and global cooperation (with the United States? We will have to wait and see) focusing on growth, sustainability and innovation, paying particular attention to the property sector. The policymakers are looking to promote long-term prosperity and stability in Hong Kong as a vibrant financial sector, as this is also essential in the rehabilitation of China’s economy. However, the property sector could really make or break China’s economy in 2024. There are many failed real estate projects in China and the crisis has also enveloped the once untouchable real estate developer Country Garden, considered by many to be a safe investment. The real worry for Beijing is a dip in housing prices, as roughly 70% of all Chinese household assets are invested in property. The government has continually fiddled with economic data, which they will have to stop in order to get more outside investment, but whilst official figures show housing prices remaining static, it is estimated that house prices have fallen by 15% in many cities and by circa 30% in Beijing.

If indeed the authorities start releasing proper economic data, and can show a credible effort at solving the property sector crisis, then according to many experts FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) will pick up as will the economy. There are many doom mongers who are saying it will be the same old China, all talk and dodgy economic data, but if those who predict a rise in the stock markets are to be believed, in 2024 China will not only talk the talk but walk the walk as well.