Tag: World News

Emerging Markets Debt Could Potentially Hit Record Sales in 2025

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Experts in emerging market debt advise that global issuance volumes in this sector year-on-year were up 20% for Q1 and Q2 for 2025, with issuances growing particularly quickly from the corporate sector. The boom in debt sales have defied missile attacks, an oil market with gyrating prices, and US policy, and tariffs putting a strain on global trade, resulting in a major increase in demand for local bonds who are having their best Q1 and Q2 in 18 years. White House policy has seen the greenback fall circa 11% this year, which has led to a fall in investor confidence resulting in an index of emerging market local debt to return in excess of 12% in the first half of 2025.

Regarding the fall in the value of the US Dollar, experts suggest that this has sent fund managers, asset managers, and the rest of the money managers to look elsewhere for better returns, and as a result, the markets have seen a surge in demand for fixed-income assets in emerging market currencies. Data released shows that hard currency bonds are only up 5.4% in the first half of this year as opposed to 12% as mentioned above in the emerging market arena, all this against the backdrop of the US Dollar having its worst performance since 1970 and falling against 19 of 23 of the most traded emerging market currencies.

Figures released by EFPR data (formerly known as Emerging Portfolio Fund Research) show circa USDD 21 Billion (an unprecedented amount) flowing into EM-debt funds, with some Latin American bonds returning some considerable gains. For example, some Brazilian government bonds have returned in excess of 29% whilst local bonds from Mexico (known as Mbonos) have generated a gain of 22%. Elsewhere, experts suggest that Ghana (Africa’s top gold producer) will, due to short-term borrowing costs falling to their lowest level in three years, resume domestic bond sales later this year.

The following is a part overview of data released regarding the total return year-to-date on emerging market bonds, Brazil Notas de Tesouro Nacional Serie F – 20.2%, Brazil Letras do Tesouro Nacional – 26.0%, Mexican Bonos – 21.7%, Poland Bonds – 19.9%, Hungary Bonds – 19.1%, Czech Republic Bonds 17.8%, Mexican Cetes – 17.4%, Nigeria Bonds – 15.8%, Egypt Bonds 15.0%, Romania Bonds – 14.9%, Taiwan Bonds – 13.8%, South African Bonds – 13.2% and Colombian TES – 12.8%.

Since the beginning of the year, data released shows emerging markets companies and governments having sold USD 331 Billion in debt in hard currencies such as the greenback and the Euro. However, not all future roads to emerging markets fixed income products are paved with gold, as tariff increases may yet put a dent in some country’s ability to issue new bonds. Donald Trump will be reviving tariff targets in the second week of this month, indeed, yesterday the White house announced that letters had been sent to 14 countries informing them new tariffs will be enforced on 1st August this year. The president also has stressed that he will put an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning themselves with “the Anti-American policies of BRICS*”, confirming “There will be no exceptions to this policy”.

*BRICS – Is an intergovernmental agency and is an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, (all joined 2009) followed by South Africa in 2010 as the original participants. Today, membership has grown to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, with Thailand, and Malaysia on the cusp of joining. Russia sees BRICS as continuing its fight against western sanctions and China through BRICS is increasing its influence throughout Africa and wants to be the voice of the “Global South”. A number of commentators feel as the years progress, BRICS will become an economic and geopolitical powerhouse and will represent a direct threat to the G7 group of nations. Currently this group represents 44% of the world’s crude oil production and the combined economies are worth in excess of USD28.5 Trillion equivalent to 28% of the global economy.

It is believed by experts that the capture of the “Global South” encompasses all of Africa and South America, and BRICS seemed determined to have their own currency and move away from the US Dollar. President Trump views this as a direct threat to the USA and western Europe and will probably follow through on his threats to BRIC aligned countries. However, as President Trump alienates many of America’s traditional allies, BRICS are positioning themselves to replace the United States in the ground that Trump has ceded. The second half of 2025 will be interesting and over the next few months the markets will see if the increase in fixed-income volumes from emerging markets runs out of steam or goes on to new record highs.

Indian Regulators Come Down Hard on India’s Options Market

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Over the last five years, India’s equity derivatives* market has become the largest in the world, with a daily turnover (including options**) of circa USD 3 Trillion. India’s SEBI (the Securities and Exchange Board of India) has recently become concerned regarding this area of the market, where it feels that certain large participants have been allegedly using manipulative practices through the use of sophisticated technology, thereby gaining illegal profits and thus affecting the market’s integrity.

*Equity Derivatives – A derivative is a contract (e.g. futures, forwards, swaps and options) whose value is derived from the performance of an underlying asset for example, bonds, commodities, currencies interest rates, or in this case equities or stocks and shares. An equity derivative is a financial instrument which derives its value from the performance of the underlying stocks or shares and allows investors to gain exposure to the equity market without owning the underlying shares, and are widely used for hedging, speculation, and investment purposes.

**Options – A financial option is a contract that gives the owner or the holder the right but not the obligation, to buy or sell an underlying asset, (in this case equities, stocks) set at a specific price, (the strike price) on or before a certain date (expiration date). Options are a type of derivative meaning their value is derived from the underlying asset.

The SEBI are currently investigating an American company Jane Street Group over alleged irregularities manipulation of trades in the above market, but according to officials, (who wish to remain anonymous) the investigation will expand to cover wider markets. The markets being investigated are the Mumbai based NSE, (National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.’s) flagship gauge, the Nifty 50*, and BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange) Ltd.’s benchmark Sensex**. The SEBI flagged manipulated and fraudulent trades that mainly took place in the Nifty 50’s weekly options contracts and its underlying constituents in the cash market.

*Nifty 50 – This is India’s leading stock market index and represents the performance of the 50 largest and most liquid companies listed on the NSE. It serves as a benchmark for the Indian equity market and is used by investors and analysts to gauge market trends and the overall health of the Indian economy.

**BSE Sensex – Sensex stands for Stock Exchange Sensitive Index and is one of the oldest indices of India and consists of 30 stocks which are listed on the BSE and represent some of the largest corporations which are also the most actively traded stocks. The BSE is allowed to revise the listing periodically and this usually takes place twice a year in June And December. Sensex is crucial to investors as it gauges market movements and aids understanding in the overall sentiment of the economy and industry-specific developments.

Last week, on Friday, July 4th, 2025, the SEBI through an interim order announced they would be seizing Rupees 48,4 Billion (USD 570 Million) from Jane Street in what they said was unlawful gains made by the company. In consequence, and after an in-depth investigation, the SEBI has barred four Jane Street entities from accessing its securities markets including the confiscation of the aforementioned rupees. Furthermore, the SEBI have accused Jane Street of adopting an “Intraday Index Manipulation Strategy” whereby in early day trading the company aggressively bought constituent stocks and futures thereby pushing up the index, followed by aggressive selling later in the day where the trades were reversed.

The SEBI concluded that the trading actions employed by Jane Street lacked any economic rationale and were designed specifically to artificially move index levels to benefit their trading positions whilst at the same mislead other market participants. Headquartered in New York, Jane Street Capital employs more than 2,600 people in six offices in New York, London, Hong Kong, Singapore, Amsterdam, and Chicago and trades a broad range of asset classes on more than 200 venues in 45 countries. The company totally refutes the allegations.

Is the US Dollar Under Threat Due to the Policies of Donald Trump?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Donald Trump was inaugurated on Monday 20th January 2025, and since his elevation to the White House, the greenback has lost over 10% of its value against the Swiss Franc, Sterling, and the Euro. Global investors have been turning away from President Trump’s policies, and there is no better measuring stick for their renunciation of his policies than the US dollar. The last time the US Dollar fell so badly was post the Global Financial Crisis 2007 – 2009, when in 2010 the Federal Reserve in order to prop up the economy was excessively printing money.

However, this time around there is no global financial crisis; it is the policies coming from the White House such as expanded global tariffs, the on-going fight between President Trump and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to push interest rates down, where Chairman Jerome Powell* refuses to budge. Furthermore, there are two further policies which are scaring investors such as the open legal warfare against those who stand up against his policies, and “the big beautiful bill” which has just passed the Senate 51-50, which many experts feel will add to an already massive deficit. These are just a few of the pillars that make up the current administration’s policy and according to the value of the US Dollar are driving global investors away.

*Jerome Powell and Tariffs – On Tuesday of this week, The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell noted that the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) would probably have reduced interest rates further without the White House’s policy of expanding global tariffs. He went on to say, “In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs and essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs. We think the prudent thing to do is to wait and learn more and see what the effect might be”.

Experts suggest that tariffs will put upward pressure on inflation and certainly slow economic growth, and the President continuing to flip-flop on the specifics of levies and halting progress on trade agreements has given much worry and uncertainty on the outlook of the US economy. However, having said that, recently released economic data shows that tariffs have yet to impact prices or the labour market with further data showing that job openings rose in May, the highest level since November 2024.

Interestingly, many market experts, traders, economists, and analysts suggest that Donald Trump and his colleagues are ambivalent to the fall in the US Dollar. When questioned as to whether they support a strong dollar, the answer is always inevitably “yes” but little seems to be done in halting the current decline. Analysts suggest the financial markets feel that the White House is happy to see the US Dollar slide downwards in order to boost manufacturing in the United States.

Such speculation has led some observers to suggest that the President is playing with fire as the cost of financing the government has exploded to over USD 4 Trillion as the budget deficit continues on its path like a runaway train. Financing mainly comes from overseas

investors, and when it comes time sell up and bring their money home, a sliding greenback means they lose money. This, some observers feel, could lead to a vicious cycle where global investors continue to pull their funds out of the USA driving up borrowing costs resulting in further declines in the US Dollar with further economic uncertainty and so on and so on. If overseas investors get a whiff that a declining greenback is government policy the results could be catastrophic for the US Dollar.

As the world’s reserve currency, the US Dollar is already on the decline because at the close of business 2014 data showed the greenback accounted for 65% of global foreign exchange reserves and as at close of business 2024 this figure stood at 58%. However, that said, swift data shows that as recently as August last year the US Dollar is used in 49.10% of global payments and as at December 2024 data shows that 54% of global traded invoices are transacted in US Dollar and 88% of foreign exchange transactions are done in USD Dollars.

Analysts agree that in the near future, the US Dollar will undoubtedly keep its status as the world’s reserve currency. However, if the US Dollar continues to slide it will come under severe pressure from foreign investors, and there are already mutterings coming out of the ECB (European Central Bank) that the Euro could, in a few years’ time, be in a position to take over the mantle of the world’s reserve currency. The US has amassed a debt pile of USD 29 Trillion (100% of GDP) and it’s not stopping, it has lost its last remaining AAA rating and the budget deficit over the past few years has increased to 6% of GDP. President Trump without a doubt will have some short-term problems coming his way, but will things have turned around by the end of his presidency, and what will his legacy be?

Has President Trump Triggered a Sell-Off of U.S. Dollar Assets by Asian Countries?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Analysts advise that many exporting Asian nations, especially those considered as powerhouses* are beginning to unwind their US Dollar holdings which today stands at circa USD 7.5 Trillion. President Trump’s economic policies have turned America from a safe haven to one of volatility and perhaps inevitably a certain amount of pain. These Asian exporting powerhouses have for many decades enjoyed a simple economic model – Sell their products to the United States and use the proceeds to invest in U.S. assets. However, experts advise that due to President Trump’s current strategies, this model, whilst not completely broken, is certainly creaking at the joints.

*Asian Exporting Powerhouses – China, Japan, South Korea, India, Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Philippines, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.

This economic model is now facing its biggest challenge since the Global Financial Crisis of 2007 – 2009 with the underlying logic that created this model in disarray. Certain senior figures in this financial arena have already suggested that Asian countries due to a certain amount of pain have already begun to unwind their dollar positions. An example of such pain can be found in Taiwan where data shows that after President Trump announced tariffs on “Liberation Day” there was a big sell-off of the U.S. Dollar. As a result, Insurers in Taiwan announced just for April 2025 a loss of circa USD 620 Million, and when at the beginning of May the Taiwanese Dollar surged against its counterpart in America by circa 8.5% the same companies announced there were potential losses of circa USD 18 billion in unhedged American investments.

During the Biden presidency, data revealed that flows of capital from Asia to the United States had already receded from previous peaks. Analysts have announced that unwinding is accelerating with family offices freezing or cutting their investments, data from March 2025 confirmed that China had reduced their treasury holdings, and Japan’s largest life insurer announcing it is searching for alternatives to US treasuries. In Australia, UNISEP, one of the largest pension funds, announced it was declaring a cap on US investments, and so the list goes on. If the switch from holding US assets to doubting their reliability could experts advise, see circa USD 2.5 Trillion flow through global markets. Indeed, data released from the US Treasury confirmed that a combined net USD 172 Billion of U.S. bonds and equities were sold by Asian Nations in 2024 adding to the USD 64 Billion sold in 2023.

There are however a number of experts who disagree with the aforementioned, saying that in order for a decoupling from the United States investors need to know where to go suggesting that this is just a cyclical shift. These opinions appear to be in the minority and recent data shows that capital is already flowing into Japan. Experts now believe that policy volatility and tariffs under the Trump2 presidency is exacerbating the decoupling from the US Dollar. However, many investors still see US treasuries as a safe haven, especially as the dollar is still regarded as the world’s reserve currency. Only time will tell where the financial markets and the US Dollar stand by the end of the second Trump presidency. However, under the current circumstances the global mood towards President Trump, his tariffs, his flip-flops on economic policy, the loss of their AAA status remains cautious if not very negative.

Despite the Recent Rebound, Will Investors in the Long-Term Continue to Dump Dollar Assets?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Although recent losses in US stocks have almost been wiped out, market experts believe that institutions such as pension funds and institutional money managers could in the long-term cut back on their massive exposure to US Dollar investments. Some investment bankers close to the action of certain money managers with trillions of dollars in U.S. Dollar asset exposure have started to cut back on these positions, mainly due to the fall out on the tariff war, flip flopping on policy, and Donald Trump’s continued attacks on the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell.

Expert analysts advise that logically Europe is the current destination for the flight of capital from the United States, due to growth in the European economy being led by German spending in the defence sector and mixture of relatively cheap equity markets. Recently released data shows that in March 2025, the largest cut in history to U.S. equity allocations* with the shift out of the economy of the United States and into Europe was the sharpest since 1999. Further data released showed that in April 2025, outflows from ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) domiciled in Europe that invest in U.S. debt and equities reached Euros 2.5 Billion, a level not reached since 2023.

*US equity allocation – refers to the portion of an investment portfolio dedicated to stocks of companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges. It’s a key component of overall asset allocation, which involves distributing investments across different asset classes like stocks, bonds, and real estate.

Although there have been recent gains by the US Dollar, overall, it is down 7% in 2025, with some institutions reporting spot transactions where institutional investors have sold the US Dollar and bought Euros on a sustained basis. One highly qualified and senior macro strategist in Europe announced that “If European pension funds were to reduce their allocations to 2015 levels, that would be equivalent to selling Euros 300 Billion in U.S. denominated assets. Some European pension funds have already started to trim their U.S. holdings position with Danish pension funds in Q1 2025 selling U.S. equities for the first time since 2023 and in the quarter Finland’s Veritas Pension Insurance Co reduced their exposure to U.S. equities.

Investors, analysts, economists etc, all talk about the cyclical effects in the various financial and commodity markets. What goes up must come down and vice versa. Remember the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-9 where liquidity completely dried up, banks were not lending to each other, investment bank(s) going bankrupt, bail outs of some of the largest financial institutions? Several years later everything it seemed was back to normal with the longest run of low interest rates seen for decades.

The point is whilst the United States is seeing massive outflows of capital in a reversal of the long-term trend where inflows were the order of the day where capital was attracted liquidity, market performance and economic growth. Some analysts advise that the current trend will only go so far given the liquidity and depth of the U.S. stock market and the circa USD 30 Trillion US Government Bond/Treasury market. Analysts report that many investors are sitting on the side lines wary of betting against the economy of the United States and its prospects for long-term growth.

Trump 90-Day Suspension U-Turn on Tariffs Except China Sees Equities Rebound

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In line with his election promises, President Trump has marched forward imposing global tariffs on all America’s trading partners, with some countries seeing a 10% tariff, others such as the EU (European Union) being hit with 25% tariffs, and Cambodia topping the list with a whopping 49%. Tariffs have now been returned to 10% across the board apart from China, where tariffs have been increased to 125%, as the announcement of the U-turn came 13 hours after the new tariffs came into effect. However, due to the unpredictability of the Trump2 administration, what happens in 90 days is anybody’s guess.

President Trump has suggested that the pause on tariffs is to give America’s trading partners (except China) time to reassess by making trade deals (or other deals) in order to avoid punitive tariffs. The White House has announced that they want their trading partners to reduce their own tariffs and remove barriers to trade* as such barriers have resulted in the U.S. deficit and should be eliminated. Both Canada and Mexico were not subject to these reciprocal tariffs as they were subject to a 25% tariff regarding illegal immigrants and drugs. However, imports covered by NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) are exempt.

*Barriers to Trade – These barriers are non-tariff and include:

Regulation – Any rules which dictate how a product can be manufactured, handled, or advertised.

Rules of origin – Rules which require proof of which country goods were produced in.

Quotas – Rules that limit the amount of a certain product that can be sold in a market.

Equities

Global markets saw an upward swing not seen for many decades thanks to the 90-day tariff pause, with stocks climbing across the globe. From an equities standpoint the market saw its best rally since 2008 with the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 rebounding 12%, the S&P 500 Index gaining 9.5%, and the Dow Jones jumping nearly 2,500 points. Europe saw Germany’s DAX rise 7%, Spain’s IBEX 35 up 7.2%, France’s CAC 40 up 6.4%, the pan continental STOXX 600 up 5.3% and the UK’s FTSE 100 up by 6.2%.

Elsewhere in the Far East and Asia, and in response to the 90-day moratorium on tariffs, Japan’s benchmark NIKKEY 225 led the way soaring upwards by 8.8% (gaining over 2,000 points), Hong Kong’s was up 2.69%, Thailand’s SET index surged 4.5% and the Shanghai Composite Index gained 1.29% despite the increase in tariffs on China.

Interestingly, on President Trump’s social media, he announced a buy tip BEFORE announcing the pause on tariffs, making money for all those investors who took his advice. This has caused outrage and concern among ethics experts and opposition politicians who feel that such an announcement is tantamount to giving inside information and is a violation of securities laws.

However, a spokesperson from the White House fired back that the President has every right to reassure the markets, no doubt political opponents will not let this one go, especially as U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren said, “I am calling for an investigation into whether President Trump manipulated the market to benefit his wall street donors – all while working people and businesses paid the price”.

The US Government bond market (treasuries) has recently seen massive sell offs despite the fact that this market has always been seen as a safe haven in times of volatility and globally there have been massive falls in stock exchanges and bourses throughout the world. This suggests that after the announcement of the fresh wave of tariffs, the U.S. usually viewed as a cornerstone of the global economy has lost the confidence of many investors.

As the price of US government bonds fall, the yield or interest rate rises, which also means that the cost of financing the United States’ debt also rises, and on Wednesday, 10th April, the benchmark 10-year treasury moved to 4.516% and at one stage the 30-year bond hit 5%, being the highest since late 2023. The moves in the treasury markets had, apparently according to experts, caught the President’s eye and may have been one of the reasons he chose to pause tariffs.

China

Whilst the rest of the trading world with the United States enjoyed a 90-day pause on tariffs, President Trump hiked tariffs on China by a massive 125%, saying on a social media post, “based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the world’s markets, I am hereby raising the tariff charged to China”. The decision by President Trump to escalate the tariff war on China came after Beijing announced retaliatory tariffs of 84% on imports of all American goods, but Trump expects China to come to the negotiating table despite their hard line approach to tariffs.

Experts suggest that this is just not simple retaliation by President Trump but more like unfinished business from the Trump1 administration and he was quoted as saying with regards to China, “We didn’t have time to do the right thing”. Furthermore, when Trump was campaigning as an outsider for his first successful stint in the White House, one of his oft repeated themes was that China is responsible for hollowing out the American economy, driven rustbelt decline, and cost blue collar workers their livelihood and dignity.

Unless these two economic powerhouses back down, the the whole scenario will devolve into a full scale trade war hurting a bilateral trade worth circa USD 585 Billion, and this is the crux of the matter, of that USD 585 Billion America’s imports from China accounted for USD 440 Billion. Figures released by the IMF (International Monetary Fund) show the U.S.A. and China account for circa 43% of the global economy and if an all-out trade war ensued this would slow down growth in both countries, (experts suggest perhaps recession) and harm growth in other countries and slowing down global investment.

Conclusion

Sadly, there is at this time no real conclusion as there is so much uncertainty surrounding White House decision making, there is only a rolling commentary on on-going proceedings. President Trump announced a reason for the U-turn on tariffs is that people were getting yippy and nervous, but experts suggest it goes a lot deep than that with Scott Bessent (U.S. Treasury Secretary) asserting that the U-turn had been the plan all along to get the countries to the bargaining table. Now that the 90-day moratorium on tariffs has been announced, the world will hold their collective breath and wait to see how the United States v China tariff war plays out.

No one wins from an outright trade war between these two giants of the global economy, but Donald Trump has, according to experts, had it in for China since he first took over the oval office. It has also been reported that the EU and China are working together against Trump’s tariffs with Chinese Premier Quang (2nd in command in China) receiving a call from EU President Ursula von der Leyen. The White House is treading a fine line with tariffs, and they may yet push the EU and China even closer together (China is the EU’s largest trading partner) and this would totally upset the world order.

Tariffs Cause Global Market Chaos 

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

On Monday, 7th April 2025, and from the opening bell in the far east, through Europe, and into the United States, chaos ensued across global markets. In the Asia Pacific arena, long before Europe and the United Kingdom had woken up, stock markets fell on a scale not seen in decades. In some Asian exchanges, due to mounting losses, trading was suspended as the Shanghai composite sank 7.34% and Japan’s Nikkei fell 7.83%. Hong Kong was the worst hit while equities in Japan, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea, and Singapore all suffered heavily, seeing steep declines.

In Hong Kong, the stock market plummeted 13.74% (its biggest single day decline in 30 years), before closing out at 13.22%. Experts suggest that the fall in Hong Kong’s stock market accurately reflects market expectations on how tariffs will affect the Chinese economy rather than any movement on China’s stock exchanges. They point out that Chinese stocks cannot be shorted, and it is impossible to trade freely.

In Europe, markets were also having a bad day as Donald Trump continued to wage his trade war. The pan-European STOXX 600* took a beating and was down 4.5% (down for the fourth straight session), whilst other major stock exchanges or bourses closed out down between 4% and 5%. In Germany, the benchmark DAX index** (.GDAXI) (trade sensitive) fell by as much as 6.4% finally closing at down 4.3% but painfully down 20% from its March 2025 closing all time high.

*STOXX 600 Index – This index tracks 600 of the largest stock exchange listed companies from 17 countries in Europe. The countries represented are Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

**DAX Index – This index measures the performance of Germany’s 40 largest companies that trade on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and is considered by many analysts as a gauge of Germany’s economic health.

Again on Monday, 5th April, along with other global stock markets, UK stocks fell dramatically extending their selloff from the previous week. The FTSE 100 closed down 4.4%, hitting its weakest closing level for over 12 months and since Thursday, 3rd April, Blue Chips have fallen by 10%. In the meantime, Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has announced that the United Kingdom will seek to lower trade barriers with key trading partners around the world whilst fighting to secure a trade partnership with the United States.

In the United States, the news was just as bad with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling for a third day on the trot, with the S&P 500 losing in excess of 10% since Thursday, 3rd April. Equity markets are sending a massive NO to President Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs and analysts suggest that hedge funds may well be forced to sell down their equities and other current risky assets in order to pay margin cash calls.

There seems to be no let up on tariffs as President Trump doubles down on China and announces that there are no plans to pause tariffs. Indeed, China imposed a 34% tariff on all U.S. goods on Friday, 4th April 2025, in response to the 34% tariff imposed by President Trump on all Chinese goods. However, in response to the Chinese actions, Trump announced he would retaliate with a further 50% tariff on all Chinese goods into the U.S. effective 9th April, unless China withdraws their tariff by 8th April. China is in no mood to take a backward step with Beijing vowing to fight to the end and China’s Commerce Ministry accused the U.S. of blackmail.

President Trump and his Trumpeteers have said that tariffs have stopped bleeding the U.S. of income and in four years we will be rich and self-sufficient whilst opponents cry you have wrecked global stock markets, sabotaged supply chains and ruined individuals’ pensions. The looming trade war with China will have, according to experts, massive fallouts across the globe. Who will blink first, China or America or will the world see a massive realignment of global trading?

Tariffs, Tariffs and More Tariffs as Donald Trump Risks Global Trade War

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Wednesday, 2nd April 2025 (or liberation day as per President Trump), is a day that will stand out in history, as Donald Trump announced a sweeping across the board 10% tariff on all imports of goods into the United States. He further announced reciprocal tariffs of 20% and rising on countries he feels has cheated America, by which he means those countries with massive trade surpluses with the U.S. and also those who already add big tariffs to American imports. President Trump had already separately announced a tariff of 25% on all global car, truck and auto accessories starting on 3rd May 2025, and a 25% tariff on all aluminium and steel products. Experts advise that these levies/tariffs/taxes are the biggest increases since 1968.

Global markets from tech to banking have been left reeling as President Trump through his tariffs attempts to rearrange global trading and the current economic order. However, thanks to tariffs, U.S. equities have taken a beating with the three major stock indexes plunging in excess of 5%, the biggest of which was the S&P 500, which crashed by almost 6%. This was the steepest fall since 2020, and elsewhere in the United Kingdom the FTSE 100 fell by just under 5%, marking its steepest fall since 2020, with similar falls being recorded in France and Germany. The global stock market has, since Trump announced an across the board tariff of 10% on every country, lost literally trillions of dollars in value, however China, the EU (European Union) and Vietnam are all facing higher tariffs on their exports to the U.S..

On Friday, 4th April 2025, China announced a 34% tariff on products from the U.S. whilst at the same time lowering exports of essential minerals plus adding a number of American companies to their blacklist and accusing Donald Trump of violating international trade rules. The EU announced through their trade commissioner that they are still looking for meaningful discussions in the hope of reducing their across the board 20% tariff, though he promised if talks failed the EU would defend themselves. The largest EU economy is Germany and with a separate tariff of 25% on the imports of cars into the U.S. and a 20% across the board tariff on all imports into the U.S., the German economy will, according to experts, take a hit in a drop in GDP of 1.5% equivalent to a loss of Euros 200 Billion over the tenure of President Trump.

The President of the EU, Ursula von der Leyen, has vowed to retaliate and condemned President Trump and went on to say that tariffs will have dire consequences for all consumer and businesses on a global basis that have enjoyed trading with the U.S. since World War II and added, “We are already finalising a first package of countermeasures in response to tariffs on steel”. The EU is of course still open to negotiations, but Ursula von der Leyen is in no mood to lie down and be trodden on. She has already announced that the EU has everything it needs to survive and survive it will. Tough talk from a tough President who will meet Donald Trump head on, so unless negotiations are successful, a full-out trade war between the U.S. is certainly on the cards and could go global.

In the United States, many experts and analysts agree that the new tariffs will push the American economy into recession, an economy which is currently losing momentum, with the result of increasing prices due to tariffs being passed on to the consumer. Analysts further advised that the tariffs could well push the American economy into a recession and have a negative effect on inflation, reversing the current downward trend. Indeed, the US Dollar shortly after the tariff announcements fell by 1.7% against a basket of European trading partners’ currencies which according to market experts reflect concern regarding growth in the economy. Some experts have warned that core inflation (excludes food and energy prices) could go as high as 4% (3.1% as of end of February 2025), unemployment to rise (despite current hiring figures showing an increase) and real GDP to decline.

In the long run, experts suggest that Trump may get his financial rewards from tariffs but his “allies” who he has hit with punitive tariffs may well look elsewhere for new trading partners, with China being the ultimate beneficiary which may well benefit BRICS* as well. Indeed, BRICS is now a major political force looking to be a counterweight to western influence with its current members accounting for just over 25% of the global economy and almost half the world’s population. There has been a lot of internal division within the BRICS organisation, with Russia leading the way over their unlawful invasion of Ukraine, however tariffs may bring them together in such a way that the allies who Trump has hit with punitive tariffs may well look to increase trade with these countries. Whilst the America First slogan is banged consistently by the U.S. administration, some of the poorest nations in Africa have been hit with punitive tariffs, with Lesotho being a prime example at a massive 50% tariff. It is no secret that BRICS want what they call the southern nations to come under their umbrella (Africa and South America) and again these tariffs could drive these nations into the arms of BRICS. Geopolitically, tariffs may be the current U.S. administration’s biggest mistake.

*BRICS – is an intergovernmental organisation consisting of ten countries, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates. The founding countries were Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, and China forming BRIC with South Africa joining at a later date to form BRICS. There are a slew of countries waiting approval of membership from BRICS including Saudi Arabia who have been approved but have delayed joining.

In the United Kingdom, experts advise tariffs will hit key manufacturing sectors and will undermine the positive growth, albeit fragile, predictions of the Labour government. Many businesses are already facing rising costs due to the Chancellors’ budget and tariffs will, according to some analysts, place negative pressure on demand and weaken supply chains. The Director of the British Chamber of Commerce was heard to say that “Orders will drop, prices will rise, and global economic demand will be weaker as a result”. Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, advised he is still hopeful that negotiations will reduce the 10% tariff, however he has begun the process of consultation with regard to retaliatory tariffs should negotiations fail. Across the Irish Sea, Northern Ireland ministers announced they feel trapped as despite the 10% tariff on the United Kingdom, if the EU announces retaliatory tariffs N. Ireland could face the higher EU tariff on any U.S. imports entering from Britain under the post-Brexit deal* between the United Kingdom and the EU.

*The Northern Ireland Protocol – is intended to protect the EU single market while avoiding the imposition of a “Harder Border” that might incite the recurrence of conflict and destabilise the relative peace that has held since the end of the troubles.

In Asia, the APAC* region was hit with tariffs between 10% and 49% with the higher rates being targeted at those countries’ lower value-added items such as textiles, garments, furniture, and footwear. Vietnam (apart from China) is currently enjoying the largest trade deficit with the U.S. (USD 123.5 Billion), got hit with 46% tariff, whilst Cambodia got hit with a 49% tariff (trade deficit USD 12.13 Billion) Sri Lanka saw a 44% tariff (trade deficit USD 2.65 Billion), Bangladesh was given a 37% tariff (trade deficit USD 2.6 Billion) with larger economies in the region slightly better off with Singapore being hit with the minimum of 10% tariffs. Experts suggest that Asian currencies may face depreciation pressure as financial markets could turn risk averse affecting FII (Foreign Institutional Investor) inflow.

*APAC – stands for Asia Pacific Region and is a broad geographical region encompassing countries and territories in or near the Western Pacific Ocean. This region typically includes East Asia, South Asia, South East Asia, and Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, and surrounding islands).

In typical Trump fashion, in one fell swoop global trading has been turned on its head, geopolitics may never be the same again and markets will remain volatile for some time to come. Experts suggest it may take weeks or in some cases months to assess the fall-out from President Trump’s tariffs. President Trump may well have destroyed smaller more vulnerable economies, destroying the lives of that country’s population at the same time. However, in breaking news the White House advises that 50 countries have contacted the administration looking to do trade deals and avoid duties. Meanwhile voices in the U.S. from the CEO down to the smallest consumer are already getting louder voicing their antipathy towards tariffs with anti-tariff rallies taking place in a number of cities throughout the world. He may think he is putting “America First” but who’s to say in the long run it may well be “America Second”.

Trump, Tariffs, BRICS, and Artificial Intelligence

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In his latest pronouncements on tariffs, President Trump announced that he would enact cross-border tariffs higher than 2.5%, a figure apparently propounded by the incoming Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent. The President told reporters aboard Air Force One that “I have in mind what it’s going to be, but I won’t be setting it yet, but it’ll be enough to protect our country”. This is yet another signal from the President that he is prepared to reshape supply chains through the introduction of tariffs in order to put “America First”.

President Trump went to tell reporters that he would be using tariffs to target specific sectors such as aluminium, copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and steel. He also advised that he may well target Mexico and Canada with tariffs on their automobile exports to the United States, the same countries that he has already targeted with tariffs of 25% on all exports to the USA (to be imposed on 1st February 2025). President Trump’s underlying belief is that tariffs on countries exporting to the United States will increase the number of jobs at home, bring factories back, and taxes on businesses and individuals will come down. 

Interestingly, the threat of tariffs on the semiconductor sector came shortly after the Chinese start-up on AI (artificial intelligence) DeepSeek* not only worried investors but erased billions from the market capitalisation of Nvidia Corp**. It appears the DeepSeek model can be as effective as other well-known AI models but at a fraction of the cost. This has translated into less data centres signing up to the likes of Nvidia, as DeepSeek can drive down the consumption of electricity, and they now challenge the assumption that the United States hold dominance in the AI market. 

*DeepSeek – Until very recently, DeepSeek was a little known Chinese start-up, but has sent shockwaves through the tech market having released an AI model named RI that can outperform leading developers from the United States such as Nvidia, OpenAI, and Google. Is reported that DeepSeek only had a USD 6 Million budget to produce RI, as opposed to the multibillion dollar budgets employed by their US counterparts.

**Nvidia – Is famous for accelerated computing to tackle challenges no-one else can and their work on AI and digital twins is transforming the world’s largest industries. Their work on AI using a GPU (graphics processing unit as opposed to a CPU – central processing unit) allows them to crunch massive amounts of data for AI much faster. When RI cast doubt on the supremacy on of US tech firms, Nvidia shed circa USD590 Billion in market value which was the biggest fall in US stock market history.

President Trump said of DeepSeek, “The release of DeepSeek should be a wake up call for our industries and that we need to be laser-focused on competing to win”. On Monday 27th January 2025, there was a major market fall-out regarding DeepSeek, with technology stocks in Europe and the United States falling by circa USD1 Trillion, with investors now questioning the spending plans of some of the biggest companies in the USA. 

On the tariffs front, experts are saying this economic tool will not just be used against those countries with just a trade surplus with the United States. Indeed, President Trump will use tariffs in other areas such as the recent spat with Colombia, where the country’s President Gustavo Petro barred and refused landing rights to two military flights from the United States carrying deported Colombians. President Trump threatened punitive tariffs of 25% on Colombian exports to the USA unless the Colombian acquiesced, and despite counter tariffs being threatened, President Petro agreed to accept migrants (including those arriving on military aircraft) without limitation, hindrance or delay. 

Elsewhere on the Trump/Tariff radar, Europe and the EU bloc has been threatened with tariffs regarding those countries with trade surpluses and those countries (just about all of them) which President Trump believes aren’t paying enough on defence. Also on the radar are the BRICS* nations, who Trump has promised to impose 100% tariffs on should they try and create a rival currency to the US Dollar. Leading politicians within the BRICS have already floated the idea of a rival currency. 

*BRICS  – is recognised as a group of emerging market countries and the acronym stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Originally the acronym was BRIC (as South Africa was not part of the founding members) and was coined in 2001 by a Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill. On January 1st, 2024, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates joined BRICS, who also announced that their newest member is Saudi Arabia, but the United Kingdom has yet to put pen to paper so as yet have not officially joined

Over the last 24 years, BRICS has grown into what is effectively a world club comprising of ten member states, some of whom are major energy producers such as the United Aram Emirates, whilst others are recognised as the largest consumers amongst the emerging or developing economies. Many western commentators feel that BRICS, led by China, are an anti-western organisation and have ambitions to have their own currency moving away from global reliance on the US Dollar.

Many experts feel that President Trump will stay true to his word and invoke tariffs on many countries, including America’s allies. He is especially adamant about those countries he feels will do the United States harm and he has named Brazil, India, and China in that bracket. How far the President will go with tariffs we will have to wait and see, but with China upending the Artificial Intelligence sector, it looks like certain countries are in for a bumpy ride.

Global Energy Overview for 2025

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Data released showed that 2024 saw a record uptake in renewable energy, EV’s, and other areas, however experts predict that in 2025 the demand for fossil fuels is expected to increase by more than 3 Million BOE/D*. At the same time, analysts suggest that CO2 emissions associated with the combustion of fossil fuels will reach a new record high, but will be the smallest increase since the end of the pandemic. 

*BOE/D – This is an acronym for “Barrels of oil equivalent per day”, and is a term used in the gas and oil industry as a measurement used to describe the amount of energy produced or consumed in a day. 

2025 will be a year of uncertainty as, according to experts, war zones such as Ukraine and Gaza have the potential to significantly alter energy markets. Further geo-political problems and polarisation between China and the western nations add to this uncertainty, with President Trump promising tariffs and Europe using tariffs to protect their markets, whilst China are looking for greater global influence by leveraging their position as a leader in clean technology.

There are a number of areas to be aware of in 2025 some of which are outlined below.

President Trump

During his 2024 campaign, and the build up to his winning the 2024 presidential election, it became, according to experts, obvious that the second term of President Trump (or Trump2) will follow a very different path on climate policy and energy to that of out-going President Joe Biden. First, it appears that the new administration will pull out of the Paris Agreement* and an increasingly negative attitude towards a somewhat weakened COP**.

*The Paris Agreement – Also known as the Paris Accords or the Paris Climate Accords, is a legally binding international treaty signed in 2016 and covers climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance. There are circa 195 members of the UNFCCC ( United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). The United States withdrew in 2020, rejoined in 2021 and are expected to withdraw again under the new administration. The overriding goal of the agreement is to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C and to hold the increase in global average temperature to well under 2 degrees C, both above pre-industrial levels.

**COP – The Conference of the Parties attended by governments that have signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, (UNFCCC), a treaty which was created in 1994. The conference meets once a year and assesses global efforts to advance the key Paris Agreements aimed at limiting global warming.

President Trump and his new administration have said they will increase US oil and gas production by promoting drilling and offshore and federal land exploration. They have also expressed their desire to increase LNG (Liquid Natural Gas), making the United States a bigger player in the market. They may hope to take advantage of European markets, who will be seeking alternative suppliers to Russian gas. The implications of such a policy may well depress global energy prices, however such downward pressure could be offset by OPEC+ adjusting production quotas. Analysts also suggest that an increase in geopolitical tensions, for example with Iran prompting a reduction in Middle East supplies, could offset any increases in production from the United States, all of which could lead to prolonged price volatility.

Total energy demand: Fossil fuels vs. clean energy

Apart from various economic recessions and the Covid-19 pandemic, there has yet to be a year when green/clean energy (nuclear, hydro, solar, wind, and other renewables) supply has resulted in the reduction in the use of fossil fuels. Experts suggest that 2025 will see robust growth and above-trend in energy demands, but even the fast growth of clean energy (over 5 Million BOE/D) it is not enough to curtail the demand for fossil fuels, let alone displace that demand. It is expected that fossil fuel demand will increase by more than 3 Million BOE/D resulting in record high CO2 emissions. 

Nuclear energy

Experts advise that nuclear energy is on the up especially in the United States, and for decades has proven to be a reliable and stable source of clean energy resulting in a carbon-free provider of electricity. Many companies are trying to decarbonise and interestingly in 2024 Amazon, Microsoft, and Google all signed power supply agreements with ties to nuclear capacity to help feed their growing data centres. 

Analysts suggest that in 2025, nuclear power generation will reach unprecedented levels, with a number of countries ramping up production in Asia and Europe. The IEA (International Energy Agency) has advised that the report from “The Path to a New Era for Nuclear Energy” says the strong comeback to nuclear energy, as advised by the IEA several years ago, is well underway and 2025 will be a record year for nuclear powered generation of electricity. 

The price of Uranium has been an indicator as to how nuclear power is on the way up. Over the last five years, the price of Uranium has soared by 255% which confirms the demand for the commodity is on-going. This strategically important metal owes its current value to the increase in nuclear powered plants in the shift to green energy plus a number of global economic factors which have also had a significant bearing on its current value. The long-term outlook for Uranium is bullish as across the world there are currently 61 nuclear reactors under construction, plus a further 90 reactors are in the planning stage with in excess of 300 in the discussion phase.

Consumption from data centres and AI

Experts suggest that in 2025, as Artificial Intelligence a datacentres expand, the demand for electricity will increase to such an extent it could fundamentally effect the trajectory of global power demand. Indeed, analysts see the demand for power between 2025 and 2030 through the increasing number of  datacentres will increase by 10% – 15% per annum. In developed countries, datacentres have accounted for a circa 3% increase in power requirements, which may have taken clean power away from the grid and has possibly aided the on-going consumption of fossil fuel generated energy. 

Liquid natural gas

After two years of relative inaction and limited growth, experts see 2025 as a year of significant change in the LNG market especially as there will be an increase in liquification capacity coming out of the United States and Canada. Analysts suggest there will be an increase in capacity of circa 27 Million mt (metric tons), 90% of which will emanate from North America, with a number of facilities all expecting to ramp up production in 2025. 

Analysts advise that total global growth projections for 2025 and 2026 currently show and an increase of 2.3%. Interestingly, in Q3 2024 y/y (year-on-year) European gas imports from outside the bloc suffered a 10% decline, and if the Russian gas transit through Ukraine agreement is not renewed, in excess of 5% of their needs will have to be sourced elsewhere such as the USA and Canada. All in all, experts suggest that exports of natural gas by pipeline will increase in 2025 by 2.9 Bcf/d (billion cubic feet per day) with the bulk of the increase coming from LNG.

Coal

Analysts predict that in 2025 global demand for coal will continue to grow in spite of renewable installations hitting record highs. Demand for coal reached new records in 2023 and 2024, and as indicated above the increased call on energy from datacentres and the charging of EV’s has increased the demand on fossil fuels, despite record growth in renewables. Interestingly, some experts suggest that demand for coal in Europe and other developed economies may indeed fall, however, data released shows China represents 60% of global coal consumption and despite renewables increasing the country, can expect another record year for coal fired energy consumption. 

India is also expected to hit new highs on coal fired energy consumption and demand in the United States is expected to rebound significantly in 2025 after decades of decline. Whilst some analysts expect coal consumption to remain broadly flat the expected increase from China will have a large impact on prices though renewables will increase and begin to eat into their coal consumption. Experts in this arena expect demand to be in the region of 8.77 Billion tonnes for 2025 but all eyes will be on China to see if they reduce their coal consumption.

Jet fuel demand

Post pandemic, airline passengers figures have been increasing year on year, and experts from IATA (The International Air Transport Association) predict air passenger numbers to top five billion for the first time with the sectors revenues breaking the trillion US Dollar mark in 2025. They also added that the accumulative cost of jet fuel will be USD248 Billion, circa 5% below that of 2024 with fuel consumption rising y/y (year-on-year) to 107 billion gallons up 6%, a number in line with what airlines have been reporting over Q3 and Q4 2024. IATA suggests that data shows that overall costs for the airline industry will rise by 4% in 2025 to USD940 Billion of which jet fuel costs total 26.4% down 28.4% from 2024. 

Renewables

In the renewables arena, experts suggest that this sector will go through major transformations in 2025. New advancements in this sector come quick and fast, with new energy technology and government policies all favouring renewables. Indeed, in the United Kingdom Energy Secretary Ed Miliband looks to turn the country into a solar energy and wind turbine farm. 

Predictions from the IEA (International Energy Agency) suggests that in 2025 renewables will be responsible for providing circa one third of the worlds electricity needs, and by 2028 90% of the worlds energy requirements will come from renewables. Data released indicates that solar energy will be the dominant renewable power in a number of countries in 2025, and global capacity doubling in 2026 closely followed by wind energy.

There is a renewables gap, where demand is outstripping supply, and the race is on to fill that gap. For the first time in history, 2025 will see Asia account for 50% of the world’s electricity consumption with China consuming one third of global electricity.

OPEC and OPEC+

OPEC is a synonym for The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and was founded in Baghdad in in 1960. The original members are Iran Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela, and today the current organisation has twelve member countries. OPEC control circa 35% – 38% of global supply of oil, but according to current estimates they own circa 80% of proven oil reserves. 

In late 2016, the members of OPEC signed an agreement with ten other oil producing countries to form what is known today as OPEC+. Among these countries was Russia who at the time produced 13% of total global output of oil. Today OPEC+ controls circa 48% of global production. 

Analysts suggest that 2025 could well be an unpredictable year for OPEC+, with tariff threats from President Donald Trump and the continuing war zones of Israel/Gaza and Russia/Ukraine presenting challenges to their ongoing strategies. OPEC’s forecasts for 2025 is for oil demand to reach 104.2 Million b/d (barrels per day) in 2025 and an increase to 106.6 Million b/d in 2026. Robust demand is expected to come from developing countries where data shows that consumption will almost double with Asian countries being key, and India and China being central to this growth.

OPEC+ analysts predict the price of Brent* crude oil will average USD74, down 8% from 2024, and will fall another 11% in 2026 to USD66 per barrel. OPEC sellers such as Saudi Aramco will sell their Arab Light into Europe plus or minus Brent, depending on their appetite for more or less market share.

*ICE Brent Crude – Is the benchmark used for light oil markets in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Saudi Arabia also use the Argus Sour Crude Index for their flagship Arab Light Crude for North America, and Oman and Dubai Indexes for East Asia. 

Conclusion

2025 will see an increase in the demand for fossil fuels despite record output from the renewables arena. The price of a barrel of oil is expected to come down unless geopolitical problems once again explode, putting upward pressure on prices. All eyes will be on renewables to see if they outperform expectations with particular eyes on the nuclear sector as it becomes more and more popular. Finally, there is the Trump.20 presidency whose policies on tariffs could, according to experts, significantly impact many sectors within the energy arena. Only time will tell how this will play out.

Head office

IntaCapital Swiss SA,
Rue du Rhône 80 - 84,
CH - 1204 Genève,
Switzerland

Other facilities

Enquire

Legal

IntaCapital Switzerland | Copyright © 2025 | All Rights Reserved