Tag: United Kingdom

Bank of England Keeps Interest Rates on Hold

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

A Tight Decision on Rates

Yesterday, the BOE’s (Bank of England) MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) voted 5–4 in a tight decision to keep interest rates steady at 3.75%, the lowest level since February 2023. The four dissenting members all voted to cut interest rates by 25 basis points. Recent data for December 2025 has hinted at stickier inflation, which some analysts were not expecting. Consumer prices have also ticked higher, which experts say likely swayed the MPC’s decision into holding rates at this time. However, policymakers indicated after the meeting that they expect inflation to fall in the coming months, paving the way for further interest rate cuts.

The Inflation Outlook

BOE Governor Andrew Bailey said, “We now think inflation will fall to around 2% by the spring. That’s good news, and we need to make sure inflation stays there, so we’ve held rates unchanged at 3.75% today. All going well, there should be scope for some further reduction in bank rates this year.” The MPC advised that they expect inflation to fall much quicker than anticipated. They stated that this was due to Chancellor Reeves’ package of anti-inflation measures announced in her budget speech in November 2025. 

However, three months ago, gross domestic product (GDP) was estimated by the MPC to grow by 1.2% in 2026, but this estimate has now been revised downwards to 0.9%. Alongside weaker growth, officials advised that the outlook for unemployment remains bleak, peaking in Q2 at 5.3%, up 0.20% from the previous official notification. 

Labour Market and Future Expectations

Data released shows that across 2026, unemployment is circa 0.30% higher than originally advised, which experts say translates into 100,000 more people out of work. As mentioned above, inflation is expected to fall to 2.00% by spring this year, and officials advise that they expect the rate to stay at that figure until the start of 2029. Figures released showed inflation hitting 3.4% in December 2025, making it nearly impossible for the MPC to cut rates today. It was a much closer vote than expected, and financial markets are now confident of two 25 basis point cuts by this coming summer.

Why International Capital is Sitting Out the UK — And Why a Post-Labour Britain Will See Billions in Deployment

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

For decades, the United Kingdom has been positioned as one of the most reliable and sought-after destinations for foreign investment. Open markets, stable legal frameworks, predictable tax treatment, property rights, deep financial services markets, and liberalised capital flow policies made Britain a global magnet for institutional money. The UK attracted sovereign wealth, private equity, pension capital, infrastructure funds, venture growth investment, and strategic acquisitions across sectors ranging from real estate and energy to fintech and advanced manufacturing.

However, since the election of the current Labour government, the behaviour of international capital has become unambiguous: investors have paused deployment, elevated their risk premiums, and postponed commitment to long-duration UK exposure. This is not anecdotal — it is observable in real estate transaction collapse, delayed capex, higher yields demanded for UK risk, muted M&A flows, stalled strategic investment, and private capital reallocating into other OECD markets.

To understand why billions of dollars remain sidelined — and why investors openly anticipate a deployment surge once Labour exits power — we must examine how international capital allocates: not through ideology, theatre, or messaging, but through the sober mathematics of regulatory forecasting, taxation, policy predictability, and expected return.

Investment Hates Uncertainty — And Labour Has Created It

Foreign investment is not sentimental. It does not deploy into jurisdictions because they are fashionable or because newspapers say it is the “right thing to do.” It deploys where outcomes are predictable, rules are durable, and returns can be modelled over 10-20-year horizons.

The Labour government’s economic approach has triggered the opposite conditions:

• Tax uncertainty

• Regulatory ambiguity

• Industrial hostility toward private capital

• Disincentives for wealth creation

• Unpredictable energy and planning policy

• Mixed messaging on business investment

This is not ideological critique; it is how investors interpret signals.

When a government signals that capital gains, property, corporate distribution, inheritance, wealth, or windfall taxes are “in scope,” investors do not wait to see the details. They wait to deploy capital until the threat is removed. Labour has spent its tenure signalling precisely these threats.

The UK Economy Needs Investment — But Treats Investors as a Problem

The contradiction at the heart of current policy is straightforward: Britain needs investment across infrastructure, housing, energy, innovation, and industry — yet the government treats investors as if they are rent-seeking exploiters who must be constrained or punished.

International capital observes this contradiction and acts rationally: it waits.

Countries competing with the UK — particularly Canada, US Sunbelt states, Ireland, UAE, Singapore, Netherlands, Australia, and parts of Central Europe — have moved aggressively in the opposite direction. They are making capital welcome. They are bidding for it. They are cutting friction, stabilising rules, and streamlining approvals.

Capital goes where capital is valued.

Policy Hostility Toward Wealth & Property Freezes Deployment

One of the most damaging signals to foreign investors has been Labour’s overt hostility toward high-value property ownership, private wealth, and non-domiciled capital.

The UK property market historically represented not only a store of value, but an entry point for global capital to participate in UK economic activity. It pulled in private investment, development finance, family offices, sovereign wealth, and institutional funds.

Since Labour’s ascent, the reaction has been swift:

• Deal volumes in prime London property have dropped sharply

• Developers have delayed or cancelled projects

• Overseas buyers have paused offers

• Family offices have rerouted allocations to Dubai, Portugal, Singapore, and the US

• Private lenders have increased risk premiums on UK exposure

• Equity partners have delayed capital calls for UK projects

The equation is simple: if a government telegraphs that property and wealth are targets not assets, capital sits out.

Corporate Investment Requires Regulatory Predictability

Corporations — particularly multinationals — deploy based on predictable multi-year regulatory frameworks. Labour’s approach to energy, infrastructure planning, environmental compliance, and corporate taxation has been erratic and politically reactive.

Industries particularly affected include:

• North Sea energy

• Renewable deployment

• Logistics and ports

• Data centres

• Heavy industry

• Manufacturing

• Financial services

• Advanced technology clusters

Private capital is not allergic to regulation; it simply demands clarity. Under Labour, regulation has become unpredictable, politicised, and declarative rather than technocratic. Investors cannot model returns under those constraints — so they defer until the political cycle resets.

The Risk Premium on UK Exposure Has Quietly Risen

Investors price political and regulatory uncertainty into their required return. Under Labour, the UK’s perceived risk premium has risen, even without formal rating downgrades. This manifests as:

• Higher yields demanded for UK real asset projects

• Larger carry limits in private debt

• Lower valuations in strategic acquisition targets

• Delayed M&A strategies

• Reallocation to other OECD markets

• Reduced foreign participation in new issuance

• Decline of inward portfolio investment flows

This is exactly what stagnation looks like: capital not fleeing, but waiting.

Capital Is Mobile — And It Is Currently Parking

The fundamental miscalculation of the Labour government is the assumption that capital has nowhere else to go. In the 1980s that might have been true; in the 2020s it is profoundly wrong. Capital today has abundant substitutes:

• Singapore for HQs and wealth

• UAE for property and tax-neutral investment

• Ireland for corporate domiciliation

• US Sunbelt for industrial investment

• Portugal & Italy for relocation capital

• Luxembourg & Switzerland for financial services

The UK used to be the default Western hub for capital. Under Labour, it is now one of many competing jurisdictions — and capital will always choose the path with the lowest friction and highest predictability.

Billions Are Sitting On the Sidelines — Waiting for Political Clearance

Here is the most important point: capital has not forgotten the UK. It has paused.

Institutional allocators, family offices, sovereign funds, infrastructure groups, pension consortia, and strategic investors are already briefing their boards that UK deployment is a “post-Labour cycle” strategy.

When Labour leaves the government, the dam breaks. Investors are waiting for:

1. Tax clarity

2. Property stability

3. Corporate and wealth policy normalisation

4. Regulatory predictability

5. A pro-investment mandate

6. A government that views capital as an enabler rather than an enemy

Once those conditions are restored, deployment will be rapid and large. The capital is already assigned. The deal teams are already modelling. Fund investment committees are already discussing the UK as a re-entry market pending political clearance.

When the political friction disappears, the UK becomes once again one of the most attractive Western jurisdictions for:

• Infrastructure capital

• Real estate capital

• Private equity

• Sovereign wealth

• Energy & resources

• Technology clusters

• Financial services consolidation

• Family office relocation

The UK’s structural advantages — legal infrastructure, language, time zone, financial markets, property rights, talent pool, and global connectivity — have not gone away. They are simply being smothered by a government that misunderstands how investment behaves.

Labour Has Frozen Capital — But It Has Not Eliminated It

International investment into the UK will remain stagnant so long as the current Labour government continues to create uncertainty, punish wealth, broadcast hostility to private capital, and politicise regulation. The UK is not unattractive — it is merely uninvestable in the current policy climate.

Billions of dollars are not fleeing the UK; they are waiting for permission to return.

When Labour falls, expect a capital surge reminiscent of:

• 1980s financial liberalisation

• Post-ERM capital expansion

• Post-Brexit currency arbitrage inflows

• 1990s private equity boom

Investors are patient. They are disciplined. They are watching.

The UK is not finished — it is paused.

The UK Economy from the Swiss Perspective: Why International Capital Is Paused on the UK — and Why It Will Redeploy When Labour Is Gone

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Switzerland views global capital flows with a uniquely unemotional lens. For decades the country has acted as a neutral observer, allocator, and recipient of worldwide financial activity, analysing long-range trends rather than reacting to political cycles. From Zurich and Geneva’s vantage point, the United Kingdom has always been one of Europe’s most attractive deployment markets for private capital, strategic acquisitions, and real asset investment. It offered common-law protections, mature financial services, deep liquidity, and globally recognised property rights.

However, since the arrival of the current Labour government in London, Swiss institutions have observed a marked shift in investor behaviour: capital deployment has slowed, strategic activity has paused, and underwriting committees have reclassified the UK from “stable deployment market” to “wait-and-see market.” This is not due to currency volatility or geopolitical shocks, but to the political and regulatory posture of the government itself.

Switzerland is not ideological. It simply follows capital — and today capital has pressed the pause button on the UK.

Investment Pauses When Predictability Is Lost

Swiss institutions are highly sensitive to long-term regulatory clarity. Pension funds, insurers, family offices, and private banks evaluate jurisdictions by their ability to remain predictable across decades, not parliamentary cycles. The Labour government’s approach to corporate taxation, property ownership, wealth treatment, and environmental regulation has introduced uncertainty that makes long-term modelling complex.

Uncertainty has a price. When risk cannot be quantified, Swiss allocators do the only rational thing: they delay.

Under Labour, London no longer offers the assumption of regulatory stability that Zurich or Geneva require for 10–20-year capital commitments. Switzerland observes the following UK signals with caution:

• Possible wealth taxation

• Possible windfall taxation

• Property and non-dom regime hostility

• Unclear energy and infrastructure policy

• Anti-private capital rhetoric

• Increasing regulatory politicisation

Swiss investors do not exit markets over political language alone — but they will not deploy at scale until the policy environment stabilises.

Switzerland’s View: Capital Is Not Ideological — It Is Selective

One of the most consistent errors made in London political circles is the belief that capital has no alternative. From the Swiss perspective, this assumption is outdated. Capital has become globally mobile and aggressively competitive jurisdictions are actively courting it.

Today capital can flow to:

• Switzerland for financial stability and wealth management

• Ireland for corporate domiciliation

• UAE for tax neutrality and property development

• Singapore for strategic Asia allocation

• Netherlands for holding company efficiency

• Luxembourg for fund structuring

• US Sunbelt for manufacturing and industrial expansion

The UK used to be the European default for large allocations. Under Labour, it has become “one of many options,” which dramatically changes its bargaining position.

From Switzerland, the question is not “Why avoid the UK?” but “Why choose the UK over jurisdictions that are actively welcoming capital?”

Currently, Switzerland sees few UK policies that answer that question convincingly.

Real Estate and Property: An Asset Class Paused

Swiss family offices and wealth managers have historically been active in UK residential and commercial property. Prime London property served both as a store of wealth and as a collateral base for broader investment strategies. Since Labour’s ascent, Switzerland has observed a sharp reduction in the willingness of international capital to engage in UK property.

The reasons are structural:

• Tax risk to non-doms and foreign owners

• Politicisation of property ownership

• Planning policy ambiguity

• Anti-private landlord rhetoric

• Falling rental yield incentives

• Currency hedging complications

Meanwhile, Switzerland observes Dubai, Lisbon, Milan, and Zurich taking the opposite approach — inviting high-net-worth relocation, encouraging property investment, and stabilising tax treatment.

Unsurprisingly, Swiss family offices have increased allocations to these markets while slowing UK exposure.

Corporate & Strategic Capital Require Technocratic Stability

Swiss institutions also observe that Labour’s regulatory approach has become politically expressive rather than technocratic. Industries including energy, heavy infrastructure, logistics, and manufacturing rely on 10–25 year planning horizons. When regulatory frameworks are altered by ideology or narrative instead of long-term industrial strategy, investors step back.

Swiss allocators distinguish between:

• Policy that expresses values, and

• Policy that produces deployment conditions

The Labour government frequently delivers the former at the expense of the latter.

Switzerland notes this contrast not out of judgement but because it creates a comparative advantage. Swiss authorities communicate regulatory changes years in advance, consult industry, protect capital formation, and maintain cross-party consensus on taxation. This consistency attracts capital that London currently deters.

The Swiss Risk-Pricing Lens: The UK Just Became More Expensive

Switzerland’s financial institutions reprice jurisdictions continuously. Under Labour, the UK has acquired a higher implied risk premium, reflected in:

• Higher expected returns demanded

• More conservative underwriting assumptions

• Delayed private equity entry

• Reduced infrastructure appetite

• Stalled cross-border M&A

• Lower real estate development funding

• Reduced mezzanine and private debt issuance

• Minimal sovereign wealth participation

Crucially, Switzerland does not interpret this as permanent. It sees it as cyclical and political.

The financial conclusion is clear:

The UK is not a bad market; it is a temporarily unattractive one.

This is an important distinction.

The Swiss Expectation: A Post-Labour Surge in Deployment

Unlike media narratives which operate in weekly cycles, Swiss allocators model political cycles. The view held by many institutions in Zurich, Geneva, and Lugano is straightforward:

• Deployment now is unattractive

• Deployment later is compelling

• Timing depends on political transition

Swiss investment committees are already building post-Labour UK scenarios. Allocation plans are being drawn. Funds are preparing mandate revisions. Real estate operators are warming capital pools. Strategic acquirers are mapping distressed opportunities. Sovereign and pension funds are modelling entry timing.

There is no hostility to Britain — merely discipline.

When Labour falls, Switzerland expects:

• swift property reactivation,

• private equity re-entry,

• infrastructure capital injection,

• renewed sovereign wealth participation, and

• strategic corporate acquisition.

Billions in capital are not avoiding the UK; they are reserving for it.

What Switzerland Gets In The Meantime

The pause in UK deployment has produced an unintended benefit for Switzerland: capital is being temporarily housed in Swiss custodial, advisory, fund, and wealth platforms. Banks in Zurich and Geneva report higher liquidity retention and reduced deployment outflow toward London, which strengthens Swiss asset management and AUM bases.

Put differently:

If capital cannot deploy to London, it parks in Zurich.

This is not ideological. It is simply financial logistics.

Switzerland Sees a Paused UK — Not a Declining UK

From a Swiss vantage point:

• Capital has paused on the UK

• The pause is political, not structural

• The catalyst for re-entry is the exit of the Labour government

• Switzerland benefits interim through custodial inflow

• The UK will become deployable again once policy normalises

The UK still possesses extraordinary competitive advantages: common law, language, talent, markets, property rights, and global connectivity. These fundamentals have not eroded; they have merely been fenced in by a government that misunderstands how investment behaves.

When Labour is gone, Switzerland expects capital to flow back into Britain rapidly and at scale. The money is waiting. The committees are waiting. The strategies are waiting. The cycle is waiting.

The UK is not finished; it is deferred.

UK Economic Outlook: Navigating the Era of ‘High-Tax Stability’

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The UK’s economic landscape is undergoing a fundamental shift. After years of market shocks, the current trajectory is moving toward a period of “High-Tax Stability.” For investors and business leaders, this means the risk of a sudden financial crisis has dropped, but the challenge of slow growth has increased.

This outlook reflects the current Labour government’s strategy of combining strict fiscal rules with historically high taxes between now and 2026.

The Core Shift: Stability Over Dynamism

The primary fear for the UK is no longer a sudden bond market crash, but rather a “slow-bleed” in private sector investment. Because the UK is facing a 70-year high tax burden and significant public debt, there is very little room for traditional economic stimulus. Instead, the government is pursuing a strategy of defensive consolidation, prioritising solvency and institutional safety over aggressive growth.

Assessing the Risks and Policy Mix

To understand where we are heading, we look at the key drivers of the UK economy:

  • Institutional Stability (Strong): The UK remains a safe harbour for capital because its legal and financial institutions are respected and predictable.
  • State-Led Investment (Execution Risk): The government is leaning on an activist, state-guided industrial strategy, using initiatives like the National Wealth Fund and GB Energy, to offset weaker private investment. However, the success of this approach depends heavily on effective execution.
  • Labour Market & Tax (High Risk): Increased costs for employers, such as the rise in National Insurance, are cooling the jobs market. We expect unemployment to hover around 5% as businesses adjust to the higher cost of doing business.
  • Green Transition (Sector Risk): While ambitious green targets are a priority, mechanisms like the planned carbon border tax could unintentionally hurt energy-intensive sectors, such as steel and chemicals, if not carefully designed.

What This Means for Investors

The era of “volatility plays”, betting on big, sudden market swings, is ending. We are now entering an era of efficiency and complexity. In this environment, opportunities are most likely found in assets that benefit from regulation and complexity, such as structured solutions, cross-border planning, and alternative capital. Success will require navigating a “Eurozone-style slog” where growth is modest (projected at 1-2%), but the environment is predictable.

The Bottom Line

The UK’s economic architecture is sound, but the engine is currently being throttled by a high tax and regulatory burden. For capital allocators, the UK offers the rare premium of predictability, provided you have the expertise to navigate a more regulated and sophisticated landscape.

A Brief Summary of the UK Economy under the Current Labour Government

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

To date, the UK economy is showing mixed signals. Real wages have improved, but have been countered by rising unemployment and a softening labour market. There are significant fiscal challenges (some inherited) where government policies, such as rising minimum wages and increased National Insurance (NI) rates, have negatively impacted business investment and future growth. These factors are now jeopardising 50% – 60% of the UK pub industry. The government has received mixed reviews, mainly negative, resulting in politically damaging U-turns, and whilst the economy has experienced modest growth, the country is suffering from weak productivity.

While recent data shows a slight improvement in GDP, growth remains fundamentally weak and hampered by long-term low productivity. Furthermore, negative forecasts have now overtaken previous optimism, suggesting that future growth will be slower than initially projected. On the jobs front, despite some vacancies, the labour market is still showing signs of weakening, together with a cooling in the jobs market.

The impact of government policies has harmed businesses with rises in employer NI, which has increased hiring costs and increased the minimum wage, also raising concerns for business costs. The government is struggling to balance and restore investment, which has declined due to a lack of confidence in its fiscal responsibility and integrity. When combined with persistently low productivity, this weak investment leaves the UK economy facing significant headwinds in the years ahead.

Bank of England Cuts Interest Rates

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The MPC Decision and Market Reaction

In a move that saw UK interest rates fall to their lowest level in almost three years, the Bank of England (BOE) cut its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 3.75% today. The decision by the nine-member MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) was reached through a close call by 5 votes to 4, with the deciding vote being given by Governor Andrew Bailey. After the decision, earlier drops by sterling and 10-year gilt yields were erased, with the pound slightly up against the US Dollar at $1.3396.

Inflation Targets and Future Borrowing Costs

Data recently released showed pressures on prices, the jobs market and economic growth all moving south, with officials from the BOE announcing that they expect inflation to fall closer to the benchmark target of 2%. Officials also announced that, based on current data, they expect borrowing costs to further decline in 2026, but cautioned that decisions on interest rates will be finely balanced as they move to what they describe as the neutral interest rate, where there is neither negative nor positive pressure on inflation.

Governor Andrew Bailey’s Assessment

After the meeting, Governor Andrew Bailey said, “Data news since our last meeting suggests that disinflation is now more established. CPI (consumer price index) has fallen from its recent peak, and upside risks have eased. Measures in the budget should reduce inflation further in the near term, but the key question for me now is the extent to which inflation settles at the 2% target in an enduring way. Slack has continued to accumulate in the economy, and unemployment, underemployment and flows from employment to unemployment have all risen.”

Economic Stagnation and Market Forecasts

Data released shows that the UK economy shrank by 0.10% in the last three months to October, and BOE officials said that they expect 0.00% economic growth in Q4 2025, down from previous expectations of 0.30% growth. Financial markets had widely expected a cut in interest rates due to the recent decline in inflation, which had outpaced expectations, lacklustre economic data and a softening labour market. Some experts are at odds as to whether or not there will be one or two rate cuts in the first half of 2026, with the markets currently pricing in a cut of 37 basis points. 

Labor Market Pressures and 2026 Outlook

Some economists suggest that the UK’s surging unemployment will negatively impact pay growth. They argue this will force the BOE into rate cuts in 2026. Much of the debate within the Monetary Policy Committee is expected to focus on how far interest rates should be cut to stabilise unemployment and stimulate a recovery in demand. Currently, it would appear that there is consensus amongst market experts and analysts that there will be an interest rate cut in 2026; however, the scale of easing remains unclear.

The Autumn Budget 2025 – Navigating the £26 Billion “Stealth Squeeze”

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The Chancellor has delivered one of the most significant tax-raising packages in recent history. Rather than dramatic headline rate hikes, the strategy relies on a “stealth squeeze” designed to generate an additional £26 billion in revenue by 2029/30.

As the UK tax burden rises to a historic high of 38% of GDP by the end of the decade, the fiscal landscape for investors, property owners, and high-income earners is undergoing a fundamental shift.

The Engine of the Squeeze: Fiscal Drag

Projected Treasury Impact: +£8.3 billion

The primary lever of this autumn budget is “fiscal drag.” By freezing personal tax thresholds while wages and inflation rise, the government is effectively pulling more income into higher tax bands without officially raising tax rates.

This freeze, now extended until April 2031, ensures that:

*780,000 people will be dragged into paying Income Tax for the first time.

*924,000 will be pulled into the higher rate band.

By 2030, nearly one in four employees (24%) will be higher-rate taxpayers—a status historically reserved for the top 10% of earners.

A New Era for Asset Taxation

Projected Treasury Impact: +£2.1 billion

In a move to narrow the gap between taxes on earned income and taxes on assets, the budget introduces a 2 percentage point increase on dividends, savings interest, and property income.

This is a tiered rollout that directly impacts portfolio returns:

*Dividend Income (Effective April 2026):

     **Basic Rate rises to 10.75%

     **Higher Rate rises to 35.75%

*Savings & Property Income (Effective April 2027):

     **Basic Rate rises to 22%

     **Higher Rate rises to 42%

     **Additional Rate rises to 47%

The Cash ISA Shake-Up

Effective April 2027

To encourage investment over cash savings, the government is slashing the tax-free cash savings allowance.

*New Limit: The Annual Cash ISA allowance for under-65s is cut from £20,000 to £12,000.

*The “Investment” Nudge: The remaining £8,000 of the overall £20,000 ISA allowance can still be used, but only for Stocks & Shares ISAs.

*Note: Savers aged 65 and over retain the full £20,000 Cash ISA limit.

Property & Inheritance: The Double Hit

The “Mansion Tax” Surcharge

Projected Treasury Impact: +£0.4 billion A new “High Value Council Tax Surcharge” will apply annually to properties valued over £2 million, effective from April 2028. Unlike stamp duty, this is a recurring annual cost:

*£2m – £2.5m Value: +£2,500 annual surcharge.

*>£5m Value: +£7,500 annual surcharge.

Inheritance Tax Freeze

Projected Treasury Impact: Rising to £14.5bn For those concerned with wealth preservation, the changes to inheritance tax UK thresholds are critical. The new inheritance tax rules confirm that the “nil-rate band” will remain frozen at £325,000 until at least April 2031.

Rising asset values mean that what was once a tax on the wealthiest will increasingly impact modest estates. Under these new inheritance tax rules, receipts are expected to nearly double by 2030/31.

Pensions: The Salary Sacrifice Cap

Projected Treasury Impact: +£4.7 billion

The budget curbs a major tax planning tool for high earners. From April 2029, the National Insurance exemption for salary sacrifice pension contributions will be capped at £2,000 per year. Contributions above this amount will now attract NI charges, increasing the cost of retirement saving for both employees and employers.

The Future of Mobility: EV Mileage Charge

As fuel duty revenue declines, the government is introducing a new mileage-based charge starting April 2028.

*Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs): 3.0p per mile.

*Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles (PHEVs): 1.5p per mile.

The average electric vehicle driver can expect to pay approximately £240 per year, ensuring road usage is taxed even as the combustion engine is phased out.

The Final Analysis: Winners and Losers

While the budget focuses on revenue, there are targeted beneficiaries:

*Pensioners (Up): The State Pension will rise by 4.8% (£241.30/wk) under the Triple Lock.

*Families (Up): The scrapping of the two-child benefit cap offers relief to larger households.

*Minimum Wage Earners (Up): A 4.1% increase brings the National Minimum Wage to £12.71/hr.

Conversely, the “losers” are clearly defined as workers facing fiscal drag, higher-earning pension savers, and investors facing diminished net returns.

Strategic Actions for the New Tax Reality

*Re-evaluate Asset Allocation: With the 2% tax hike on dividends and savings, holding assets inside tax-efficient wrappers is critical.

*Maximise Cash ISAs Now: Under-65s have a window until 2027 to utilise the full £20,000 Cash ISA allowance before the cap drops to £12,000.

*Property Holding Structures: Owners of £2m+ homes should factor the new annual surcharge into their long-term costs.

*Review Pension Strategy: Assess the impact of the £2,000 salary sacrifice cap on your net pay and consider front-loading contributions.

Ready to find out if IntaCapital Swiss can help? Use our fast-track form to get an answer within 48 hours, or request a callback from one of our experts. 

UK Chancellor Raises Taxes by £26 Billion in November Budget

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Yesterday, the 25th of November, was a very chaotic day for the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, as the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) released in error details of the budget that had not already been pre-briefed to the media. As the chancellor rose from her seat, the house was filled with cheers from the Labour benches, but the enthusiasm quickly faded, returning only when she announced the end of the two-child benefit cap.

However, there was no hiding place for the chancellor as the brutal facts of this budget hit home. Despite promising no more increases in taxes after the 2024 autumn budget, where taxes were raised by £40 billion, she raised taxes by a further £26 billion.

On top of that, data released by the OBR showed declining growth, therefore undermining one of the chancellor’s main priorities of tackling the cost of living. Also, further data showed that the budget will have no significant impact on output by 2030. 

In the budget, Chancellor Reeves announced in excess of 80 policies, which included tax rises, allowing her to double her “Fiscal Buffer” to £22 billion, which, in doing so, kept her manifesto pledge on not raising the rate of income tax. However, the OBR announced that the latest Labour budget has taken the overall tax intake to the highest on record. Observers have noted that this budget has straddled the line between keeping the Labour backbenchers happy and not upsetting the bond markets, but the so-called smorgasbord approach (a large number of small measures) will create a significant gap between the winners and losers.

Winners 

*The Bond Market – Markets were surprised by the chancellor as she announced a higher-than-expected buffer of £22 billion. In response to the signal that the government was going to be borrowing less than was originally suspected, sterling rallied against the US Dollar to $1.32, and the FTSE 100, led by the banks, was up by 1%. The gilt market rallied to this news, with bonds climbing, pushing down the 10-year yield for the fifth day in a row to 4.42%, and the 30-year yield dropped 11 basis points on the news from the DBO (Debt Management Office) that it would sell fewer long-dated bonds.

*Low-Paid Workers and Pensioners – State pensioners will gain an increase of up to £575 per year, the equivalent of 4.8% pa, whilst those on a minimum wage will get an increase of 4.1%.

*Investment/Fund Managers and Advisers/Consultants – The chancellor is encouraging more savers to invest in stocks and shares from April 2027 by cutting the annual cash limit for ISAs from £20,000 to £12,000.        

*Household Heating – The chancellor has provided relief to households by reducing the average energy bills by £150, though she did not cut VAT. This measure included removing a scheme that funds efficiency upgrades for homes, and abolishing a number of green levies that support renewable electricity.

*High Street Retailers – The chancellor announced that lower business rates (permanent) will be enjoyed by shops, hospitality and leisure companies who have properties valued at under £500,000. The savings will be funded by an increase in rates on properties valued in excess of £500,000.

*The Young Generation – For those classified as young people who have been out of work for over 18 months, the government will provide training, education and guaranteed work in a bid to tackle long-term youth unemployment.

Losers

*Mansion Tax – The chancellor has raised a levy on houses worth £2,000,000 and over, and experts suggest that 60% of taxable homes are in London. The levy, due to come into effect in 2028, consists of a surcharge of £ 2,500 pa rising to £ 7,500 on homes worth more than £5,000,000. Reaction from professionals inside the property market was one of relief as they felt it could have been much worse, as trial balloons floated before the budget suggested that the chancellor might force homes in the two highest bands of council tax to pay more, drawing in many more homes than the new mansion tax.

*Online Casinos – The chancellor announced a doubling of duties from 20% to 40% for remote gaming companies, prompting a fall in the share price for many British gaming companies. Online casinos have been growing rapidly, with data showing that in 2024, the sector made £12.6 billion, and the treasury expects to earn an extra £1.1 billion a year from increases in taxes by 2029 – 2030. Three major gambling companies, including the Rank Group, have already warned of job losses and have revised profit forecasts downwards.

*Owners of Electric Vehicles – The chancellor has slapped electric vehicle owners in the face by announcing a pay-per-mile tax on electric vehicles and some hybrid vehicles. Starting in April 2028, electric car owners will pay a road charge of 3p per mile, and hybrid plug-in owners will pay 1.5p per mile. In order to collect the tax, mileage will be checked once a year, typically via the MOT, or for new cars around their first and second anniversary.

*Salary Sacrificed Pensions – Currently, employees can use salary sacrifice to pay up to £60,000 of contributions into their pension scheme, with NICs and income tax relief available on the full amount of the contribution. However, under the chancellor’s new threshold of £2,000, any amounts above this figure will incur NICs at standard rates.

*Landlords – Under the November budget, the chancellor has targeted property income through an increase in tax of 2% starting in April 2027, plus new separate Property Tax Bands of 22% (basic rate was 20%), 42% (higher rate was 40%) and 47% (additional rate was 45%). Rumours of National Insurance charges on rental income did not come to fruition in this budget, with landlords breathing a sigh of relief.

*Student Loans – Sadly for students, the chancellor announced that from April 2027, the salary at which they must repay their student debt will be frozen at £29,385 for three years. The new measure applies to graduates with plan 2 loans** and the vice-president of the NUS (National Union of Students) for higher education has said that when repayments begin, the salary being earned by a graduate could be dangerously close to the minimum wage.

**Plan 2 Student Loans – This is a type of UK government income-contingent repayment student loan for undergraduate courses, primarily for students from England and Wales who started their courses between September 2012 – July 2023 (England) and September 2012 onwards (Wales).

The chancellor said her autumn budget is “a budget for fair taxes, strong public services and a stable economy, and in the face of challenges on our productivity, I will grow our economy through stability, investment and reform.” Welfare spending was £16 billion higher than forecasted back in March this year, including a £3 billion decision to remove the cap on child benefits, all of which was loudly cheered by left-wing MPs.

The government’s number 1 ambition is to grow the economy; however, the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility), the budget watchdog, has announced that this budget has not moved the needle on growth and will have “no significant impact on output by 2030”. The leader of the opposition, Kemi Badenoch, strongly criticised the chancellor, and in a fiery speech labelled it a “smorgasbord of misery”. She accused Reeves of breaking promises and implementing tax hikes that punish hard-working people and reward welfare.

Bank of England Keeps Interest Rates on Hold

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In a knife-edge vote, with Governor Andrew Bailey casting the deciding ballot, the MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) voted 5–4 to keep interest rates on hold at 4.00%. It was a narrower margin than expected, with one poll of economists prior to the announcement predicting a 6–3 vote in favour of keeping borrowing costs unchanged. Indeed, two Deputy Governors of the Bank of England, David Ramsden and Sarah Breeden, along with the rest of the minority, voted for a 25-basis-point rate cut. It was also the first time that Sarah Breeden voted against the majority since joining the MPC in 2023.

Although inflation remains almost double the Bank’s target, officials announced after the vote that they believe inflation has now peaked at 3.8%. The MPC also signalled that rates could fall to 3% by 2028, while some analysts predict that cuts could come sooner. Experts suggest that Governor Bailey’s deciding vote was influenced by several factors, one being his desire not to appear biased towards the government, particularly with the Chancellor’s Budget just around the corner. It is also thought he preferred to wait and see what fiscal measures the Chancellor will announce, especially as she has been signalling a short-term increase in taxes.

Minutes released from the MPC meeting showed that Governor Bailey was the most dovish among the majority. In a written statement, the Governor said: “We still think rates are on a gradual downward path, but we need to be sure that inflation is on track to return to our 2% target before we cut them again”.

A number of market experts have described this as a “dovish hold”. Governor Bailey also remarked that “upside risks to inflation have become less pressing since August”. Analysts suggest that another reason for maintaining rates was the Governor’s preference to wait for further evidence that inflation is continuing to decline.

Interestingly, several financial experts believe that the Bank of England’s latest inflation forecast has paved the way for an interest rate cut (estimated at 25 basis points) when the MPC meets again on 18th December. Data shows that the Bank of England has cut interest rates five times since Labour won the general election on 4th July 2024. Following today’s decision, Governor Bailey noted that “the MPC would have an opportunity to consider the Budget before its 18th December meeting”.

If, as suspected, the Budget includes tax increases, analysts predict that weaker demand could follow, pushing inflation lower in 2026 and thereby creating a plausible case for a rate cut in December.

The London IPO Market – Still in the Doldrums

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In Q1 and Q2 of this year, data released showed the London IPO market was down to just £182.8 million from nine raisings, as opposed to the same period in 2024, where eight IPOs raised £526.7 million, raising concerns that London is fading as a centre for global capital. Further data also showed that Q3 and Q4 of 2024 had only nine IPOs raising £258 million. Indeed, in April of this year, the market saw the most significant IPO for MHA, a professional services company that raised £98 million on AIM (Alternative Investment Market).

The City (City of London – the financial centre) is struggling to maintain its reputation as a centre and destination for high-growth listings as evidenced by reports suggesting that the CEO of AstraZeneca (pharmaceuticals) might well relocate their primary listing to the United States along with Wise (money transfer service), who with a valuation of £11 billion might also consider moving their listing to the United States as well. A further disappointment is Shein (Online fast fashion company), who were denied a London listing by the Chinese regulators, so they have opted for a listing in Hong Kong.

The above companies are just a part of a growing number of companies that have shelved listings in the city due to pushbacks from investors and challenges related to Brexit, which have negatively impacted valuations. As such, these companies have opted for listings not only in the United States but also in other markets where there are perceived higher valuations plus stronger investor appetite.

However, not all is doom and gloom as analysts report that the Labour government are making headway in reforming listing requirements, which it is hoped will help revive the market that headed south once the United Kingdom had left the European Union. However, 2026 should provide the biggest impetus in the London IPO market as there is a planned IPO by the software giant Visma valued at Euros 19 billion, and HG Capital is leaning towards the City for a listing, attracted by listing reforms, especially allowing euro-denominated stocks into flagship FTSE indexes.

Experts argue that out of all the European exchanges, London has been the hardest hit. However, in Q1 and Q2, bourses in Zurich, Milan, and Paris saw lower volumes than London, and overall Europe suffered its worst opening six months in IPO volumes. However, a large part of the problem has been President Trump’s tariffs, which unleashed a round of volatility which resulted in the market being shut for a while, delaying plans by issuers to go public. Analysts are hopeful of a rebound in 2026 with the new regulations attracting companies to the IPO market in London.

  • 1
  • 2

Head office

IntaCapital Swiss SA,
Rue du Rhône 80 - 84,
CH - 1204 Genève,
Switzerland

Other facilities

Enquire

Legal

IntaCapital Switzerland | Copyright © 2025 | All Rights Reserved