Tag: United States

United States Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports, Uncategorized. Leave a Comment

In the weeks leading up to today’s interest rate announcement by the FOMC (Federal Reserve Open Market Committee), President Donald Trump has viciously attacked the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell. In one damning statement the President said on his social media post to “cut rates pre-emptively to help boost the economy,” saying Powell had been “consistently too slow to respond to economic developments”.

President Trump also wrote “There can be no slowing of the economy unless Mr Too Late, a major loser, lowers interest rates now”. This criticism (he has also threatened to replace Chairman Powell) came after Powell’s warning that Trump’s import taxes were likely to drive up prices and slow the economy. Below, the vote on interest rates by the FOMC reflects Chairman Powell’s and the Federal Reserve’s commitment to that warning.

Today the FOMC voted unanimously to hold its key benchmark interest rate at 4.25% – 4.50% where it has remained since December 2024. Confirming the decision, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said that officials were not in a hurry to adjust interest rates adding that tariffs could lead to higher inflation and unemployment. Chairman Powell went on to say, “If the large increase in tariffs are sustained, they are likely to generate a rise in inflation, a slowdown in economic growth and an increase in unemployment”.

Experts suggest that the unpredictability of President Trump and his back and forth on tariffs makes it very difficult for the Federal Reserve to predict the future of the economy. However, the statements coming out of the Federal Reserve confirmed that currently the economy is resilient with improving job gains and the economy growing at a solid pace. At the same time, analysts suggest that the Federal Reserve is in a holding pattern as it waits for uncertainty to clear.

Several analysts and experts have said that the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy direction depends on how the risks develop on inflation or jobs, or in a more difficult scenario whether unemployment and inflation risks increase together. If both increase together, the Federal Reserve will have to choose which direction to take monetary policy as a weaker job market calls for rate cuts and higher inflation would call for a tightening of monetary policy.

In his post-statement comments Chairman Powell also added that inflation ignited by tariffs could be short-lived or long-lasting depending on how high tariffs go. Just before the FOMC released their interest rate statement President Trump indicated that he would not back down on the current duties of 145% imposed upon China. The wait and see element of Federal Reserve policy is here to stay for a while with some financial analysts suggesting a cut of 0.25% in interest rates will come in July 2025.

Are Critical Minerals China’s Trump Card?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports, Uncategorized. Leave a Comment

Among the many things coveted by President Donald Trump, experts suggest “Critical Minerals”* are somewhere very near the top of the list. The reason why critical minerals are so important is that they are essential in many products such as electric car vehicles, military hardware, iPhones, clean energy, and semi-conductors, to mention but a few. There is a sub-sector or subset of Critical Minerals known as REEs** (Rare Earth Elements) and both play a crucial role in various technologies.

*Critical Minerals – These are a broad group of minerals considered essential and deemed vital for national and economic security. They are deemed critical due to their importance in modern technologies including defence and energy sectors, and all major industries, but are vulnerable to supply chain disruption. Examples of critical minerals are copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, silicon, tungsten, platinum group metals and rare earth elements.

** REEs / Rare Earth Elements – Often confused with Critical Minerals, this subset makes up a highly specific category within the critical mineral family and are made up of 15 elements in lanthanide series within the periodic table plus two who are outside the periodic table. These elements are known for their unique magnetic, catalytic, and other properties. The word rare is confusing because these elements are not so rare in the earth’s crust but found in relatively low concentration. China currently dominates the market in Rare Earth Elements.

When President Trump had finished slapping China with increase after increase in punitive tariffs, one of the responses from Beijing was to introduce controls in exports on certain elements in the Rare Earth Element category. Indeed, the Rare Earth Elements chosen by the Chinese government could be very disruptive to the United States as it is designed to have maximum impact on the American military-industrial complex. Currently, China has the greatest global control over supply of these elements and is being used as a negotiating tactic as the US/SINO trade war escalates.

Many experts are now saying that some of the tariffs introduced by President Trump are self-defeating, and this scenario is playing out in the critical mineral and rare earth element arena. China is recognised as far and away the major player within this sector, but it has an even bigger grip on the refining and processing of these minerals/elements (aka the mid-stream) rather than just the mining. Indeed, recent data released by the US Geological Survey showed that China led production in 33 of 44 critical minerals, and figures show that in 2023 China mined in excess of 75% of the world’s graphite which is the main element used in the anodes of batteries.

Whilst the western world and the United States sat back and did nothing, China has spent many years building up their dominance in the critical mineral market, not only through domestic availability (including processing) but by investing in infrastructure in overseas destinations, in return for securing supplies of minerals. Experts suggest that it will take years for the United States to build up critical mineral infrastructure in order to bypass China’s current hold in the marketplace, so to this end could Beijing hold the Trump Card in trade negotiations with the United States.

Are Tariffs Negatively Impacting America’s AI and Semi-Conductor Ambitions?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

President Donald Trump has made his desire public for U.S. global dominance in the AI and Semi-Conductor (chips) markets; however experts suggest that his tariffs will hinder domestic chip production and put a stop to his ambitions of dominating the worldwide AI market. They are portraying the escalation in tariffs which will perhaps end in an all-out trade war will dramatically increase costs in American data centres and the building of semi-conductor fabrication plants, with some analysts predicting that tariffs will become the single largest barrier to supremacy in the A1 arena.

Tech experts and industry leaders suggest tariffs will inevitably hit global supply chains, thus negatively impacting and disrupting medium to very large AI computing projects. This will be a blow to major tech companies such as Meta, Google, and Amazon who between them have pledged just for 2025, USD 300 Billion on computing infrastructure which will underpin AI projects. Furthermore, TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd) has already committed USD 100 Billion to increase the capacity of chip production in the U.S. which will underpin the above-mentioned AI ambitions.

Potential supply chain issues are at the top of the agenda for many big tech executives, with one executive currently attached to a USD 500 Billion data centre enunciating that the delay of one single component could affect the whole project as the supplier is making business decisions brought on by tariffs. One only has to look at other industries like the European Wine Sector where shipments may be halted because impending tariffs are stopping suppliers putting a price on future orders. Elsewhere in the steel pipe manufacturing arena, tariffs on Chinese built ships/bulk carriers effect on supply chains can be located in Germany where port workers should be loading a first round 16,000 MT of steel piping bound for a huge Louisiana energy project, however due to the proposed levies, the cargo is now sitting gathering dust in a German warehouse.

In the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)* market, Nvidia’s most advanced model is utilised Microsoft and Amazon in their cloud service providers platform, however these GPUs arrive in the United States as racks of servers or just a single rack which have been assembled in a number of different countries according to data released by Z2Data (supply chain data analysis platform). This is where the economics get blurred because although GPUs have been exempt from tariffs, the many components which make the GPU have not been exempt. Experts suggest that importers in the U.S. will be hit with huge costs as component and product categories are massive and it is suggested that even the smallest component can bring the supply chain to a halt.

*Graphics Processing Unit – is a specialised electronic circuit designed to accelerate computer graphics and image processing. The GPU is essential for AI, particularly for tasks like training deep learning models and handling complex computations. Their parallel processing capabilities and high memory bandwidth allow AI to significantly accelerate their workloads.

Experts are saying that even if chips were produced in the United States, they would be more expensive to produce despite the 32% proposed tariff on chips produced by Taiwan’s TSMC, as tariffs would push up prices on all key tools and materials. They went on to say the biggest loser would be American producers of chips, as despite tariffs it will still be cheaper to factories and manufacturing capacity outside the United States, dashing Trump’s dream of domestic chip manufacturing. This is a catch 22 situation for President Trump, for once he cannot have it both ways having his cake and eating it, and analysts wait to see how he will solve this particular conundrum.

Confidence in U.S. Government Bonds Can No Longer be Taken for Granted

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Amongst the financial carnage inflicted on the global markets by the introduction of punitive tariffs by President Donald Trump, global investors have been fleeing to safe haven assets, which for the first time in living memory does not include Treasuries or U.S. Government Bonds. Treasury bonds have had a tradition of being first in line for investors during adverse conditions which was true during the Global Financial Crisis, on 9/11, and even when the United States’ credit rating was cut, where Treasuries were seen to rally.

However, in today’s markets, and as Donald Trump has declared war on global trade, US Treasuries are now being questioned as the world’s best safe haven as can be seen in their surging yields*. Many experts and analysts agree that US Government Bonds and the US Dollar (which has in recent days plunged), rely on the world’s confidence in the financial and political systems of the United States in order to get their strength.

*Treasury Yields – Yields and Treasury prices have an inverse relationship as when Treasury prices rise yields fall and vice versa. Therefore when investors sell treasuries the yield rises and when they buy the yield falls.

The faith in the systems of the United States is now being tested as Thursday saw foreign investors en masse retreating for US assets with equities, treasuries, and the USD Dollar all falling together. The US Dollar fell against the Swiss Franc and the Euro by the most in 10 years, whilst 30-year Treasury yields headed north to 4.87% surging by 13 basis points. The point here is that when investors in the United States and from global markets sell off stocks, they usually find safety in U.S. Government bonds, so following the stock market route yields on treasuries rose, which is totally the opposite of trends in the near and distant past.

Economists have noted that the problems in the U.S. Government Bond market will have deep implications for the global financial system, because as Treasuries are (or were) regarded as “Risk Free Asset” they are utilised as a benchmark determining the price of stocks, mortgage rates, sovereign bonds, nearly everything including collateral for intra-day lending in the amount of trillions of US Dollars. US assets in general now appear to be being repriced as sentiment towards the U.S. as a safe haven diminishes.

There are however some dissenting voices who have concluded not everyone is losing faith in the United States’ political and financial systems. Indeed, some experts expound that long-end Treasury sell-offs are due to technical factors such as hedge funds unwinding leverage trades, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent backing these views. There was even an auction of USD 22 Billion 30-year bonds on Thursday with investors, despite tariff driven volatility, showing solid demand as they did for the sale of 10-year bonds on Wednesday.

However, whatever views are held it is generally believed by experts that a message has been delivered to The White House that confidence in U.S. Government bonds can no longer be taken for granted. The lack of clarity in this administration’s policies together with their President antagonising allies and enemies alike, including their largest creditors, through his determination to rewrite the financial and trading global rules, will in the eyes of many see the rest of the world in the long run look elsewhere for safe haven assets.

China Retaliate with the Imposition of 125% Tariffs on all U.S. Imports

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

So the all-out trade war escalates between the United States and China as Beijing announces retaliatory tariffs of 125% (up from 84%) as Donald Trump confirmed that tariffs on China are now effectively 145%. Officials in China confirmed that the 125% tariff will remain no matter if the White House decides to increase tariffs as the levies are now so high there is no longer a market for goods in China imported from the United States.

Chinese experts in this arena have advised that there is no sign from officials from either the United States or China that their respective governments would start negotiations which would avoid a negative impact on global supply chains. However, one official from China’s Commerce Ministry was quoted as saying, “Beijing is open to negotiate with the United States on an equal footing”.

Once again Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was on the offensive saying, “It’s unfortunate that the Chinese actually don’t want to come and negotiate, because they are the worst offenders in the international trading system”. He went on to say, “They have the most imbalanced economy in the history of the modern world, and I can tell you this escalation is a loser for them”.

Analysts suggest that due to the drag from U.S. trade tensions and slower global growth, China’s GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for this year will be 4%. They further advised that exports from China to the United States only accounted for circa 3% of GDP, however there is a possible negative impact on employment with circa 10–20 million Chinese workers involved with exports to America.

Elsewhere the previous U.S. Treasury Secretary under President Biden has unleashed nothing less than a massive broadside against President Trump and his economic policies, saying, “President Trump has taken a wrecking ball to the U.S. economy”. She commented that Trump and his officials have declared that they had inherited an economy in a “state of calamity and catastrophe”. However, Yellen noted the Economist back in October 2024 said the U.S. economy was the envy of the world.

As already advised previously on this website, U.S. tariffs may well drive other countries including those in the western world further into the arms of China. China is already Europe’s largest trading partner and at a meeting today between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, Xi said that China and the EU (European Union) must join together in defending globalisation and oppose unilateral acts of bullying. Already the Spanish Agricultural Minister has said, “Spain will pursue closer trade ties with China in the interest of its citizens”.

As Democrats and some Republicans, along with leaders and officials of trading partners with the U.S,. a timely reminder is that the U.S. trading deficit with other countries amounted to USD 130.7 Billion in January 2025 and USD 122.7 Billion in February 2025, and many economists have voiced their wonder about how previous administrations and congress were so happy with this situation.

Obviously Donald Trump is not and has the bit between his teeth but perhaps there was a better way of rebalancing the deficit away from using tariffs. Only time will tell, but the U-turn on tariffs (10% across the board apart from China) giving a 90-day pause, is perhaps part of his intended policy (as confirmed by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick) bringing trading counties to the negotiating table.

Trump 90-Day Suspension U-Turn on Tariffs Except China Sees Equities Rebound

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In line with his election promises, President Trump has marched forward imposing global tariffs on all America’s trading partners, with some countries seeing a 10% tariff, others such as the EU (European Union) being hit with 25% tariffs, and Cambodia topping the list with a whopping 49%. Tariffs have now been returned to 10% across the board apart from China, where tariffs have been increased to 125%, as the announcement of the U-turn came 13 hours after the new tariffs came into effect. However, due to the unpredictability of the Trump2 administration, what happens in 90 days is anybody’s guess.

President Trump has suggested that the pause on tariffs is to give America’s trading partners (except China) time to reassess by making trade deals (or other deals) in order to avoid punitive tariffs. The White House has announced that they want their trading partners to reduce their own tariffs and remove barriers to trade* as such barriers have resulted in the U.S. deficit and should be eliminated. Both Canada and Mexico were not subject to these reciprocal tariffs as they were subject to a 25% tariff regarding illegal immigrants and drugs. However, imports covered by NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) are exempt.

*Barriers to Trade – These barriers are non-tariff and include:

Regulation – Any rules which dictate how a product can be manufactured, handled, or advertised.

Rules of origin – Rules which require proof of which country goods were produced in.

Quotas – Rules that limit the amount of a certain product that can be sold in a market.

Equities

Global markets saw an upward swing not seen for many decades thanks to the 90-day tariff pause, with stocks climbing across the globe. From an equities standpoint the market saw its best rally since 2008 with the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 rebounding 12%, the S&P 500 Index gaining 9.5%, and the Dow Jones jumping nearly 2,500 points. Europe saw Germany’s DAX rise 7%, Spain’s IBEX 35 up 7.2%, France’s CAC 40 up 6.4%, the pan continental STOXX 600 up 5.3% and the UK’s FTSE 100 up by 6.2%.

Elsewhere in the Far East and Asia, and in response to the 90-day moratorium on tariffs, Japan’s benchmark NIKKEY 225 led the way soaring upwards by 8.8% (gaining over 2,000 points), Hong Kong’s was up 2.69%, Thailand’s SET index surged 4.5% and the Shanghai Composite Index gained 1.29% despite the increase in tariffs on China.

Interestingly, on President Trump’s social media, he announced a buy tip BEFORE announcing the pause on tariffs, making money for all those investors who took his advice. This has caused outrage and concern among ethics experts and opposition politicians who feel that such an announcement is tantamount to giving inside information and is a violation of securities laws.

However, a spokesperson from the White House fired back that the President has every right to reassure the markets, no doubt political opponents will not let this one go, especially as U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren said, “I am calling for an investigation into whether President Trump manipulated the market to benefit his wall street donors – all while working people and businesses paid the price”.

The US Government bond market (treasuries) has recently seen massive sell offs despite the fact that this market has always been seen as a safe haven in times of volatility and globally there have been massive falls in stock exchanges and bourses throughout the world. This suggests that after the announcement of the fresh wave of tariffs, the U.S. usually viewed as a cornerstone of the global economy has lost the confidence of many investors.

As the price of US government bonds fall, the yield or interest rate rises, which also means that the cost of financing the United States’ debt also rises, and on Wednesday, 10th April, the benchmark 10-year treasury moved to 4.516% and at one stage the 30-year bond hit 5%, being the highest since late 2023. The moves in the treasury markets had, apparently according to experts, caught the President’s eye and may have been one of the reasons he chose to pause tariffs.

China

Whilst the rest of the trading world with the United States enjoyed a 90-day pause on tariffs, President Trump hiked tariffs on China by a massive 125%, saying on a social media post, “based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the world’s markets, I am hereby raising the tariff charged to China”. The decision by President Trump to escalate the tariff war on China came after Beijing announced retaliatory tariffs of 84% on imports of all American goods, but Trump expects China to come to the negotiating table despite their hard line approach to tariffs.

Experts suggest that this is just not simple retaliation by President Trump but more like unfinished business from the Trump1 administration and he was quoted as saying with regards to China, “We didn’t have time to do the right thing”. Furthermore, when Trump was campaigning as an outsider for his first successful stint in the White House, one of his oft repeated themes was that China is responsible for hollowing out the American economy, driven rustbelt decline, and cost blue collar workers their livelihood and dignity.

Unless these two economic powerhouses back down, the the whole scenario will devolve into a full scale trade war hurting a bilateral trade worth circa USD 585 Billion, and this is the crux of the matter, of that USD 585 Billion America’s imports from China accounted for USD 440 Billion. Figures released by the IMF (International Monetary Fund) show the U.S.A. and China account for circa 43% of the global economy and if an all-out trade war ensued this would slow down growth in both countries, (experts suggest perhaps recession) and harm growth in other countries and slowing down global investment.

Conclusion

Sadly, there is at this time no real conclusion as there is so much uncertainty surrounding White House decision making, there is only a rolling commentary on on-going proceedings. President Trump announced a reason for the U-turn on tariffs is that people were getting yippy and nervous, but experts suggest it goes a lot deep than that with Scott Bessent (U.S. Treasury Secretary) asserting that the U-turn had been the plan all along to get the countries to the bargaining table. Now that the 90-day moratorium on tariffs has been announced, the world will hold their collective breath and wait to see how the United States v China tariff war plays out.

No one wins from an outright trade war between these two giants of the global economy, but Donald Trump has, according to experts, had it in for China since he first took over the oval office. It has also been reported that the EU and China are working together against Trump’s tariffs with Chinese Premier Quang (2nd in command in China) receiving a call from EU President Ursula von der Leyen. The White House is treading a fine line with tariffs, and they may yet push the EU and China even closer together (China is the EU’s largest trading partner) and this would totally upset the world order.

Tariffs Cause Global Market Chaos 

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

On Monday, 7th April 2025, and from the opening bell in the far east, through Europe, and into the United States, chaos ensued across global markets. In the Asia Pacific arena, long before Europe and the United Kingdom had woken up, stock markets fell on a scale not seen in decades. In some Asian exchanges, due to mounting losses, trading was suspended as the Shanghai composite sank 7.34% and Japan’s Nikkei fell 7.83%. Hong Kong was the worst hit while equities in Japan, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea, and Singapore all suffered heavily, seeing steep declines.

In Hong Kong, the stock market plummeted 13.74% (its biggest single day decline in 30 years), before closing out at 13.22%. Experts suggest that the fall in Hong Kong’s stock market accurately reflects market expectations on how tariffs will affect the Chinese economy rather than any movement on China’s stock exchanges. They point out that Chinese stocks cannot be shorted, and it is impossible to trade freely.

In Europe, markets were also having a bad day as Donald Trump continued to wage his trade war. The pan-European STOXX 600* took a beating and was down 4.5% (down for the fourth straight session), whilst other major stock exchanges or bourses closed out down between 4% and 5%. In Germany, the benchmark DAX index** (.GDAXI) (trade sensitive) fell by as much as 6.4% finally closing at down 4.3% but painfully down 20% from its March 2025 closing all time high.

*STOXX 600 Index – This index tracks 600 of the largest stock exchange listed companies from 17 countries in Europe. The countries represented are Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

**DAX Index – This index measures the performance of Germany’s 40 largest companies that trade on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and is considered by many analysts as a gauge of Germany’s economic health.

Again on Monday, 5th April, along with other global stock markets, UK stocks fell dramatically extending their selloff from the previous week. The FTSE 100 closed down 4.4%, hitting its weakest closing level for over 12 months and since Thursday, 3rd April, Blue Chips have fallen by 10%. In the meantime, Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has announced that the United Kingdom will seek to lower trade barriers with key trading partners around the world whilst fighting to secure a trade partnership with the United States.

In the United States, the news was just as bad with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling for a third day on the trot, with the S&P 500 losing in excess of 10% since Thursday, 3rd April. Equity markets are sending a massive NO to President Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs and analysts suggest that hedge funds may well be forced to sell down their equities and other current risky assets in order to pay margin cash calls.

There seems to be no let up on tariffs as President Trump doubles down on China and announces that there are no plans to pause tariffs. Indeed, China imposed a 34% tariff on all U.S. goods on Friday, 4th April 2025, in response to the 34% tariff imposed by President Trump on all Chinese goods. However, in response to the Chinese actions, Trump announced he would retaliate with a further 50% tariff on all Chinese goods into the U.S. effective 9th April, unless China withdraws their tariff by 8th April. China is in no mood to take a backward step with Beijing vowing to fight to the end and China’s Commerce Ministry accused the U.S. of blackmail.

President Trump and his Trumpeteers have said that tariffs have stopped bleeding the U.S. of income and in four years we will be rich and self-sufficient whilst opponents cry you have wrecked global stock markets, sabotaged supply chains and ruined individuals’ pensions. The looming trade war with China will have, according to experts, massive fallouts across the globe. Who will blink first, China or America or will the world see a massive realignment of global trading?

Tariffs, Tariffs and More Tariffs as Donald Trump Risks Global Trade War

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Wednesday, 2nd April 2025 (or liberation day as per President Trump), is a day that will stand out in history, as Donald Trump announced a sweeping across the board 10% tariff on all imports of goods into the United States. He further announced reciprocal tariffs of 20% and rising on countries he feels has cheated America, by which he means those countries with massive trade surpluses with the U.S. and also those who already add big tariffs to American imports. President Trump had already separately announced a tariff of 25% on all global car, truck and auto accessories starting on 3rd May 2025, and a 25% tariff on all aluminium and steel products. Experts advise that these levies/tariffs/taxes are the biggest increases since 1968.

Global markets from tech to banking have been left reeling as President Trump through his tariffs attempts to rearrange global trading and the current economic order. However, thanks to tariffs, U.S. equities have taken a beating with the three major stock indexes plunging in excess of 5%, the biggest of which was the S&P 500, which crashed by almost 6%. This was the steepest fall since 2020, and elsewhere in the United Kingdom the FTSE 100 fell by just under 5%, marking its steepest fall since 2020, with similar falls being recorded in France and Germany. The global stock market has, since Trump announced an across the board tariff of 10% on every country, lost literally trillions of dollars in value, however China, the EU (European Union) and Vietnam are all facing higher tariffs on their exports to the U.S..

On Friday, 4th April 2025, China announced a 34% tariff on products from the U.S. whilst at the same time lowering exports of essential minerals plus adding a number of American companies to their blacklist and accusing Donald Trump of violating international trade rules. The EU announced through their trade commissioner that they are still looking for meaningful discussions in the hope of reducing their across the board 20% tariff, though he promised if talks failed the EU would defend themselves. The largest EU economy is Germany and with a separate tariff of 25% on the imports of cars into the U.S. and a 20% across the board tariff on all imports into the U.S., the German economy will, according to experts, take a hit in a drop in GDP of 1.5% equivalent to a loss of Euros 200 Billion over the tenure of President Trump.

The President of the EU, Ursula von der Leyen, has vowed to retaliate and condemned President Trump and went on to say that tariffs will have dire consequences for all consumer and businesses on a global basis that have enjoyed trading with the U.S. since World War II and added, “We are already finalising a first package of countermeasures in response to tariffs on steel”. The EU is of course still open to negotiations, but Ursula von der Leyen is in no mood to lie down and be trodden on. She has already announced that the EU has everything it needs to survive and survive it will. Tough talk from a tough President who will meet Donald Trump head on, so unless negotiations are successful, a full-out trade war between the U.S. is certainly on the cards and could go global.

In the United States, many experts and analysts agree that the new tariffs will push the American economy into recession, an economy which is currently losing momentum, with the result of increasing prices due to tariffs being passed on to the consumer. Analysts further advised that the tariffs could well push the American economy into a recession and have a negative effect on inflation, reversing the current downward trend. Indeed, the US Dollar shortly after the tariff announcements fell by 1.7% against a basket of European trading partners’ currencies which according to market experts reflect concern regarding growth in the economy. Some experts have warned that core inflation (excludes food and energy prices) could go as high as 4% (3.1% as of end of February 2025), unemployment to rise (despite current hiring figures showing an increase) and real GDP to decline.

In the long run, experts suggest that Trump may get his financial rewards from tariffs but his “allies” who he has hit with punitive tariffs may well look elsewhere for new trading partners, with China being the ultimate beneficiary which may well benefit BRICS* as well. Indeed, BRICS is now a major political force looking to be a counterweight to western influence with its current members accounting for just over 25% of the global economy and almost half the world’s population. There has been a lot of internal division within the BRICS organisation, with Russia leading the way over their unlawful invasion of Ukraine, however tariffs may bring them together in such a way that the allies who Trump has hit with punitive tariffs may well look to increase trade with these countries. Whilst the America First slogan is banged consistently by the U.S. administration, some of the poorest nations in Africa have been hit with punitive tariffs, with Lesotho being a prime example at a massive 50% tariff. It is no secret that BRICS want what they call the southern nations to come under their umbrella (Africa and South America) and again these tariffs could drive these nations into the arms of BRICS. Geopolitically, tariffs may be the current U.S. administration’s biggest mistake.

*BRICS – is an intergovernmental organisation consisting of ten countries, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates. The founding countries were Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, and China forming BRIC with South Africa joining at a later date to form BRICS. There are a slew of countries waiting approval of membership from BRICS including Saudi Arabia who have been approved but have delayed joining.

In the United Kingdom, experts advise tariffs will hit key manufacturing sectors and will undermine the positive growth, albeit fragile, predictions of the Labour government. Many businesses are already facing rising costs due to the Chancellors’ budget and tariffs will, according to some analysts, place negative pressure on demand and weaken supply chains. The Director of the British Chamber of Commerce was heard to say that “Orders will drop, prices will rise, and global economic demand will be weaker as a result”. Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, advised he is still hopeful that negotiations will reduce the 10% tariff, however he has begun the process of consultation with regard to retaliatory tariffs should negotiations fail. Across the Irish Sea, Northern Ireland ministers announced they feel trapped as despite the 10% tariff on the United Kingdom, if the EU announces retaliatory tariffs N. Ireland could face the higher EU tariff on any U.S. imports entering from Britain under the post-Brexit deal* between the United Kingdom and the EU.

*The Northern Ireland Protocol – is intended to protect the EU single market while avoiding the imposition of a “Harder Border” that might incite the recurrence of conflict and destabilise the relative peace that has held since the end of the troubles.

In Asia, the APAC* region was hit with tariffs between 10% and 49% with the higher rates being targeted at those countries’ lower value-added items such as textiles, garments, furniture, and footwear. Vietnam (apart from China) is currently enjoying the largest trade deficit with the U.S. (USD 123.5 Billion), got hit with 46% tariff, whilst Cambodia got hit with a 49% tariff (trade deficit USD 12.13 Billion) Sri Lanka saw a 44% tariff (trade deficit USD 2.65 Billion), Bangladesh was given a 37% tariff (trade deficit USD 2.6 Billion) with larger economies in the region slightly better off with Singapore being hit with the minimum of 10% tariffs. Experts suggest that Asian currencies may face depreciation pressure as financial markets could turn risk averse affecting FII (Foreign Institutional Investor) inflow.

*APAC – stands for Asia Pacific Region and is a broad geographical region encompassing countries and territories in or near the Western Pacific Ocean. This region typically includes East Asia, South Asia, South East Asia, and Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, and surrounding islands).

In typical Trump fashion, in one fell swoop global trading has been turned on its head, geopolitics may never be the same again and markets will remain volatile for some time to come. Experts suggest it may take weeks or in some cases months to assess the fall-out from President Trump’s tariffs. President Trump may well have destroyed smaller more vulnerable economies, destroying the lives of that country’s population at the same time. However, in breaking news the White House advises that 50 countries have contacted the administration looking to do trade deals and avoid duties. Meanwhile voices in the U.S. from the CEO down to the smallest consumer are already getting louder voicing their antipathy towards tariffs with anti-tariff rallies taking place in a number of cities throughout the world. He may think he is putting “America First” but who’s to say in the long run it may well be “America Second”.

Donald Trump is Ruining European Wineries

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Wine growers across the European continent have been struggling due to a decline in consumption from secular demand with consequences so awful that the French government has been paying growers to uproot their vines. Then along comes President Trump with his oft-repeated rhetoric “America First”, threatening tariffs of 200% on European wine, with the result that shipments of the product have completely stopped and owners of vineyards no longer know how to price their bottles.

European wineries are at a loss of exactly what to do, especially now as overseas clients orders are rapidly disappearing, with the result that many brands such as Chardonnay and Merlot will be cellar bound rather than sold. Indeed, in France’s biggest wine cooperative located in Cave Héraclès, there are in excess of 200 steel tanks which by experts’ calculations are as high as a six-storey building and are still full of 2024’s production. The region, as with the rest of Europe, can see the vines budding again, and the next harvest is not that far away.

Owners of these vats are being told to wait by buyers who already have enough wine on their books, and somehow the vats need to be empty by July at the very latest in order to accommodate this year’s produce. Now that President Trump has announced his punitive tariff, he has brought the whole industry to a complete stop. Producers of wine now are unable to commit to a price as they don’t know for sure exactly what the tariff will be. They therefore are unable to commit or offer any discounts as they have no idea what their ultimate costs will be. Furthermore, they could well incur extra costs to empty their vats to store elsewhere to accommodate the new produce.

Sadly for wine producers, there is currently a global glut of product and 2024 saw a slump in production mirroring a 60-year low. Demand for wine is falling at an accelerated rate, with today’s health conscious youngsters drinking less than baby boomers or millennials when they were the same age. A number of savvy brand owners fearing a Trump victory, shipped excess supplies to the United States before Trump won the election. Indeed, Sogrape owner of Mateus Rosé ensured their importer in America has at least six months’ supply, whilst the wine estate Château de Fieuzal also shipped many more bottles than previously planned to the United States.

The wine tariff on European Wines and champagne was announced by Trump as a retaliatory measure against the EU (European Union) for threatening tariffs on American whisky due to come into effect on 14th April 2025. In 2024, the United States accounted for 30% of all of Europe’s wine exports, and the European Commission (handles all trade matters for the EU) is currently working on a concession package to present to the Trump administration in the hope that partial tariffs can be removed. However, with the mood Donald Trump is in, the European wine growers can only hold out hope that the commission is successful.

Donald Trump Hits European and UK Carmakers with 25% Tariffs

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

On the evening of Wednesday, March 26th 2025 in Washington DC, and in a devastating blow to global car makers, President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on all car imports into the United States which translates into levies amounting to circa USD 100 Billion. The President was quoted as saying, “This is the beginning of liberation day in America, this is very modest. What we’re going to be doing is a 25% tariff on all cars not made in the United States”. He went on to say, “We’re going to charge countries for doing business in our country and taking our jobs, taking our wealth, taking a lot of things that they’ve been taking over the years”.

This move of course exacerbates the global trade war started by President Trump, taking the animosity towards him from his allies to new heights. The Shadow Trade Secretary to the House of Commons in the United Kingdom noted that he is concerned with this auto tariff, adding that the UK automotive sector is under pressure and British jobs are clearly at risk. The president of the EU (European Union), Ursula von der Leyen, said, “I deeply regret the US decision to impose tariffs on EU automotive exports”. The German Economy Minister Robert Habeck has called for the EU to provide a decisive response.

Experts in this arena suggest that due to the imposition of a 25% car tariff, the price of cars could rise between USD 5,000 and USD 15,000 depending on the vehicle, and even those automobiles assembled in the United States could rise between USD 3,000–USD 8,000. The rise in US assembled automobiles, according to analysts, is that roughly 50% of parts in US-produced cars are imported and tariffs on auto parts will significantly increase production costs. The United States imported circa 8 million cars in 2024 with a trade value of over USD 240 Billion, the country’s total automotive vehicle imports including engine and parts was over USD 474 Billion.

Certain media outlets in the United Kingdom are saying that the government in private is advising car manufacturers that they are confident of securing a bi-lateral trade deal with the U.S. administration and will hope to avoid President Trump’s car tariffs on the importation of vehicles into the United States. The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, has been quoted as saying “the Government is in intense negotiations with the U.S.”. Data released by the Society of Motor Manufacturing and Traders confirm that Europe is the biggest export market for UK made motor vehicles, with the United States firmly in second place enjoying circa 16.9% of UK car exports. Analysts suggest Jaguar Land Rover may be one of the hardest hit by tariffs, and Aston Martin saw its share price fall by 6% on the London Stock Exchange in response to Trump’s announcement.

In Europe, there is outrage over the car tariffs with the VDA (German Association of Automotive Industry) warning of a serious economic fallout. The association further added that the consequence of tariffs will cost prosperity and growth on both sides of the Atlantic. President of the VDA, Hildegard Müller, highlighted the fact that German firms employ circa 138,000 workers in the U.S.A., split 48,000 in manufacturing and 38,000 in parts supply. Various automotive bodies have urged officials in the European Union to get back round the table, with the Trump administration and thrash out a trade deal instead of talking about reciprocal tariffs.

Officials of the European Union who last week met with their U.S. counterparts see little chance of averting this current round of tariffs. There have been muted signs of the EU and Canada working together against the U.S., but President Trump threatened larger tariffs if the two countries joined forces. EU officials suggest that Trump will issue an EU bloc-wide tariff rather than a country by country tariff. Analysts advise that Volvo cars and Porsche stand to be the two hardest hit manufacturers should tariffs proceed on the 2nd of April 2025, whilst Thursday 27th March saw shares in Porsche plunge 5.4%, Mercedes-Benz AG fall 4,8%, Ferrari and BMW AG fell 4.7% and 3.7% respectively and Volkswagen AG fell circa 2%.

Amongst all the outrage and wringing of hands regarding this car tariff, President Donald Trump has gone on record as saying, “I couldn’t care less if automakers raise their prices” in a response to planned tariffs on imported vehicles. He went on to say, “I couldn’t care less if they raise prices, because if they do, people are going to buy American-made cars”. The new automobile tariffs come into effect on 2nd April 2025, whilst tariffs on parts are set to start in May 2025 or later.

Head office

IntaCapital Swiss SA,
Rue du Rhône 80 - 84,
CH - 1204 Genève,
Switzerland

Other facilities

Enquire

Legal

IntaCapital Switzerland | Copyright © 2025 | All Rights Reserved