Trading Archives

The World Gold Council Looking to Launch a Digital Form of Gold

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on September 10, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The WGC (World Gold Council)* is, according to experts within this arena, planning to launch gold in a digital form, which may well create major changes as to the collateralisation, trading and settlement of gold, whilst at the same time transforming the USD 900 Billion gold market centred in London. David Tait, the current CEO of the WGC, when interviewed, said this new form “will allow for the digital circulation of gold within the gold ecosystem, using it as a collateral for the first time”.

*The World Gold Council – The WGC is an international trade association for the gold industry, it is headquartered in London and whose members are gold mining companies. The WGC is a market development organisation for the gold industry and works to champion the use of gold as a strategic asset.

The WGC has said that the digitisation of gold will broaden its market reach and they are trying, according to their CEO, David Tait, to standardise that digital layer of gold such that the various financial products used in other markets can be used going forward in the gold market. Gold has recently proved that it is still extremely popular especially as a safe haven as only last week it reached a record price of USD 3,550 per ounce having also doubled in price over the last two years.

Each digital unit of gold will be known as PGI’s (“Pooled Gold Interests”) and this will allow investors to buy a form of fractional interest in gold bullion. Over many years the OTC* (over-the-counter) gold has been settled through two key structures i). allocated gold and ii). unallocated gold

i). Allocated Gold is a form of gold ownership where physical gold is purchased (bars) and are stored in a secure vault and is legally owned by the purchaser and ownership is insulated from credit risks of the custodian bank. However, in order to attain this status, there is a limitation on holding only whole-bar multiples and increased operational complexity.

ii). Unallocated Gold is where specific gold bars are not set aside for the holder, rather the holder has a contractual right against the institution where their unallocated gold is held in respect of their entitlement. Unallocated gold has traditionally provided holders with greater liquidity through deeper markets and quick and simple settlement mechanics. However, the status for unallocated gold is that it requires holders to take the credit risk against the institution where their unallocated gold is held.

*OTC or over-the-counter gold refers to gold being directly traded between two parties (the buyer and the seller) rather than through a formalised or centralised exchange. This allows for flexible, customised transactions with such terms as quantity, quality and delivery being negotiated privately. Major clients within this market include central banks, refiners and investors with the London market being a central hub for these 24-hour transactions.

This proposal from the WGC would create a third type of transaction for the OTC gold in London and the pilot scheme due to be launched at the beginning of Q1 in 2026, will include major banks and trading houses as joint or co-owners of the underlying gold. This third pillar in the OTC market is known as the Wholesale Digital Gold Ecosystem (the “ECOSYSTEM) and will underpin as mentioned above, the new form of digital gold bars the pooled gold interests or PGI. This third transaction, or as the WGC refer to it, as the “Third Foundational Pillar” has been designed to sit alongside existing settlement through allocated and unallocated gold, with the belief that gold when paired with the new structure could unlock significant opportunities across financial markets with regard to trading, investment and collateralisation.

A Brief Overview – The Global Outlook for the Remainder of 2025

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on August 27, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The central banks’ banker BIS (Bank for International Settlements) recently said that fractious geopolitics and trade tensions have exposed deep fault lines in the global financial system and the then head of the BIS, Augustin Carstens, (retired 30th June 2025) said the U.S.-driven trade war and other policy shifts were fraying the long-established economic order. He went on to say the global economy is at a pivotal moment entering a new era of heightened uncertainty, which was testing public trust in institutions, as well as central banks.

Today, experts suggest that for the remainder of 2025 there will be a slowdown in economic growth characterised by falling inflation, however analysts point to sticky inflation in the United States, along with persistent risks emanating from geopolitical tensions, together with increasing trade tensions which could perhaps result in a more negative impact on the global economy. Indeed, some analysts who were expecting a soft landing for the global economy have retracted these opinions as said soft landing has suddenly disappeared from view, as long-established trade relationships began to crumble with the announcement back in April this year of higher-than-expected U.S. trade tariffs.

Some financial news outlets have suggested that emerging and long-standing structural challenges are being faced by the global economy, and, for over 20 years, productivity growth has been on a downward path in many of today’s advanced economies. Furthermore, with the introduction of Trump’s tariffs this could accentuate the decline as further pressure is placed upon supply chains who are also facing current geopolitical tensions (the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia, Middle East tensions between Israel, Iran and Gaza, and the potential invasion of Taiwan by China) that could be the driver of more frequent supply shocks.

On the global inflation front, analysts suggest that inflation is set to decline, though at a divergent pace, with some economies enjoying further declines, whilst others, especially the United States, face possible increases due to tariffs. However, some forecasters are at odds with each other with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) predicting a steady global decline from 2024 to 2025, and one major Wall Street player suggesting a global core inflation increase for the remainder of 2025.

Some financial commentators have even pointed the finger at the President of the United States as a danger to the global economy, not only for the remainder of 2025 but potentially for the rest of his term in office. Indeed, his continued attacks on the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, and his attacks on the Federal Reserve itself for not reducing interest rates could threaten global financial stability. Some experts have pointed out the incumbent President was not elected due to his extensive knowledge of interest rates and all the attendant data that aids central banks in their decisions to hold, drop, or increase rates. The fear is that if politicians and in this case a U.S. president takes effective control of the Federal Reserve for their own political aims, this could set a dangerous precedent for other central banks where monetary policy is subject on a global basis to political interference.

There are a number of negative factors that could affect the global economy by the end of this year. Experts suggest that apart from geopolitical tensions, regional conflicts and trade wars, there is the negative impact of high public and private debt possibly exacerbated by higher interest rates, together with persistent/sticky inflation in some advanced economies along with stagnant productivity and an ageing population which can all have a negative effect on sustainable economic growth. Interestingly, as of today, India has been hit by a doubling of tariffs (for buying Russian oil) from 25% to 50%. There is no agreement in sight therefore India could serve as a template by the end of the year and into 2026 as to what impact tariffs have on their economy.

How Tariffs are being Weaponised by President Trump

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on August 27, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

For years, international trade was as tranquil as it comes and within the offices of the WTO (World Trade Organisation) on the banks of Lake Geneva worked the trade lawyers and trade economists unencumbered by the problems of today. Sadly, the twin forces of geo-economic fragmentation and geo-political confrontation have undermined the balance of the global trade regime and what we witness today is the weaponisation of tariffs*. The most pronounced effect of tariffs in the present day has come from the White House with President Trump’s “Liberation Day” on 2nd April this year, where he announced punitive tariffs across the board on all of the United States’ trading partners.

*Tariffs – are defined as a tax on imported goods levied by governments typically as a percentage of the product’s value. It is designed to protect domestic industries, raise government revenues, or serve as a political tool in trade negotiations. Importers pay the tax which increases the cost of foreign products, potentially making domestic alternatives more attractive to consumers.

The return of Donald Trump to the White House has transformed the utilisation of tariffs into instruments of both economic and political coercion and in the process has reignited economic nationalism. Some experts argue that the weaponising of trade (via tariffs) is where existing trade relations are manipulated to advance political and geo-political objectives, the ultimate goal being to push another government to change its policies in favour of the country wielding the tariffs. The biggest offender in the new tariff war is the United States and as seen below, they have successfully employed tariffs to bend the will of certain governments to their way of thinking.

On the domestic front, (Trump’s efforts are not just confined to foreign governments), he is reshaping domestic supply chains and even threatening iconic power price points. However, there are downsides as the 50% increase in tariffs on imports of aluminium and steel*, (which came into effect on 3rd June 2025) have increased production costs for such brands as Home Depot, Walmart, Target, Lowes Proctor & Gamble and AriZona Iced Tea. Famed for its 99 cents cans AriZona sources most of its aluminium domestically, but tariffs on imported aluminium/steel distort the broader market increasing prices for all producers. The tariff will increase prices which will be passed on to customers, and in the case of AriZona this will undercut a key brand identity that has endured for decades.

*Aluminium and Steel Tariffs – The tariff on these two metals doubled to 50% on June 3rd this year with some counties getting exemptions and paying the original tariff of 25%. The impact of this increase in the US has potentially led to higher consumer prices and fewer jobs in downstream industries, including higher domestic commodity prices and supply chain disruption. Experts say the main reason for these tariffs are national security under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act 1962 to protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition and to help correct trade deficits.

Elsewhere on the domestic front on the 6th of this month President Trump announced a plan to impose a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors*, with exemptions for companies that commit to manufacturing in the United States. The White House framed the policy as national security concerns with over-reliance on Asian countries such as Taiwan and South Korea for critical technology. This move was not about trade imbalances, it was about forcing multinational companies to expand manufacturing with the borders of the United States. Interestingly, Apple has been exempt from these tariffs after pledging to invest USD 600 Billion into U.S. based chip production and related infrastructure. This has now set a precedent where tariff relief can be bought through commitments that serve President Trump’s domestic industrial goals.

*Semiconductors – is a material with electrical conductivity that falls between that of a conductor (e.g., copper) and an insulator (e.g., glass). Their unique ability to be controlled make them essential components of modern electronics including computer chips, transistors and diodes.

Under the current administration in the White House, experts conclude that traditional legal frameworks are being bypassed with tariffs which were originally imposed on China, Mexico and Canada by invoking the IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) citing security reasons. This is a classic example of weaponising tariffs in order for Donald Trump to bend counties to his will. It did not work with China but initial reactions from Mexico and Canada showed that Trump had certainly won the initial battle but Mexico has had a stay of execution and Canada and the U.S. are currently in negotiations.

Elsewhere in Europe, the member countries have agreed to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP for NATO in line with the wishes of President Trump. However, analysts suggest that the invasion of Ukraine by Russia on 24th February 2022 prompted the European Union members to raise defence spending but interestingly it was not agreed upon for just over three years when President Trump introduced punitive tariffs.

In another example of weaponising tariffs, on 6th August President Trump issued Executive Order “Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation imposing additional tariffs, currently 25%, on Indian Imports (circa USD 81.4 Billion 2023). Experts suggest that India has been targeted because of their direct and indirect purchases of Russian oil (averages a 5% discount), and now the Indian tariff is 50% on most goods imported to the U.S. which is seen as a penalty for facilitating Russia’s oil trade. However, the White Hopes the weaponising of tariffs against India will hopefully persuade them to reduce their dependency on Russian oil. Also, in the week ending 25th July 2025, the White House agreed tariff deals with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines; granting them lower rates than previously threatened in exchange for them to sign up to national security commitments, the verbiage of which was somewhat opaque.

Conclusion

President Trump has shown even his closest allies are not immune from weaponised tariffs and neither are historical neutral trading partners such as Switzerland who were recently hit with a 39% punitive tariff on Swiss goods, mainly pharmaceuticals, watches and luxury

goods. It appears that currently no country is safe from the Trump trade war machine which uses tariffs as a blunt instrument to beat other countries into submission.

In his second term, Donald Trump has elevated tariffs from a traditional economic safeguard to an overt instrument of political leverage. Whilst tariffs have long been used to protect domestic industries the current approach is far more aggressive as they are being imposed and lifted not purely on economic grounds, but as bargaining chips in corporate negotiations and diplomatic manoeuvres.

Trump Hits Switzerland with 39% Tariffs

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on August 6, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The highlight of Switzerland’s summer calendar is the national holiday (Switzerland’s birthday), which fell last Friday, 1st of August, but all of Switzerland, including the government, woke up to the headlines that President Donald Trump had hit the country with punitive tariffs of 39%. The tariffs cover all Swiss imports to the United States and in 2024, according to data released by the United Nations COMTRADE data base totalled USD 72.88 Billion, leaving America with a trade deficit of USD 38 Billion, (though other figures suggest it’s as high as USD 47.4 Billion,) the 13th largest of any nation with the USA. This has obviously caught the eye of President Trump who has made it clear that he wishes to eradicate trade imbalances with all of America’s trading partners.

This has come as a huge shock for both the politicians and the business elite as only a few weeks ago the government was exuding confidence regarding its tariff negotiations with the United States. Indeed, back in May, Switzerland hosted the United States and China in the hope of preventing a trade war which gave Switzerland’s President Karin Keller-Suter the opportunity to meet with Scott Bessent, the United States Trade Secretary. It appeared that the meeting was successful having been told that Switzerland was second in the queue after Great Britain to strike a trade deal with the U.S. at potentially a 10% tariff, much lower than the 31% as unveiled by President Trump back in April’s “liberation day”.

Therefore, the 39% has come at a complete shock and politicians are divided as to the negotiation tactics, with some saying the government were too obsequious, and others saying they were too tough, while many just said the negotiation tactics were not up to scratch. However, the trade deficit according to officials is the sticking point, and basically the Swiss sell more to the U.S. than it buys, and the population of just 9 million quite frankly just do not like U.S. goods such as their cheese, chocolates, and cars. However, the Swiss have tried to compensate for the trade deficit by reducing their own tariffs on imported U.S. industrial goods to zero, and many of the Swiss companies have multibillion dollar investments in U.S. plants. Data suggests that Swiss investment in the U.S has created circa 400,000 jobs, furthermore Trump has ignored service industries which would bring the deficit down to USD 22 Billion, but sadly President Trump is just fixated on trade imbalances.

Analysts point to one problem which is where on earth did the 39% come from, which makes it appear that President Trump is just arbitrarily picking out numbers from thin air. There appears to be little wiggle room in negotiations, but Switzerland could import LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) from the U.S. plus they can also point out they are committed to investments in the United States totalling USD 105 Billion. In Q1 two thirds of the trade deficit was due to shipments of gold bullion, this was due to the price of gold not due to any added value by the Swiss refineries. Experts point out that gold is not manufactured in Switzerland but reprocessed into bars and one offer to Trump could be a one off tariff of 50% on gold.

This Thursday, 7th August is deadline day for tariffs and experts point out that the Swiss government will be moving heaven and earth to get an extension. Indeed, officials from the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic affairs have already contacted their counterparts in the United States to try and negotiate a way forward, plus the President of Switzerland herself is flying to Washington (without an invitation) to meet face-to-face with Trump in the hope of avoiding the increase in tariffs. Trump is known for flip flopping at the last minute so the President of Switzerland can only hope they can extend the current deadline and get a reprieve, otherwise the damage to their economy could be quite serious. Experts point out that the key to the current tariff impasse would be that instead of dealing with Trump’s negotiators is instead to win over the man himself.

For Switzerland’s export-driven economy, the impact could be significant. Key industries—including luxury watchmaking, pharmaceuticals, and precision engineering—depend heavily on access to the U.S. market. Higher tariffs risk eroding profit margins, raising prices for American consumers, and prompting Swiss firms to reassess their U.S. expansion plans. Politically, the move is a shock to a nation that prides itself on neutrality and stable bilateral relations. It signals that even close, low-conflict partners are not immune from politically motivated trade actions.

The tariffs also complicate Switzerland’s position within the EU-Swiss economic framework, as Brussels weighs its own responses to Trump’s trade policy. In the short term, Swiss exporters may absorb some costs to maintain market share, but over time, the pressure could accelerate efforts to diversify export destinations and invest in U.S.-based production—ironically, one of Trump’s intended outcomes.

Overview of the New Trade Agreement Between the European Union and the United States

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on August 6, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

On Sunday 27th July, and after weeks of tense behind the scenes negotiations, the President of the European Union, Ursula von de Leyen, shook hands with United States President, Donald Trump, concluding a trade pact a week before the upcoming deadline as set by the White House. The trade deal was announced by the two leaders at Donald Trump’s golf course, Turnberry, located in Ayrshire, West Scotland. Those close to the negotiations said the “framework deal” was finally stuck, and ultimately it took a face-to-face meeting between the two leaders to reach an agreement. However, a number of EU member countries have already voiced their disapproval and in some cases outright hostility to the agreement.

The White House administration has lauded the agreement as a big win for Donald Trump, advising that based on last year’s trade figures the US governments will be better off by circa USD 90 Billion. Furthermore, included in the agreement is the EU’s promise to purchase arms and energy products from the United States which analysts estimate to be in the region of hundreds of billions of US Dollars. Elsewhere, carmakers in the EU will only face a 15% surcharge on imports into America, whereas the global tariff introduced in April is 25%. Indeed, the Eurozone agreement to a 15% tariff on most exports (steel will remain at 50%) to the United States has prevented a trade war which would have probably dealt a hammer blow to the global economy.

Not all European leaders were happy with the agreement with initial words coming from Benjamin Haddad, France’s Junior Minister for Foreign Affairs, who called the agreement “unbalanced”, Hanneke Boerma, the Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade, said the deal was “not ideal” and urged further negotiations with the United States, and the French Prime Minister Francois Bayou said it was “tantamount to a submission”. On Wednesday 30th July France’s President, Emmanuel Macron, said the deal is “not the end of it”. He went on to say that “the European Union had not been feared enough in negotiations with the United States towards a trade deal”, pledging to be firm in follow-up talks. Meanwhile, Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, said the agreement would “substantially damage the nation’s finances”, France’s far right leader, Marine Le Pen, said the agreement was a “political, economic and moral fiasco”, whilst the Hungarian leader, Viktor Orban, announced that “Trump had eaten von de Leyen for breakfast”.

A number of experts have already said that this is a bad deal for the European Union. In fact, when Great Britain announced a 10% tariff agreement with the United States, the statement that came out of Brussels was “we will never accept such humiliating terms”. Analysts now suggest that the hit to the EU’s economy would be 0.4 percentage points by the end of 2026 and the average tariffs on imports from the Union are set to rise from 1.5% (when Trump was elected) to circa 16%. Meanwhile, experts are suggesting that the EU is now a pushover and will have a weakened hand in future negotiations, and recently the Sino/EU trade negotiations came to nought partly as in part the Chinese would not make any concessions to a European Union that lacks leverage.

However, von der Leyen said the deal avoided the near-term catastrophe of an all-out trade war and had nullified any near-term uncertainty. Sadly, some experts and economists have said there is a perception that the European Union cannot defend their own interests which will undermine their position as a key geopolitical player which is the key to their wish for the Euro to play a bigger global role. Indeed, the president of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde, recently advocated a greater international role for the Euro, specifically its active function as an international reserve currency. Experts suggest that since the US/EU trade agreement such words may well fall on deaf ears. The US/EU trade agreement is not a done deal, just look at all the negative comments and outright hostility being shown by some member countries towards this agreement, and it suggests some very choppy seas are just around the corner.

Emerging Markets Debt Could Potentially Hit Record Sales in 2025

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on July 9, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Experts in emerging market debt advise that global issuance volumes in this sector year-on-year were up 20% for Q1 and Q2 for 2025, with issuances growing particularly quickly from the corporate sector. The boom in debt sales have defied missile attacks, an oil market with gyrating prices, and US policy, and tariffs putting a strain on global trade, resulting in a major increase in demand for local bonds who are having their best Q1 and Q2 in 18 years. White House policy has seen the greenback fall circa 11% this year, which has led to a fall in investor confidence resulting in an index of emerging market local debt to return in excess of 12% in the first half of 2025.

Regarding the fall in the value of the US Dollar, experts suggest that this has sent fund managers, asset managers, and the rest of the money managers to look elsewhere for better returns, and as a result, the markets have seen a surge in demand for fixed-income assets in emerging market currencies. Data released shows that hard currency bonds are only up 5.4% in the first half of this year as opposed to 12% as mentioned above in the emerging market arena, all this against the backdrop of the US Dollar having its worst performance since 1970 and falling against 19 of 23 of the most traded emerging market currencies.

Figures released by EFPR data (formerly known as Emerging Portfolio Fund Research) show circa USDD 21 Billion (an unprecedented amount) flowing into EM-debt funds, with some Latin American bonds returning some considerable gains. For example, some Brazilian government bonds have returned in excess of 29% whilst local bonds from Mexico (known as Mbonos) have generated a gain of 22%. Elsewhere, experts suggest that Ghana (Africa’s top gold producer) will, due to short-term borrowing costs falling to their lowest level in three years, resume domestic bond sales later this year.

The following is a part overview of data released regarding the total return year-to-date on emerging market bonds, Brazil Notas de Tesouro Nacional Serie F – 20.2%, Brazil Letras do Tesouro Nacional – 26.0%, Mexican Bonos – 21.7%, Poland Bonds – 19.9%, Hungary Bonds – 19.1%, Czech Republic Bonds 17.8%, Mexican Cetes – 17.4%, Nigeria Bonds – 15.8%, Egypt Bonds 15.0%, Romania Bonds – 14.9%, Taiwan Bonds – 13.8%, South African Bonds – 13.2% and Colombian TES – 12.8%.

Since the beginning of the year, data released shows emerging markets companies and governments having sold USD 331 Billion in debt in hard currencies such as the greenback and the Euro. However, not all future roads to emerging markets fixed income products are paved with gold, as tariff increases may yet put a dent in some country’s ability to issue new bonds. Donald Trump will be reviving tariff targets in the second week of this month, indeed, yesterday the White house announced that letters had been sent to 14 countries informing them new tariffs will be enforced on 1st August this year. The president also has stressed that he will put an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning themselves with “the Anti-American policies of BRICS*”, confirming “There will be no exceptions to this policy”.

*BRICS – Is an intergovernmental agency and is an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, (all joined 2009) followed by South Africa in 2010 as the original participants. Today, membership has grown to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, with Thailand, and Malaysia on the cusp of joining. Russia sees BRICS as continuing its fight against western sanctions and China through BRICS is increasing its influence throughout Africa and wants to be the voice of the “Global South”. A number of commentators feel as the years progress, BRICS will become an economic and geopolitical powerhouse and will represent a direct threat to the G7 group of nations. Currently this group represents 44% of the world’s crude oil production and the combined economies are worth in excess of USD28.5 Trillion equivalent to 28% of the global economy.

It is believed by experts that the capture of the “Global South” encompasses all of Africa and South America, and BRICS seemed determined to have their own currency and move away from the US Dollar. President Trump views this as a direct threat to the USA and western Europe and will probably follow through on his threats to BRIC aligned countries. However, as President Trump alienates many of America’s traditional allies, BRICS are positioning themselves to replace the United States in the ground that Trump has ceded. The second half of 2025 will be interesting and over the next few months the markets will see if the increase in fixed-income volumes from emerging markets runs out of steam or goes on to new record highs.

Is the US Dollar Under Threat Due to the Policies of Donald Trump?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on July 2, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Donald Trump was inaugurated on Monday 20th January 2025, and since his elevation to the White House, the greenback has lost over 10% of its value against the Swiss Franc, Sterling, and the Euro. Global investors have been turning away from President Trump’s policies, and there is no better measuring stick for their renunciation of his policies than the US dollar. The last time the US Dollar fell so badly was post the Global Financial Crisis 2007 – 2009, when in 2010 the Federal Reserve in order to prop up the economy was excessively printing money.

However, this time around there is no global financial crisis; it is the policies coming from the White House such as expanded global tariffs, the on-going fight between President Trump and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to push interest rates down, where Chairman Jerome Powell* refuses to budge. Furthermore, there are two further policies which are scaring investors such as the open legal warfare against those who stand up against his policies, and “the big beautiful bill” which has just passed the Senate 51-50, which many experts feel will add to an already massive deficit. These are just a few of the pillars that make up the current administration’s policy and according to the value of the US Dollar are driving global investors away.

*Jerome Powell and Tariffs – On Tuesday of this week, The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell noted that the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) would probably have reduced interest rates further without the White House’s policy of expanding global tariffs. He went on to say, “In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs and essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs. We think the prudent thing to do is to wait and learn more and see what the effect might be”.

Experts suggest that tariffs will put upward pressure on inflation and certainly slow economic growth, and the President continuing to flip-flop on the specifics of levies and halting progress on trade agreements has given much worry and uncertainty on the outlook of the US economy. However, having said that, recently released economic data shows that tariffs have yet to impact prices or the labour market with further data showing that job openings rose in May, the highest level since November 2024.

Interestingly, many market experts, traders, economists, and analysts suggest that Donald Trump and his colleagues are ambivalent to the fall in the US Dollar. When questioned as to whether they support a strong dollar, the answer is always inevitably “yes” but little seems to be done in halting the current decline. Analysts suggest the financial markets feel that the White House is happy to see the US Dollar slide downwards in order to boost manufacturing in the United States.

Such speculation has led some observers to suggest that the President is playing with fire as the cost of financing the government has exploded to over USD 4 Trillion as the budget deficit continues on its path like a runaway train. Financing mainly comes from overseas

investors, and when it comes time sell up and bring their money home, a sliding greenback means they lose money. This, some observers feel, could lead to a vicious cycle where global investors continue to pull their funds out of the USA driving up borrowing costs resulting in further declines in the US Dollar with further economic uncertainty and so on and so on. If overseas investors get a whiff that a declining greenback is government policy the results could be catastrophic for the US Dollar.

As the world’s reserve currency, the US Dollar is already on the decline because at the close of business 2014 data showed the greenback accounted for 65% of global foreign exchange reserves and as at close of business 2024 this figure stood at 58%. However, that said, swift data shows that as recently as August last year the US Dollar is used in 49.10% of global payments and as at December 2024 data shows that 54% of global traded invoices are transacted in US Dollar and 88% of foreign exchange transactions are done in USD Dollars.

Analysts agree that in the near future, the US Dollar will undoubtedly keep its status as the world’s reserve currency. However, if the US Dollar continues to slide it will come under severe pressure from foreign investors, and there are already mutterings coming out of the ECB (European Central Bank) that the Euro could, in a few years’ time, be in a position to take over the mantle of the world’s reserve currency. The US has amassed a debt pile of USD 29 Trillion (100% of GDP) and it’s not stopping, it has lost its last remaining AAA rating and the budget deficit over the past few years has increased to 6% of GDP. President Trump without a doubt will have some short-term problems coming his way, but will things have turned around by the end of his presidency, and what will his legacy be?

Trump’s Tariffs Hobble U.S. Markets Whilst European Stocks Forge Ahead

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on June 4, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The week ending 30th May 2025 saw equities in Europe as a clear winner globally, whilst tariffs and trade wars initiated by President Trump have hampered and shackled the markets in the United States. Recent data released showed that out of the world’s ten best performing stock markets, eight can be found in Europe. Indeed, this year in US Dollar terms Germany’s DAX Index* has rallied in excess of 30% including such peripheral markets as Hungary. Poland, Greece, and Slovenia.

*The DAX Index – The DAX or its full name Deutsche Aktien index 40, is Germany’s benchmark stock market index, and reflects the performance of 40 of the largest and most liquid German companies trading on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It is a key indicator of the health of the German economy.

The European STOXX 600 Index* is currently beating the U.S. S&P 500 by 18% (reflected in dollar terms) which as data shows is a record, which experts advise is being powered by a stronger Euro and Germany’s strong fiscal spending plan both current and in the past. Market analysts with knowledge of this arena suggest there is more to come due to attractive valuations and resilient corporate earnings, which when compared to America’s which is being gripped by fiscal and trade debt, make Europe a safer bet.

*European STOXX 600 Index – This index is a broad measure of the European Equity Market. Based in Zug, Switzerland, it has a fixed number of components and provides extensive and diversified coverage across 17 countries and 11 industries within Europe’s developed economies, representing circa 90% of the underlying investible market.

Equity bull experts suggest that Europe is back on the investment map, with some investment managers saying that recently there has been more European interest from investors than there has been in the last decade. Bulls went on to say that this rally may well be self-feeding and if European stocks continue to rise, they will be likely to attract fresh investment from the rest of the world. Indeed, some analysts suggest that if the trend away from America continues over the next five years the European markets could expect an inflow of circa USD 1.4 Trillion (Euros 1.4 Trillion.) Analysts suggest the gains so far this year were the result of a proposal by the German government to spend hundreds of billions of Euros on defence and infrastructure with some economists suggesting that this will boost growth across the European bloc from Q2 2026.

Elsewhere, a slew of Europe’s peripheral markets have had performances that have made investors sit up. For example, Slovenia’s SBI TOP Index is, according to data released, the second-best performing stock market up 42% (in dollar terms) just behind Ghana’s benchmark the Ghana Stock Exchange GSE-CI, (tracks all the performance of all company’s trade on the Ghana Stock Exchange). Other peripheral stock exchanges that have done well are Poland’s WIG20) Index up 40% whilst the benchmarks in both Hungary and Greece are both up circa 34%.

Experts suggest that 2025 could be a good year for European Stock Markets as some professionals are already betting that European stocks will outperform their counterparts in America. President Trump’s tariffs, the loss of the country’s AAA status, looming trade wars, and the current fiscal deficit of USD 1.9 Trillion (and predicted to climb), are all factors as to why investors are turning their backs on the US markets. Whether this will last, we will have to wait and see if all of Donald Trump’s predictions come true. Meanwhile back in Europe data released show that corporate earnings are in the spotlight having risen 5.3% in Q1 2025 against predictions of a 1.5% decline, another reason to perhaps bet on Europe.

Trump Reignites Trade War with EU as he Threatens 50% Tariffs on the Bloc

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on May 28, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

On Friday 23rd May, President Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on June 1st, 2025, on the EU (European Union) stating that current negotiations on trade between Washington and Brussels were going nowhere. President Trump has been complaining for a long time that the EU bloc has been unlawfully targeting U.S. companies with regulations and lawsuits, plus he feels that the Europeans have been deliberately taking their time over the current trade negotiations. Originally, on “Liberation Day” 2nd April 2025, the EU had been marked down for 20% tariffs, but were reduced to 10% until July 9th, to give enough time for trade talks to find common ground and a solution.

In response to the tariff threats by President Trump, the EU Trade Commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, said “EU/US trade is unmatched and must be guided by mutual respect, not threats. We stand ready to defend our interests”. He went on to stress “the EU’s fully engaged, committed to securing a deal that works for both of us”. Many of the European governments reacted to the tariff threat warning that higher tariffs would indeed be damaging to both sides. Meanwhile, back in the Oval Office, President Trump also announced to reporters that new tariffs would be imposed unless EU companies moved their operations to the United States.

However, on Monday 27th May, following a phone call between the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump, where the EU signalled a more conciliatory approach by agreeing to accelerate trade talks, the President of the United States agreed to extend the 50% tariff deadline to July 9th, 2025. Experts suggest that one of the major roadblocks that face the EU is that they feel America is not making it clear exactly what they want, and they still do not know who is speaking for the President. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic has spoken twice with U.S. Commerce Secretary with his statements adopting a more malleable tone, gone was the previous rhetoric of “we will defend our interest rates”.

After Trump’s announcement last Friday, the markets reacted with the usual predictability with the Nasdaq down 1%, the broader S%P 500 down 0.68%, the STOXX EUROPE 600 index down 0.68%, Germany’s Dax and France’s Cac 40 both ended the day down over 1.5%. The US Dollar took a beating again, down by as much as 0.8% on the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index*, slumping to its lowest level since 2023. Experts suggest that the threat of punitive tariffs then removing that threat gives many investors and traders in the financial markets a lack of confidence in the Presidency translating to a lack of confidence in the greenback. Whilst many indexes recovered on Monday 26th May, the US Dollar continued its decline which not only included the slap happy way tariffs are doled out, but also Trump’s tax bill which is expected to add hundreds of billions to the federal deficit. Meanwhile data released from the Commodities Futures Trading Commission show hedge funds, asset managers and other speculative traders continued to bet against the US Dollar.

*Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index – This index is a benchmark that tracks the performance of the US Dollar against a basket of major global currencies. It’s designed to provide a

comprehensive view of the dollar’s strength by including currencies from both developed and emerging markets that are significant in international trade and liquidity.

A full-blown trade war between the EU and the United States is according to experts not in anyone’s interests. The repercussions to both protagonists’ economies would be negative and will undoubtedly have a downside effect on global trade as well. No matter what is currently being said, both the U.S. and the E.U. are miles apart in their negotiations, with President Trump having already rebuffed a trade deal from the E.U. last Thursday 22nd May. Despite improved rhetoric from both sides those close to the negotiations are fearful that come July 9th, 2025, a consensus may not have been reached.

United States and China Trading Update

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on May 21, 2025. Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Without a doubt, President Trump’s tariff war has severely disrupted trade between the two economic powerhouses, and nowhere else is this as dramatically highlighted as Apple’s iPhone and mobile devices, where shipments to the United States in April 2025 are down to levels not seen since 2011. Customs data revealed that Smartphone exports slid 72% or circa USD 700 Million in April, outpacing by a long way an overall drop in Chinese shipments to the U.S. of 21%.

Elsewhere in early May 2025, the busiest container hub in the United States, the Port of Los Angeles, saw a drop in shipments by circa 30% as the weight of Trump’s tariffs took their toll. Data released shows that retailers and importers were the most affected, especially those linked to China. Bilateral trade in 2024 between China and the U.S. was circa USD 690 Billion and investors feel that tariffs will significantly erode this figure.

Despite the temporary reprieve in tariffs between the two nations, data reveals that the trade war has left a deep unwelcome imprint on Chinese exporters with many looking to new markets away from the United States. Well known in the trade insurance arena, Allianz Trade having conducted a poll of Chinese exporters found 95% will or already are more determined than ever to double down on exporting their goods to non-U.S. markets.

China’s coastal city of Ningbo is host to China’s second largest port (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port) by cargo tonnage where local businesses, despite the de-escalation in tariffs still plan to reduce exports to the United States and “Go Global’. Senior experts and economists at the Economic Intelligence Unit confirmed this fact whilst also confirming Southeast Asia* remained the favoured destination among many businesses seeking to move production away from China.

*Southeast Asia – comprises eleven countries Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. Note that many Chinese companies are somewhat wary of Vietnam with concerns over rising cost weighed against an attractive labour market. Indonesia appears to be the favoured destination.

Experts in the Sino – U.S. arena suggest that decoupling in the medium term seems to be the favoured outcome as Chinese exporters move away from the United States and American companies look to increase efforts to move production out of China with Apple already accelerating a shift in production to India. Apple was railed against by President Trump for not moving production back to the United States, experts close to the situation have said that scenario is unfeasible. The deal struck in Geneva between China and the United States brought tariff rates down to levels before the tit-for-tat tariff skirmish. But with time eating into the 90-day de-escalation agreement, the world will hold their breath whilst these two economic giants try and come to a sensible agreement.

Tag: Trading