Bank of Japan Increases Interest Rates

18th September 2026

Today, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) raised its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 1.25%, pushing borrowing costs to a new 31-year high and marking the highest interest rate level since 1995. The BOJ’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decision to raise interest was passed by seven votes to two, marking the central bank’s sixth hike under the governorship of Kazuo Ueda. In a widely expected decision, the BOJ’s Policy Board voted by seven votes to two to increase interest rates, with analysts suggesting that increase comes amidst severe global and domestic economic pressure.

The move by the BOJ comes as many major central banks (apart from the Bank of England) are raising interest rates as inflation is being pushed up due to the energy crisis, which is a result of the United States/Iran conflict in the Middle East. The increase in the policy rate comes just three months after the BOJ voted to hike rates – the shortest interval between increases since 1990. It arrives at a time when US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been actively pressing Japan to raise interest rates.*. 

*Scott Bessent/BOJ’s interest rates – The US Treasury Secretary has been aggressively pushing the BOJ to raise interest rates to protect the US Treasury market, strengthen the Japanese Yen, and curb regional currency weakness. Indeed, with Bessent’s repeated calls starting earlier this month to Governor Ueda to hike interest rates, money markets had almost fully priced in the chance of a rate increase at the September policy meeting.

After the policy meeting, Governor Ueda noted that underlying inflation is approaching 2.00%, the banks focus had shifted from pushing prices up to target to guarding against inflation overshoot. He was quoted as saying, “if risks of underlying inflation overshooting 2.00% materialise, that could have a negative impact on Japan’s economy”, and in his strongest remark to date on the central bank’s resolve to combat price pressure through continued rate hikes It’s important to stabilise underlying inflation at 2.00%. Our policy phase has changed”.

The Governor went on to stress that back-to-back rate hikes of 50 basis points would not be ruled out, but stressed that the BOJ did not want to be forced into large moves that might unsettle financial markets, so the bank would move pre-emptively. Experts suggest that the Governor is keeping his options open to include further increases in interest rates, whilst keeping a close eye on the state of inflation in order for it to be stabilised. BOJ officials noted that economic and price developments are moving in line with its baseline forecast, however, there is a risk of underlying inflation moving away from its 2.00% target.

As for the future, some analysts expect the central bank to lift interest rates to 1.50% by the close of business 31st March 2027 and to 1.74% by the close of Q2 2027. Experts advise that Japan is heavily dependent on energy imports purchasing circa 85% – to 90% of its total energy needs, and if the Middle East conflict carries on into 2027, the interest rates for 2027 predicted above may well turn out to be on the conservative side.

Bank of England Keeps Interest Rates on Hold

17th September 2026

Today, the Bank of England’s (BOE) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted by six to three to keep interest rates on hold, with the naysayers voting to raise the interest rate to 4.00%. The decision to hold rates steady comes despite the BOE’s counterparts, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the United States Federal Reserve, both increasing interest rates by 25 basis points due to rising inflation. In the United Kingdom, inflation has been rising to 3.10% (BOE benchmark target for inflation is 2.00%), but Governor Bailey feels that global energy costs have a limited effect on price and wage settings.

On the inflation front, data released yesterday by the Office of National Statistics (ONC) showed August’s inflation figure higher than the July figure of 2.90%, with rising petrol prices being the main driver to the current figure of 3.10%. Once again, the MPC voted as they did in the July meeting by six to three to hold interest rates, showing the committee is still deeply divided on how to respond to the surging energy prices caused by the on-going Middle East crisis being acted out between the United States and Iran. Experts suggest that the wait-and-see approach to inflation by the MPC will be severely tested by the ever increasing energy prices.

Analysts advise that a key point that emerged from yesterday’s data regarding the increase in headline inflation showed the wider economy had suffered less than expected from the spillover of increasing energy prices. The six MPC members who voted to hold interest rates had latched on to this piece of data as a major reason to keep interest rates on hold, despite the recent increase in the Middle East conflict and Saudi Arabia having to close its East West pipeline, a critical asset that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz. Other inflation data released by the ONC showed service inflation (a gauge for domestic pressure) holding steady at 3.40% and core inflation (excluding food and energy) also holding steady at 2.60%.

Governor Bailey noted that the global energy shock has so far had a limited effect on price and wages in the UK and he went on to say, “the longer volatility persists, the bigger the impact it will have on inflation and the more likely it is we will need to raise the bank rate”. Experts suggest that a hike in interest rates is likely on the table for the next meeting of the MPC on 5th November 2026, who today confirmed it stands by ready to act, with risks being tilted to the upside. Analysts note that following recent economic data and MPC statements, money markets expect inflation to hit 4.00% in 2027. As a result, traders have fully priced in a rate hike by the end of the year, alongside a 50% chance of a second hike. With chances of the war in the Middle East coming to an end in the near future being virtually zero, analysts say the money market bet for one rate rise before the end of the year is a near certainty.

The Federal Reserve Hikes Interest Rates

16th September 2026

Today, in defiance of President Donald Trump’s call for lower interest rates, and for the first time since 2023, the Federal Reserve’s FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) raised interest rates by 25 basis points to a range of 3.75% – 4.00%. Experts and financial markets predicted the rate rise as Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh tries to head-off increasing inflation due to the Middle East war between the United States and Iran. This has pushed the price of the Benchmark Brent crude oil higher and higher, where it currently sits trading at circa $105.45 p/bl (per barrel), having already pushed through $108 p/bl earlier in the day. 

After the rate increase announcement, officials of the FOMC advised that the rise “will support a timelier return” to the Federal Reserve’s inflation benchmark target of 2.00%. Whilst this target has not been reached for around 5 ½ years, the officials added “the committee will deliver price stability”, all of which was reiterated by Chairman Warsh at a press conference post FOMC meeting. The decision by the FOMC to raise rates was approved unanimously by twelve votes to zero, and the FOMC indicated that another rate rise was on the cards due to persistently high inflation – with indications suggesting the target figure of 2.00% will not be reached until 2029. 

After the meeting, Chairman Warsh acknowledged previous concerns regarding inflation commenting that too many categories of products and services were showing annualised price gains above 3.00% on a six and twelve-month basis. He went on to say that, “we removed a dose of accommodation so that financial and credit conditions would be more consistent with our ultimate objectives. This summer’s inflation readings do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved”. Data provided by the BLS (Bureau of Labour Statistics) revealed core inflation rose at a higher-than-expected rate in August. This was a major factor in the decision to raise interest rates, reflecting broader concerns that inflationary pressures are spreading beyond the Middle East war, surging energy prices, and the temporary effects of tariffs.

On the future of interest rates, projections released today by the Federal Reserve shows sixteen officials advancing the possibility of a further rate rise before close of business 31st December 2026, with the median projection for 2027 pointing to no additional rate increases for 2027. However, eight policymakers suggested no further increases in rates for this year, but projected a 0.25% increase in 2027 to a range of 4.00% – 4.25% by the end of year 2027. Interestingly, the rate rise was in defiance of Donald Trump’s wishes to have the lowest borrowing cost in the world, and it should be remembered that Chairman Warsh is the President’s pick, and when the previous Chairman Jerome Powell defied the President on interest rates, he suffered a series of highly personal attacks. 

Analysts advise that financial markets in a hawkish shift anticipate a further 25 basis point increase in interest rates before the end of the current year and have priced in a 57.40% probability. The surge in bet rate hikes across money markets is being fueled by what experts describe as a mix of persistent macroeconomic factors and official central bank projections. As the Middle East conflict continues unabated with no end in sight, and with the Saudi East West pipe line (avoids the Strait of Hormuz) now closed, the potential for inflationary increases in the coming months is ever present and the markets could see more hawkish bets regarding rate increases before the end of the year.

Global Energy Crisis Deepens

As the United States/Iran conflict widens, Saudi Arabia has closed its crucial east/west pipeline after it was attacked by drones launched from Iraq, and officials confirm the attack originated in the southeastern province of Maysan. Saudi officials have yet to announce how badly the pipeline has been damaged, however, the president of Lipow Oil Associates suggested that a pump station had been seriously damaged and that engineers may be able to bypass the station resulting in a lower output, though on-line pictures show that repairs may take months. A meeting between the gulf states and Iran to be held in Salalah regarding the Strait of Hormuz has subsequently been cancelled due to the pipeline attack by Iran.

*Saudi Arabian East/West Pipeline – This pipeline is known as the Petroline and stretches for 746 miles from the Abqaiq oil fields in the eastern province (close to Bahrain and Qatar on the Persian Gulf coast) to the port city Yanbu on the west coast by the Red Sea. The pipeline was built during the 1980’s allowing Saudi Arabian oil exports to bypass the tanker war in the Persian Gulf, which was a result of the war between Iran and Iraq. The pipeline serves as a strategic and critical lifeline not only to Saudi Arabia but to the global economy, and is currently pumping 7 million barrels a day, which is the pipeline’s maximum capacity. 

As result of the pipeline closure, the Benchmark Brent Crude price has risen and is trading today at circa $107.84 p/bl having briefly gone through the $108 p/bl mark. WTI (West Texas Intermediate) is also up, trading within a range of circa $101.81 p/bl – $103.86 p/bl, having recently surged past the $100 p/bl mark. During the past week, oil prices have continued to rise due to the on-going conflict in the Middle East, and in the US, consumers saw the retail price of diesel shoot past $6.00 per gallon, being a record price for the fuel. Experts note that supply chain difficulties are the reason for the recent surge in energy prices, and the longer the east/west pipeline remains shut, there remains the potential for further increases in energy prices. 

Furthermore, Iranian backed Houthi rebels have been advancing towards coastal areas of the Red Sea which border the strategic Bab el-Mandeb Strait or Gateway*, and with the Houthis attempting to seize the Yemeni port city of Mokha, could well impact maritime security in the area – resulting in pushing crude oil prices even higher. The Houthis have already been disrupting shipping in this area through its control of Hodeida, another port city, and if they take control of Mokha this would most certainly see the rebels tightening its grip on the strait.

*Bab el-Mandeb Gateway – Often translated from Arabic as the “Gate of Tears” or the “Gate of Grief”, possibly an apt description considering the current state of affairs in the Middle East. It is located between the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula and is one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints, as well as a crucial shortcut between Europe and Asia. Historically, the gateway has handled circa 10% – 12% of all global trade and acts as a primary artery for energy transportation between Asia, the Middle East and Europe. Analysts advise that millions of barrels of petroleum products transit the gateway daily and its closure will have a direct effect on the global economy.

Elsewhere, European gas prices have had five weeks of consecutive gains, and at the start of this week continued to head north as risks to supply were compounded by the closure of the east/west Saudi pipeline. Due to the Middle East confrontation, LNG supplies from Qatar have been crippled and Europe is heading into winter with its lowest level of gas storage for twenty years. 

Today, the competition is cut throat for LNG cargoes that do not have cross geographically charged checkpoints, and as winter approaches, experts advise there is the potential for a global fight for fuel. Data shows that the competition for LNG is intensifying in Asia where spot prices for LNG surged to levels not seen since 2022, and as buyers in Asia and Europe compete for alternative cargoes, the price for European natural gas has dramatically risen.

The IEA (International Energy Agency) has warned that oil consumption for the remainder of 2026 will fall and have accordingly cut forecasts for oil demand as the Middle East Conflict between the US and Iran continues unabated. The IEA projects that the drop in oil demand for 2026 will be 2.5 million b/pd (barrels per day), and due to the current crisis, it is estimated there will be a deeper shortfall in supply than originally advised. 

Forecasts for Benchmark Brent Crude Oil at the close of 2026 vary among major financial institutions and energy advisory firms: JP Morgan projects $78/bbl, HSBC has revised its estimate to $90/bbl, the EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) predicts $89–$90/bbl, and Barclays maintains an average forecast of $100/bbl. Some analysts predict even higher prices, but the world waits to see if there is any conclusion to this conflict on the horizon, as consumers globally see their costs of living going forever higher.

Escalation in the Middle East Crisis as Brent Crude Hits the USD101 Mark

Benchmark Brent Crude oil climbed above $101, hitting its highest price per barrel since July this year, with recent prices being quoted at $101.69 p/bl (per barrel) with West Texan Intermediate trading at circa $96.14 p/bl. Increased concerns about the shipment of crude oil through the crucial Strait of Hormuz, due to escalating attacks within the region along with the Iranian-backed Houthi militants targeting Saudi Arabian energy facilities, have been responsible for driving up the price of crude oil. 

In the meantime, the Iranian media have announced that the country will not back down in the face of increased strikes from the American task force, and have promised to escalate their counterstrikes if the United States continues to target infrastructure and oil tankers. Whilst their leaders acknowledge that the country is suffering from severe economic pain, they feel that the existential threat they are facing from the US leaves them no choice but to carry on fighting. 

The US/Iran war has now entered seven months of hostilities, with comments by officials on both sides suggesting that there is little chance of the war ending in the near future. As proof of this, on Tuesday a US warship was forced to evade an attack by Iranian ballistic missiles and in response destroyed five Iranian energy tankers, with Iran then launching twenty missiles at an airbase in Jordan currently being used by the US. President Trump has continued his dialogue, suggesting that Iran is at the end of the road and the war will end immediately after the mid-term elections in November, which many observers suggest is nothing more than a gesture to the American voters.

Experts confirm that one of the main planks of the White House’s war with Iran was that the Iranian people would rise up and oust the government, but a mass uprising late last year due to severe economic pressures only led to thousands of innocent people being slaughtered by Iranian authorities. The current blockade on the Strait of Hormuz has stopped Tehran from exporting most of its petroleum, plus, they are unable to import a cross section of goods vital to the populace and the economy. Officials in the Iranian government have said that the US must go back to the failed Memorandum of Understanding signed in June if any talks are to take place. 

Benchmark Brent Crude oil has increased by circa 70% since the start of this year, and today, November settlement briefly went above the $102 p/bl mark, though it is still well below its March/April 2026 wartime peak of $126.41 p/bl. Some experts suggest that the price of Brent Crude due to supply chain conditions could reach $120 p/bl by close of business 31st December 2026.  On the diesel front, analysts advise that the current crunch in the global diesel refining sector will keep prices elevated due to tight supply in this arena. The market is also having to cope with Ukrainian drone strikes on refineries in Russia, which has resulted in Russian authorities extending the current ban on diesel exports. 

Experts suggest that the big loser in the diesel market will be North West Europe, as the onset of the winter months will produce a dramatic increase in consumption of this energy product. Whilst exports of diesel from the United States have partially alleviated tightness in the European market (import dependent), analysts suggest that this will not cover the increase in consumption come the winter months. Market observers note that the war is set to continue despite briefings to the contrary from the White House. In fact, no lesser figures than US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Mario Rubio have both suggested that the Middle East conflict could run through to the end of President Trump’s presidency in January 2029.

The ECB Raises its Key Interest Rates

On the 10th of September 2026 and for the second time since the commencement of the United States/Iran conflict (28th February 2026), the ECB lifted its three key interest rates by 25 basis points. The central bank hiked its key benchmark deposit rate to 2.5%, whilst at the same time, they hiked the interest rates of both their Main Refinancing Operations and the Marginal Lending Facility by 25 basis points to 2.65% and 2.9% respectively. 

*ECB Interest Rates – The ECB has three interest rates; the Key Deposit Rate is the interest rate banks receive when they deposit monies overnight with the ECB. The other two facilities are the Main Refinancing Operations which is the rate the banks pay when they borrow money from the ECB for one week. Lastly, the Marginal Lending Facility is the rate banks pay when they borrow money overnight from the ECB.

Those close to the meeting of the governing council advised that there was a broad consensus among members to raise interest rates, with the President of the ECB, Christine Lagarde, being quoted as saying the latest hike was a “no brainer”, noting the increase in rates was agreed unanimously. A statement from the ECB read, “the conflict in the Middle East continues to generate inflation pressures, and inflation is set to remain well above target for an extended period.”

Officials advised that projections showing inflation averaging 3% this year and slowing to 2.7% next year were a key driver for the general council reaching today’s decision on interest rates. Officials went on to say that, “the outlook remains highly uncertain, with risks to the upside of inflation and the downside of economic growth.” President Lagarde further warned that higher energy costs are set to feed through gradually into core and food-price inflation. 

Recently released data for last month confirmed that across the 21-country eurozone, surging oil and gas prices pushed inflation past the 3% mark, well above the ECB’s benchmark target of 2%. Officials noted that recent conflict escalations between the United States and Iran in the Middle East could have further negative effects on inflation, pointing to further price increase which could impact wage-setting. President Lagarde added that, “the war in the Middle East is weighing on activity, and surveys are pointing to a slowdown, especially in services. The increase in energy prices will lift inflation further over the summer and keep it well above target in 2027.”

Analysts advise that financial markets have significantly adjusted their expectations upward, pricing in at least two more interest rate increases by the ECB, spanning a period of late 2026 through to early 2027. The hawkish shift in sentiment by traders is due to the on-going and increasing fighting in the Middle East conflict, which has pushed the Benchmark Brent crude price back above the $100 p/bl mark (which hit the $102 p/bl earlier this week), but as of today, is trading at circa $101.69 p/bl.

Is OPEC’s Future Under Threat

On the 28th April this year, the United Arab Emirates officially announced they were leaving OPEC and OPEC+, and formally walked away three days later on 1st May, ending a 59 year membership that began in 1967. A number of reasons for leaving OPEC include a frustration with OPEC+ production caps limiting the UAE’s output to circa 3.4 million bpd (barrels per day), leaving just under 30% of overall production offline. As a result, the UAE wanted independence from OPEC in order to maximise revenue before global oil demand begins a permanent decline. Another problem was sitting at the same table with representatives from Iran, who due to the Middle East crisis, had persistently attacked the Emirate with drones and missiles, threatening their economy.

*OPEC – Short for the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Nations and is a coalition of 23 oil producing countries of which the full members are: Algeria, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela. 

**OPEC+ – There are a further 10 non-OPEC partner countries that form the OPEC+ and make up the DoC (Declaration of Cooperation), consisting of: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan. The whole group’s modus operandi is to cooperate to influence the global oil market and stabilise prices.

The UAE is not the first member to resign as Indonesia left in 2016, Qatar in 2019, Ecuador in 2020 followed by Angola in 2023. At the time, experts, analysts, and oil commentators all sounded the death knell for OPEC—but it never happened. OPEC simply carried on as if nothing had occurred. However, the UAE is a different matter, being OPEC’s third largest producer and second highest spare production capacity. Indeed, OPEC lost circa 15% of its total capacity severely weakening its position and ability to adjust and set global prices. Furthermore, in late July this year, it was reported that Venezuela was considering resigning its membership from OPEC, however a final decision has yet to be made.

Coming quickly on the heels of the UAE’s decision to resign from OPEC, alongside rumblings of discontent from Iraq, this announcement leaves experts questioning whether OPEC and OPEC+, led by Saudi Arabia, can continue to hold together oil prices. A former senior oil marketing official from Oman’s Energy Ministry noted, “The critical question is whether this marks the beginning of a broader wave of withdrawals, the very cohesion and credibility of OPEC could be at stake”. Further erosion in recent years of OPEC dominance can be seen by rivals outside of OPEC and OPEC +, such as Brazil and Guayana and shale drillers in the United States. 

In volume terms, Venezuela resigning from OPEC would have little short-term impact. However, the country possesses massive oil reserves that, alongside US supermajors, could be unleashed onto the market over coming decades, with analysts noting high-level US-Venezuela discussions over 100-year leases on several oilfields. Losing Venezuela would deal a major blow to OPEC’s prestige. As a founding member back in 1960, its departure carries immense symbolic weight, with a former OPEC secretariat analyst observing, “This would be a big hit to OPEC.”

Is The US Dollar Debasement Trade Back in Earnest?

A number of experts advise that the “Debasement Trade”* is back as investors unload the US dollar, due to fiscal and political uncertainty and piling into alternative assets such as gold and Bitcoin, with the cryptocurrency hitting a three month high and passing the $80,000 mark. However, a number of other experts suggest that the debasement trend is not real, and just because there has been a dip in the dollar, there is no need to expound on the debasement theory. 

*Debasement Trade – A financial strategy where investors invest in assets such as Bitcoin and gold as a hedge against the devaluation of fiat currencies, with key takeaways being rising sovereign or government debt, geopolitical instability, and inflation.

Currency commentators suggest that the reason for the latest fall in the US dollar started with interventions in the currency markets to support the Japanese Yen, as instigated by the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Scott Bessent then tried, unsuccessfully, to rein in long-term borrowing costs by announcing further plans to buy back long-term government bonds and issue shorter term treasuries. These two steps taken by the Treasury Secretary have revived talks of debasement, despite the fact that he maintains that the White House through the Treasury still has a strong US dollar policy.

However, government debt has now gone roaring past the $40 trillion mark, and with yields on treasuries elevated, the sustainability of such debt is becoming harder with analysts suggesting that this will weigh on growth and devalue the US dollar. Some well-known experts have encouraged investors to sell the dollar and buy gold and Bitcoin, driven by market speculation (despite claims to the contrary) that both the President and the Treasury Secretary are comfortable with a weaker dollar.

One problem for the White House is that come November, the upcoming mid-term elections are just around the corner, and with mortgage rates still rising and gasoline prices still high at the pumps, commentators suggest that the bond buy-backs, hopefully lowering long-term yields, may well be politically motivated. The problem, suggest some analysts, is that by pushing this programme too hard it may reignite inflation, forcing the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates, which is exactly what the White House does not want. 

On the flip side of the debasement argument, some analysts point out that the debasement trade is flawed and there is not enough evidence to support this theory. Indeed, they note that there is no global selling of US dollar denominated assets as global investors continue to hold sizable amounts of US Treasuries. They also note the current strength of the US stock market as a nod to their anti-debasement theories, as overseas investors need to purchase dollars in order to buy US stocks and shares. 

However, looking forward, many experts agree that enthusiasm for the debasement trade may prove to be short-lived. The recent moves within the gold, Bitcoin and the US dollar markets may start to substantially cool as no one can see where the next catalyst for these moves will be coming from. Analysts point out that the buy-back schemes initiated by Secretary Bessent are on the small side in relation to the Treasury market itself. On the cryptocurrency front, Spot Bitcoin ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) have recently had their strongest inflow for ten months, but will this continue if the debasement debate goes away? 

Escalating Yields of Global Sovereign Bonds

Earlier this week, global sovereign bond yields surged to multi-decade highs as hopes faded for a US/Iran/Israel peace deal, which has kept oil and energy prices elevated — escalating fears for increases in inflation. The 30-year US Treasury yield went above the 5.3% yield (the highest since 2007, with long-term borrowing costs across European and Asian benchmarks spiking to multi-decade highs). According to experts, the massive sell-off in global debt is due to elevated oil prices fuelling inflation fears, highly elevated government fiscal deficits, and massive corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure.

Analysts advise that investor concerns regarding inflation, government debt and the debt laden AI boom, have converted into selling longer maturity bonds with a heavy price being paid by governments as their costs of borrowing keep rising. Indeed, analysts confirm that in Germany, government costs of borrowing were this week at their highest level since 2011. In France, government borrowing costs were also at their highest point since 2008. Meanwhile, in Japan, government bonds were close to their all-time high recorded in June 1984, and the United Kingdom equivalent long-dated yields were approaching 6%.

Analysts point to AI “hyperscalers” who have dramatically increased borrowing, while governments continue spending at a vastly increased rate. This has been a key factor in pushing up government bond yields, as buyers demand higher returns to keep purchasing the avalanche of bonds coming onto the market. Unsurprisingly, when the US Department of the Treasury held a $25 billion 30-year Treasury bond auction on Thursday 13th August this year, the sale cleared at a high yield of 5.216%, marking the highest borrowing cost for a 30-year bond auction since 2001. Experts pointed out the yield was driven by swelling budget deficits and strong investor demand for higher returns.

*AI Hyperscalers – Defined as large-scale cloud providers or tech giants that operate massive, globally distributed data centres which are packed with specialised chips to train, host, and scale artificial intelligence models. They supply the immense computing power and infrastructure required for the modern AI boom. The biggest AI hyperscalers are: AWS (Amazon Web Services), GCP (Google Cloud Platform), Meta Platforms and OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure), and together, these companies control over 70% of the world’s total AI computing infrastructure.

Experts advise that competition for capital has reached levels rarely seen in recent times. Driven by the rapid AI build-out and other factors mentioned above, this capital scarcity is directly pushing bond yields higher. Data released shows that so far this year, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta alone have issued circa $220 billion in bonds which almost double the total amount of bonds issued in 2025 (which stood $108 billion at close of business 31st December 2025).

In the US, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a fresh attempt to rein in long-term borrowing—doubling the size of liquidity support for 10- to 30-year Treasuries from his original announcement two weeks ago. This had the effect of lowering the 30-year yield by circa 10 basis points to 5.18%, encouraging a small domino effect on long dated government bonds in other countries. However, this has only increased the Treasury Department’s borrowings, and with the public debt now in excess of $40 trillion for the first time, experts suggest that this is only a temporary fix. 

Mid-term elections are in November, and with consumers having to pay higher mortgages, fuel costs, and energy bills, a voter backlash could lead to a lame-duck presidency for the next two years. There is no end in sight for the Middle East conflict, and if Democrats regain control of the Senate, as pollsters currently expect, the US could be rudderless for two years, with long-dated bond yields perhaps elevating even higher than this week’s record peaks.

The Disconnect Between Fuel Prices and the Price of Crude Oil

On the 9th August, the Benchmark Brent Futures for October hit $84.11p/bl (per barrel) which is still well below the highest price per barrel of $126.41 recorded on 30th April 2026, as Iran continues to demand tougher concessions in on-going negotiations with the United States. Global Benchmark Brent Crude was trading at circa $72.30p/bl on 27th February 2026, the day before the USA launched its attack on Iran, and even though the price is currently about $14p/bl higher, the price for diesel and petrol remain inflated at the pumps due to record premiums over crude oil.

Experts advise that if indeed the Strait of Hormuz reopens, consumers and businesses will not see a reduction in fuel at the pumps, as the gap between crude oil and its refined products has spiked in recent weeks. Analysts note that the diesel commodity is currently trading at a premium of roughly $70 per barrel over crude oil. While slightly down from its recent record high of $90 per barrel, this remains far above historical levels of around $20 per barrel.

Analysts advise that this current disconnect is due to the global shortage in refining capacity, with some of the world’s largest refiners being cut off by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Furthermore, China is currently restricting exports of refined products, and Ukraine’s drone attacks on Russia’s refineries has not helped matters. 

A number of experts point out that global inventories are diminishing by the day and Europe is particularly vulnerable due to years switching investments to green energy, ignoring investing in refineries, and are now reliant upon imports for much of their domestic consumption. In Europe, analysts advise another reason that diesel is trading at a higher than normal premium is because the marginal barrel price of diesel in Europe is becoming more expensive, due to the market paying a higher price to pull replacement barrels into a physically tight European system.

Europe is also facing upward pressure on diesel and petrol prices as energy supply chains begin to run out of water. The water levels in the Rhine are reaching record lows which is restricting barge traffic, and in turn it has pushed gasoil freight rates to record levels. Authorities will now have to adapt energy supply routes to these critical weather conditions, which experts estimate will not be ending any time soon, placing further upward pressure on fuel and energy prices. In fact, experts warn that Europe could face a serious diesel shortage this winter due to limited domestic refining capacity and its heavy reliance on imports. 

Experts note a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz remains distant. Tehran has rejected direct talks with the United States, and even though Iran and Oman are apparently close to agreeing terms on shipping lanes within the Strait, Iran has said they will not reopen the Strait unless the United States accede to their demands. The US/Iran/Israel continues to drag on, and analysts advise that refined crude products could well increase in price as the months go on.