IEA Declares Largest Ever Global Oil Supply Disruption

Headquartered in Paris, France, the IEA (International Energy Agency) has recently declared that the current Middle East Crisis is responsible for the creation of what will most likely be the largest supply disruption the global oil market has ever encountered. The closing of the Strait of Hormuz is eroding the current oil surplus, and it is forcing energy producers and exporters within the Persian Gulf to cut output. 

Officials from the IEA have estimated that the current US/Iran/Israel conflict will cut global oil supply by 8 Million/bls a day this month, and they went on to confirm that overall exports of crude oil and other products through the Strait of Hormuz are already down by circa 90%. Original predictions by the IEA for 2026 was for a record oil glut/surplus, these have now been dramatically reduced. As of Wednesday last week, the IEA announced that members (32 OECD* nations) had approved to let go 400 Million/bls from emergency reserves.

*OECD – Based in Paris, France the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is an international forum of 38, mostly industrialised countries that promote policies to improve economic and social well-being worldwide. Founded in 1961, it acts as a knowledge-based organisation developing standards and research to improve trade, financial stability and public policy.

Despite output losses from the Persian gulf being slightly set off by increased production from non-OPEC (Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries), the IEA has said that the effects of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz will be felt well beyond the time that the Strait is reopened. Sadly, consumers in many countries around the world will be forced to endure for many months, maybe years, higher prices for food, petrol and diesel, airline flights, restaurants and many other day-to-day  purchases.

Central Banks who have Kept Interest Rates Steady Despite the Iranian Conflict

Two months ago, on February 28th the United States and Israel launched a major military campaign against Iran, which after thirty 39 days came to a halt (on 7th April 2026) so peace talks could take place in Islamabad, Pakistan. The US delegation to Islamabad was led by Vice President J.D. Vance who yesterday announced, after 21 hours of talks, that negotiations with the Iranians had sadly failed.

However, since the conflict began, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz through which 20% of the world’s oil is shipped. During this time, the price of oil has shot up and down on the back of President Trump’s announcements, usually on his media outlet, Truth Social. Currently, jet fuel prices per the European Benchmark have more than doubled, rising from a pre-conflict price of $831/tonne to a closing price of $1,838/tonne on Friday, April 3rd. Similarly, the benchmark Brent Crude oil price has surged from approximately $70/bbl before the conflict to peaks exceeding $119/bbl. It currently sits at $102.22/bbl, following a closing price of $95.20/bbl on Friday the 26th.

Oil prices are now well above pre-conflict prices and as such, inflation is at the forefront of thoughts of policymakers at central banks across the globe. The recent failure of peace talks between Iran and the United States has resulted in the increased attention to inflation in the bond markets where, according to experts, the expectation is there will be no movement downward in interest rates but they will stay higher for longer. Many experts are suggesting that if the conflict carries on for much longer, and as increased energy prices are reflected in CPI (consumer price index), central banks may have to increase interest rates to battle rising inflation. Last week’s data released revealed that in the US there was the steepest advance in consumer prices for nearly four years.

However, last week a number of central banks had policy meetings where interest rates were kept on hold despite the conflict as can be seen below:

New Zealand

On Wednesday 8th April 2026, the MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) of the RBNZ (Royal Bank of New Zealand) kept the Benchmark OCR (Official Cash Rate) at 2.25% with officials noting, “If the increase in near term inflation is largely temporary, the committee envisages gradually moving the OCR to more neutral levels as activity recovers and near term inflation dissipates. However, any signs of significant second round inflation expectations would require decisive and timely increases in the OCR to re-anchor inflation expectations. The committee is vigilant to these risks”. 

Local economists and analysts suggest that headline inflation will hit 4.50% by June/July this year, outstripping the RBNZ’s target of 1% – 3% for 2026. The Governor of the RBNZ, Anna Breman, said that the MPC had discussed the possibility of a “relatively early” increase in interest rates. However, she later advised that committee members were not close to enforcing such a measure at this time. 

South Korea

On Friday 10th April 2026, the MPB (Monetary Policy Board) of the BOK (Bank of Korea), by a unanimous decision, held its Benchmark Seven-Day Repurchase Rate steady at 2.50%. The BOK Governor Rhee Chang Yong issued a warning that due to the United States/Iran conflict, inflation may outpace this year’s forecast as the economy is threatened with a bigger supply shock than was seen after Ukraine was invaded by Russia. 

Governor Rhee warned that it was too early to make any substantial policy decisions and will hold off from adjusting rates whilst waiting to see if the supply shock proves temporary or not. Officials have advised that following the failure of US/Iran peace talks, the bank has adopted a cautious stance of monitoring whilst maintaining steady interest rates amid rising inflation and economic uncertainty. 

Peru

On Thursday 9th April 2026, the Consejo de Politica Monetaria/MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) of the BCRP (The Central Reserve Bank of Peru) left its Benchmark Reference Interest Rate steady at 4.25% for the seventh straight month. Officials noted after the meeting, that policymakers were of the opinion that the previous month’s surge in inflation would only be of a temporary nature. 

Officials went on to say, “it is projected that both year-on-year inflation and inflation excluding food and energy (underlying inflation) will return to the target range towards the end of the year and settle around 2.00% as the effects of supply shocks gradually dissipate”. Among emerging market economies, Peru has one of the lowest interest rates and despite on-going political turmoil enjoys one of the more stable economies and currencies amongst Latin American countries.

Kenya

On Wednesday April 8th 2026, the MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) of the CBK (Central Bank of Kenya) held their Benchmark Central Bank Interest Rate (CBR) at 8.75% finally ending a two year easing cycle. Analysts advise that the CBK’s mid-point target range for inflation is 5.00% and inflation currently remains below that figure, despite ticking up to 4.40%.

In a statement following the meeting, the Governor of CBK Kamau Thugge noted, “The conflict in the Middle East has disrupted global supply chains, leading to significantly higher energy prices and heightened risks to the global economic outlook”. The Governor also noted that likeminded central banks in the region (including South Africa) have paused monetary policy decisions whilst awaiting the outcome of the current Middle East conflict between Iran, the United States and Israel. 

Governor Thugge went on to say that helped by appropriate monetary policy actions, inflation is expected to remain within the target range of 2.50% – 7.50%, and he further expected food prices to be stable due predicted good weather and a stable exchange rate. However, analysts warn that due to the consequences of the Iran/US conflict, prices of fuel and food may well rise, testing the upper limits of a 2.50% – 7.50% inflation band.

Romania

On Tuesday 7th April 2026, the NBR Board (Board of the National Bank of Romania – monetary policy committee) of the BNR (Banca Nationala a Romaniei) kept its Benchmark Monetary Policy Rate* on hold at, and for the thirteenth time since October 2024 , at 6.50%. Officials also advised that that the NBR had left unchanged the Deposit Facticity Rate**at 5.50% and the Lending Facility Rate*** at 7.50%

*Monetary Policy Rate – The main benchmark interest rate for 1-week repo operations which guides interbank market rates.

**Lending Facility Rate (Lombard) – The rate used by the central bank to provide overnight liquidity to banks.

***Deposit Facility Rate  – The rate at which banks can deposit excess funds with the central bank

Officials noted after the meeting that, “ High uncertainties and risks to the outlook for economic activity, implicitly the medium-term inflation developments, arise however from the Middle East war and the on-going energy crisis, via the effects potentially exerted through multiple channels on consumer purchasing power, as well as firm’s activity and profits, also by affecting the dynamics of economies and inflation in Europe/Worldwide and the risk perception towards the region, with an impact on financing costs”.  Put simply, along with many other central banks, rates are left on hold as the world awaits the outcome of the on-going crisis in the Middle East.

Analysts suggest, as does the above cross-section of central banks, that interest rates are being kept on hold until the on-going conflict between Iran/US becomes clearer. Or in some countries if inflation had spiked dramatically interest rates may well be increased. Financial markets are waiting to see what interest rate decisions will be made by the Federal Reserve, the BOE (Bank of England) and the ECB (European Central Bank) on 29th – 30th April 2026 respectively. 

Europe About to Suffer Jet Fuel Shortages

ACI (Airports Council International) Europe’s director-general, Olivier Jankovec, has warned in a letter to the European Commissioners that, “A supply crunch would severely disrupt airport operations and air connectivity – with the risk of harsh economic impacts for the communities affected, and for Europe”. At this stage, we understand that if the passage through the Strait of Hormuz does resume in any significant and stable way within the next three weeks, systematic jet fuel shortage is set to become a reality for the EU (European Union).

In the week ending Friday 3rd April 2026, the European jet fuel benchmark price was at an all-time high of $1,838 p/tonne as opposed to a pre-conflict price of $831p/tonne. The director-general went to mock the commission for lack of monitoring with regard to jet fuel production and availability, suggesting they should intervene as relying on market forces alone is currently not an option. ACI also urged the commission for the restrictions and regulations on importing jet fuel to be temporarily lifted, whilst advising that the price of jet fuel will remain elevated in the medium to long-term.

Analysts advise that the European politicians and officials did nothing to predict and alleviate the potential shortages of jet fuel, and it is expected that airlines focusing on air travel within Europe will start cutting back on flights. The airline industry is important to the European economies GDP as it contributes EUR 851 Billion and supports 14 million jobs.

Malta AKA Blockchain Island Rails Against Crypto Regulation by the European Union

The Rise of Blockchain Island

In 2018, Malta earned its nickname of “Blockchain Island” as it became the first country in Europe to produce an in-depth and wide-ranging regulatory framework for distributed ledger technology, crypto and blockchain. Analysts advise that a number of companies relocated to Malta as they felt the island now had the regulatory framework to oversee and understand their business, and this, coupled with a 5% tax rate for some international companies, drew significant attention from the crypto world. Data released by the NSO (National Statistics Office) in Malta shows that in the crypto sector, on-line gaming has provided 14,000 – 15,000 high productivity jobs. 

The MiCA Framework and EU Centralisation

However, in 2023 the EU (European Union) approved a framework known as MiCA (Markets in Crypto Assets) which if enacted has the potential to reduce Malta’s edge in the crypto arena. On July 1st 2026, MiCA is due to come into force and will allow national authorities the ability to grant licences to companies, enabling them to operate across the eurozone. Accordingly, such companies will be regulated under the rules of the EU. Indeed, in 2025 those crypto companies registered in the EU (numbered in the thousands), were contacted and requested to obtain early licences. 

Sovereignty vs. ESMA Oversight

Officials of the EU have advised that in order to make investing a safer proposition and hopefully prompting savers to invest in stocks and bonds, centralisation of crypto oversight under ESMA (European Securities and Market Authorities – based in Paris) is essential. However, experts say Malta is vehemently opposed to this move saying that there is deep jealousy over the islands ability to attract well known crypto companies, therefore accusing the EU of a politically motivated assault. If the EU parliament backs these measures, on July 1st Malta would have to cede direct regulatory oversight to all the big industry names currently doing business on the island.

Political Tensions and French Ambitions

The chief executive of MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority), Kenneth Farrugia, has said it is not the country’s fault for having stolen a march on their rivals, quoted as saying to them “you should have foreseen where the market was going”. Analysts advise he is particularly upset that by allowing other European countries to develop their crypto markets, EU officials are deliberately disempowering Malta who got there first. Indeed, some political commentators have said that President Macron of France would have no problems disempowering Malta to achieve his own ambitions of ensuring that France becomes the destination of choice by the crypto industry.

Licensing Trends and Regulatory “Shopping”

However, by the end of January this year, only 60% of crypto firms in France had applied for a MiCA licence, with other nations also showing little interest. However, a number of officials opined that it is early days and there is no crisis and nothing we are trying to fix. However, Natasha Cazenave, executive director at ESMA said that under current regulations, firms can go shopping as to which country they wish to plant their flag, then pick out the most advantageous jurisdiction, allowing them to operate in whichever market they choose. The No 2 at the (FSB) Financial Stability Board*, Martin Moloney, said “Being regulated creates opportunity to treat authorisation as a badge of trust, and it is likely that some firms will seek authorisation in small jurisdictions where they can exercise significant power”.

*Financial Stability Board, FSB – Based in Basel, Switzerland, the FSB is an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system, promoting international financial stability by coordinating national financial authorities and international standard setting authorities. 

Investigatory Pressure and Global Security Concerns

However, analysts advise that Malta is facing significant problems in their financial sector, with multiple investigations over the last year by American prosecutors, local magistrates, banking regulators and European politicians. Significantly, some of the most powerful nations have suggested that an island as small as Malta’s (circa 450,000 people) could indeed pose serious threats to combating global money laundering and the enforcement of economic sanctions. Experts suggest that perhaps in the back of their minds, EU regulators had Malta’s on-going investigations as one reason to bring crypto regulation under one roof. 

United States, Israel and Iran Agree to Temporary Ceasefire

A two week temporary ceasefire in the current Middle East hostilities has been agreed, but only one hour before President Donalds Trump’s deadline where he had promised to obliterate Iran. The ceasefire, which was brokered by Pakistan, includes a 10-point plan with Iran opening up the Strait of Hormuz whilst on-going peace talks continue. As a result, oil fell below $100pbl, with Brent crude falling by as much as 16% to trade within a range of $93pbl – $95pbl. West Texas Intermediate also fell to around the $95pbl mark. 

Those close to the agreement have advised that the 10-point peace plan includes:

  • An end to attacks on Iran and its allies
  • Continued control by Iran over the Strait of Hormuz
  • All primary and secondary sanctions on Iran to be lifted 
  • US military withdrawal from the Middle East
  • The release of all frozen Iranian assets
  • Iran and Oman to levy fees on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz (USD 2 million per ship)

Interestingly, the above points are also in Farsi, however that document includes the words “acceptance of enrichment” for their nuclear plan, which for whatever reason was left out of the English version. According to a statement issued by state media, Iran will only accept an end to hostilities if the final version of the peace plan incorporates the above demands. Some of these demands have been rejected by the White House in the past, however President Trump said the 10-point peace plan was a “workable basis on which to negotiate”. 

However, a number of experts have advised that the United States are unlikely to agree with some of Iran’s demands, and Democratic Senator Chris Murphy noted that with Iran controlling the Strait of Hormuz, it would be “cataclysmic for the world”. The office of the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netan, advised that Israel has backed the decision to temporarily cease hostilities with Iran, however, the ceasefire does not include Israel’s current hostilities with Lebanon.

Experts and analysts suggest that whilst the President sees a framework to discuss a permanent ceasefire, they cannot see the United States agreeing to allow Iran to continue with nuclear enrichment. Political commentators advise that the temporary ceasefire has let President Trump “off the hook” in regard to his promise to obliterate Iran. They also note that one of the cornerstones of the attack on Iran was to get rid of the current leadership and return the country to a democratic government. 

Sadly, this has not happened, in fact, nothing has really changed. The IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) remains the dominant force, and the old guard leadership that has essentially been wiped out has been replaced by more extreme figures. Furthermore, it should be remembered that the IRGC controls 50% of all the income from Iran’s energy exports, so if all sanctions are lifted and all assets unfrozen, this will make them even stronger. 

Experts say that if any agreement is reached it will surely be a hollow victory at best for President Trump, and how this will play out in the US with the mid-terms looming could end up being totally catastrophic for the Republican party. The only other option is a resumption of hostilities, which will be a nightmare for those peace-loving citizens of Iran, and the economic and social repercussions on the rest of the world do not bear thinking about. 

How Does Today’s Oil Crisis Compare to that of the Early 1970’s

Current Impact on Consumers

As a result of the United States/Israel/Iran war the world is now reeling from a global energy shock with prices of gas, electricity and fuel at the petrol pumps all hitting the consumer where it hurts, in the pocket! In the United Kingdom, diesel prices at the pumps before the war started were circa 134p per litre, whereas today they are circa 185p per litre and rising. On the intercity motorway’s, diesel is being offered in some cases at even 200p per litre. In the EU (European Union), commentators advise that Brussels are drawing up plans for potential rationing of jet fuel and/or diesel with officials stressing that these are just emergency plans. 

Lessons from the 1973 Embargo

The oil crisis back in the early 70’s was fundamentally different to the crisis the world is facing today, but the potential outcome of today’s crisis is essentially the same: It could trigger a global financial and economic crisis. The crisis began in 1973 when OAPEC*  members imposed an oil embargo on the United States and other nations who were supporting Israel in the Yom Kippur War. The result was the quadrupling of oil prices, severe shortages and rationing that consumed the countries involved. When the embargo was lifted in March 1974, there were economic recessions, massive inflation and major and lasting shifts in global energy policy. 

*OAPEC  – Founded in 1968 and stands for the Organisation of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries, limited to Arab oil-exporting nations. With headquarters in Kuwait the current membership includes Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, and the UAE (United Arab Emirates). This is a separate group from OPEC (Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries) which was founded in 1960, membership includes countries from Africa, the Middle East and South America. 

The Strait of Hormuz Blockade

Today’s oil crisis is different from the 1970s insofar as oil, gas and fertiliser shortages are due to the current United States/Israel/Iran conflict. This has resulted in the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, through which circa 20% of the world’s oil and natural gas is shipped. Analysts and experts in the energy and economic arenas are at loggerheads as to the potential fall-out from this crisis, but all are agreed that this war should end sooner rather than later. 

Potential for Greater Economic Instability

A number of experts suggest that the fall-out from this crisis could be worse than the 1973 crisis, where both the USA and the UK suffered recessions from 1973 – 1975. In the UK, this resulted in the downfall of the Edward Heath led conservative government. One expert has suggested that currently, there could be a bigger energy shock as opposed to the early 70’s when there was a cut in oil of 5% – 7%, however, today we are looking at a global cut of circa 20%, and things will only get worse the longer the crisis goes on. Not only will there be a massive spike in oil, gas and food prices, but there will also be hikes in interest rates to combat the inevitable inflation. 

Supply Chain Risks: Beyond Fuel

Currently, there is irrefutable proof of what the future may hold as jet fuel has almost doubled, which will lead to increases in airfares, prices for the consumer at the pumps for diesel and petrol have already risen, and some foodstuffs in supermarkets are already seeing an increase in prices. One third of the world’s helium flows through the Strait of Hormuz, which is essential for the production of semi-conductors or micro chips used in just about everything consumers use on a daily basis. Analysts report that the Gulf region is also central and crucial to the global fertilizer supply, and if it becomes scarce the world could also be in for a food shock to add to the on-going energy shock.

The Long Road to Recovery

Consumers and governments alike are lucky that summer is fast approaching, therefore resulting in lower heating costs to households. However, experts advise that if the war was to end tomorrow, it would take at least a year for supply lines to get back to normal, and a further year to see a reduction in prices. However, if there has been substantial damage to refineries and export outlets, then analysts suggest it could be up to five years before normality resumes. 

The Limitations of Renewable Energy

Data shows that in the EU, wind and solar energy combined now outpace fossil fuel generation by 30% – 29%, and in the UK in 2024, renewables for the first time produced more than 50% of electricity. However, despite forward steps being made for renewables taking over from fossil fuels, and despite the ongoing rhetoric, the crisis in the Middle East shows that even after just five weeks of the Strait of Hormuz being closed, there is already an energy crisis which highlights how far renewable energy still has to go. It is hoped that this conflict will end soon, otherwise, and according to experts, there could be intolerable economic hardship.

The Loss of Helium Exports Due to the Iran Crisis Will Prove Critical

Helium is a colourless, odourless, non-flammable, non-renewable inert gas. It is commercially extracted from natural gas using fractional distillation*. As the second lightest and second most abundant element in the universe, helium has widespread applications across multiple industries and medical fields. The sudden disruption to helium exports via the Strait of Hormuz is now having a significant negative impact on the medical sector, semiconductor manufacturing, and several other critical industries.

*Fractional distillation is a laboratory and industrial process used to separate mixtures of liquids with different boiling points. In the case of helium, it involves a cryogenic process in which natural gas is cooled to extremely low temperatures. This takes advantage of helium’s exceptionally low boiling point (−268.9°C), allowing it to be separated from nitrogen, methane, and other components.

Roughly two-thirds of the world’s helium supply comes from the United States, with much of the remainder supplied by Qatar. With the Strait of Hormuz currently closed, supply lines have effectively been choked. This disruption is now threatening the production and operation of semiconductor-based technologies used in everything from automobiles and washing machines to smartphones, space systems, and artificial intelligence infrastructure. Helium plays a vital role in semiconductor fabrication, particularly in cooling extreme ultraviolet lithography machines used to print microchips.

At present, around 200 helium containers remain stranded in the Persian Gulf, each holding approximately 41,000 litres of liquid helium. Experts warn that the gas will gradually boil off within 35 to 48 days, rendering the shipments unusable. These containers were destined for South Korea and Taiwan, which together manufacture approximately 90% of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. Without chips, global supply chains face severe disruption. Some analysts have even highlighted the knock-on effect on defence systems, noting that modern AI-driven technologies rely heavily on semiconductor availability.

In the medical sector, the shortage of helium is already affecting hospitals and diagnostic centres worldwide. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) machines rely on helium to cool superconducting magnets to extremely low temperatures. Current shortages are delaying refills, increasing operational costs, and threatening the continuity of MRI services. Beyond MRI systems, helium is also critical for NMR spectrometers, cryosurgery procedures, and respiratory treatments.

  • NMR spectrometers are used to determine molecular structures essential for research and pharmaceutical development.
  • Cryosurgery and cryoablation use helium’s ultra-low temperatures to freeze and destroy diseased tissue.
  • Respiratory medicine uses helium-oxygen mixtures (heliox) to treat severe airway obstructions.

Donald Trump has issued an ultimatum stating that the United States will withdraw from the war zone “with or without a peace deal” once Iran’s nuclear capabilities are neutralised. However, logistics experts caution that even after hostilities cease, it could take more than three months for helium supply chains to normalise. If there is significant structural damage to Qatari production facilities, shortages could persist for years.

White House officials have indicated that US military forces could begin returning home within three weeks. However, recent history suggests that such timelines are often optimistic and subject to change.

Without semiconductors, modern economies could grind to a halt. Chips underpin almost every aspect of daily life, from aviation and automotive systems to global shipping, communications, and digital infrastructure. In emerging markets, access to MRI technology is already becoming limited, and prolonged disruption could soon affect developed nations as well.

Beyond the geopolitical narrative, the helium shortage represents a critical vulnerability in global supply chains. If the conflict continues, the consequences of helium scarcity may prove more damaging than the geopolitical tensions that caused it.

MBaer Merchant Bank AG Accused of Money Laundering

MBaer Merchant Bank AG, Zurich, which was co-founded in 2018, has been forced to close due to alleged breaches of AML (anti-money laundering) laws. No less a figure than Scott Bessent, the United States Treasury Secretary, has stated that the bank dealt with intermediaries acting on behalf of Russia and Iran, with in excess of USD 100 billion allegedly funnelled back to these two countries. It was Secretary Bessent’s intervention that ultimately brought the curtain down on this small but lucrative private bank.

US investigators working for Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a division of the US Department of the Treasury, identified illicit AML links to Venezuela as far back as 2020. They allege that further activity over the following five years enabled Russia to finance its ongoing invasion of Ukraine, while Iran, including the Revolutionary Guard Corps, received funds linked to oil sales.

FinCEN stated in an official document issued on 2nd March:


“MBaer has also provided access to the US financial system to persons providing material support to Iran-related money laundering and terrorist financing efforts, including support to Iranian foreign terrorist organisations.”


Officials went on to accuse the bank of organising illicit payments on behalf of the Quds Force* of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard in connection with money laundering schemes and international oil smuggling.

*The Quds Force is a specialised branch of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps responsible for extraterritorial operations, unconventional warfare, and military intelligence. It is known for supporting proxy groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, and is designated by the United States as a foreign terrorist organisation.

In 2023, Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) and US authorities began a more intensive investigation into MBaer, followed by a 2024 review of the bank’s operational structure by Wenger Vieli Ltd, which identified widespread systemic risks. A formal investigation by FINMA later that year found that 98% of the bank’s recent client assets originated from high-risk sources. The report concluded that the bank had failed to carry out adequate due diligence on its clients and had assisted them in avoiding asset freezes.

Two senior executives, Mike Baer, the bank’s co-founder, and Von Merey, have now left the firm. Sources close to the investigation suggest that FINMA has begun proceedings against four unnamed individuals associated with the bank. The bank’s high-risk clients now face prolonged uncertainty, with experts warning that any resolution could take years. In the meantime, it is considered unlikely that other Swiss financial institutions will offer them services.

Elsewhere in the United Kingdom, it was announced that the *Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has fined the Bank of London £2 million for misleading the regulator regarding its capital position. The bank was found to have fabricated documents that concealed its financial health. The PRA concluded that the bank failed to maintain adequate financial resources between October 2021 and May 2024 and breached more than a dozen regulatory requirements in the process.

*PRA – is a UK financial services regulatory body, part of the Bank of England and was formed as one of the successors to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) – now known as the Financial Conduct Authority(FCA). Established in 2013, it is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy, sound risk management, financial stability across 1200 banks, building societies, credit unions and insurers. 

The Bank of London was first thrust into the spotlight in September 2024 when UK tax authorities issued a winding-up order over an unpaid tax debt, which was later withdrawn. In August 2025, the regulator instructed the bank to stop onboarding new customers, a restriction that was formally enforced on 18th March 2026. The bank has accepted the PRA’s findings and stated that a new management team is now in place to strengthen governance and regulatory reporting.

On-Going Iranian War means a Farewell to Cheap Flights

Due to the on-going Iran conflict in the Middle East, the world can say a farewell to cheap flights, especially for those wishing to connect between Asia and Europe. Recent data released shows ticket prices rocketing, up by 560% this month. According to a number of aviation experts, the world’s busiest and largest transit corridors are airports located within the Persian Gulf region, as such, prices are expected to remain elevated throughout the summer on to autumn, and likely even the Christmas period. 

The disruption to flights, which began on 28th February, has resulted in circa 70,000 flights being cancelled. This combined with rising fuel costs (jet fuel has more than doubled), reduced capacity and the shutdown of airspaces, has experts expecting elevated airfares to remain well into late November and likely into January 2027. Experts within the aviation arena suggest that price reductions to jet fuel may take a minimum of twelve weeks to work their way through to the airlines, depending on how quick supply lines become unfettered. 

The disruption to the Persian Gulf corridor is reflected in prices from Hong Kong to London, where an average fare is now circa $3,318, an increase of 560% on February prices. Other examples are the Sydney to London route (AKA the Kangaroo Route) which fares are up 429% for the same period, as well as Bangkok to Frankfurt, which has spiked to $2,870 and increased by 505% for the same period. Analysts advise that jet fuel accounts for around one third of operating costs and a number of airlines have already raised fuel surcharges. Pan European flights are expected to raise prices of tickets in the near future, as jet fuel increases are passed onto customers.

What is the “Taco Trade” and How is it Prevalent in Today’s Markets

You might mistake this for a new Mexican futures derivative, but as financial commentators advise, the word TACO is an acronym for “Trump Always Chickens Out”. It describes a strategy where investors “buy the dip”* after a sell-off caused by a Trump policy threat, betting that he will eventually back down or soften his stance.

*Buy The Dip – This is a strategy which involves the buying of assets such as stocks and shares, cryptocurrencies and commodities such as gold and silver, where the aim is to buy low and then profit from the subsequent rebound. Experts advise it works best in long-term upward trends where temporary price dips occur. However, in today’s world, the Middle East crisis together with remarks from President Trump makes buying the dip an almost weekly occurrence. 

There are three stages to this trade:

  1. First, there is the shock when President Trump makes a bold announcement, such as an increase in tariffs, or in today’s world, military attacks and threats. Such actions can cause share and gold prices to drop, sparking off a round of intense market volatility. 
  1. The second stage is the Pivot where faced with negative market reactions or economic pressure, the President softens his stance or rhetoric, delays implementation, or negotiates a framework. 
  1. Finally, there is the Rebound where the threat is reversed, markets recover quickly allowing those who bought at low prices to sell for a profit. 

The TACO trade was initially brought to the fore on Liberation Day, 2nd April 2025, when President Trump announced a steep imposition of tariffs on friends and foes alike, with about 90 countries being hit with blanket tariffs. However, President Trump quickly backed down on his Liberation day tariffs, (except for China) as markets reacted by going into meltdown, and tariffs that were threatened on the Eurozone in May 2025 were quickly pulled back days after they were announced. 

A number of traders in the financial markets accused President Trump of chickening out and started making trades accordingly and thus the TACO trade was born. Today the Taco trade has been reborn with some vengeance due to the surprise attack on Iran by President Trump. The use of Truth Social by President Trump during the current US/Iran/Israel conflict has already upended markets. Recently, he rowed back on threats to hit Iran’s power plants.

So, President Trump chickened out and as a result of his pronouncements stocks rallied, oil prices dropped as he bought time for further negotiations. On another recent occasion, the President announced he was in talks with Iranian officials to end the war, once again oil fell, gold went up, and stocks went up. Iran announced that no talks had been held and the markets swung into reverse with gold going below the support level of $4100 per oz before rebounding to circa $4,400. The TACO trade is back and with markets as volatile as ever, will traders be able to predict what will come forth from Trump’s media outlet Truth Social.