Author: IntaCapital Swiss

Global Payments Decoded: What is a MT-103 and Why It Matters for Importers

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

For Importers and international traders, the movement of goods relies entirely on the guaranteed movement of capital. In this intricate world of cross-border commerce, the MT-103 is one of the most important payment messages in cross-border trade.

Understanding the function and finality of this single SWIFT Message is essential for Corporate Liquidity management and streamlining your Trade Finance operations.

What is a SWIFT MT-103 Message?

The MT-103 is a standardised SWIFT Message used specifically for a single customer transfer.

It is a specific instruction sent by one financial institution to another, requesting that a fixed, named amount of money be transferred to a specific beneficiary. Because of its globally standardised format and routing via the SWIFT Network, the MT-103 is universally accepted and recognised as the gold standard for secure, reliable Cross-Border Payments.

Key Characteristics of the MT-103:

  • Fungibility: It handles only one payment from one ordering customer.
  • Standardisation: It follows a strict, numbered field format, ensuring automated processing and minimising error.
  • Finality of Payment: Once processed and credited, the payment is generally treated as final and is very difficult to reverse, which underpins trust in international trade.

Why the MT-103 is Crucial for Importers

For Importers, the timely and confirmed issuance of the MT-103 is vital because it directly mitigates execution risk and impacts Capital Access timing:

  1. Proof of Payment: The MT-103 acts as definitive proof that the buyer’s bank has successfully sent the funds. This confirmation is often required by the supplier to release goods from customs or commence shipping.
  2. Trade Security: The message provides Finality of Payment. Once confirmed, the seller is secure in the knowledge that funds are irrevocably moving, preventing disputes and allowing the transaction to proceed smoothly.
  3. Liquidity Forecasting: Since the message confirms the date and amount of funds, it enables accurate Corporate Liquidity forecasting, allowing importers to manage cash flow and plan subsequent transactions effectively.

The Critical Link: MT-760 (Security) vs. MT-103 (Payment)

While the MT-103 is the instruction to pay the funds, it is frequently the Collateral Transfer facility that makes the payment possible or secure in the first place.

This is the distinction that matters most in Structured Finance:

  • SWIFT MT-760 (The Guarantee): This message is used to transfer a Bank Guarantee (BG) or Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC), which acts as Collateral or security. The BG is not a payment, but a non-cash instrument that guarantees the importer’s line of credit.
  • SWIFT MT-103 (The Instruction): This message is the cash payment instruction, often funded by the line of credit secured by the MT-760 BG.

Essentially, a BG or SBLC issued via MT-760 can secure the importer’s credit line, which the bank then uses to fund MT-103 payments. This strategic use of security to facilitate payments ensures Capital Access is not hindered by perceived credit risk.

Ready to Optimise Your Trade Finance?

Speed and certainty in Cross-Border Payments are achieved through superior structure and dedicated Liquidity Management.

IntaCapital Swiss provides specialised Corporate Funding solutions that leverage high-grade instruments to ensure your Funding Timeline is predictable and your trade operations run without delay.

Ready to guarantee your payments and accelerate your global deals? To discuss enhancing your import security and ensuring timely global payments, contact our experts today.

How Fast is Fast? Transfer Time for Corporate Liquidity

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In the pursuit of competitive Corporate Liquidity and accelerated Capital Access, finance teams frequently ask: how quickly can a Collateral Transfer facility translate into actionable funds?

While the movement of the actual financial instrument is typically completed within a few banking days once contracts are in place, the total Funding Timeline is composed of several critical phases, each demanding precision. The process can be significantly faster than traditional lending for large sums, but requires meticulous cooperation to maintain Transaction Speed.

Phase 1: Preparation and Due Diligence

This phase, which is part of the overall 8 to 12-week recommended timeframe, is the most time-consuming, yet crucial, as the Transaction Speed depends entirely on the accuracy and speed of client compliance.

Estimated Time: 4 to 8 Weeks

StepDescriptionTime Factor
Initial VettingSubmission of the Client Information Profile (CIP) and immediate Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks.IntaCapital Swiss offers initial acceptance within 48 hours.
Term Sheet IssuanceOur financiers locate a suitable Collateral Provider and issue a formal Term Sheet detailing all pricing, terms, and conditions.Completion of all legal documents and due diligence typically requires 8 to 12 weeks from the initial application.
Contract ExecutionFormal acceptance of the Term Sheet and signing of the Collateral Transfer Agreement (CTA) and related security documents.Requires prompt action and payment of the initial booking fee by the client.

Key to Speed: Full and rapid cooperation from the client in providing clean, complete documentation is the single biggest determinant of accelerating the Funding Timeline.

Phase 2: The Final Interbank Transfer

Once the legal paperwork is finalised, the actual transfer of the security is where the efficiency of modern Corporate Liquidity mechanisms shines.

Estimated Time: 1 to 3 Banking Days

  1. SWIFT Advice: The Provider’s issuing bank sends a preliminary SWIFT advice (such as the MT799 pre-advice) to the Recipient’s bank, confirming the pending transaction and verifying account details.
  2. Instrument Issuance: Following confirmation and the successful lodgement of the Provider’s underlying assets, the Bank Guarantee (BG) is issued and transmitted inter-bank via the highly secure SWIFT MT760 platform.

The transfer of the BG security to the Recipient’s bank is generally completed within 1 to 3 banking days following the final contractual closing.

Phase 3: Monetisation and Final Capital Access

The final step is converting the collateral into immediately usable capital, providing genuine Corporate Liquidity.

Estimated Time: Variable (Typically 1 to 2 Weeks)

  1. Collateral Verification: The Recipient’s bank formally applies the received BG to the client’s account and completes its internal verification, granting the client the right to draw against the collateral.
  2. Loan Drawdown: If IntaCapital Swiss is assisting with Monetisation, we work with our panel of lenders to secure a credit facility against the new BG. If the client uses their own bank, this step is handled internally.

The facility is secured at this point, and the drawdown of the funds—the true moment of Capital Access—occurs once the client and their lending bank finalise the terms of the Monetisation facility.

Summary: Optimising Your Funding Timeline

While the speed of the final instrument transfer is typically completed within a few banking days, the total process for securing large-scale Corporate Liquidity via Collateral Transfer is measured in weeks, not days. This methodical approach ensures legal rigour and integrity throughout the entire transaction.

IntaCapital Swiss fast-tracks every possible stage, offering tailored facilities to ensure swift and successful Capital Access for your business. 

Ready to accelerate your capital? Contact our experts today to map your specific Funding Timeline.

PE Finance: The Bridge to Instant Securitisation Liquidity

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

For managers in the Private Equity (PE) space, the decision to transform illiquid assets into tradeable securities via a Collateralised Fund Obligation (CFO) or similar fund securitisation structure is a strategic step toward portfolio optimisation. However, the complexity of Securitisation often creates immediate liquidity management challenges, particularly in the lead-up to deal closure.

The critical hurdle is timing: there is frequently a financing gap between the moment assets are locked down and the date the new investment bonds are successfully issued and sold. IntaCapital Swiss addresses this mismatch by positioning Collateral Transfer as precise Bridge Funding designed specifically for this high-stakes phase.

The Challenge of Securitisation Structure

A CFO structure depends on certainty and credit quality. The portfolio of Limited Partner Interests is transferred to a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), which isolates the assets and issues tranches of securities.

  • The Funding Gap: The SPV often requires funding to settle underlying positions or cover initial operational costs, but the revenue from the newly issued bonds takes time to materialise.
  • Collateral Risk: The quality of the underlying assets—the future rights to Capital Call and distributions—must be validated and often enhanced to achieve the high credit ratings required for the senior bond tranches.

This environment demands flexible, timely capital that doesn’t disrupt the SPV’s clean structure.

Collateral Transfer as Bridge Funding

This is where the precision of Collateral Transfer provides a critical advantage. When structured for this purpose, the Collateral Transfer facility acts as a robust Bridge Funding mechanism.

  1. Immediate Credit Enhancement: A third-party Bank Guarantee (BG) is delivered to the SPV’s facility bank. This high-grade collateral immediately acts as Credit Enhancement for the overall structure, helping to increase confidence among rating agencies and prospective bond investors.
  2. Timely Liquidity Support: The SPV can use the Credit Enhancement to draw a revolving credit facility or short-term loan, providing the necessary Bridge Funding to cover transaction costs, acquisition expenses, or manage the mismatch in cash flow timing.
  3. Strategic Integration: The Collateral Transfer arrangement is structured to sit alongside the main securitisation debt rather than encumbering the core asset pool. When properly documented, it can be integrated into the SPV structure without disturbing the ring-fencing of the underlying assets. The facility may be treated as contingent, subject to accounting standards.

Strategic Liquidity Management for PE

The seamless integration of third-party security provides sophisticated Liquidity Management that enables the entire CFO or similar fund securitisation structure. By securing a robust Bridge Funding solution, PE firms can:

  • Accelerate Timelines: Shorten the time between asset aggregation and bond placement.
  • Optimise Pricing: The inclusion of high-quality Credit Enhancement may contribute to better pricing and higher ratings on the senior debt tranches of the CFO.
  • Maintain Control: Funds retain strategic flexibility over their core Capital Call and capital structure while securing competitive financing.

Through specialised solutions like Collateral Transfer, IntaCapital Swiss empowers PE managers to navigate the technical demands of Securitisation and achieve high-level Investment Fund Leverage. We offer services designed for Capital Structure Optimisation to enhance financial flexibility and minimize financing costs.

Ready to Discuss PE Liquidity Solutions?

IntaCapital Swiss offers expertise in transforming illiquid assets into secure financial solutions.

Find out today how our strategic financing structures can optimise your Private Equity portfolio. Contact our experts today.

How Does Collateral Transfer Work for Modern Business?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

For businesses seeking financial agility, Collateral Transfer (CT) is a highly effective structured finance solution. It supports credit access and contractual security without creating immediate traditional balance sheet debt, making it ideal for optimising corporate capital structure and achieving rapid business expansion.

At its core, Collateral Transfer (CT) is a formal agreement where a collateral provider—an institutional entity, the ‘Transferor’—makes available a specific financial instrument to the ‘Recipient’ or ‘Beneficiary’. This provision of security is governed by a legally robust framework called a Collateral Transfer Agreement (CTA).

The Mechanics of Collateral Transfer

The process relies on the issuance of a high-value financial instrument, typically a Bank Guarantee (BG).

1. The Collateral Transfer Agreement (CTA)

The Collateral Transfer Agreement (CTA) is the foundation of the arrangement, acting as the commercial mandate. It legally defines the obligations, tenor, and the Collateral Fee paid. Critically, the CTA establishes the specific conditions under which the Bank Guarantee (BG) is leased or assigned, ensuring the Recipient maintains control over the collateral’s use—a necessity for managing complex cross-border or project finance facilities.

2. Secure Instrument Delivery

  • Issuance: The Transferor’s bank issues the Bank Guarantee (BG) to the Recipient’s nominated Beneficiary Bank.
  • Delivery: The BG is delivered via the secure interbank messaging system, SWIFT MT760. This SWIFT MT760 delivery ensures authenticity and compliance, which is essential for global business transactions where trust and speed are paramount.

3. The Recipient’s Strategic Use 

Once the Recipient’s bank receives the BG, the Recipient uses this collateral to achieve their financial objectives:

  • Credit Line Access: Securing a third-party credit line or loan with the BG as the sole security.
  • Project Security: Utilising the BG to satisfy high-value contractual performance requirements and guarantees in major commercial tenders.

Strategic Advantage: Balance Sheet Optimisation

The most powerful advantage for a modern business is the accounting treatment. Collateral Transfer is classified as a Contingent Liability, providing credit management leverage without immediate balance sheet debt.

FeatureCollateral Transfer (CT)Traditional Secured Debt
Accounting StatusTypically treated as a Contingent Liability, depending on accounting standards and facility structure.On-balance sheet (Direct Liability)
Security SourceThird-party Bank Guarantee (BG) or SBLC.Borrower’s own assets (e.g., property, inventory).
Primary BenefitCapital Structure Optimisation and off-balance sheet leverage.Lower interest rate on funds accessed.

The Collateral Fee

The Recipient pays a non-refundable Collateral Fee for utilising the Transferor’s credit rating and capital during the term. There are no interest payments owed to the Transferor; the BG simply expires.

Bespoke Collateral Funding Solutions

For modern businesses, Collateral Transfer is essential for strategic agility. IntaCapital Swiss specialises in structuring these transactions to be bespoke, ensuring the size, term, and jurisdiction of the Bank Guarantee (BG) perfectly align with the Recipient’s complex financing needs.

Securing Your Transaction

Every strong financial structure rests on solid Due Diligence. IntaCapital Swiss leverages its deep expertise in these structured finance transactions to ensure that every Collateral Transfer arrangement is commercially viable and founded on sound legal, financial, and jurisdictional principles.

Ready to Leverage Your Fund’s Capital?
Find out today how a Collateral Transfer facility can optimise your fund’s capital needs. Contact our experts today

Stop Guessing: Due Diligence That Secures Fund Finance

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

For Private Equity funds and sophisticated investors, Fund Finance—the ecosystem of credit facilities provided to investment funds—is a critical component of capital management. Among the most strategic tools in this space is the Collateral Transfer arrangement, often structured as a Credit Guarantee Facility (CGF). Successful execution of these arrangements hinges on rigorous Due Diligence (DD).

In Fund Finance, due diligence isn’t just a box-ticking exercise. It’s a full review of the borrower’s stability, legal standing, and financial capacity to meet commitments secured by the collateral. The findings of this review determine whether the facility is viable and on what terms.

While this analysis focuses on facilities secured by guarantees—such as the Collateral Transfer mechanism and CGFs—it is important to note the differing scope of Due Diligence (DD) across the Fund Finance ecosystem. For subscription line facilities, DD centers on the fund’s Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) and investor quality; for Net Asset Value (NAV) facilities, it focuses heavily on portfolio valuation; and for asset-backed facilities, the collateral quality (e.g., real estate or infrastructure) is paramount. Regardless of the facility type, a meticulous legal and financial review is essential.

Key Pillars of Fund Finance Due Diligence

Effective DD focuses on validating three primary areas to ensure the security package is robust and the repayment risk is mitigated.

1. The Sponsor and Investment Strategy

A crucial first step is to vet the General Partner (GP) or Sponsor that manages the fund. DD must establish a clear track record and alignment of interests.

  • Track Record: Assessing the performance of prior funds, realisation history, and the management team’s stability.
  • Fund Strategy: Analysing the stated investment thesis, target assets, geographical focus, and any potential regulatory risks associated with the strategy. This ensures the fund’s operations are consistent with the financial model underpinning the CGF.

2. The Legal Documentation and Structure

The Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) is the core legal document and receives the closest scrutiny during due diligence.

Document FocusDue Diligence ObjectiveImpact on Collateral Transfer
Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA)To confirm the GP’s authority to borrow, grant security, and make capital calls on its Limited Partners (LPs).Verifies the legal enforceability of the security package securing the obligation covered by the Collateral Transfer instrument.
Subscription DocumentsTo verify the nature, quality, and legal jurisdiction of the underlying LP investor base.Ensures the investor commitments are reliable and legally sound, which is the ultimate source of repayment.
Side LettersTo identify any preferential rights or restrictions granted to specific LPs that could impair the fund’s ability to draw down capital when required.Mitigates the risk of unexpected challenges to the fund’s liquidity, which could compromise the CGF structure.

3. The Security Package and Repayment Mechanism

In a Collateral Transfer facility, due diligence concentrates on the security provided to the lender. The collateral’s ultimate purpose is to stand as security for the fund’s specific obligation (e.g., securing an underlying credit facility or project).

  • Capital Call Rights: DD must confirm the lender has a perfected security interest (a lien) over the fund’s right to call capital from its LPs. This mechanism is the primary source of facility repayment.
  • Bank Account Control: Reviewing the legal arrangements around the fund’s capital call and distribution accounts ensures the lender/guarantor maintains sufficient control or security over the cash flows.
  • Borrowing Limitations: Confirming the fund is not violating any covenant that restricts the amount or nature of debt it can incur, ensuring the Credit Guarantee Facility fits within the fund’s parameters.

DD’s Role in Collateral Transfer Authority

In the context of Collateral Transfer and Credit Guarantee Facilities, Due Diligence serves a specialised purpose: validating the fund’s authority and ability to service the secured obligation.

A fund may seek a CGF from a trusted provider like IntaCapital Swiss to secure a credit line or specific project finance. The DD process ensures that:

  1. The fund has the contractual right to enter the CGF. (Checked via LPA review).
  2. The underlying LPs are contractually bound to fund capital calls. (Checked via subscription documents).
  3. The transfer of a Bank Guarantee (BG) or Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) as collateral is an appropriate and permitted use of the fund’s credit standing.

By confirming the capital call process is effective, due diligence verifies the fund’s capacity to meet its obligations, thereby justifying the use of the Collateral Transfer instrument. A robust DD process is the bridge between a fund’s credit profile and the secure provision of a CGF.

Every strong financial structure rests on solid due diligence. IntaCapital Swiss applies deep expertise to ensure each Collateral Transfer is legally and financially sound.

Ready to optimise? Discover today how a Collateral Transfer facility can immediately elevate your fund’s capital strategy. Contact our experts today

Unlocking Yield Through Currency-Based Arbitrage: Using Swiss CHF Lombard Loans to Buy UK 10-Year Gilts

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

In an era where global interest rates have risen unevenly across jurisdictions, sophisticated investors are rediscovering the power of cross-currency arbitrage. Switzerland, with its uniquely low interest-rate environment and deep private-banking infrastructure, offers a particularly attractive mechanism: borrowing cheaply in CHF through a Lombard loan and reallocating the capital into higher-yielding GBP assets, such as UK 10-year gilts.

At its core, this is a classic carry trade enhanced by Swiss lending conditions, robust collateral rules, and the relative stability of CHF borrowing. When conducted properly, it can generate a reliable yield uplift with controlled risk, while utilising internationally held liquid assets as collateral.

Below, we explore the structure, the mechanics, and the financial logic behind this increasingly compelling strategy.

Context: The Divergence That Creates the Opportunity

Over the past decade, Switzerland has experienced prolonged periods of ultra-low interest rates, including negative base rates for several years. Even after the Swiss National Bank’s adjustments, the lending environment remains uniquely attractive. Private banks—particularly for high-net-worth individuals—continue to offer CHF Lombard loans at rates as low as 0.5%–1.0%, depending on collateral quality, relationship strength, and loan-to-value ratios.

Contrast this with the UK, where gilt yields have surged in response to inflation, fiscal pressure, and Bank of England tightening. As of December 2025, 10-year UK gilts yield approximately 4.57%,

This differential creates a spread of circa 3.50% 4.00%, which—if harvested through a correctly structured arbitrage—can produce attractive net returns with relatively low operational complexity.

On the commodities front, a CHF carry trade with gold transacting in January 2025 would have earned a spectacular return of in excess 50%. Elsewhere in the commodities world, a CHF carry trade again transacted in January 2025 with silver and copper would have returned as of 12th December 2025 in excess of 60% and 27% respectively.

What Is a CHF Lombard Loan?

A Lombard loan is a credit line issued against a pledged portfolio of liquid financial assets, such as:

  • Blue-chip equities
  • Investment-grade bonds
  • Actively Managed Certificates (AMCs)
  • ETF portfolios
  • Cash and near-cash instruments

Swiss banks excel in this type of lending. Their regulatory environment, relationship-driven approach and risk-based margining allow borrowers to leverage existing portfolios efficiently, with loan-to-value ratios typically between 50% and 80%.

Key attributes of a Swiss CHF Lombard loan include:

  • Ultra-low interest rates

CHF is one of the cheapest funding currencies globally.

  •  No purpose restriction

The borrower can deploy the drawn funds anywhere, including into other currencies and international assets.

  • Revolving structure

The loan can be drawn and repaid at will, allowing dynamic management of exposure.

  •  Attractive risk-adjusted borrowing

Because the collateral remains under custody, the bank views the credit as relatively safe, and thus, rates remain low.

This is the foundation on which the arbitrage is built.

The Strategy: Borrow CHF → Convert to GBP → Buy UK Gilts

The arbitrage process is relatively straightforward when broken down into its operational steps:

Step 1 — Establish or Leverage a Swiss Private Banking Relationship

To access Lombard rates at 0.5%–1.0%, the investor needs:

  • A custody account
  • A qualifying portfolio of assets
  • A lending agreement and minimum loan amounts (often CHF 1–5 million+)

Some banks require formal financial planning or wealth advisory processes, but high-net-worth individuals with existing portfolios can typically proceed quickly.

Step 2 — Secure the CHF Lombard Loan

The bank approves a loan facility based on portfolio value. For example:

  • Portfolio value: CHF 10 million
  • LTV allowed: 60%
  • Lombard facility available: CHF 6 million
  • Interest rate: 0.5%

Interest is calculated quarterly or semi-annually and debited automatically from the account.

Step 3 — Convert Borrowed CHF Into GBP

The facility is drawn in CHF and immediately converted into GBP via spot FX conversion.

FX considerations:

  • A competitive institutional spot rate
  • Optional hedging (forward contracts or options)
  • Assessment of CHF vs GBP strength

Some investors prefer to leave the position unhedged to benefit from relative GBP strength if expected.

Step 4 — Purchase 10-Year UK Gilts Yielding Approx 4.5%

The GBP proceeds are then deployed into UK government bonds—either directly or via a UK brokerage account or custodian.

Why gilts?

  • They are highly liquid
  • They carry near-zero credit risk
  • They provide a steady, predictable income
  • They benefit from potential price appreciation if UK rates fall

Thus, the CHF cost of funds is dramatically lower than the GBP return on capital.

The Financial Logic: Why the Spread Works

Let’s examine the mechanics of the spread in simple terms:

  • Cost of funds (CHF Lombard loan): ~0.5%
  • Yield on UK 10-year gilts: ~4.50%

This produces a gross spread of 4.00%.

On CHF 6 million borrowed and converted:

  • GBP equivalent at FX 1.06 = ~£5,640,000 (F/X rate as of 12.12.25)
  • Annual gilt income at 4.00% = £225,600
  • Annual CHF interest cost = ~CHF 30,000 (approx. £28,000)
  • Net annual gain ≈ £197,600

This is a clean carry return, before FX adjustments.

Why Switzerland Enables This Strategy Better Than Anywhere Else

  • Lowest funding currency in Europe

CHF consistently trades at low or even negative real yields.

  • Highly flexible lending against securities

London brokers, for example, often restrict or price Lombard lending far less attractively.

  • Private-banking operational efficiency

Swiss banks excel at cross-currency management, FX execution, and multi-asset settlement.

  • Stability of CHF

Even if CHF appreciates slightly against GBP, the yield pick-up can still outweigh FX movements.

  • Transparency and contractual freedom

Swiss credit agreements allow international deployment of borrowed capital with minimal restriction.

Key Benefits of the Arbitrage Strategy

  • Strong Yield Enhancement

The primary benefit is the high risk-adjusted net yield created by borrowing at 0.5% and earning 4.00%.

  • Portfolio Liquidity Retained

The investor keeps full exposure to their existing equity, bond, or AMC portfolio, which continues to grow independently.

  • Access to Government-backed Yield

UK gilts provide a secure, low-risk income stream with minimal credit concerns.

  • Potential for Capital Gains

If UK interest rates fall (which many economists expect), gilt prices could rise.
This gives the investor:

·       Yield carry plus

·       Bond capital appreciation

  • FX Optionality

Depending on macroeconomic positioning, the investor may:

  • Hedge the GBP exposure back to CHF
  • Partially hedge
  • Remain unhedged for speculative gain

Each approach has its own risk/return implications.

  • Tax Efficiency

In many jurisdictions, including Switzerland and the UK (depending on residency), interest expenses may be deductible or treated favourably—though tax advice is essential.

  • Leverage Without Selling Core Assets

The strategy avoids liquidation of existing holdings and instead monetises balance-sheet strength.

Risk Considerations (And Why They Are Manageable)

No arbitrage is entirely without risk, but in this case, risks are typically manageable:

  • FX Risk

If GBP weakens significantly relative to CHF, the converted capital may lose value.
Mitigation: FX forwards, call options, or partial hedging.

  • Margin Calls

A drop in the value of the pledged portfolio may reduce available collateral.
Mitigation: conservative LTV, diversified assets, or over-collateralisation.

  • Gilt Price Volatility

Gilt yields fluctuate with BOE policy.
Mitigation: holding to maturity eliminates mark-to-market risk.

  • Bank Relationship Terms

Interest rates may adjust if the SNB changes policy.
Mitigation: fixed-rate loan tranches or caps.

Overall, for high-net-worth clients with diversified portfolios and long-term horizons, these risks are typically well within acceptable parameters.

Why This Works Especially Well in 2025

  • UK yields remain elevated despite falling inflation
  • CHF remains structurally cheap
  • Swiss banks are competing aggressively for AUM
  • FX volatility has stabilised after post-pandemic disruptions
  • Investors seek income without unnecessary risk

This convergence of macro conditions makes the arbitrage one of the cleanest, lowest-risk carry trades available to private clients today.

A Strategic Opportunity for Sophisticated Investors

Borrowing in CHF at 0.5% through a Swiss Lombard facility and reallocating into UK 10-year gilts at 4.50% is not merely a financial trick—it’s a structural yield opportunity created by divergent monetary policies and Switzerland’s unparalleled lending environment.

For investors with substantial balance-sheet assets, this strategy:

  • Enhances yield
  • Maintains liquidity
  • Adds diversification
  • Provides optionality
  • Utilises low-risk government-backed instruments

When analysed on risk-adjusted terms, very few fixed-income opportunities offer anything close to this spread with such operational simplicity.

For those already working with Swiss lenders—or those considering relocating assets to Switzerland—this arbitrage represents a compelling, timely, and elegant strategy for capital efficiency and long-term income generation.

CONTACT US FOR MORE INFORMATION

Swiss National Bank Holds Interest Rates Steady

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Today, the SNB (Swiss National Bank) kept its benchmark interest rate on hold at 0.00%, as many market experts had already priced in a minimal chance of a rate reduction. This is the second straight meeting where the central bank has kept interest rates on hold, against a backdrop of zero inflation, which is at the lower end of the SNB’s target range of 0.00% – 2.00%. The bank signalled that they are open to further rate cuts if threatened with a sustained period of falling prices.

Reasons Behind the Decision

Following the rate decision, the Chairman of the SNB, Martin Schlegel, pointed out that there were bigger considerations than just reducing rates into negative territory, given the financial hits that pension funds, banks’ profits and savers would have to bear. Investors have always seen Switzerland as a haven for savings in times of strife and geopolitical tensions, which has presented the central bank with several problems. 

Under normal circumstances, with inflation at zero and the Swiss franc hitting recent highs against the euro, the case for cutting rates would have been far stronger. But the bank has set a much higher bar for moving into negative rates, making such a move far less likely now.

Inflation Outlook

The SNB has cut its inflation forecast for 2026 to 0.3% and 0.6% for 2027, and experts say that today’s rate cut decision is an indication that the bank is prepared for a fairly long period of low inflation. One market expert noted, “Leaving policy rates at 0.00% now also implies that these low inflation rates will not be sufficient to trigger another cut.” The SNB President Martin Schlegel also pointed out that “Inflation in recent months had been slightly lower than expected, but the outlook is basically unchanged. Our monetary policy is helping to ensure that inflation is likely to rise slowly in the coming quarters.”

Economic Growth and Trade Impact

There was a contraction in the Swiss economy in Q3 due to President Trump placing a tariff of 39% on many of Switzerland’s exports. This has since been replaced with a 15% tariff, which the President of SNB acknowledged was a positive development. 

New data show the Swiss economy is gaining momentum, prompting the central bank to upgrade its growth outlook. GDP growth for 2025 has been revised from 1.0% to just under 1.5%, with the 2026 forecast raised from just under 1.0% to just under 1.5% as well.

The Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates by a Quarter Point

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

FOMC Announces Rate Cut Amidst Divisions

Today, the Federal Reserve’s FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) cut interest rates by 25 basis points to 3.50% – 3.75% in a majority vote (9-3), which included three dissensions.  The divisions within the FOMC are between members who see stubborn inflation as the biggest risk and those who believe weakness in the labour market poses the greater threat to the U.S. economy. Indeed, Austan Goolsbee and Jeff Schmid, both regional Federal Reserve presidents from Chicago and Kansas City, voted against a rate cut, whilst Governor Stephen Miran (a President Trump appointee) dissented in favour of a larger cut of 50 basis points.  

Deep Divide Over Future Interest Rate Decisions

As details of the meeting were released, it became clear that the Federal Reserve is very much divided over interest rate cuts. Although Chairman Jerome Powell downplayed the dissenting voices over the decision to cut rates, several non-voting regional Federal Reserve presidents signalled their opposition by arguing that the year-end benchmark rate should be kept between 3.75% and 4.00%. Such divisions could make life difficult for the new Chairman (who will be picked by President Trump to get agreements on interest rate decisions). The President also commented that the interest rate cut could have been larger.  

Cautionary Language in Post-Meeting Statement

The FOMC has now cut interest rates for the third time in a row, but the language emanating from the post-meeting rate statement was one of caution and reflected the contents of a post-meeting statement back in December 2024. The current statement read, “In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the committee will assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.” However, in December 2024, the same language was used, and as a result, the Federal Reserve did not cut rates for another nine months until September 2025.  

Market Uncertainty and the Dual Mandate

Experts suggest that the financial markets will face a degree of uncertainty regarding the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy for 2026, as labour market strength and inflation trends remain unclear. Due to the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate of price and employment stability, the debate within the central bank will continue unabated with one market expert saying, “It’s highly unknowable where we are headed in the next six to nine months, just given all the changes that are out there in this historically kind of odd period where you have tensions on both sides of the mandate.”  

Policy Decisions Amidst Data Gaps

Due to the 43-day government shutdown, recent official data on inflation and unemployment are for September and showed inflation rising from 2.70% to 2.80%, and unemployment rising from 4.30% to 4.40%. In the Federal Reserve statement, it was announced that, “Available indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace, job gains have slowed this year, and the unemployment rate has edged up through September.”   

The latest policy statement was, however, put together without the benefit of inflation and job data but relied on available indicators, which officials said included their own private data, community contacts and internal surveys. Inflation and job data for November are expected to be released next week, followed by a full report on economic growth for Q3. The rate cut outlook for 2026 is uncertain as policymakers remain deeply divided, with median projections pointing to a single cut in 2026 and a further cut in 2027. However, eight officials have signalled their support for two cuts in 2026, whilst seven officials have indicated their support for no rate cuts next year.

Outlook for Crude Oil 2026

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Many experts and observers in the crude oil arena are forecasting an oversupply in 2026, leading to an oil glut driven by rising supply and weaker demand. 

Price Forecast and Supply Glut

Analysts suggest that the price of Brent Crude will average US$58 bbl (1 barrel). In Q1 of 2026, as the glut gets larger, the price will gradually fall to US$52 bbl and end the year at US$50 bbl, giving an average price for the year of US$55 bbl. 

Indeed, the IEA (International Energy Authority) has estimated that there will be a record oil glut or surplus (estimated at 4 million b/pd – barrels per day) next year, with demand growth remaining subdued as OPEC+* continues to revive supplies.

*OPEC+ – is short for the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Nations and is a coalition of 23 oil-producing countries, of which the full members are Algeria, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela. There are a further 10 non-OPEC Partner Countries that form the OPEC+ and make up the DoC (Declaration of Cooperation), consisting of Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan. The whole group’s modus operandi is to cooperate to influence the global oil market and stabilise prices.

The Market’s Muted Response to Geopolitical Risk

Several experts have voiced surprise at the lack of volatility in the crude oil market in 2025, despite the many supply and geopolitical risks. Key events such as Russian oil sanctions, plus Israeli and the United States strikes on Iran, had many analysts expecting major volatility given the potential to lose Iranian oil supplies. However, the market showed a complete lack of volatility, and Brent even had a small but brief rally, hitting US$80 bbl. Experts suggest that there is fatigue within the market, especially after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, so volatile market reactions to explosive geopolitical tensions appear to have been muted. It is therefore being predicted that with a market glut continuing into 2026 and the large amount of spare capacity in Saudi Arabia, there will be little impact on oil supplies, with prices falling as mentioned above.

OPEC+’s Strategic Shift

In April, OPEC+ shifted its strategy from supporting high oil prices through production cuts to increasing output to regain market share from non-OPEC+ producers such as Brazil, Guyana, and the United States. Indeed, the market was taken by surprise when a series of production increases added a total increase of 2.9 billion b/pd, contributing to the downward pressure on prices, which, as stated above, is expected to keep going south well into 2026. 

Experts say the policy shift was driven by several external factors, including diplomatic pressure from the White House and unexpected geopolitical events such as the Iran–Israel war and sanctions on Russian oil. The later sanctioning of major Russian producers Lukoil* and Rosneft** also provided an unexpected buffer against a sharper price collapse.

*Lukoil – Engages in the exploration, production, refining, marketing and distribution of oil and gas in both Russian and international markets. Lukoil is owned by private shareholders, with its founder, Vagit Alekperov, holding circa 28.3%.

**Rosneft – A vertically integrated energy company specialising in the exploration, production, refining, transportation, and sale of petroleum, petroleum products and LNG. The Russian Government owns circa 40.4% of the company, with the QIA (Qatar Investment Authority) also owning a significant stake.

Demand and The Fiscal Breakeven Point

Analysts suggest that in 2026, there will be a modest increase in oil demand at circa 800 b/pd, which is expected to be driven by non-OECD (Organisation for Co-operation and Economic Development) countries, especially Asia, which is calculated to make up 50% of demand, whilst China’s demand is expected to be under 200 b/pd. 

In effect, many analysts and commentators agree that 2026 will be a challenging year for oil prices due to overwhelming supply, with large surpluses potentially building, unless OPEC+ makes significant production cuts or geopolitical events disrupt supply chains. Another factor to consider is how long OPEC+ nations are willing to tolerate low oil prices. With an average price of USD $55 per barrel forecast for 2026 and Saudi Arabia’s fiscal break-even at around USD $90 per barrel, any decision to cut production could put upward pressure on prices later in the year.

Outlook for Gold 2026

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

There is a divergence amongst gold experts and analysts regarding the price of gold in 2026, where some predict a continuation of gold’s strength, and others suggest a potential correction or just a modest gain. 

The Remarkable Performance of 2025

2025 was a remarkable year for gold, returning over 60% whilst also achieving over 50 record highs. This outstanding performance was underpinned by various factors such as heightened geopolitical uncertainty, global economic uncertainty, central banks increasing their gold purchases (especially China), positive price momentum and a weaker U.S. Dollar.

Core Factors Shaping 2026

However, looking forward to 2026, many experts, analysts and financial commentators believe that gold will be defined by ongoing global economic uncertainty and geopolitical unrest. They suggest that if the prevailing conditions currently affecting gold remain the same moving into 2026, then gold is likely to remain rangebound. However, if interest rates fall and economic growth slows, then gold could enjoy a moderate increase in value. 

Gold could perform at heightened levels in the event of a severe economic downturn driven by growing global risks. Conversely, if geopolitical tensions ease and White House policies boost economic growth, strengthening the dollar and pushing interest rates higher, the price of gold would likely fall.

Analysts suggest that as we move into 2026, financial markets expect the status quo to continue. However, uncertainty will persist due to geo-economic pressures on financial data, questions over whether inflation can finally be brought under control, and the outcome of political negotiations aimed at easing geopolitical unrest. 

Gold as a Strategic Diversifier

Another key aspect of gold is its role as a portfolio diversifier and a source of stability in times of political unrest and market volatility. This is especially prevalent as to whether we see a risk-on or risk-off sentiment, which will shape not only gold but all asset classes, and will affect gold’s status as a strategic diversifier*.

*Gold as a Strategic Diversifier – In investment terms, gold is included as a core, long-term asset within a multi-asset portfolio to enhance stability and improve risk-adjusted returns, rather than using the metal for short-term speculation. Some of the main characteristics of gold are an inflation and deflation hedge, and a historical record of preserving purchasing power. Other characteristics are no counterparty or credit risks (such as bonds or shares), as well as the market being highly liquid, meaning that the metal can be easily traded even in times of volatile and turbulent market conditions.

Bullish Price Targets and Downward Risks

Some market experts remain extremely bullish and are suggesting that in 2026, the yellow metal could go as high as USD 5,000, propelled by a cocktail of central bank buying, concerns over Donald Trump’s tariffs, a widening United States deficit and stubborn inflation. Some experts predict that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates by 75 basis points in the coming year and expect strong investor demand to continue. Many believe the bull market is far from over and that gold’s long-term rally will extend well into 2026. But bulls beware, as mentioned above, there are many twists and turns expected in 2026, some of which might put downward pressure on the yellow metal.

Head office

IntaCapital Swiss SA,
Rue du Rhône 80 - 84,
CH - 1204 Genève,
Switzerland

Other facilities

Enquire

Legal

IntaCapital Switzerland | Copyright © 2025 | All Rights Reserved