Author: IntaCapital Swiss

The ultimate guide to selecting the best business capital services

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Selecting a reputable provider requires more than just identifying the lowest interest rate; it requires matching your entity’s specific needs to the right regulatory and geographical framework. Reputable business capital services are typically judged by their underwriting transparency, total borrowing costs, and a proven track record of supporting clients through various market cycles. 

Whether you are seeking an SME working capital loan or a multi-million-pound facility for international expansion, selecting a provider with a clear, published underwriting process is essential for long-term financial planning.

Key insights for navigating business capital

  • Provider specialisation: Global leaders like HSBC and J.P. Morgan remain major options for conventional lending. Meanwhile, the rise of Private credit for small business has seen firms like Funding Circle and iwoca offer notable fintech alternatives for faster, online-first applications.
  • Speed of access: While digital lenders are built for speed, funding timelines vary significantly by region and product.Decisions can often be reached in hours, with funds typically arriving within 24 to 72 hours for certain products, though complex applications naturally take longer.
  • Reputation & regulation: Reputable providers are usually distinguished by visible regulatory status, such as FCA authorisation in the UK or local equivalent oversight, and clear communication regarding fees, covenants, and their approach to ESG finance and sustainable lending practices.

What are the most reputable business capital services for firms?

The market offers a diverse range of reputable business capital services. No single ‘best’ provider exists for every business; rather, the most reputable choice depends on your jurisdiction, turnover, trading history, and the purpose of the capital.

Conventional leaders: Global and high-street banks

For businesses seeking low-interest business loans, major banks remain a cornerstone of the market. They often provide the most competitive rates for established entities with strong credit histories and demonstrable security.

  • HSBC & Barclays: These institutions are major players in international commercial finance, frequently providing business loans with representative APRs that are among the most competitive in the market for prime borrowers.
  • Lloyds Bank: A prominent choice for SME working capital loan requirements, Lloyds is well-regarded for its sector-specific funding initiatives aimed at supporting international trade and domestic growth.
    • Asset-based lending solutions: Many top-tier banks now offer sophisticated asset-based lending solutions, allowing businesses to unlock liquidity from their balance sheets by leveraging accounts receivable, inventory, or machinery.

Fintech and alternative lenders: Speed and accessibility

Non-Bank Business Funding has transformed the landscape for businesses requiring faster decisions or more flexible underwriting than a traditional retail bank might offer.

  • Funding circle: A significant provider of fixed-rate business loans, Funding Circle is known for a streamlined application process and a high volume of lending to the SME sector across both the UK and US.
  • iwoca: A leading choice for flexible credit, iwoca offers an Unsecured business line of credit that allows for rapid drawdown and repayment, which is particularly useful for managing short-term cash flow fluctuations without pledging physical assets.
  • Specialist brokers: Many businesses work with commercial finance brokers to compare the market. While not all brokers are regulated by default, many reputable firms maintain local regulatory authorisation or membership in professional bodies like the NACFB, providing a framework for professional standards.

How to select the best business capital services

Matching the product to the use case is the most important step in selecting a capital service.

1. Revolving credit facility vs. term loan

Choosing the right structure is vital for the long-term health of your cash flow:

  • Revolving credit facility: Acts similarly to an overdraft; you have a limit and draw down funds as needed. You typically only pay interest on the active balance, making it a standard tool for managing day-to-day liquidity and seasonal dips.
  • Term loan: A lump sum provided upfront with a fixed repayment profile. This is generally the more stable choice for specific, one-off investments, such as international premises expansion or major equipment purchases.

2. Transparency in costs and fees

Lenders vary in how they charge for capital, especially when cross-border elements are involved. Reputable providers will be transparent about:

  • Arrangement & completion fees: These vary by lender and facility type and are often a flat fee or a percentage of the total facility amount.
  • Ongoing costs: Some products may include monthly service fees or cross-border transaction charges rather than a simple annual interest rate.
  • Early repayment: Many modern lenders differentiate themselves by offering no early repayment charges, though this varies significantly by jurisdiction and product type.

Frequently asked questions

How fast can I realistically access business capital? 

While digital-first lenders can often provide funds within 24 to 72 hours, this is an example of an expedited application. Timelines depend heavily on the accuracy of your financial data and the regulatory requirements of your specific region.

What should I check to ensure a lender is reputable? 

Check for clear pricing, published eligibility criteria, and local regulatory verification (e.g., the FCA in the UK or ASIC in Australia). Verification of a firm’s regulatory status or membership in trade bodies like the NACFB can provide confidence in their commitment to industry standards.

Are fixed or variable rates better for international loans? 

Given the volatility in global bond markets, many businesses prefer fixed-rate facilities to ensure their debt-servicing costs remain predictable, protecting them against potential central bank rate hikes.

Strategic solutions with IntaCapital Swiss

At IntaCapital Swiss, we understand that standard retail bank products are not always the optimal fit for high-growth or complex corporate structures operating across borders. We specialise in Bespoke corporate finance solutions designed for resilience and scalability.

As global businesses private capital growth partners, our expertise includes structured facilities and specialist Collateral Transfer Facilities, often technically referred to as the provision of bank guarantees or Standby Letters of Credit (SBLC), to help businesses secure the capital required for major international strategic projects.

Contact us today to discover how our tailored business capital services can empower your long-term strategic vision.

Permanent working capital loans: Which providers are the most reliable?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

How can a business secure long-term stability in a volatile market? For many, the answer lies in Permanent Working Capital Loans. Unlike temporary fixes, these loans provide a steady foundation of cash to cover ongoing operational costs, inventory, and payroll during both growth spurts and seasonal dips.

In this guide, we evaluate the most reliable financial institutions and explore the strategies for choosing a provider that aligns with your long-term goals.

Key insights for navigating working capital

  • Traditional vs. alternative: Traditional banks often offer Low-Interest Business Loans for established borrowers, while fintech lenders can offer a speed advantage, with some providing access to capital in as little as 48 hours.
  • Economic resilience: In high-inflation environments, fixed-rate permanent facilities provide a critical hedge against rising debt-servicing costs.
  • Selection criteria: Reliability is defined by transparency in fee structures and the lender’s demonstrated ability to support credit lines during market contractions.

What are the most reliable providers for permanent working capital loans?

The most reliable providers for permanent working capital loans are top-tier commercial banks, such as JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Barclays, alongside established alternative lenders like BlueVine and Funding Circle. These institutions are recognised for their high lending caps, transparent terms, and strong track records of maintaining liquidity even during periods of global economic shift.

Tier-1 commercial banks: The safety leaders

Traditional banks remain the gold standard for businesses with strong credit scores and established trading histories. Because these institutions are systemically important, they typically offer stable interest rates and significant loan amounts, often reaching seven-figure sums for unsecured facilities.

  • Best for: Established operations requiring permanent capital exceeding £500,000.
  • Institutional support: Major banks frequently announce large-scale funding commitments, sometimes exceeding £30 billion, aimed at supporting specific sectors like SME growth or international trade.

Fintech and alternative lenders: The flexibility experts

For businesses requiring agility, alternative lenders like Iwoca or Fleximize are often the preferred choice for an SME working capital loan. They utilise advanced underwriting to assess real-time performance data rather than relying solely on historical balance sheets.

  • Why they are reliable: They offer revolving permanent facilities that grow alongside your revenue, with some providers offering terms of up to 7 years.
  • Bespoke solutions: Specialised firms, like IntaCapital Swiss, are increasingly vital for businesses requiring Bespoke corporate finance solutions. These include tailored arrangements, such as Collateral Transfer solutions, to secure high-value capital when standard credit markets tighten.

How do you identify a reliable loan provider?

Identifying a reliable loan provider requires looking beyond the initial interest rate. True reliability is found in a lender’s ability to act as a stable partner throughout the business cycle.

1. Transparency in fee structures

A reliable provider is upfront about the total cost of capital. Before signing, ensure the lender clearly defines:

  • Origination fees: The upfront cost of setting up the facility (commonly between 1% and 4%).
  • Drawdown fees: The cost associated with accessing funds from a revolving line.
  • Early repayment: Many leading alternative lenders now differentiate themselves by offering zero fees for early settlement.

2. Industry-specific expertise

A lender that primarily serves retail may not understand the complex supply chain and inventory cycles of a manufacturing firm. Seeking a lender with a dedicated desk for your specific sector reduces the risk of impulsive credit freezes in response to temporary industry-wide dips.

Frequently asked questions 

What is the difference between temporary and permanent working capital? 

Temporary working capital covers short-term needs like holiday inventory. Permanent working capital loans represent the minimum level of liquid assets a company needs to continue operations year-round, regardless of seasonal sales fluctuations.

What is the advantage of a revolving line of credit vs term loan? 

When comparing a revolving line of credit vs term loan, the revolving line offers greater flexibility for ongoing needs, allowing you to withdraw and repay as needed. A term loan provides a lump sum with a fixed repayment schedule, which is often better for a specific, one-time investment.

Which banks are most active in the current market? 

Major institutions like HSBC, NatWest, and Lloyds remain among the most active in the market for those seeking low-interest business loans. However, lending appetite and criteria often fluctuate in response to government bond yields and central bank base rates.

How does inflation affect my loan choice? 

During periods of high inflation, a fixed-rate permanent working capital loan is generally more reliable than a variable-rate one. It protects your business from interest rate hikes that can increase the cost of existing debt overnight.

The path to financial security

Securing a SME working capital loan or a larger facility is a landmark decision for your business’s future. By prioritising authoritative lenders with proven sector expertise, you position your company as a high-value, low-risk entity. In today’s climate, reliability is found in partners who offer not just cash, but the flexibility to adapt to an evolving global economy.

Are you ready to strengthen your company’s financial foundation?

At IntaCapital Swiss, we provide bespoke capital solutions built for growth. Contact us today to see how our permanent working capital facilities can empower your strategic vision.

Extended Sell-off in Global Bonds

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in Iran, News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The global bond sell-off deepened dramatically last Friday and continued into this week as the geopolitical deadlock over the Iran war drove oil prices higher. At Friday’s close, benchmark Brent Crude had risen 1.8% to $111.16, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures climbed just over 2.00% to settle at $107.56.

The 30-year US Treasury (U.S. Government Bond), which is a benchmark for long-term global interest rates, saw yields rise to 5.16%, the highest since October 2023. The 2-year treasury touched a 14-month high of 4.102%, and is considered the most sensitive benchmark to inflation and rate expectations.

In Germany, the 10-year German Bund saw yields rise by two basis points, hitting 3.1827%. In the United Kingdom, after a turbulent week last week, the 10-year gilt, a benchmark for UK government debt, saw yields ease slightly by circa 1 basis point, but remains elevated at 5.169%. In Japan, the 10-year JGB (Japanese Government Bond) raced to 2.739%, last seen this high in 1996, an increase of 13 basis points, whilst the 30-year bond surges 20 basis points—the highest since its debut in 1999.

Financial markets are betting that central banks will have to employ monetary tightening and raise interest rates, as the continuing closure of the Strait of Hormuz keeps energy prices elevated, negatively impacting inflation. President Donald Trump has warned Iran that the “clock is ticking” for them to strike a deal, and yesterday announced on his media outlet ,Truth Social, “They (Iran) had better move fast or there won’t be anything of them left”.

However, experts warn that previous deals offered by Iran and the US have been rejected by both sides, and further note that there appears little prospect for a deal between the US and Iran. With manufacturing supply chains signalling an ever increase in prices, plus a lack of energy flows from the Persian Gulf, it seems inevitable that interest rates will rise across major financial centres as central banks battle to keep inflation under control. 

Many experts agree that between rising inflation, high sovereign debt, increasing interest rates, plus the recent gains in government bond yields in developed countries, the global economy is in danger of negative impacts in the next three to six months. Even if the war were to end tomorrow, oil prices will remain elevated due to supply chain bottlenecks, a lack of investment in the energy sector, plus the need to restructure global energy security.

Financial and political commentators are laying the blame for the present global fiscal problems at the door of President Donald Trump. The US/Iran/Israel war began on 28th February 2026 with the White House trumpeting that Iran’s ballistic missile programme could endanger US allies including Europe and the American mainland. 48 days later, the Strait of Hormuz remains shut, the war is at a standstill, and energy and food prices will begin to rocket should there be no conclusion either way to this conflict.

As a result, experts suggest that bond prices will continue to soar, and financial markets feel that if the hard left of the UK Labour Party replaces UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, spending will be out of control and gilts may reach levels not seen before. In the US, financial markets are saying the Federal Reserve needs to get behind the inflation curve and remove the bias towards easing monetary policy. If not, the word is investors will demand a higher inflation risk premium.

UK Government Bonds and the Starmer Effect

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Historic Surge in Gilt Yields

Yesterday, gilts (UK Government Bonds) fell, sending the long-term yield on the 30-year gilt to 5.79%, up by 11 basis points, and to the highest level in 28 years. The 10-year gilt hit 5.14%, (highest level since 2008) up by 20 basis points on the day. The spread between 30-year gilts and their counterparts in US Treasuries widened to 78 basis points up from 60 basis points. This large increase in the country’s cost of borrowing is due to calls for the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, to resign not only from his bank benchers (now over 100 MP’s), but from cabinet members as well — four of whom resigned yesterday, following Labour’s brutal defeat in local elections last Thursday. 

Market Fears of Looser Fiscal Policy

Such calls for Starmer’s resignation have put investors on high alert, as a potential change in leadership signals the possibility of increased spending by the labour government in an effort to win back votes. The possible shift to looser fiscal policies sees investors pricing in higher risk premiums. Also, financial markets are already suggesting that there will be three interest rate hikes between now and the end of the year. Experts suggest that a fiscal crisis may well be around the corner, and with yields surging, markets are looking at the math and not ideology — where current debt levels are high, global and energy risks are already elevated, leaving investors looking for fiscal discipline, clarity and continuity.

The Return of the Bond Vigilantes

Analysts suggest that in reality, no matter who succeeds Kier Starmer, there is no credible plan to restore the country’s finances, and as a result, UK Government bonds will remain under pressure. Experts suggest the gilts are under attack from what is known as “Bond Vigilantes” (a term coined in the 1980s by economist Ed Yardeni) who aggressively sell government bonds in protest of monetary or fiscal policies they deem inflationary or irresponsible. With the UK currently facing the highest long-term borrowing costs in the G7, a new left-leaning Prime Minister could drive debt even higher. In response, ‘bond vigilantes’ may sell off gilts, forcing borrowing costs up and potentially compelling the government to adopt more disciplined economic policies.

Leadership Contenders and Economic Outlook

The likely successors to Kier Starmer do not fill the bond markets with great hope, as one potential contender, ex-Deputy Prime Minister Angela Raynor, led a cabinet revolt against Chancellors’ Reeve’s plan to slash welfare spending. There is a potential challenge from the Mayor of Manchester, Andy Burnham, who has already criticised the economic approach of the Starmer government by claiming the country is in hock to the bond markets. Also, last year he promised to increase government spending by a further £40 Billion to pay for more council homes. The only candidate prepared to appease the bond markets is Health Secretary Wes Streeting, by committing to fiscal rules and helping bring down government borrowing. 

The Reality of Market Forces

Whoever takes over from Starmer, and it is not a given as he is currently hanging on by any means possible, would do well to heed the words of Margaret Thatcher (late 1980’s), who said, “You can’t buck the market”. This mantra she used to describe her belief that the government cannot and should not attempt to resist market forces, specifically addressed her view on the power of financial and bond markets to dictate financial reality. Experts suggest that bond yields may come down if Starmer keeps his job as this will give continuity, however prevailing winds seem to be against him.

The Iranian Crisis & Rising Prices: Does Oil or Gold Offer Better Protection?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in Iran, News & Reports. Leave a Comment

The current Middle East conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran, which has closed the Strait of Hormuz (where circa 20% of the world’s supply of crude oil and associated derivatives flow), has turned inflation predictions on its head. The Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the ECB, along with many other central banks, originally planned to cut interest rates in 2026. However, both the banks and financial markets are now predicting potential holds or even rate increases to combat rising inflation.

Oil

Experts advise that oil generally offers an immediate protection against rising inflation, especially during energy-driven price shocks like the one currently fueled by the United States/Iran/Israel conflict. Indeed, as a direct driver of inflation, oil and other energy related investments often spike during a crisis, providing strong returns and offering better, more direct protection than gold during times of rising inflation. However, analysts advise that investors need to take care, as during this current crisis the oil market has seen much volatility.

Gold

Common wisdom suggests that in times of crisis, investors flee to a safe haven such as gold, however, the current Iranian conflict has turned this assumption in its head. Indeed, since the start of the US invasion of Iran codenamed Operation Epic Fury on February 28th, 2026, Brent Crude has increased by 37%, whilst gold has retreated by 15%. Gold hit a historic all-time high of over $5,500 in January, before retreating below $4,400 by late March. Since that correction, it has regained ground and is currently trading between $4,710 and $4,730 per troy ounce.

On 28th January this year, gold hit an all-time high of $5,589 per troy ounce, one month before the start of the Iran conflict. This, according to many analysts, was due to rallying on the back of tariff uncertainty, central bank buying and exceptional demand for gold ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds). The fall in the price of gold as suggested by experts is primarily due to surging bond yields, a strong US Dollar and investors taking profits after the aforementioned massive rally in 2025. Experts in the gold arena suggest that many investors sold for liquidity purposes, resulting in a flight to cash rather than a flight to safe haven.

Analysts advise that the rise in bond yields have raised the “opportunity cost”* of holding non-interest bearing assets such as gold. Also, with inflation expectations roaring into view on the back of the current energy shock, government bond yields have spiked globally. The UK 10-year government bonds (Gilts) hit their highest level since 2008. A 15-year high was reached by German bunds, and the 10-year US Treasury recently enjoyed a number of highs and hit 4.38% on Friday before slipping back. 

*Opportunity cost – The next best alternative investors give up when deciding whether or not to move out of one asset class and into another. It represents missed benefits when choosing one option over another. 

Geopolitical Uncertainty and the Outlook for Peace

Just how long oil prices will remain elevated and gold prices depressed will largely depend on the current Middle East crisis ending as soon as possible. However, despite White House rhetoric, an agreement to end the war with Iran seems to be a long way off. With Israel increasing their attacks in Lebanon, and cargo ships still being attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, any peace plan put forward by the Americans may have little hope of receiving Iranian approval.

Is The Global Oil Market Just Weeks Away From Imploding?

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Experts within the oil arena suggest that the global oil market could reach the point of no return between the end of May and the end of June, if the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz continues into the summer and beyond. Experts are advising that the blockade will reduce the levels of stock of diesel, jet fuel, gasoline and crude oil to critical levels by the end of May, when prices will go through the roof. 

One renowned expert advised that global oil reserves are currently at their lowest levels for eight years driven by trade frictions and refining bottlenecks, even though there are still ample supplies of oil . Estimates suggest that in Europe, and excluding government emergency reserves, commercial jet inventories could, by June, fall below the IEA’s (International Energy Agency) critical 23-day threshold. 

Analysts advise that any buffers to the shortages could well be reduced to zero by the end of June, pushing the price even higher than those predicted at the end of May, reaching levels of circa $200p/bbl or higher. The effect on households all over the world could be devastating as the cost of food increases, petrol and diesel at the pumps could see prices never seen before, and airlines dramatically reduce flights whilst increasing ticket prices.

Indeed, between them, global airlines have cut circa two million seats in May (2% of global aviation capacity) due to the frightening increase in jet fuel. Analysts advise that the most exposed country is the United Kingdom, being the largest net importer of jet fuel in Europe. Refineries in the UK have been requested to maximise jet fuel production under government agreed contingency planning, though the Labour government refused requests by industry to reduce taxes. 

On-going fighting between Iran and the USA has increased today, with Iran bombing a critical oil port in Fujairah, UAE. The longer the war goes on, more critical problems for economies will surface, with inflation in the Eurozone and the United Kingdom expected to move upwards. Hopefully, an end to the confrontation can be found soon, otherwise global economies, industry and households will all begin to suffer. Experts advise that families and businesses who intend to fly in the coming months should book early to avoid potential disappointment.

UAE to Leave OPEC

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

A historic departure and strategic vision

The UAE (United Arab Emirates) recently announced that after sixty years of membership the country has left OPEC (Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries) and OPEC+* on May 1st 2026, saying the decision to leave the two oil cartels will allow them greater flexibility to charter their own path under their long-term strategic and economic vision. Furthermore, the UAE had threatened to quit the cartels in the past, due to longstanding tensions between themselves and Saudi Arabia. 

*OPEC+ – Short for the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Nations, and is a coalition of 23 oil producing countries of which the full members are Algeria, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela. There are a further 10 non-OPEC Partner Countries that form the OPEC+ and make up the DoC (Declaration of Cooperation) and consist of Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan. The whole group’s modus operandi is to cooperate on influencing the global oil market and stabilise prices.

Reserving the right to increase output

The UAE is not the first member to exit; Indonesia departed in 2016, followed by Qatar in 2019, Ecuador in 2020, and Angola in 2024. While various experts and oil commentators repeatedly predicted the demise of OPEC, the organization has proven resilient, continuing its operations largely unaffected. However, the UAE is on a different level to those countries who previously departed, wanting to increase the output of oil. With the geological backing on its side, the country has the finances to turn their ambitions into reality. Some observers suggest that leaving OPEC is due to the current Iranian crisis and the on-going closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but there are many observers who disagree with this.

Decades of tension over pricing and quotas

Many experts suggest that whilst the UAE has been majorly taken aback by the attacks by the Iranian regime, and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the move to quit the cartel started nearly ten years ago. Experts say that the reasoning boils down to the price of crude oil, which the UAE and Saudi Arabia have been at loggerheads for over a decade, and over OPEC’s direction. Both Saudi and Russia have wanted to keep the price as close to $100 p/bbl, which meant at times curbing output, whilst the UAE, at the risk of lower prices, wanted to increase output. This argument was kept under wraps until July 2021, when at an OPEC+ meeting the divisions boiled over into the public domain.

The shift from Riyadh to Abu Dhabi’s autonomy

The clash between the two oil producers caused the meeting to be adjourned for two days, until Abu Dhabi eventually retreated from their stance under massive pressure from Riyadh. Experts advise that the UAE has never forgotten this humiliating experience and are perhaps using the current Iranian conflict as a front to leave the cartel. They are in reality leaving to produce more oil, which is against the express wishes and interests of Saudi Arabia. The authorities in Abu Dhabi have been quick to calm any nerves within the energy market, promising to act responsibly by bringing additional output in a measured and gradual manner. 

Weakening OPEC’s global market influence

Analysts point out that without the barrels from the UAE, OPEC’s global market share will fall below 30% for the first time as the UAE’s was OPEC’s third largest producer and second highest spare production capacity. Indeed, OPEC loses circa 15% of its total capacity, severely weakening its position and ability to adjust and set global prices. OPEC’s share of global oil production has been slowly declining due to the rise of US shale. Some analysts feel that now Abu Dhabi has left the cartel, other nations may follow, looking to capitalise on the current heightened price of oil. 

Standing alone: The path forward

In the end, experts believe that the UAE did not need OPEC, and their production was already in excess of OPEC quotas before the current conflict. Officials in Abu Dhabi have long felt the direction taken by OPEC was more to favour Saudi needs than to serve the needs of its members. The UAE has spent years in expanding its production capacity and is now ready to stand alone, dropping the shackles of OPEC, increasing total exports which may well see the dropping in prices in the medium term.

The ECB keeps Interest Rates on Hold

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Yesterday, and for the third straight meeting, the Governing Council of the ECB (European Central Bank) voted unanimously to keep their key benchmark deposit rate steady at 2.00%. Financial markets were expecting a rate hold, as the ECB kept their three key interest rates* at their lowest level for more than two years. However, sentiment within the governing council is changing as growth is weakening on the downside and price pressures are building on the upside.

*ECB Interest Rates – The ECB has three interest rates, one being the key deposit rate, which as mentioned above was held at 2.00% and is the interest rate banks receive when they deposit monies overnight with the ECB. The other two facilities are the Main Refinancing Operations (rate held at 2.15%) which is the rate the banks pay when they borrow monies from the ECB for one week, and the Marginal Lending Facility (rate held at 2.40%), which is the rate banks pay when they borrow monies overnight from the ECB.

Indeed, officials noted that policymakers within the ECB will probably vote to increase interest rates at their next meeting in June, unless the crisis in the Middle East abates and there are some positive developments on energy prices. Those close to the ECB’s decision, while asking for anonymity, noted that there was little chance of avoiding a rate hike in June, but stressed that the situation is fluid and can change quickly.

President of the ECB, Christine Lagarde, said, “the next six weeks will be the right time to assess the economy in order to make an informed decision on verified and revisited information”. The president went on to say, “we made an informed decision on the basis of yet insufficient information. We debated the decision that we have unanimously taken today, but we also debated at length, and in depth, a decision to possibly hike”.

Experts advise that officials from the ECB have not been convinced from data received the need to tighten monetary policy, with the increasing prices of energy such as oil and natural gas yet to trigger “second round effects”*. In a statement issued by ECB officials, they said, “the upside risk to inflation and the downside risks to growth have intensified. The Governing Council remains well positioned to navigate the current uncertainty”.

*Second Round Effects – In these scenarios second round effects are price and wage-settings stemming from the current shock that have the potential to raise Eurozone inflation beyond the near-term in a persistent manner.

Analysts advise that financial markets suggest that ECB officials will prioritise an upswing in prices (by 3% in April), which are suffering negative effects from the USA/Iran/Israel crisis. Traders have accordingly priced in 75 basis points rise in interest rates by the end of the year. President Lagarde noted that, “there is one element that is going to have a real impact, and that is the duration of the conflict”.

Bank of England Keeps Interest Rates on Hold

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Today, the BOE’s (Bank of England) MPC (monetary Policy Committee) voted 8 – 1 to hold the benchmark interest rate steady ay 3.75%, with the Chief Economist, Huw Pill, being the only dissenting member voting to increase interest rates by 25 basis points. Interestingly, other members of the MPC acknowledged that in future meetings they might in fact join Mr Pill in calling for a rate increase.

Officials noted that in the Q3 of this year, they now forecast that inflation will be circa 1.4% higher than their original forecast in the last report issued this February. Indeed, Governor Andrew Bailey said, “holding rates was a reasonable place to be given the softness in the UK economy”, but argued that rates may well have to rise because of the disruptions to energy supplies due to the current Middle East situation. 

Clare Lombardelli and Dave Ramsden, both Deputy Governors, plus external members Catherine Mann and Megan Greene, all signalled that in the future, rates may need to go up tightening financial conditions. The MPC noted that it stands ready to act, should further data shows negative impacts on inflation, such language indicating they will raise interest rates if need be.

Governor Bailey said, “attempting to bring inflation back to target too quickly after a shock like this may cause undesirable volatility in output. There is not much monetary policy can do to prevent these cost increases from affecting UK businesses and households. Thursday’s wild swings in the oil price were an example of how the BOE simply cannot stop the music and make decisions based on a certain level of expected cost pressures”. 

Latest official data shows that the CPI (Consumer Price Index) rose to a three month high of 3.30% in March on the back of accelerating fuel prices. The price of motor fuels month-on-month saw the largest increase since June 2022, jumping by a spectacular 8.70% as disruption to transportation and oil production drove prices higher for both diesel and petrol. Officials of the BOE suggested that if the Middle East conflict were to continue and worsen, inflation could rise as high as 6.20%.

Due to the uncertainty surrounding the Iran conflict, the BOE this time round has not published any forecasts for inflation and other key economic indicators. Instead, the BOE has produced three scenarios based on energy prices and “second round effects”. In the toughest case, scenario C, they suggest that inflation could peak to around 6.20% in early 2027, and stay above the BOE’s 2.00% inflation target for years, forcing interest rates higher. 

Federal Reserve Keeps Interest Rates on Hold

Written by IntaCapital Swiss on . Posted in News & Reports. Leave a Comment

Yesterday, Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve Chairman, officiated at his last FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) meeting where benchmark interest rates were kept on hold for a third consecutive time at 3.50% – 3.750%. The increasing uncertainty with the Middle East crisis left the committee deeply divided voting by 8 – 4 to keep interest rates steady. This was the first time since October 1992 where four committee members dissented against the FOMC decision, with Governor Stephen Moran voting in favour of a 25 basis point cut. 

Three other Federal Reserve Presidents: Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari and Lorie Logan of Cleveland, Minneapolis and Dallas respectively, all agreed to hold rates but dissented because they “could not support inclusion of an easing bias in the statement at this time”. Experts suggest that the dissents caught financial markets by surprise, and despite the nomination by President Trump of dove leaning Kevin Warsh* as the new Fed Chair, the vote could indicate a shift away from rate cuts at future meetings. 

*Kevin Warsh – He has passed a major hurdle to become the next Chairman of the federal reserve, as yesterday, he was approved by the Senate Banking Committee. The nomination now advances to a full senate vote with the earliest date being the 11th May 2026.

Analysts advise that money markets are betting that there will be no further rate cuts in 2026. However, analysts now suggest a better than 25% chance of a rate hike by early next year. This shift comes as oil prices climb back above $100/bbl, driven by the ongoing Middle East conflict and the continued blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for 25% of the world’s oil. Experts advise the big fear for policymakers is that the current energy-driven price shock feeds into a broader, more consistent core inflation. 

On that note, US headline inflation for March 2026 jumped to 3.30%, the highest level since May 2024. Core inflation (excluding food and energy) also rose slightly to 2.60%, with policymakers still adopting a wait and see attitude towards inflation. However, on the employment front, the unemployment rate for now appears to have stabilised, but net hiring flattened out to just about zero over the past year. Experts and policymakers are suggesting this would make the labour market more vulnerable to shocks.

Finally, Chairman Powell’s tenure as the Chair of the Federal reserve ends on 15th May 2026, but under current rules he can remain on the board until January 2028. Historically, Fed Chairs typically resign from the Board of Governors entirely upon leaving the chair. However, Jerome Powell has opted to remain on the board, a decision that prevents President Trump from appointing a new governor who might align more closely with White House policies. Chairman Powell noted, “I plan to keep a low profile as a governor. There is only ever one chair of the Federal Reserve Board. When Kevin Warsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair”.

Head office

IntaCapital Swiss SA,
Rue du Rhône 80 - 84,
CH - 1204 Genève,
Switzerland

Other facilities

Enquire

Legal

IntaCapital Switzerland | Copyright © 2025 | All Rights Reserved