Author: Joesph Patterson

Is China’s Property Crisis Getting Worse?

Over the last four years a number of China’s biggest property developers have gone into default and today the Chinese economy is hobbled by the world’s largest distressed debt of circa USD 160 Billion. The financial markets were shocked when the China Evergrande Group, at the time China’s biggest property developer, received on the 26th of January 2024 a liquidation order from a Hong Kong court. The group had amassed in excess of USD 300 Billion in liabilities during the debt-fuelled years of the China property boom, and on that fateful day in Hong Kong when their shares stopped trading, their value was down 99% from the peak at USD 275 Million.

Today, four years later, the last remaining titan in the Chinese property developing arena, China Vanke Co., warned that they were facing losses of circa USD 6.2 Billion. In the last weeks of January 2025, Chinese officials finally decided that China Vanke Co. was “too big to fail” (a term that has been used over the years for banks where their executives have failed to do their jobs) and faced with a collapse in the company’s bond price, and officials from Shenzhen (Vanke’s hometown) have taken over operational control. The company is also facing USD 4.9 Billion of maturing bonds and redemption options this year whilst the rating agency Moody’s has downgraded the company to Caa1 (Non-Investment Grade– Substantial Risk) which is seven points below investment grade.

Chinese authorities are working on a bail-out package that will help fill the funding gap of USD 6.2 Billion, which has been welcomed by the financial markets. However, despite the authorities stepping in at China Vanke, plus many stimuli packages from the government, analysts confirm that real estate projects in the hinterland (outside major cities) are not receiving any lending from banks. Furthermore, experts advise that circa 12 developers are currently facing liquidation petitions, restructuring deals are falling apart and on the international front, creditors are losing patience.

Another tale of woe is Country Garden whose name used to be in lights along with China Evergrande, now suffering from weak domestic demand and a declining job market. The company has suffered from a year on year 51% decline with contract sales dropping 59% from the previous year to USD 309 Million (Yuan 226 Billion). According to analysts, one major stumbling block (and this, despite government support) is that a substantial number of buyers prefer to purchase second-hand homes as they have a lack of faith in developers’ abilities to finish projects. The markets are holding their breath to see if Country Garden can reach an agreement with creditors on a revised debt plan. Meanwhile, a liquidation hearing in Hong Kong has been delayed by the court.

Sadly market conditions have worsened, and experts point to Sunac China Holdings, when in 2023 they enjoyed a successful debt restructuring (and was hailed by creditors as a blueprint and role model), have recently advised that they may have to do a second restructuring. Analysts also advise that in Hong Kong’s court, liquidation petitions are piling up – with one of China’s biggest builders Shimao Group Holdings Ltd in the firing line. Elsewhere, and in an unfamiliar approach, China Fortune Land Development Co. (In Default) has scrapped a debt plan already approved by creditors and is going for a court-led decision.

Some experts point the finger at leading communist officials who, when the slump took place, blamed them for turning the economy towards economic growth driven by the technology sector, thereby reducing the role of the property sector. The government then cracked down on the massive leverage being used by developers whilst tackling a housing bubble. The property market then crashed with home prices according to experts falling 30% from their peak in 2021, with the housing sector’s financial contribution to the economy falling from circa 24% to circa 19%.

Initially, China’s answer to the property crisis was not to bail out companies but to rather focus on actually delivering homes to buyers. In this respect, they requested (which means told) state-backed companies and local governments to purchase those homes that remained unsold, whilst providing finance on a limited scale to finish uncompleted property projects. The government then sought to improve demand by cutting mortgage rates and lifting restrictions on buying with an end result of not reflating the market but to manage the slowdown.

However, that strategy appears to be in pieces considering the number of developers queuing up in Hong Kong waiting on the courts’ liquidation decisions. Economists are fearful that the property crisis will continue on a downward track, hampering the government’s goal of kick-starting and reviving domestic consumption. Economists are crying out for more stimuli packages when Chinese lawmakers have their annual meet in March. It is hoped this time that the authorities will offer packages that will be big enough and effective enough to stimulate confidence and consumption, thereby boosting a seriously flagging property sector.

Will Gold in 2025 Outperform its Record Year of 2024?

Gold could possibly be on for another record annual performance in 2025, up 28% through to November 2024. Even though consumer demand decelerated, this was offset by investor and central bank buying. In Asia, investors’ presence was a constant and in Q3 2024, western investment flows were fuelled by a weakening US Dollar and lower yields. However, experts suggest that this quite remarkable performance was fuelled by the role gold plays as a hedge amidst geopolitical risk and market volatility.

2024

Data released shows, without a doubt, that 2024 was a record year for gold as it increased by more than 28% where the trading average was up 22% compared to 2023. Gold also hit forty new records against currencies, plus for the first time gold demand surpassed USD100 Billion. 

Other data released shows that in many regional financial markets, volatility and geopolitical risk supported investment demand for gold, especially in OTC *(over the counter) demand. Central banks (who have been net buyers for just about 15 years) were again to the fore, continuing to add to gold reserves picking up the pace in early October 2024. As central bank began to cut interest rates, investors in the western world made a beeline to purchase gold. 

*OTC Market – OTC or Over-The -Counter trading is the process of trading commodities such as gold, stocks, bonds, and derivatives without the oversight of a central exchange. OTC trading is different from exchange based trading where transactions take place on a centralised exchange such as the London Stock Exchange, the Nasdaq, or New York Stock Exchange. OTC trading takes place between a network of participants such as brokers, banks, and other financial institutions that trade directly (not via an exchange) with each other.

2025

The world waits with bated breath to see the outcome of a Trump2 presidency, and the effect the new administration’s policies will have on the economies of many countries. Many experts suggest that the Federal Reserve will deliver 100 basis points cut by the end of the year with the ECB  (European Central Bank) and their associate central banks following suit to one degree or another. Historic data shows that gold has risen by as much as 6% in the first six months of a rate cycle, with its subsequent performance swayed by the depth and length of that cycle. 

Gold’s largest markets are India and China, with both making up 60% of annual demand (not including central banks). In China, experts hope for increased economic  growth (more likely through government stimuli in the Q1 and Q2) to keep gold investment at the forefront of consumer demand. Once again, central banks are expected to have a positive impact on gold with analysts suggesting that the current trend is not likely to decelerate, and some analysts predicting central bank buying could outpace 2024. 

Conclusion

Experts in the arena suggest that gold will remain rangebound, with a dovish Federal Reserve having a positive impact on gold. However, if inflation returns to the US economy as some experts predict (due to Trump2 policies), a reversal in Federal reserve policy will have a negative impact on gold. Geopolitical problems in 2025 are expected to have a positive effect on gold, and as long as India’s economic growth remains above 6.5% demand from that country will be along the 2024 levels.

Analysts advise that currently the same factors are in plac  in 2025 that drove gold’s record breaking performance in 2024, however it could be positively impacted if Donald Trump makes good on his tariff policy and provokes a trade war with investors fleeing to safe havens such as gold. Furthermore, the gold world will be keeping an eye on China, as consumer demand will more than likely depend on improved economic growth.

The Trump Effect on the Economy of China

The self-proclaimed “Tariff Man” President elect (and ex-President) Donald Trump will reascend to the White House on 20th January 2025, and one of his first orders of business will be to batter China with 60% tariffs on all their export to the United States. Such tariffs, if introduced, will obliterate China/United States trade and will damage exports which has been one of the bright spots in an otherwise gloomy Chinese economy. However, many experts suggest that the Chinese government might deliberately weaken the Yuan, in order to make their exports more competitive, plus they feel that the broad budget deficit will be increased as well in response to the election of Donald Trump.

The election of ex-President Trump could not have come at a worse time for the Chinese economy, which has been struggling for a number of years. The housing market, once the driving force behind China’s economy, is currently a spent force. Analysts suggest that by close of business 31st December 2024, between completed and still under construction floor space, 2.9 billion square feet will remain unsold housing inventory. The downturn in the property market has left local governments shouldering billions in unsustainable debt, with analysts estimating the size of the debt as in the region of USD20.7 Trillion (Yuan147 Trillion), which as a comparison is just over 50% of the national debt of the United States which stands at USD36 Trillion as of November 2024. 

China has been struggling with weak domestic demand in the property sector, and this has been attributed to high youth unemployment, low pensions and wages and a social safety net which is at best chronically feeble. The net result is China’s household spending is 20% points behind the global average coming in at under 40% of Gross Domestic Product, and the government has to either increase the national debt burden or redistribute the national income in order to boost this sector. Indeed, on Friday 8th November 2024, Chinese officials gave indebted local governments a lifeline of USD1.4 Trillion (Yuan10 Trillion), however many economic commentators who are China focused said that they felt a much larger sum should have been allocated such as USD2 Trillion or above.

Therefore, with a struggling economy and masses of local government debt, it is envisioned that Trump’s administration policy of 60% tariffs on China will negatively impact a number of areas within their economy. If China feels that Donald Trump is serious, then output in the short term may well increase prior to the introduction of tariffs. It is, however, felt by many experts that there will be a long-term negative impact on the industrial activity in China. As mentioned above, the Chinese Government will use monetary and fiscal policy to support the economy (especially the construction and housing sectors), however, the decline in private investment and drastically reduced exports to the United States will outweigh any expected fiscal and monetary offsets. 

Elsewhere, experts suggest that another sector to be hit hard by tariffs will be the high-tech electronics sector, with advanced production being taken on in countries such as South Korea and Japan. Tariffs may well also restrict the flow of knowledge, thus eroding competitiveness and productivity in this sector. Furthermore, supply chains will take a hit as companies seek to reposition their operations away from China in the hope that they will avoid tariffs, with the machinery and automotive sectors being hit hard as parts are traded multiple times across border to border before final assembly commences. 

Many analysts are predicting that a Trump2 Presidency will be more destructive than the previous version, and the effect of tariffs on the USD500 Billion worth of goods will ignite a trade war worse than Trump1. It is expected that growth in China will be slower under a Trump presidency, and some analysts are predicting between 1% and 2% drop in GDP. Other experts suggest a minimal fall, as China will embrace greater stimulus and bolster manufacturing, whilst allowing the Yuan to weaken helping to offset the negative effects of Trump2. 

On the geopolitical front, President elect Trump has promised tariffs of between 150% and 200% should China blockade Taiwan, and China’s continued political and economic support for Russia has not gone down well in the west. If China approaches the European Union to increase exports to the Eurozone, Trump has promised increased tariffs to the EU’s exports to the United States. All in all, from the 20th of January 2025 (inauguration day), the US/China relationship could well have negative effects on a global scale.