Tag: Global Markets

Hedge Funds Leverage Bets in the Bond Mark Could Risk Instability

Recently, central banks have become worried about a trading strategy usually known as a basis trade* or cash futures basis trade, where hedge funds and similar investors place leverage multi-trillion dollar bets on government bonds. Indeed, the FSB (Financial Stability Board)**, in a recently published report has encouraged policy makers to increase oversight on market participants and the accompanying risks being taken “repurchase agreements/repos”*** which are backed by government bonds. 

*Basis trade – This is an arbitrage strategy that profits from the price differential between the current “spot” (cash) price of an asset and its relative derivative, which is usually a futures contract. Traders/hedge funds buy the cheaper asset and sell the more expensive asset, aiming to profit when the two prices eventually converge, and it is the US treasury basis trade that is primarily used by hedge funds.

The US treasury basis trade – Sometimes, treasury futures trade at a higher price (a premium) compared to the actual underlying treasury bond in the cash market. This usually happens because institutional investors or asset managers have a high demand for futures for a quick liquid way to manage risk, and they are willing to pay a premium. The hedge fund will buy the cheaper treasury bonds in the cash market and sell the more expensive treasury futures contract. 

However, because the price differential between the cash and futures price are generally very small, these trades are only profitable when done on a massive scale. Hedge funds borrow heavily (usually in the repo market) to amplify their returns, and whilst this enables them to generate steady returns, the trades can be exposed to significant risks. If prices move briefly in the wrong direction, it can trigger massive margin calls, forcing rapid sell-offs – which in turn can create broader market volatility.

**Financial Stability Board, FSB – Based in Basel, Switzerland, the FSB is an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system, promoting international financial stability by coordinating national financial authorities and international standard setting authorities. 

***Repurchase agreement/Repo market – This arena is essentially a short-term loan where one party sells securities (e.g., government bonds), which will act as collateral to another party for cash and simultaneously agrees to buy them back shortly after at a slightly higher price. The price differential represents interest paid on the transaction. Obviously, the basis trade can only work in the repo market if the interest paid on the borrowed cash (repo rate) is lower than the yield generated by the treasury bond. The hedge fund then increases their returns by utilising immense leverage, which according to experts is in the region of 95% to 98% of the bonds value. 

Recently, warnings have been issued by both the ECB (European Central Bank) and the BOE (Bank of England) regarding basis trades and the risks they pose to their bond markets and financial stability. Indeed, in a report issued on Wednesday 27th May 2026, the ECB advised, “Their leveraged positions may have to be unwound quickly if bond prices react sharply to geopolitical or risk sentiment shocks”. The report went on to say that this could “erode the stable funding base of European governments” by amplifying price movements and increasing volatility. Officials from a number of central banks suggest that if hedge funds are forced into rapid liquidation of their positions, the fall-out could potentially lead to massive price moves impacting the cost of borrowing for governments, companies and consumers. 

Analysts advise that the cash against futures basis trades market represents today circa $1 – 1.5 trillion and under normal conditions acts as a lubricant for bond markets, as hedge funds virtually represent warehouses for government bonds as they absorb enormous amounts of sovereign debt. This in turn smooths the passage for governments to issue bonds. However, experts suggest that there could be cross-border contagion if there is a sudden huge unwinding of basis trades in the U.S. treasuries market (the global risk-free benchmark), as these trades will inevitably spill over into the UK and European sovereign debt market. 

This could lead to a tightening of global financial conditions, which will negatively impact borrowing costs, and because basis trades are heavily dependent on the repo market, any stress on this market by the unwinding of basis trades could, experts suggest, cause a liquidity freeze. As the leverage by hedge funds goes largely unchecked, global regulators are ramping up monitoring of this market. But as yet, have not decided on when and possibly how to impose regulations within the basis trade arena. 

What is Happening in the LNG Market?

Since the USA/Iran/Israel conflict began on 28th February this year, Global LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) prices have spiked significantly, with Asian LNG spot prices surging by 143% and European wholesale gas prices (such as Dutch TTF) increasing by circa 85%. As the world is well aware, the conflict has closed the Strait of Hormuz, Qatar Energy and Adnoc (Abu Dhabi National Oil Company), who together make up 20% of global LNG exports. They have turned to alternative methods to ship LNG out of the Persian Gulf.

In a significant move to ship LNG through the Strait of Hormuz, both exporters are adopting tactics pioneered by Moscow by going “dark”, and employing tactics that are being used by what is commonly known as Russia’s “Dark Fleet”*. Experts note that these covert tactics have already allowed Qatar and Abu Dhabi to slip a limited number of shipments through the blockaded Strait. Shipping commentators suggest these initial runs serve as a critical test case for expanding dark-fleet operations in the region. Limited data on the situation suggest that the tankers are switching off vessel-tracking equipment (AIS transponders), and are hiring crew from a recruiting company that is known to have provided personnel for tankers carrying sanctioned Russian LNG. 

*The Dark Fleet – A large clandestine network of aging oil tankers, shell companies and maritime service providers that operate outside international regulations to transport sanctioned oil primarily from Iran, Russia and recently, Venezuela. Experts and analysts estimate the fleet to be roughly in the region of 1,470 tankers that use deceptive practices such as disabled tracking systems, forged documentation and ship-to-ship transfers in open waters that enable them to bypass international sanctions.

Interestingly, perhaps even bizarrely, some analysts are predicting an upcoming glut in the LNG market, which does seem to be counterintuitive as the closing of the Strait of Hormuz has effectively halted 20% of global exports. Indeed, Qatar has the largest LNG plant in the world, and the government has advised that it will take at least three years of repairs to get the plant back to 100% working order. Experts have suggested that as long as the Strait of Hormuz is opened by the beginning of September, a long-term surplus from 2026 – 2023 is on the way, which will result in lower prices.

Analysts suggest that the Middle East conflict has redefined the future of the LNG market as importers from the Persian Gulf, especially those countries in Southeast and Southwest Asia have been marooned without reliable energy supplies. These countries will have long memories and any future long-term contracts may well, due to lack of trust in supply  from the Persian Gulf, diversify away as a matter of priority and finance upcoming LNG ventures outside of the Strait of Hormuz. One commentator has gone so far as to say that the current US/Iran/Israel crisis will guarantee a construction boom in the LNG industry that excludes the Persian Gulf.

Before the Middle East conflict broke out, analysts were predicting a LNG glut from 2026 – 2030, and as such have predicted that this will be delayed by about a year. They suggest that buyers from Asia will help finance more projects in Africa, Latin America and North America. According to data released from the IEA (International Energy Agency), last year the construction of 100 billion cubic metres of new capacity was approved by the LNG industry. The IEA has also noted, “There remains a pipeline of over 700 billion cubic meters of projects globally seeking final investment decisions, including circa 110 billion in the United States that have received regulatory approval”. 

If the current pipeline of global projects is fully realised, global LNG supply is estimated to double. Should the Russia-Ukraine war draw to a close, an influx of legacy supply would hit the market simultaneously, amplifying the potential glut. However, the price of LNG would have to significantly fall in order for the market to absorb the increase in supply. However absorption happened in the past, so whilst experts expect this glut to arrive in the next 12 months, all eyes remain fixed on the diplomatic solutions to end the Middle East conflict. 

Volatility Knock-Out Options are Back in Demand

After the invasion of Iran by the United States and Israel on February 28th this year, the conflict has introduced high energy shocks and what some commentators might suggest as political disinformation, which has produced geopolitical upheaval resulting in financial markets becoming extremely volatile. Increased uncertainty has boosted demand for risk-management tools, specifically volatility driven instruments, hence the return of “Volatility Knock-out Options”. 

Volatility Knock-Out Options or VKOs as they are usually referred to, are specialised cost-effective derivative instruments, typically “Put-Options”*, that become void if the underlying asset’s realized volatility exceeds a predetermined level during the life of the option. They are designed for “Buy and Hold” hedgers seeking lower premiums, cutting costs by up to 40% compared to standard vanilla puts exploiting the steepness of implied volatility skew**.

*Put Option – This is a financial contract giving the holder the right but not the obligation to sell an underlying asset (e.g., equities, commodities, currencies) at a set price, (the Strike Price) within a specific timeframe. It acts as a bearish bet or insurance increasing in value as the underlying asset’s price falls. 

**Volatility Skew – Indicates variations in implied volatility across options, revealing insights into expectations and market sentiment. To develop effective trading and in order to price options, skew patterns serve as a valuable tool in this market. An important ingredient is that the skew reflects differences between implied volatility across options with different strike prices, but with same expiry dates, therefore highlighting market sentiment and expectations.

Earlier this year, markets were relatively calm, and in January, the FTSE 100 hit a record high with implied volatility at circa 50% of the current level. However, since then, implied volatility has climbed above 23%, forcing institutions to switch from expensive vanilla puts to VKOs in order to manage hedging costs. In essence, VKO adoption is usually higher than 23%, more often than not around a realised volatility threshold of 30%, and in particular in the context of the S&P 500 (SPX) hedging. 

Overall, the renewed interest, especially institutional interest in VKOs, is down to the Middle East crisis and the ensuing volatility that has been engendered. Participants have turned to this option as it is cheaper than standard vanilla puts. The VKO features a realised volatility barrier that makes the option expire worthless if the market becomes too volatile, which eliminates the premium costs associated with volatility. 

Investors Pile Into Ultra-Short Term Bonds ETFs

Currently, President Trump’s economic policies are fanning the flames of concerns regarding a recession and a sell-off in the stock markets, and investors are pumping money into Ultra-Short Term Bonds ETFs*. Led by products such as the iShares 0 – 3 Month Treasury ETF, this sector has received in excess of USD 16 Billion since January 1st 2025 with iShares 0-3 Month Treasury accounting for circa USD 7 Billion. Last week March 3rd – March 8th 2025, data reveals that the iShares ETF received USD 1.4 Billion recording the largest inflow of funds to date.

*Ultra-Short Term Bonds – These are bond funds that invest only in fixed income instruments with very short-term maturities. Such instruments will have maturities of less than one year and are usually defined as government or corporate bonds, CDs (Certificates of Deposits), commercial paper, and money market funds.

*Ultra-Short Term Bonds ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) – These funds are designed for investors who are focused on reserving assets but would also like to earn income. Utilising short-term investment grade corporate, bonds, government bonds and money market instruments, these ETFs aim to best returns on cash and your typical money market funds without incurring substantially more risk.

Data provided by experts show that lay-offs in the US federal workforce, softening economic data and President Trump’s on-again, off-again tariff war on the allies and top trading partners of the United States has fuelled a sell-off in the stock market. Indeed, since election day of November 5th 2024, President Trump and the rest of the financial markets has seen all the gains since that day on the S&P 500 Index completely wiped out. Furthermore, economic models provided by a number of investment banks and other such luminaries, suggest that the risk of a recession in the US economy is on the up.

During times of volatility and turbulence in stock markets those ETFs with short-dated maturities tend to receive an accelerated amount of incoming funds. Data received shows that from 2013 during downturn months in the S&P 500, flows into the above-mentioned funds were circa USD 2.7 Billion, and during the up-turn months funds received were circa USD 440 Million.

Elsewhere in the week through March 5th 2025, Global Money Market Funds witnessed a huge inflow of funds, and data provided by LSEG Lipper* showed the amount received as USD 61.32 Billion, with a net inflow of USD 39.55 Billion the week before. Many commentators and experts attribute this inflow to President Trump escalating his trade war by imposing steeper tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada.

*LSEG Lipper – provides global independent fund performance data, in a precise granular fund classification system, and includes mutual funds, CEFS (Closed-End Funds), ETFs, hedge funds, domestic retirement funds, pension funds, and insurance products.

Experts have suggested that President Trump has put the strength of the economy on the backburner while he pursues his political goals and agendas. This could turn out to be a massive mistake as more and more analysts, experts, and economists, suggest that his somewhat outdated “America First” platform is knocking confidence and weighing on confidence. Indeed, an increasing number of economists had revised downwards their growth predictions with warnings that Trumpenomics and his trade wars are proving more damaging to the US economy than first anticipated.

Furthermore, the R word is beginning to be used more and more with many feeling that a recession could soon be appearing on the horizon. Furthermore, when asked that very question on Sunday 9th March 2025, President Trump declined to rule out the possibility that the US Economy could indeed fall into recession.

The Global Housing Market Crisis of 2023

Sadly, for many people throughout the world, higher interest rates besetting global property markets are diminishing the prospects of home ownership. In 2022 central banks started employing quantitative tightening monetary policy and raising interest rates in their fight against inflation, the resultant shock that rippled through global housing markets gave way to the reality that the real estate boom was at an end, marking a finish to the millions made by people across the globe.

It would appear that higher interest rates are here to stay for a while longer, keeping borrowing costs high, this together with a shortage of homes are keeping prices elevated. This has resulted in those homeowners who have had to reset their loans facing increased financial hardship, whilst in many areas housing is now less affordable. For instance, in the United States the home market is dominated by the 30-year mortgage and today it is effectively frozen, as buyers are being squeezed because those with lower interest rate mortgages are reluctant to sell. 

In each country across there are differing scenarios, but in the end they are all dragging down global economies, as whether they rent or buy, people are using more of their net income for housing. Take for example Canada and New Zealand, where those who bought at the top are now struggling with higher repayments on their loans. Across the world landlords are suffering from distress and in many areas higher interest rates have negatively impacted on the building of homes. 

Experts suggest that the “Golden Age” of single family homes is ancient history with the cost of home loans doubling in some parts of the world. If potential home buyers bought just after the global financial crisis then in most parts of the world owners would now have built up a substantial amount of equity. They predict that the next ten years will be an uphill battle for many new home buyers or even for those looking to trade up. For example, in the United States the current 30-year mortgage is circa 7.4% and over the next decade is expected to be around the 5.5% mark, whereas in the comparable low early part of 2021 it was 2.65%. In 2011 the average 30-year mortgage was circa 3.9% and slowly reduced over the next decade, making it the optimal time to buy.

Interestingly, back in the 1980’s, John Quigley, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, identified what was to be known as the lock-in effect. Between 1978 and 1981 mortgage rates had doubled from 9% to a staggering 18%, which left millions of households paying well below the market rate for mortgages . Therefore, to purchase a new home meant adding possibly unsustainable costs to the monthly household bills, which was a powerful reason to not to move, hence the lock-in effect.

Economic incentives quite often make people forget lessons learnt in the past, as Quigley’s “lock-in effect” was quietly forgotten as interest rates fell back. However, this all changed when the Covid-19 Pandemic hit. In 2020 the US housing market briefly shut down, then a housing boom exploded (not seen in decades) due to a combination of plummeting borrowing costs and stimulus payments. For the first time in fourteen years existing home sales hit six million annually. The market was seeing house hunters purchasing homes far from the coast (the most popular areas before the pandemic), mainly due to the new remote working policies. Today, the quantitative tightening policies of the Federal Reserve has reduced demand and reduced supply even more due to Quigley’s “Lock-in Effect”

Unfortunately for home buyers, even as inflation begins to recede and central banks reverse their strict monetary policy of interest rate hikes, they have to face the reality that borrowing costs on their mortgages may never return to the lows during the fifteen years seen since the global financial crisis. In the past, if interest rates shot up, consumers were confident that rates would return to what was perceived as normal. They would be able to struggle through the higher rate or take on mortgages with a view to refinancing at a later date when interest rates once again fell. Today, these options will not be available because as previously stated, higher interest rates and costs look like dragging on for quite a number of years. 

Experts in the United States are referring to the housing market as the start of the glacial period due to the collision of the highest mortgage rates in a generation (timeline 20 – 30 years ), a low inventory and rising prices. As a result, recently released data shows sales of previously owned homes having dropped to their lowest level since 2010, with contract closings in October falling by the most in the last twelve months and dropping by 4.1% from September of this year. Further data released from ICE (Intercontinental Exchange Inc) show that the housing market in the United states is the least affordable in forty years. The data further confirmed that circa 40% of average household income is now required to purchase your average home. 

Expert analysts predict that in 2024 the housing market will feel the most severe effects of higher interest rates and sustained higher mortgage rates as they estimate transactions in this market will fall to their lowest levels since the 1990’s. The glacial period that is being deferred on the United States housing market will have many knock-on effects. For instance, families may be forced to live together, and as the elderly age without moving, homes will be kept off the market which could have been made available for purchase by younger buyers. Furthermore, there are a vast number of homeowners who are unaffected by the increase in interest rates (as 30-year mortgages were negotiated when interest rates were low), and they are also sitting on a near-record amount of equity. In other circumstances, there may have been forced sales or foreclosures which would have opened up purchasing opportunities for potential buyers. 

Away from the United States things are just as bad in many housing markets with New Zealand being an extreme case. New Zealand enjoyed possibly one of the largest pandemic booms as in 2021 property prices rose by an incredible 30%, and according to data released by the Reserve Bank, circa 25% of the then current stock of mortgage lending was taken out in 2021 and a fifth were first time buyers. However, mortgages are only fixed for three years or less, and interest rate hikes of 5 ¼% since October 2021 have sent mortgage repayments through the roof. The Reserve Bank has estimated that household disposable income that is used to finance mortgage repayments will be circa 20% by June 2024 up from a low in 2021 of 9%, more than double of what they were paying. However, thanks to strong wage growth many households are just about managing.

In China the property slump is not driven by interest rate hikes, but two years ago a government led clampdown on developers borrowing was the forerunner to a growing crisis. Today, China’s property market, which once accounted for 30% of the economy, is struggling with unresolved debts and slow sales leading to an economic decline. Potential buyers have been reluctant to invest in homes yet to be finished, due to a legal system that is not prepared to restructure debt and spreading defaults by home builders. However, the government has advised that it will target selected developers for financial aid, but insist the funding is to finish housing projects, not to repay debt.

In Canada many citizens profited from the housing boom of the last decade, and by 2020 had come to own more than two homes which, in British Columbia and Ontario, accounted for just under 33% of housing stock. However, data shows the introduction of higher interest rates meant that in a city such as Toronto owning a condo was now yielding only circa 3.5% after mortgage repayments and costs whilst Canadian Government Bonds were paying 5%. The high rates of interest have certainly put a damper on interest in new housing purchases, whilst some with investment properties are facing negative cash flows, forcing owners to sell, if indeed they can find buyers. 

Elsewhere, Europe is facing a housing crisis, as a collapse in home building threatens an increase in shortages over the next five years. Those countries that are hardest hit are among the wealthiest with building permits in France down by over 25% in seven months through to July 2023, and in Germany building permits were down 27% in the first half of 2023. In fact, when Olaf Scholz’s coalition took power in Germany in 2021, the Chancellor’s pledge of adding 400,000 new homes per year was sadly way behind schedule. In fact experts suggest that Germany won’t reach this figure until 2026 at the very earliest.

There is a massive construction crash in Europe with governments reluctant to spend any more funds than are absolutely necessary as they continue the battle against inflation in the post-covid era. Recent data shows that in Sweden in the first ten months of 2023, 1,145 companies within the construction industry filed for bankruptcy, an increase of 32% from 2022. 

Many politicians are advocating more spending on housing, even the Labour party in the United Kingdom (polls suggest a shoo-in at the next general election) are promising to overhaul the planning system and build 1,500,000 over the next term of parliament. However, as in many countries a manifesto promise and reality are often many miles apart. The German government has offered to boost public investment and simplify licensing procedures, but what analysts describe as a tepid response is not expected to make any significant impact. 

Without government investment and private sector investment many citizens across the world  will be unable to buy their own homes destroying the dreams of home ownership. The only winners appear to be those buyers in the United States locked into the 30-year mortgage when interest rates were at their lowest. The rest of the world can only hope that the property market returns to relative normality, but how long that will take is anybody’s guess.