Demand Increasing for Green Energy Due to the Current Middle East Conflict

It is a well-documented fact that for the past number of decades, many governments across the globe (except perhaps the US where President Trump has cancelled many green energy initiatives in favour of fossil fuels), have been actively moving away from fossil fuel dependency to alternative energy supplies. Experts suggest that the supply shock from the US/Iran/Israel conflict will be a major catalyst for governments to increase the transition to alternative energy. Analysts reference the response by European governments to the invasion of Ukraine by Russia on 24th February 2022 and the subsequent energy crisis threatening energy security, which made it imperative to focus on building a more diversified domestic energy supply.

Many governments across the globe have been investing for years in wind farms, electric vehicles, battery storage and solar panels with the primary goal of reducing carbon emissions. However, in today’s world, the current Middle East Conflict and the Ukraine/Russia war alongside the subsequent energy supply shocks, have moved geopolitical risk to front and centre for the race to alternative energy supply. Wind and solar resources hold advantages over fossil fuels, for example their resources are domestic and supplies cannot be restricted by war in foreign jurisdictions including geopolitical choke points (e.g., the Strait of Hormuz*). 

*The Strait of Hormuz — A narrow waterway at the entrance to and exit from the Persian Gulf — is a linchpin of global energy and freight flows. Traditionally, about 20% to 30% of the world’s total daily petroleum liquids (oil, condensate and products) and circa 20% of  global LNG (liquified Natural Gas) are shipped via the Strait. Furthermore,  data reveals that around one-third of the world’s seaborne fertilizer trade flows through the Strait, including circa 30% of global urea and circa 20% of global ammonia supplies. 

Recent International Energy Agency (IEA) projections show global energy investment reaching $3.4 trillion this year. Of that total, $2.2 trillion will go toward clean energy and grid infrastructure, while $1.2 trillion will fund traditional fossil fuels (oil, gas, and coal). Investment in oil is expected to decline for the third year from 2023 with investment falling below $ 500 billion, whilst LNG investment is expected to rise to $ 330 billion, however this figure may be inaccurate to LNG terminals and fields in Qatar suffering damage as a result of the US/Iran conflict.

Experts conclude that the current Middle East crisis has encouraged policymakers across the globe to shift the emphasis to system flexibility and energy security, which in turn will support increased investment from fossil fuels to alternative energy. In Europe for example, the European Commission on 22nd April this year published Accelerate EU which refers to the need to strengthen energy resilience. In the report, they said that whilst transition to alternative energy is by no means new, it needs to be accelerated allowing the EU (European Union) to rely less and less on imported fossil fuels, thereby shielding economies within the bloc from rising energy costs. 

In Southeast Asia, the need for energy transition is more acute as circa 80% of crude oil flowing through the Strait of Hormuz is bound for Asian markets, prompting governments in the area to make energy security a core priority. Facing some of the highest residential electricity rates in Southeast Asia, the Philippines is rapidly turning to solar power. It recently surpassed Pakistan as the second-largest buyer of Chinese solar panels, with imports from China more than doubling between January and May compared to the same period in 2025. Elsewhere, auto dealers throughout the region advised that there had been increased consumer interest in EVs (electric vehicles), with exports from China jumping by 64% to Vietnam, 70% to Thailand, and 95% to the Philippines. Overall, Chinese EV exports were 57% higher in the first three months since the start of the Middle East crisis (March through May 2026) than for the same period in 2025.

The global airline industry announced in June 2026 a near halving of its 2026 profit forecast, placing the blame squarely on the current Middle East crisis for disrupting key air corridors and driving up fuel costs, which due to thin margins in the airline industry has exposed the fragility of the sector. Data reveals that jet fuel costs account for circa 33% of airline costs, and when prices are elevated, it can impact the financial health of a number of carriers. Jet fuel prices have recently stabilised, however the recent failure of the US/Iran ceasefire pact and the subsequent re-engagement of hostilities has led to analysts suggesting that some smaller airlines may not generate enough cash flow during the peak summer months to survive the coming winter.

Rising living costs continue to strain households worldwide, leading a growing number of governments—mostly in private, but some publicly—to condemn President Trump for initiating the war with Iran. Military experts warn that without ground troops or escalated mass bombing (which would cause an unacceptable level of civilian casualties), the conflict will likely become a drawn-out war of attrition. Many lower income households across the world are now struggling with paying their bills as fuel, food and transport prices increase. 

A number of analysts have suggested that the world will not see the energy spikes as seen before the ceasefire accord, as OPEC+ and the UAE have vowed to increase oil exports plus the Saudi Arabian pipeline (The Petroline which avoids the Strait of Hormuz and is pumping at full capacity) should hopefully keep prices below the $100 per barrel mark. However, several experts challenge this view. While they agree that Brent crude could average around $85 per barrel by Q4, they warn that escalating hostilities between the US, Iran, and Israel—combined with ongoing disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz—could push prices past $120 per barrel by the fourth quarter.

Today, the Benchmark Brent crude oil price is trading around the $90pbl mark with WTI (West Texan Intermediate) trading at circa $83.70pbl. This marks a notable surge in prices driven by the United States and Israel re-engaging in hostilities with Iran. The world will have to wait and see if oil exceeds $100 a barrel. Still, ongoing Houthi threats against Saudi Arabian crude passing through the Bab al-Mandab Strait, a vital choke point at the southern end of the Red Sea, could easily drive prices past that level.

Oil Prices Rise as the United States and Iran Escalate the Middle East Conflict

The peace accord between the United States and Iran which was remotely signed on June 17th, 2026, has now completely collapsed with both protagonists increasing hostilities, and the Strait of Hormuz is once again closed to all traffic. The US has also blockaded Iranian oil exports, having a negative effect on oil prices with the benchmark brent crude now trading at $84.20 – $85.20p/bl (per barrel), an increase of circa 18% – 20%, and WTI (West Texan Intermediate) trading at circa $80.34p/bl, an increase of circa 13% – 15%.

Iranian officials have subsequently announced that “Regional energy exports are either shared by all or denied by all”. Furthermore, experts in this arena have observed that the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps) may well employ their Houthi partners/allies located in Yemen to close the Bab el-Mandeb gateway* to the Red Sea, putting that energy artery at risk as well as the currently shut Strait of Hormuz. The US military may well find themselves to be soon fighting on two fronts. 

*Bab el-Mandeb gateway – Often translated from Arabic as the “Gate of Tears” or the “Gate of Grief”, possibly an apt description considering the current state of affairs in the Middle East. It is located between the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, and is one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints. Historically, the gateway has handled circa 10% – 12% of all global trade and acts as a primary artery for energy transportation between Asia, the Middle East and Europe. Analysts advise that millions of barrels of petroleum products transit the gateway daily and its closure will have a direct effect on the global economy.

Analysts have noted that once the peace was signed, exports from the Persian Gulf recovered to just over 80% of pre-conflict levels, (Iranian crude exports were estimated in the region of 1.5 million – 2 million bpd – barrels per day), but last week, it had declined to under 50% or approx 11 million bpd. Furthermore, analysts noted that if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, benchmark brent crude could be above the $110pbl come Q4 this year, and could be even higher if Houthi’s are successful in disrupting shipping in the Bab el-Mandeb gateway.

Experts suggest that once again, global inflation will be negatively impacted leading to further rises in the cost of living including fuels at the pumps, foodstuffs and airline prices. Indeed, once the Strait of Hormuz reopened data shows that oil prices plunged leading to an easing of inflation in such countries as the United States, China, Germany, France, Italy and Brazil. What happens next is dependent on the two protagonists, but it seems that neither side is prepared to budge with Iran not prepared to give up their nuclear programme including their uranium enrichment— which is a key component of nuclear weapons.

Experts suggest that there is no way Iran will allow a free passage through the Strait of Hormuz and will accordingly charge tariffs. Iran currently holds the upper-hand in the Strait, and some independent military experts are saying that short of the United States conducting an all-out war with Iran, this stalemate will continue until President Trump declares victory. Experts note that even if he secures a victory, it is likely to be pyrrhic—a win achieved at such a high cost that it ultimately feels like a defeat. Analysts argue that regardless of how events unfold between now and November, the fallout will likely cost him the mid-term elections, with some news outlets already labeling the conflict ‘Trump’s Vietnam’.

Energy Prices Rise as USA/Iran 60-Day Ceasefire Agreement Collapses

Last Friday (July 10th), President Donald Trump announced that the 60-day ceasefire negotiated with Iran was over, having previously called their leadership ‘scum’ and ‘cuckoo’ as a result of an escalation in hostilities over the past week. The escalation which began last week, was originally blamed on Iran for targeting commercial traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, and indeed, hostilities continued to escalate over the weekend and up until recently, with the Iranian leadership announcing that the Strait of Hormuz was now closed.

Despite protests from President Trump persisting the Strait was still open, recently released ship tracking data has shown that no commercial shipping has crossed the Strait of Hormuz since a few days ago. Iran and the United States continue to exchange blows with Iran hitting targets in Jordan, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar in response to strikes by the US military forces. Last Tuesday (July 7th), the USA revoked the licence authorising the sale of Iranian crude, and the Iranian foreign ministry announced that the USA had “rendered futile all efforts of the past few months to reduce tension and establish peace in the West Asian region”. 

In response to the breakdown of the peace accord, crude oil prices have shot up recently. Brent crude, the global benchmark, rose over 4.00% to $78.82 per barrel for September delivery—its highest level since June 22nd. While oil prices had nearly returned to pre-conflict levels when the peace accord was signed on June 17th, this surge leaves them 9.00% below where they stood before the conflict began.

Experts suggest that the previous spike, where crude oil hit a high of $126.31, is unlikely to be seen again. While the current risk premium should keep prices supported, an increase in output from Abu Dhabi and the OPEC+ output quota expansion will continue to add barrels to an outlook leaning towards oversupply. Indeed, the Emirate boosted crude oil production to an all-time high last month, pumping an average of four million barrels per day. However, analysts believe the long-term outlook for oil prices will depend on whether or not peace can be found in the Persian Gulf, but currently, it seems Iran and the US will continue to escalate the conflict. 

Elsewhere, gold and silver declined, as the latest outbreak of hostilities raised inflation fears and the possibility of rate hikes by the federal reserve to combat an already stubborn inflation figure. Indeed, gold has dropped circa 1.13% with the price now down by circa 2.00% from a recent high of about $2,400. Experts advise that part of the problem for gold is the fall-out from the Middle East conflict, which has produced an inflationary environment where interest rates remain stubbornly elevated, as do bond yields thus making the opportunity cost of holding gold somewhat high.

In the longer-term, experts advise that if the conflict in the Persian Gulf continues and the Strait of Hormuz remains shut, and Iran continues to strike at key crude oil and LNG export infrastructure, prices could once again spike beyond the $100 p/bl mark. However, the current conflict has pushed many countries to accelerate their transition towards renewable energies. Additionally, a further effort by major energy firms to build more pipeline capacity should cover much of the Persian Gulf exports by 2028.

How Will the Re-Opening of the Strait of Hormuz Affect Consumers?

The United States and Iran signed a 14 point MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) on Wednesday June 17th, 2026, which triggered the continuation of the 60-day negotiation window, allowing the toll-free re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz, with the US lifting its naval blockade of Iranian ports. Iran has reaffirmed its commitment not to procure or develop nuclear weapons, and has agreed to allow UN nuclear inspectors of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) back into the country.

Recently, analysts advised that millions of barrels of crude oil have been seen passing through the Strait of Hormuz with more ships and tankers signalling their intention to traverse the strait. The United States/Iran/Israel conflict saw Brent Crude spike in excess of $120p/bl (pre-conflict just under $73pbl), and recently, the price is sitting at circa $77.28p/bl. The drop in price is not only due to the re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz, but also due to slowing global demand and record production outside of OPEC.

However, households and other consumers should not celebrate just yet, as experts estimate that the initial energy shock from the conflict could see inflation increasing in Q3 of this year and remain elevated into 2027. According to analysts at Rystad Energy, exports of oil from the Persian Gulf could take until 2027 to reach pre-crisis levels and that is only if the agreement holds. Indeed, some analysts advise that it will take three months for 70% – 85% of lost production to resume, which will also rely heavily on spare capacity in Saudi Arabia and for the UAE (United Arab Emirates) to ramp up quickly once pipelines are clear. Analysts further advised that the timescale to reach 90% of pre-conflict volumes is up until 2028 or longer to reach full capacity, or longer for those facilities damaged during the war.

Therefore, consumers will find prices at the pumps for diesel and petrol remaining elevated for some time as will the cost of electricity. Gas prices may remain elevated for longer as experts advise it will take extended time to repair Persian Gulf LNG (Liquid Natural Gas) complexes such as Qatar, where it will take from three to five years to repair their damaged gas facilities at the Ras Laffan LNG complex.

Will the Price of Oil Hit $200 Per Barrel?

Earlier in the year a number of energy commentators were hinting at a potential price of $200 and above for a barrel of oil if the USA/Iran/Israel conflict continued into June. However, it’s the second week of June and Brent Crude is sitting at $90.54 p/bl, and WTI (West Texas Intermediate) is currently sitting at $93.09 p/bl. The price of crude oil has largely been suppressed to below the $100 – $120 mark despite the Middle East crisis, which has shut the Strait of Hormuz where circa 20 million barrels of oil flow daily — being roughly 20% of global demand.

The conflict started on February 28th, just over three months ago, so why has the global economic catastrophe predicted by a number of traders, oil executives, analysts and experts not appeared in the form of $200 plus per barrel of oil? Analysts advise that the economic shock from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has to some extent been nullified by a drop in demand by China, record exports from the United States, a trickle of oil export sneaking through the strait, the Saudi Arabian pipeline*, to the Red Sea and a pre-war surplus. 

Saudi Arabian pipeline – This pipeline is known as the Petroline and stretches for 746 miles from the Abqaiq oil fields in the eastern province (close to Bahrain and Qatar on the Persian Gulf coast) to the port city Yanbu on the west coast by the Red Sea. The pipeline was built during the 1980’s allowing Saudi Arabian oil exports to bypass the tanker war in the Persian Gulf, which was a result of the war between Iran and Iraq. The pipeline serves as a strategic and critical lifeline not only to Saudi Arabia but to the global economy and is currently pumping 7 million barrels a day, which is the pipeline’s maximum capacity. 

One of the big surprises has been China, who up until 28th February were the world’s largest importer of crude oil, and according to data released, the government has slashed oil imports by circa 40%. Analysts have estimated that the reduction in oil imports by China is offsetting roughly 1/3 – 1/5 of the barrels that have been lost due to the US/Iran/Israel conflict. To compensate for cuts in crude imports, China’s refineries are processing oil from strategic and commercial stockpiles which analysts estimate to be around 1.4 billion barrels. Furthermore, the country is relying on increased domestic shale oil extraction and forcing petrochemical plants to deplete their own reserves. 

The United States has also proved pivotal in keeping the price of crude oil down, as May figures show that American crude and fuel exports were in excess of 2 million barrels per day, higher than the average for the whole of 2025. Indeed, U.S. crude oil exports reached a record high of 5.6 million bpd (barrels per day), whilst combined exports of crude and refined petroleum products/ fuel hit circa 9 – 10 million bpd. Elsewhere, governments from around the world have coordinated the release of strategic reserves, Qatar it is suggested is using “Dark Fleet”* operations and other Persian Gulf exporters e.g., the UAE, are rerouting shipments through alternative export routes. 

*The Dark Fleet – Is a large clandestine network of aging oil tankers, shell companies and maritime service providers that operate outside international regulations to transport sanctioned oil primarily from Iran, Russia and until recently Venezuela and now allegedly Qatar. Experts and analysts estimate the fleet to be roughly in the region of 1,470 tankers that use deceptive practices such as disabled tracking systems, forged documentation and ship-to-ship transfers in open waters that enable them to bypass international sanctions.

Despite recent rhetoric emanating from the White House suggesting talks with Iran are on-going and peace is in sight, today, any compromise deal let alone peace seems to be miles apart, with Iran’s weaponised plutonium being at the heart of any negotiations. Many experts are saying that the current global strategy of keeping oil prices suppressed is unsustainable, and if China comes back into the market, prices will only move higher. A speedy end to the conflict will certainly help as this would allow for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, however, some analysts note that if the war is still blazing in September, perhaps $200 p/bl could well become a reality by the end of 2026 or early 2027. 

Extended Sell-off in Global Bonds

The global bond sell-off deepened dramatically last Friday and continued into this week as the geopolitical deadlock over the Iran war drove oil prices higher. At Friday’s close, benchmark Brent Crude had risen 1.8% to $111.16, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures climbed just over 2.00% to settle at $107.56.

The 30-year US Treasury (U.S. Government Bond), which is a benchmark for long-term global interest rates, saw yields rise to 5.16%, the highest since October 2023. The 2-year treasury touched a 14-month high of 4.102%, and is considered the most sensitive benchmark to inflation and rate expectations.

In Germany, the 10-year German Bund saw yields rise by two basis points, hitting 3.1827%. In the United Kingdom, after a turbulent week last week, the 10-year gilt, a benchmark for UK government debt, saw yields ease slightly by circa 1 basis point, but remains elevated at 5.169%. In Japan, the 10-year JGB (Japanese Government Bond) raced to 2.739%, last seen this high in 1996, an increase of 13 basis points, whilst the 30-year bond surges 20 basis points—the highest since its debut in 1999.

Financial markets are betting that central banks will have to employ monetary tightening and raise interest rates, as the continuing closure of the Strait of Hormuz keeps energy prices elevated, negatively impacting inflation. President Donald Trump has warned Iran that the “clock is ticking” for them to strike a deal, and yesterday announced on his media outlet ,Truth Social, “They (Iran) had better move fast or there won’t be anything of them left”.

However, experts warn that previous deals offered by Iran and the US have been rejected by both sides, and further note that there appears little prospect for a deal between the US and Iran. With manufacturing supply chains signalling an ever increase in prices, plus a lack of energy flows from the Persian Gulf, it seems inevitable that interest rates will rise across major financial centres as central banks battle to keep inflation under control. 

Many experts agree that between rising inflation, high sovereign debt, increasing interest rates, plus the recent gains in government bond yields in developed countries, the global economy is in danger of negative impacts in the next three to six months. Even if the war were to end tomorrow, oil prices will remain elevated due to supply chain bottlenecks, a lack of investment in the energy sector, plus the need to restructure global energy security.

Financial and political commentators are laying the blame for the present global fiscal problems at the door of President Donald Trump. The US/Iran/Israel war began on 28th February 2026 with the White House trumpeting that Iran’s ballistic missile programme could endanger US allies including Europe and the American mainland. 48 days later, the Strait of Hormuz remains shut, the war is at a standstill, and energy and food prices will begin to rocket should there be no conclusion either way to this conflict.

As a result, experts suggest that bond prices will continue to soar, and financial markets feel that if the hard left of the UK Labour Party replaces UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, spending will be out of control and gilts may reach levels not seen before. In the US, financial markets are saying the Federal Reserve needs to get behind the inflation curve and remove the bias towards easing monetary policy. If not, the word is investors will demand a higher inflation risk premium.

The Iranian Crisis & Rising Prices: Does Oil or Gold Offer Better Protection?

The current Middle East conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran, which has closed the Strait of Hormuz (where circa 20% of the world’s supply of crude oil and associated derivatives flow), has turned inflation predictions on its head. The Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the ECB, along with many other central banks, originally planned to cut interest rates in 2026. However, both the banks and financial markets are now predicting potential holds or even rate increases to combat rising inflation.

Oil

Experts advise that oil generally offers an immediate protection against rising inflation, especially during energy-driven price shocks like the one currently fueled by the United States/Iran/Israel conflict. Indeed, as a direct driver of inflation, oil and other energy related investments often spike during a crisis, providing strong returns and offering better, more direct protection than gold during times of rising inflation. However, analysts advise that investors need to take care, as during this current crisis the oil market has seen much volatility.

Gold

Common wisdom suggests that in times of crisis, investors flee to a safe haven such as gold, however, the current Iranian conflict has turned this assumption in its head. Indeed, since the start of the US invasion of Iran codenamed Operation Epic Fury on February 28th, 2026, Brent Crude has increased by 37%, whilst gold has retreated by 15%. Gold hit a historic all-time high of over $5,500 in January, before retreating below $4,400 by late March. Since that correction, it has regained ground and is currently trading between $4,710 and $4,730 per troy ounce.

On 28th January this year, gold hit an all-time high of $5,589 per troy ounce, one month before the start of the Iran conflict. This, according to many analysts, was due to rallying on the back of tariff uncertainty, central bank buying and exceptional demand for gold ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds). The fall in the price of gold as suggested by experts is primarily due to surging bond yields, a strong US Dollar and investors taking profits after the aforementioned massive rally in 2025. Experts in the gold arena suggest that many investors sold for liquidity purposes, resulting in a flight to cash rather than a flight to safe haven.

Analysts advise that the rise in bond yields have raised the “opportunity cost”* of holding non-interest bearing assets such as gold. Also, with inflation expectations roaring into view on the back of the current energy shock, government bond yields have spiked globally. The UK 10-year government bonds (Gilts) hit their highest level since 2008. A 15-year high was reached by German bunds, and the 10-year US Treasury recently enjoyed a number of highs and hit 4.38% on Friday before slipping back. 

*Opportunity cost – The next best alternative investors give up when deciding whether or not to move out of one asset class and into another. It represents missed benefits when choosing one option over another. 

Geopolitical Uncertainty and the Outlook for Peace

Just how long oil prices will remain elevated and gold prices depressed will largely depend on the current Middle East crisis ending as soon as possible. However, despite White House rhetoric, an agreement to end the war with Iran seems to be a long way off. With Israel increasing their attacks in Lebanon, and cargo ships still being attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, any peace plan put forward by the Americans may have little hope of receiving Iranian approval.

Fallout From the Middle East War Triggers Aluminium Crisis

The Aluminium “Black Swan Event”

Analysts confirm that the global aluminium market will face a “Black Swan Event “in 2026, as continued conflict in the Middle East between the United States, Iran and Israel is triggering a supply shock. Experts point out that the Persian Gulf exporters account for circa 7 Million tonnes of smelted aluminium per annum, which is equivalent to circa 9.00% of global production per annum. Indeed, on the LME (London Metal Exchange) on April 16th this month, prices reached a four year record high of $3,673 per ton due to concerns in supply disruption. 

*Black Swan Event – This is a highly unpredictable event which can have severe consequences, however in retrospect, they often seem fairly obvious. Examples of a “Black Swan Event” are the Global Financial Crisis 2007 – 2009, the Dot Com bubble and the Covid-19 pandemic. In the case of the global aluminium market, analysts are calling it the largest single supply shock to any base metal this century.

Market Deficits and Regional Vulnerability

Analysts suggest that between now and the end of the year, the global aluminium market will face a deficit of circa 2 million tons, however, this may be a conservative estimation as increased shortages will be dependent on the length of the Middle East crisis, which has currently entered its 53rd day. Experts advise that Europe and the United States are particularly vulnerable due to current low stocks with the Middle East, accounting for 22% the USA’s 3.4 million tons of imported primary and alloyed aluminium, and 18.50% of Europe’s imported 1.20 million tons of the same. 

Supply Chain Limitations and Global Alternatives

Unfortunately, analysts suggest that there are few alternatives to fill the void left by the US/China/Israel conflict, as a serious amount of the metal quoted on the LME is of Russian origin, which has been sanctioned by western governments and is therefore untouchable. China is the world’s largest producer with an annual capacity of 45 million tons, however, their exports consist largely of sheet, rods and billets as opposed to speciality alloys and primary aluminium that western companies/fabricators require.

The Energy Cost Barrier

It has been suggested that idle smelters that have been mothballed both in Europe and the United States be restarted, however the cost of energy is going through the roof due to the Middle East crisis.With aluminium smelting facilities being highly energy intensive, bringing back idle smelters to production is a non-starter. Companies thinking about obtaining Russian aluminium would find a political minefield, especially as western governments are not in the mood to finance the Russian war machine.

Industrial Impacts: Automotive and EV Production

The effect of the aluminium shortage is seeping through to industry dependent sectors, such as the automotive industry where car makers are facing a dire scarcity of specialised alloys for engine components and wheels. Some companies are predicting production cuts by the end of the Q2, and the EV market which is highly dependent on aluminium, is facing cuts in production of up to 11.00% which will inevitably lead to job losses. 

Construction, Consumer Packaging, and Demand Destruction

Elsewhere in the construction and infrastructure sectors, increased aluminium costs are impacting construction budgets across the board, whilst data centres and healthcare construction facilities are facing budget uncertainty. In the consumer packaging sector which includes aluminium bottles, food containers and beverage cans, the arena is facing severe supply disruptions. Firms are struggling to secure supplies due to material shortages and rising premiums which is causing what is known as “demand destruction”.*

*Demand Destruction – This is a permanent or long-term decline in the consumption of a commodity or product, driven by prolonged high prices or severely constrained supply. It represents a structural shift where consumers switch to alternatives, adopt efficiency measures, or permanently alter habits, rather than a temporary dip in purchasing.

Economic Outlook and Consumer Impact

As with the export of crude and its offshoots from the Persian Gulf, experts predict that the price of aluminium will remain elevated due to the time it will take to get supplies of the metal back to normal. Once again, the consumer will bear the brunt of this damaging war whether through the increase in prices of household energy bills and the price of fuel at the pumps, or through the negative impact on jobs as companies cut staff due lack of available commodities.

Middle East Conflict Negatively Impacts UK Inflation

Recent data released by the ONS (Office of National Statistics) confirms that inflation in the United Kingdom climbed in March, driven by increasing energy costs as a result of the US/Iran/Israel conflict. The CPI (Consumer Price Index)* increased by 0.03% to 3.30%, increasing from 3.00% from the previous month, with an 8.70% increase in the price of fuel also from the previous month at the petrol pumps, being held up as the culprit.

*CPI – The consumer price index is a key economic indicator that measures the average change over time in prices paid by households for a representative basket of goods and services such as housing, food, transport and healthcare. It is primarily used as an index to measure inflation or deflation.

The increase of 8.70% in the price of motor fuel has been confirmed by analysts as the biggest monthly gain since February 24th 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. Analysts also advise that service inflation, which is a key component when it comes to underlying price pressure, also increased from 4.30% to 4.50% in March, largely due to volatility in the price of airfares which jumped 10.00% in the same month. Airlines have been adjusting to these operational challenges by passing on costs driven by a twofold surge in jet fuel prices and the temporary closure of airspace across the Persian Gulf.

The current Middle East crisis has turned inflation forecasts on its head, with the current 53-day war bringing oil and gas exports from the Persian Gulf to a near standstill. Indeed, the conflict has seen the benchmark price of Brent Crude surging more than 55% to just shy of $120p/bl at its peak, from circa $72p/bl on February 27th this year, and it is currently trading today at $99.83p/bl. 

Before the conflict, inflation was on track to hit the BOEs (Bank of England) target figure of 2.00%, with promises of more rate cuts, however, analysts suggest that inflation will stay around the 3.00% mark. But, they expect that figure to accelerate at the beginning of Q3, raising the potential for an increase in interest rates. Experts suggest that if the conflict continues, food prices in the UK will be dramatically affected, with food inflation hitting close to 10.00%. 

Financial commentators noted that data from the ONS for March confirmed that higher petrol and crude oil prices had increased the costs to businesses for raw materials leaving factories. All in all, the British consumer should brace for an increase in the price of food, petrol and diesel, and more expensive holidays as the country moves towards the summer period. 

Volatility Knock-Out Options are Back in Demand

After the invasion of Iran by the United States and Israel on February 28th this year, the conflict has introduced high energy shocks and what some commentators might suggest as political disinformation, which has produced geopolitical upheaval resulting in financial markets becoming extremely volatile. Increased uncertainty has boosted demand for risk-management tools, specifically volatility driven instruments, hence the return of “Volatility Knock-out Options”. 

Volatility Knock-Out Options or VKOs as they are usually referred to, are specialised cost-effective derivative instruments, typically “Put-Options”*, that become void if the underlying asset’s realized volatility exceeds a predetermined level during the life of the option. They are designed for “Buy and Hold” hedgers seeking lower premiums, cutting costs by up to 40% compared to standard vanilla puts exploiting the steepness of implied volatility skew**.

*Put Option – This is a financial contract giving the holder the right but not the obligation to sell an underlying asset (e.g., equities, commodities, currencies) at a set price, (the Strike Price) within a specific timeframe. It acts as a bearish bet or insurance increasing in value as the underlying asset’s price falls. 

**Volatility Skew – Indicates variations in implied volatility across options, revealing insights into expectations and market sentiment. To develop effective trading and in order to price options, skew patterns serve as a valuable tool in this market. An important ingredient is that the skew reflects differences between implied volatility across options with different strike prices, but with same expiry dates, therefore highlighting market sentiment and expectations.

Earlier this year, markets were relatively calm, and in January, the FTSE 100 hit a record high with implied volatility at circa 50% of the current level. However, since then, implied volatility has climbed above 23%, forcing institutions to switch from expensive vanilla puts to VKOs in order to manage hedging costs. In essence, VKO adoption is usually higher than 23%, more often than not around a realised volatility threshold of 30%, and in particular in the context of the S&P 500 (SPX) hedging. 

Overall, the renewed interest, especially institutional interest in VKOs, is down to the Middle East crisis and the ensuing volatility that has been engendered. Participants have turned to this option as it is cheaper than standard vanilla puts. The VKO features a realised volatility barrier that makes the option expire worthless if the market becomes too volatile, which eliminates the premium costs associated with volatility.