Tag: Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin Continues to Fall After October Crisis

Yesterday, Tuesday 4th November, Bitcoin fell 7.4%, dropping below the $100,000 mark ($96,794) for the first time since 23rd June this year. Experts in the sector suggest that Bitcoin holders, as well as cryptocurrency investors in general, have been selling this risk-on asset amid growing concerns over current stock valuations, which have likely been driven to unsustainable heights by the Artificial Intelligence (AI) trade. Bitcoin has now fallen 20% from its record high reached in October. While there was some recovery earlier today in New York, traders in the options markets are, according to analysts, placing bets on further declines.

Analysts suggest that one reason for the latest fall in Bitcoin’s price is that long-term holders of the cryptocurrency have, over the last month, offloaded approximately 400,000 coins with a combined value of $45 billion. Unlike the forced leveraged selling seen last month, the current decline is more measured, representing a continued sell-off in the spot market. This price fall has also diverged from the usual pattern where bursts of volatility stem from liquidations in the futures market. Data released by CoinGlass — a cryptocurrency derivatives data analysis platform providing real-time information- shows that since yesterday morning, around $2 billion in crypto positions have been liquidated.

One market expert has stated that a market imbalance is emerging. As leverage remains relatively subdued, attention has turned to long-term holders who are now selling Bitcoin. There appears to be a growing disconnect between these long-term sellers and first-time buyers, which is shaping a market no longer driven solely by sentiment. Analysts have observed that since major holders with between 1,000 and 10,000 Bitcoins (so-called “mega-whales”) began offloading large portions of their portfolios, and since last month’s crash, overall demand has waned.

Other analysts, however, suggest that despite the absence of specific bad news, the market is fatigued and struggling under multiple pressures. There are ongoing concerns regarding the trade war, whether tariffs will hold, and whether the Supreme Court will decide if such tariffs are legal. Added to this are the continuing government shutdown, spiralling public debt, overpriced stocks, and caution over U.S. interest rates. Furthermore, one analyst commented that fundamentals remain weak across the board following last month’s major sell-off.

Market commentators remain divided over Bitcoin’s near-term future. One analyst suggested that now Bitcoin has fallen below the $100,000 threshold, it could drop as far as $70,000 before resetting and recovering. Others, however, believe that Bitcoin will gradually climb back if economic and geopolitical conditions improve, particularly if the United States-China trade talks yield a stable agreement. Despite a recent outflow from Bitcoin ETFs, experts remain broadly optimistic that fund managers could see gains over the coming months, though with fundamentals still fragile, Bitcoin’s price outlook remains uncertain.

What Ignited the Recent Record Crypto Crash?

On Friday, 10th October, just after reaching an all-time high, the cryptocurrency market imploded, wiping out around half a trillion dollars in value. Bitcoin alone lost more than USD 200 billion. Most experts, analysts, and financial commentators agree that the crash was triggered by President Trump’s announcement on his Truth Social platform that he would impose 100% import tariffs on China from 1st November 2025. Following the post, Trump’s own meme coin plunged to USD 4.65, leaving his followers nursing losses of around 40% in a single day. The same coin had recently traded at a high of USD 45.

Leveraged trading has become standard practice among many crypto traders, who borrow money to increase the size of their positions. While such trades can be highly profitable, they are equally risky when prices move sharply in the wrong direction, as they did last Friday. In today’s crypto market, heavily leveraged bets are automatically closed by exchanges once losses reach a level that would make repayment impossible. Experts say this system amplified the crash, as countless traders with high leverage were forcibly liquidated by exchange algorithms once prices began to fall.

Allegations of insider trading have also surfaced after an investor reportedly placed a short position on Bitcoin, earning around USD 200 million when prices collapsed. This trade occurred just 30 minutes before President Trump’s post on Truth Social announcing the new tariffs on China. Many within the crypto community have questioned whether the investor had access to insider information from within the White House. The trader has since been dubbed the “Trump Insider”, particularly after opening another large short position on Bitcoin this week, sparking fears of a second market downturn.

The unwinding of leveraged trades also had a devastating impact on altcoins, leaving the wider market reeling. Ethereum dropped by around 11% to USD 3,878, while Cardano and Solana both fell roughly 30%. Other major cryptocurrencies such as XRP, Dogecoin, and ADA also tumbled by 19%, 50%, and 25% respectively, according to market data. Analysts say stablecoins which are pegged 1:1 to fiat currencies such as the USD, GBP, or gold, are edging closer to mainstream adoption as Congress debates the *Genius Act. However, during the sell-off on 10th October, Ethena’s yield-bearing stablecoin (USDe) briefly lost its dollar peg, plunging to 65 cents on Binance before rebounding to close just below USD 1. Financial commentators say this episode should give Congress some food for thought when refining the legislation.

The *“Genius Act”, passed in July 2025, is a U.S. law that created the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for stablecoins. It aims to provide clarity and consumer protection by requiring issuers to maintain a 1:1 backing with high-quality assets such as cash or short-term U.S. Treasuries. The Act also establishes both federal and state licensing pathways and includes provisions for financial stability, disclosure of reserves, and legal safeguards for holders in the event of insolvency.

Experts suggest several key lessons can be drawn from the 10th October 2025 crypto crash. Earlier that week, China announced restrictions on rare earth mineral exports, reigniting speculation about a renewed U.S.–China trade war. President Trump’s retaliatory post amplified global concerns, sending shockwaves through financial markets. While traditional markets were closed, the 24/7 nature of crypto trading meant that digital assets bore the full force of the panic almost instantly.

This has been the largest single liquidation event in cryptocurrency history. Data shows that around USD 19 billion in leveraged positions were wiped out in under 24 hours, though some commentators believe the true figure could be higher. Analysts say the episode highlights the extreme risks of trading with leverage in such a volatile environment. The market’s structure also contributed to the collapse, as automatic deleveraging mechanisms at major exchanges like Binance triggered further sell-offs, creating a vicious cycle.

The crypto industry now faces serious questions about its own resilience and governance. The ecosystem is so interconnected that when one segment collapses, the rest often follow. Moreover, repeated allegations of insider trading, including claims that an unknown trader made USD 200 million shortly before President Trump’s announcement, have further damaged trust. To avoid similar crises, experts say exchanges and market participants need to adopt stronger risk management systems and institutional-grade compliance standards. However, given crypto’s historical resistance to regulation, some argue that Congress may need to intervene to ensure proper oversight as stablecoins move into mainstream financial markets.

Precious Metals and Bitcoin Rise on the Back of Debasement Trades

A financial strategy in which investors allocate funds to assets such as Bitcoin and gold as a hedge against the devaluation of fiat currencies is known as a debasement trade. Key drivers include rising sovereign or government debt, geopolitical instability, and inflation. Experts note that investors have been selling major currencies and moving towards alternative assets such as gold (both physical and ETF), silver, Bitcoin, and even certain collectables such as Pokémon cards, which recently reached an all-time high.

Data released indicates that investors have added momentum to debasement trades due to growing concerns over fiscal challenges affecting many of the world’s largest economies, several of which are struggling under an expanding burden of debt. Analysts also highlight that political instability within these economies has further encouraged investors to pursue debasement hedges by purchasing gold, Bitcoin, and other crypto assets, particularly as the US dollar, Japanese yen, and euro face mounting fiscal and political pressures.

Experts suggest that one of the main reasons investors are rebalancing their portfolios is the rising debt levels in countries such as the United States, Japan, and across the Eurozone. These nations are finding it increasingly difficult to manage their debt piles, which in turn has enhanced the appeal of debasement trades. Gold opened today, surpassing USD 4,000 per ounce, a new record, as it continues to demonstrate its role as a safe haven amid economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Recent data also revealed that Q3 saw the largest global gold ETF monthly inflow on record at USD 17 billion, resulting in the strongest quarter ever, totalling USD 26 billion.

On the Bitcoin front, the cryptocurrency has risen steadily over the past year, driven largely by President Trump’s introduction of crypto-friendly legislation. However, the United States is grappling with a massive debt load, standing at USD 37.88 trillion as of the close of business on 30th September 2025 and still climbing. The ongoing US government shutdown has also acted as a strong buy signal for Bitcoin, much of it linked to debasement-related transactions.

Indeed, on Sunday 5th October Bitcoin reached USD 125,689, surpassing its previous record set on 14th August this year, driven primarily through Bitcoin ETFs. Data shows the coin is up 30% for the first three quarters of the year. Yesterday, 6th October, Bitcoin hit another record of USD 126,279 with the US dollar having weakened approximately 30% against the cryptocurrency this year. Several Wall Street analysts now predict Bitcoin will reach between USD 160,000 and USD 180,000 by the close of business on 31st December 2025.

Analysts advise that investors engaging in or considering debasement trades need only to look at France for an example of why hedging has become increasingly common. Newly appointed Prime Minister Sebastian Lecornu lasted only 26 days in office, surpassing the brevity of former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss’s record by 23 days. The French leader did not even manage to deliver an inaugural address to parliament, let alone present a budget that could achieve cross-party support.

Commentators suggest that debasement trading will continue an upper trajectory, as Europe contends with instability in France and beyond. Japan has also unsettled markets with a newly elected pro-stimulus Prime Minister and concerns over further debt expansion. In the United Kingdom, the Chancellor is preparing a budget that many expect to be highly contentious. Meanwhile, in the United States, already burdened by an out-of-control debt pile, a prolonged government shutdown, and a President seeking to assert influence over the Federal Reserve, the pressure continues to mount.

Stablecoins & New Regulatory Regimes: Tether’s USAT and the Future of Digital Money


Why Stablecoins Matter

Stablecoins have long been a bridge between the volatile world of crypto and the predictability of fiat money. By offering digital tokens that maintain a 1:1 peg to a stable asset like the U.S. dollar, they provide traders, investors, and even ordinary consumers with a tool to move in and out of crypto markets without exposure to wild price swings.

For Tether — the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, with its flagship USDT consistently ranking among the most traded digital assets — the stakes are high. Stablecoins now underpin billions of dollars of daily transactions across exchanges, DeFi protocols, and cross-border payments. They have become the plumbing of the crypto economy.

Yet that central role has also attracted scrutiny. Concerns about the quality of reserves backing stablecoins, the risks of bank runs, and the potential for systemic contagion have prompted regulators to act.


The Push for Regulation

Until recently, stablecoins lived in a regulatory gray zone. In the U.S., questions about whether they were money market funds, payment instruments, or securities left issuers juggling multiple overlapping frameworks. In Europe, the new Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has taken a firmer step, requiring stablecoin issuers to be licensed, audited, and transparent about their reserves.

Other jurisdictions, from Singapore to Japan, are following suit. The common theme is clear: stablecoins will be allowed, but only within tightly defined guardrails. Regulators want to ensure that these digital dollars are as safe and reliable as the real thing — if not safer.

The U.S. is currently advancing draft legislation and regulatory guidance that would require stablecoin issuers to hold high-quality liquid assets (HQLA), submit to oversight, and ensure redemption at par. For an industry that grew up in the shadows, this represents a profound shift.


Enter Tether’s USAT

Against this backdrop, Tether’s move to create a new U.S.-based stablecoin, USAT, is strategic. Unlike USDT, which is issued by Tether Holdings and based offshore, USAT is being designed specifically to comply with forthcoming U.S. stablecoin rules.

This is significant for several reasons:

  1. Regulatory Alignment – By building a stablecoin under the U.S. framework, Tether signals its willingness to engage directly with regulators. This is not just about avoiding conflict — it’s about positioning USAT as a legitimate, regulated alternative that institutions can adopt without hesitation.
  2. Institutional Adoption – Large financial players, from banks to fintechs, have been hesitant to engage with unregulated stablecoins. A compliant U.S.-issued version could open the door to partnerships, integrations, and mainstream use cases.
  3. Market Competition – USAT is entering a field already eyed by competitors like Circle (issuer of USDC) and PayPal (with PYUSD). By leveraging Tether’s brand, liquidity, and distribution, USAT could capture significant market share, especially if it achieves rapid listings and integrations.

A Turning Point for Stablecoins

The introduction of USAT under a regulated regime is more than a branding exercise. It marks the beginning of a dual ecosystem:

  • Offshore stablecoins like USDT may continue to dominate in markets where regulation is looser, serving as global liquidity tools.
  • Onshore, regulated stablecoins like USAT will target compliance-minded institutions and consumers, particularly in the U.S. and allied jurisdictions.

This bifurcation mirrors developments in traditional finance, where offshore Eurodollar markets coexist alongside regulated domestic banking. The innovation here is digital: stablecoins move across borders at the speed of the internet, raising questions about how these two worlds will interact.


The Global Ripple Effect

Tether’s USAT is not happening in isolation. Other regions are watching closely:

  • Europe: Under MiCA, stablecoins must be backed by reserves held with EU-regulated institutions. This has already prompted issuers to adjust their business models. A U.S.-compliant Tether product could inspire a European equivalent.
  • Asia: Japan has approved legislation requiring stablecoins to be issued by licensed banks and trust companies. Singapore has leaned heavily on prudential regulation. USAT’s design may become a template for alignment across Asia-Pacific.
  • Emerging Markets: Stablecoins are increasingly used for remittances and as dollar substitutes in countries with volatile currencies. For these markets, regulatory approval in the U.S. could lend credibility and encourage adoption.

Challenges Ahead

Of course, the path forward is not without obstacles. Tether has faced criticism in the past over the transparency of reserves and regulatory compliance. Sceptics will demand proof that USAT truly embodies a new standard.

Questions remain:

  • Reserve Composition: Will USAT be backed exclusively by U.S. Treasuries and cash, as regulators may require, or will there be more flexibility?
  • Redemption Rights: How easily will holders be able to redeem USAT for dollars, and at what scale?
  • Oversight: Which U.S. regulatory body will oversee USAT, and how intrusive will the supervision be?

If Tether can answer these convincingly, USAT could reshape its reputation and position it as a partner to regulators rather than an adversary.


What This Means for Investors and Institutions

For businesses and investors, the rise of regulated stablecoins like USAT has several implications:

  1. Safer Infrastructure – Institutions can build on regulated stablecoins with more confidence, reducing counterparty risk.
  2. Mainstream Integration – Payment firms, banks, and asset managers may embrace stablecoins as part of their offerings.
  3. Competition and Innovation – With multiple regulated players, stablecoin markets could see lower fees, better transparency, and more diverse services.

At the same time, offshore stablecoins will remain vital for global liquidity and in regions where regulatory acceptance is still developing. The coexistence of both models may spur innovation in cross-border payments and financial inclusion.


The Future is Stable

Stablecoins began as a crypto-native experiment, a workaround to avoid volatility. They have now become the backbone of the digital asset economy and are poised to enter the regulated mainstream. Tether’s planned U.S.-based stablecoin, USAT, represents a watershed moment — one that could define the next chapter of digital money.

As governments move from ambiguity to clarity, stablecoins are transitioning from shadow players to recognised instruments of financial infrastructure. For consumers, investors, and institutions alike, this promises not only greater security but also greater opportunity.

The future of finance may not lie in the extremes of unregulated crypto or traditional banking — but in the stable middle ground that regulated digital dollars like USAT are now beginning to occupy.

Bitcoin versus Altcoin – A Corporate Dilemma?

For a while now, and just in the background, there has been a long-simmering feud between the advocates of Altcoin and the purists of Bitcoin as they compete to win the corporate treasury boom*. Indeed, many companies have been loading up their balance sheets with unheard of amounts of digital assets, and the debate has come to the fore as to which tokens belong on the balance sheet and just as important is why they should appear there. Basically, the argument between the two sides rests on the premise as to how value should be stored and also how it should be grown.

*Corporate Treasury Boom – In this year alone, in excess of one hundred companies have been formed and are known as digital-asset treasury companies (or DATS) and have been buying cryptocurrencies, some of whom are struggling with this high-risk strategy. The philosophy underpinning these companies is just to buy cryptocurrencies and thereby offer investors a way into the digital-asset boom while at the same time offering lucrative returns.

Those who side with Bitcoin feel companies should be built on the premise that ideological purity and a hard supply cap should be the only digital-asset to legitimately appear as a treasury asset on the balance sheet. However, Altcoin supporters are promoting an investment scenario premised on dynamic returns offering yield generating tokens such as Solana and Ether which can be built into portfolios. Altcoin are challenging the ethos that Bitcoin is the only digital-asset that belongs on a balance sheet, and data released suggest that today they are edging ahead in the battle.

Indeed, data shows that altcoin prices are rallying whilst other data shows the purchases of Bitcoin by the corporate treasury companies are on the decline. Figures recently released show that in June of this year purchases were circa 66,000, however in August just 14,800 Bitcoin were purchased. Elsewhere, total Bitcoin holdings have declined with the accumulation rate by treasury companies sliding to 8% in August down from a March high of 163% which can account for the average purchase size declining 86% from its peak earlier in the year to just 343 Bitcoin in August. 

Experts suggest that Altcoin, with their capacity and ability to be distributed throughout the decentralised finance markets**, are better placed to generate yield. This premise appears to be supported in the marketplace, as ,just recently, a USD 500 Million investment by Pantera Capital was secured by Helius to build a Solana based treasury. Indeed, while some senior players (notably pro-Bitcoin) have suggested that Ether or Ethereum is not the best asset by any means for a treasury company, data shows that some USD 16 Billion in Ether have been added to the balance sheets of treasury companies. 

**Decentralised Finance Market – This market, also referred to as DeFi, is a blockchain-based financial system that provides traditional financial services such as lending, borrowing, and trading without intermediaries such as banks or brokerages. It operates on public, permissionless blockchains utilising smart contracts to speed up and automate the process, enabling peer-to-peer transactions for participants in the network. The DeFi market focuses on replicating traditional financial services within the crypto-asset ecosystem, but through automated protocols rather than centralised institutions.

However, the total holdings of Altcoins are, according to data released, not really comparable to the holdings of Bitcoin treasuries which currently total circa USD 116 Billion. But the shift towards Altcoins has not gone unnoticed. The battle for which coin to support will continue with the ultimate prize being corporate investment in either Bitcoin or Altcoin treasury companies, however one CEO has ventured that the ultimate strategy is to have a digital asset company with a blend of both Bitcoin and Altcoin.

Bitcoin Surges Past USD 120,000 Creating New Record

On Monday of this week, Bitcoin blew past the USD 120,000 mark creating a record price and hitting a high of USD 123,205 (up 3.4%) before pairing early gains to trade around the USD 121,600 mark. On the back of this rise, and clinging to the shirt tails of Bitcoin Ether, the second largest crypto token, advanced beyond the USD 3,000 barrier whilst a number of other smaller coins such as Uniswap and XRP also joined the bandwagon. Experts suggest that investor demand has been fuelled by crypto week (14th – 18th July), a term coined by the House of Representatives. Indeed, the House will consider the Clarity Act*, the Anti-CBCD Surveillance State Act**, the Senate’s Genius Act***, as part of Congress’ effort to make America the crypto capital of the world.

*Clarity Act – The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act aka the Clarity Act, is a proposed US law designed to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, specifically clarifying the roles of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) in overseeing these assets.

**Anti CBCD Surveillance State Act – This act prohibits unelected bureaucrats in Washington D.C. from issuing a CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency), that undermines Americans’ right to financial privacy.

***Genius Act – This act refers to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (a stable coin is a digital currency pegged one-to-one against a hard fiat currency, mainly the US Dollar) and is a piece of legislation aimed at regulating stable coins. The act establishes a comprehensive framework for stable coin issuance, custody, and use, including rules for issuers, custodians and digital asset service providers.

Analysts suggest that investor confidence is at a high and will probably stay there for a while especially as congress are considering the abovementioned bills. Post the election of Donald Trump for a second term in the White House, Bitcoin enjoyed a surge but then fell back trading either side of USD 100,000 for a number of months. The policies emanating from the White House did indeed have a negative effect on investor optimism regarding the President’s pro-crypto agenda, however, other U.S. assets that carry risks such as equities have now rebounded to just about their original highs, giving Bitcoin has once the impetus to move upwards.

Interestingly, institutional investors have also jumped on the Bitcoin bandwagon as confidence in the cryptocurrency has dramatically improved because despite the flip-flop chaotic trade policy of the current U.S. administration, Bitcoin has been steadily moving north. Since doubling in 2024 Bitcoin is up circa 30% since January 1st of this year, and last week investors piled into combined US Bitcoin ETFs with inflows of USD 2.7 Billion, furthermore the current rally has also been helped by crypto trades by the bears who all unwound their short positions last Friday. Data released showed those traders who were short of Bitcoin and had to unwind their trades, saw their positions wiped out to the tune of USD 1 Billion.

There are many in the Democratic party who oppose the introduction of the aforementioned bills to Congress, and Senator Elizabeth Warren last week made vocal her concerns regarding the package of bills, stating it could amount to an “Industry Handout”. She also noted that if passed into law, these bills could inject traditional cryptocurrency volatility into mainstream financial markets. Once upon a time, President Trump described Bitcoin as a “Scam”, but a complete U-turn showed him to be the biggest backer of the crypto world. His family are heavily invested in crypto world such as Bitcoin, Stable Coin crypto mining and sensationally the two meme coins $Trump and $Melania. He has promised to make America the crypto centre of the world, and it appears he will be living up to that promise.

In the Crypto World Are Stablecoins About To Become Mainstream?

In the cryptocurrency arena, a stablecoin is a digital asset where the value is pegged to a fiat currency such as the US Dollar, the Euro, or the sterling pound. They can also be linked to other assets such as gold and other precious commodities. However, the preferred medium is as previously mentioned, a hard fiat currency thereby keeping its value on a daily basis and not being subject to volatility as can be seen in many other digital cryptocurrencies. Indeed, the stablecoin is being backed by White House and in particular by President Donald Trump and is gaining traction in a number of boardrooms across America. Interestingly a stablecoin launched by Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial crypto venture, is being used by an Abu Dhabi investment firm for its USD 2 Billion investment into crypto exchange Binance.

Today there are rumours circulating that Bank of America, Uber, Amazon, and Walmart, are thinking about issuing their own stablecoins, whilst PayPal have already issued their own stablecoin PYUSD, which currently has an average daily turnover of circa USD 13.8 Million, (data from CoinMarketCap). Elsewhere, other banks and payment companies such as Mastercard and Visa are starting partnerships and investments to become part of the growing stablecoin mania and as far back as early December 2023, AXA Investment managers announced it had completed its first market transaction using stablecoins. So, what is the driving force propelling stablecoins towards the mainstream?

Proponents of stablecoins suggest that moving the processing of payments outside the global arena, (currently dominated by banks, Visa and Mastercard) may well make such processing cheaper, and the use of stablecoins will allow businesses and their clients/customers to bypass fees* charged by the payment networks. Furthermore, such proponents also suggest that companies/institutions that create their own stablecoins will help protect consumers while at the same time ensuring that the coins are easily redeemable. Regulators have already said that stablecoins must be backed on a one-to-one basis by liquid assets such as treasuries in America, or Gilts in the UK, or gold, or cash.

*Fees – Whenever a customer uses a bank card, it is subject to a transaction charge known as an interchange fee which covers processing costs as well as giving protection against fraud and other risks. The rates for fees are set by the payment networks and can vary from country to country, and data shows that the banks get the lion’s share of the fees which in 2023 for America alone totalled USD 224 Billion.

Donald Trump and his administration are very much in favour of stablecoins and in order to ensure everything moves forward in a proper manner they have created the “Genius Act”. The details of this act are currently being finalised and it will create a regulatory framework whilst at the same time giving the go ahead for banks to enter the stablecoin market. However, stablecoins do have their detractors and among them are central banks who say the coins are a poor substitute for money and whilst they are backed by assets recognised by regulators and the financial markets, they currently still need to be converted into fiat cash for utilisation in many day-to-day transactions. Stablecoins therefore fail as a useable currency as according to central banks the coins fail a crucial test generally referred to as the “Singleness of Money”*.

*Singleness of Money – The BIS (Bank for International Settlements) the BOE (Bank of England) and other central banks and regulators in major capitals of the world have recently expressed doubts over stablecoins as they may undermine the “Singleness of Money”. They define singleness as the principle that all different forms of money must have the same value at all times and be interchangeable at par without cost. Furthermore, the central banks and regulators have pointed out that stablecoins which currently circulate outside of the traditional payment systems trade on secondary markets as bearer instruments, can experience disparities from their pegged value and deviate in purchasing power from their pegged currency.

Other detractors suggest that the payment systems already in place are competitive, highly sophisticated with anti-fraud measures already built into the systems. Furthermore, credit card users are very protective of the “perks” or rewards they get with using their cards such as airmiles, with some experts suggesting that card users will be loath to lose their rewards. Be that as it may, analysts suggest that stablecoins will find their place in society and the financial markets especially in the United States which includes the backing of the President, Donald Trump.

Major Victory for the Crypto Arena as Senate Passes Stablecoin Bill

On Tuesday 17th June 2025, the United States Senate passed a bill (AKA The Genius Act) to create a regulatory framework for “Stablecoins”* in a defining moment for digital currencies in the crypto industry. The bill passed the Senate by a majority of 68 – 30 with a number of democrats joining most Republicans ensuring the bill was passed by a significant majority. The bill will now sit before a Republican controlled House of Representatives which will vote on its version of the bill before finally landing on the desk of President Donald Trump.

*Stablecoins – are a type of cryptocurrency designed to minimize price volatility by pegging their value to a stable asset such as a fiat currency which in this case is the US Dollar. Unlike other cryptocurrencies which historically and today can fluctuate wildly in price, stablecoins doctrine is to maintain a relatively stable value making them suitable for everyday transactions and a storage of wealth. 

Stablecoins that are pegged to the dollar will have to hold dollar-for-dollar reserves in either cash, short-term US government debt (treasuries) or similar products that are easily convertible to cash, which shall be overseen by federal or state regulators, The crypto industry as a whole has waited years for yesterday’s vote, have literally spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect a Congress that is crypto friendly, and the industry is posed to do more of the same in the 2026 mid-term elections.

Those in the stablecoin arena are hopeful that the recent legislation will ensure stablecoins sooner or later become a mainstream form of payment. Indeed, retailers have backed this bill because it is felt that stablecoins will provide a faster and cheaper way to process transactions as opposed to traditional banking products such as credit cards. However, in the banking world, the smaller banks have issued warnings that deposits may be drained plus a reduction in access to credit. Meanwhile larger banks are mulling over whether they should issue their own stablecoins will generate profits from reserves. 

Senator Elizabeth Warren (Democrat and ranking member on Senate Banking) and a number of her colleagues argue that the bill does not go far enough to protect consumers in the event that issuers of stablecoin fail. They contend that in the event of a failure customers could well lose their money which could fuel demands for a bailout by the taxpayer, and Senator Warren went on to say the bill would “supercharge the value of Donald Trump’s corruption. 

Elsewhere in the crypto world declines in cryptocurrencies were led by Solana and Ether falling by 7% and 8% respectively, while Cardano had fallen by 8.5% (all coins had rebounded slightly by C.O.B. on Monday) all reflecting growing concern over the escalating conflict in the Middle East. The sell-off in crypto appeared to be a warning to Bitcoin holders that the cryptocurrency is a haven from turmoil as it sank along with other coins when Israel launched airstrikes against Iran at the end of last week.

Rush to File Exotic ETFs Linked to Crypto

Currently there is a rush of filings by fund firms for exotic ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) that will be linked to will track digital artwork, cryptocurrencies, meme coins in the hope that bored retail investors will be attracted to a more speculative investment in the crypto world. Among the many recent filings by fund managers are ETFs tracking Litecoin and Cardano (these are smaller cryptocurrencies), meme coins* which also include $TRUMP**, dogecoin***, non-fungible tokens****, Pudgy Penguins*****, and companies investing in “reversed engineered” alien technology******.

*Memecoins – these are crypto currencies created to follow trends (often internet trends of cultural phenomena) employ humour and try and build a sense of community to attract users.

**$TRUMP – this is an example of a meme coin associated with the President of the United States, Donald Trump and is hosted on the Solana blockchain.

***Dogecoin – Is considered to be one of the first meme coins based on the Japanese word Kabosu (dog) which was a Shiba Inu dog.  Dogecoin morphed into an open-source, peer-to-peer digital currency and it was initially created as a light-hearted joke in the cryptocurrency space but has evolved into a significant cryptocurrency with a dedicated community. Some experts feel that dogecoin is an ALT coin (alternative coin e.g., not Bitcoin) and as such should not be considered as a meme)

****Non-Fungible Tokens – also known as NFTs are unique digital assets stored on a blockchain acting as a digital certificate and ownership for various items such as digital art, music, videos, domain names, to mention but a few.

*****Pudgy Penguins – are an example of a NFT and are a collection of 8,888 unique digital penguins launched on the Ethereum blockchain in August 2021. Each penguin is a unique digital collectible, generated from a collection of hand-drawn traits.

******Reversed Engineered Alien Technology – this technology refers to the hypothetical process of understanding and replicating extra-terrestrial technology recovered by governments and other organisations. There is apparently no verifiable evidence to support the existence of this technology but some proponents suggest reverse engineering in aerospace and the energy sector. However, Tuttle Capital (Offices in Delaware and Connecticut and has circa USD 681 Million under management) have filed for an Alien Tech” ETF, and therefore there is perhaps more to this technology than meets the eye.

Experts in the crypto arena suggest that since the elevation of Donald Trump to the White House who has also nominated Paul Atkins as Chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, such appointments have had a positive effect on money managers and hence the ETF filings on the aforementioned crypto’s. Whilst Donal Trump has indicated his support for the crypto market, analysts suggest that Paul Atkins is much more crypto-friendly than his predecessor Gary Gensler.

Some analysts are ruminating that some fund/asset/money managers are desperate to offer new products to a retail investor base that is becoming bored with the current offerings on display today and want something more exciting and exotic to trade. However, there are many experts who suggest a number of these new filings will have a short life as product development is often well ahead of the investor base interest.

Are Tariffs Negatively Impacting America’s AI and Semi-Conductor Ambitions?

President Donald Trump has made his desire public for U.S. global dominance in the AI and Semi-Conductor (chips) markets; however experts suggest that his tariffs will hinder domestic chip production and put a stop to his ambitions of dominating the worldwide AI market. They are portraying the escalation in tariffs which will perhaps end in an all-out trade war will dramatically increase costs in American data centres and the building of semi-conductor fabrication plants, with some analysts predicting that tariffs will become the single largest barrier to supremacy in the A1 arena.

Tech experts and industry leaders suggest tariffs will inevitably hit global supply chains, thus negatively impacting and disrupting medium to very large AI computing projects. This will be a blow to major tech companies such as Meta, Google, and Amazon who between them have pledged just for 2025, USD 300 Billion on computing infrastructure which will underpin AI projects. Furthermore, TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd) has already committed USD 100 Billion to increase the capacity of chip production in the U.S. which will underpin the above-mentioned AI ambitions.

Potential supply chain issues are at the top of the agenda for many big tech executives, with one executive currently attached to a USD 500 Billion data centre enunciating that the delay of one single component could affect the whole project as the supplier is making business decisions brought on by tariffs. One only has to look at other industries like the European Wine Sector where shipments may be halted because impending tariffs are stopping suppliers putting a price on future orders. Elsewhere in the steel pipe manufacturing arena, tariffs on Chinese built ships/bulk carriers effect on supply chains can be located in Germany where port workers should be loading a first round 16,000 MT of steel piping bound for a huge Louisiana energy project, however due to the proposed levies, the cargo is now sitting gathering dust in a German warehouse.

In the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)* market, Nvidia’s most advanced model is utilised Microsoft and Amazon in their cloud service providers platform, however these GPUs arrive in the United States as racks of servers or just a single rack which have been assembled in a number of different countries according to data released by Z2Data (supply chain data analysis platform). This is where the economics get blurred because although GPUs have been exempt from tariffs, the many components which make the GPU have not been exempt. Experts suggest that importers in the U.S. will be hit with huge costs as component and product categories are massive and it is suggested that even the smallest component can bring the supply chain to a halt.

*Graphics Processing Unit – is a specialised electronic circuit designed to accelerate computer graphics and image processing. The GPU is essential for AI, particularly for tasks like training deep learning models and handling complex computations. Their parallel processing capabilities and high memory bandwidth allow AI to significantly accelerate their workloads.

Experts are saying that even if chips were produced in the United States, they would be more expensive to produce despite the 32% proposed tariff on chips produced by Taiwan’s TSMC, as tariffs would push up prices on all key tools and materials. They went on to say the biggest loser would be American producers of chips, as despite tariffs it will still be cheaper to factories and manufacturing capacity outside the United States, dashing Trump’s dream of domestic chip manufacturing. This is a catch 22 situation for President Trump, for once he cannot have it both ways having his cake and eating it, and analysts wait to see how he will solve this particular conundrum.

  • 1
  • 2